Small home · Licensed for 6 · Northridge
Amazing Senior Care
16938 Citronia Street, Northridge, CA 91343Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (6). BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #1 ONLY.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Amazing Senior Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,750a month to start
Likely $3,900–$5,850
From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,750likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,750likely $3,900–$5,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$6,050
- $4,750
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,600–$9,250
- $7,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,500
10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$6,800.
- Alaga HomesNorthridge · 0.4 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 1.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity of Granada HillsGranada Hills · 1.6 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 2.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Alalik Care HomeGranada Hills · 2.1 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- A Paradise in the ValleyNorthridge · 2.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Balboa Senior LivingGranada Hills · 2.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 2.7 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aurora Home for SeniorsGranada Hills · 3.0 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
16938 Citronia Street, Northridge, CA 91343Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Northridge Hospital Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.6 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609860 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an annual required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with staff, Karine Zakaryan, and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:00 AM administrator,Yelena Aladadyan, arrived and was explained the reason for the visit. At 9:58 AM, with the assistance of administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. At 10:33 AM smoke alarms were tested and are operational. There are carbon monoxide detectors that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is in between the dining area and the office with a charge date of 1.24.2025. During the visit the facility is at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is fire cleared for six (06) non-ambulatory residents; one (1) may be bedridden; hospice waiver for six (6). Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. The kitchen has a working gas stove, faucet, freezer, refrigerator, and microwave. LPA found enough at least two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food at the facility that is properly stored. Frozen foods are wrap, dated, and stored properly as well. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in the office area cabinets. Bedrooms: There were four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. Four (4) of the that are in use by the residents were properly furnished with appropriate dresser, beddings, and linens with sufficient lighting. Bedroom #1 and #2 are properly furnished and is for private used. Bedroom #3 and bedroom #4 are shared. Continue to LIC 809-C Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 107.2 degrees Fahrenheit for bathroom #1 located in the hallway in the hallway the entrance of the facility. Bathroom #2 measured 110.1 degrees Fahrenheit inside bedroom #2. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There was enough clean linen available in the cabinets in the hallway. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area for residents. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Residents dining table fits enough for six (6). Office space is by the dining area and kitchen. Fireplace is block-off, non-operational and inaccessible to residents. Surrounding Grounds: Entry and exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area and detergents are located by the laundry room by the kitchen that is kept secured. Cleaning supplies are being stored in a locked cabinet in the laundry room. The facility does have a swimming pool or body of water, this is fenced, blocked off, and locked. The garage is attached and is used for storage. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to ensure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to ensure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records (MMR) were review for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, no deficiencies were observed during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda and Huma Rahimi conducted an continuation annual required visit and inspection of the facility. At 11:40 AM Yelena Aladayan who is the administrator met with LPA, explained the reason for the visit. At 11:45 AM, with the assistance of administrator, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are operational that are located each bedroom, the hallway and kitchen. There are carbon monoxide detectors that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is in the kitchen. The charge date is 11/01/2023. During the visit the facility is at 74 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is fire cleared for six (06) non-ambulatory residents. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. The kitchen has a working gas stove, faucet, freezer, refrigerator, and microwave. LPAs found enough at least two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food at the facility that is properly stored. Frozen foods are wrap, dated, and stored properly as well. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Garbage cans have tight fitting covers. Cleaning supplies, pesticides or toxic cleaning supplies were stored and not locked away in the kitchen. Citation will be issued in LIC 809-D. Bedrooms: There were four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. Bedroom #2 and bedroom #4 are private, but bedroom #1 and bedroom #3 are shared. All of the bedrooms are used by residents were properly furnished with appropriate dresser, beddings, and linens with sufficient lighting. Continue to LIC 809-C Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathroom designated for residents' use. The bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 109.6 degrees Fahrenheit for bathroom #1 located in the hallway beside room #1. Bathroom #2 is inside bedroom #3. Hot water temperature was measured at 112.8 degrees Fahrenheit. There was enough clean linen available in the cabinets in the hallway. Common Areas: LPA toured all common areas of the facility. These included the living room and dining area for residents. The common areas were properly furnished. Residents dining table fits enough for six (6). LPA observed common areas to be very clean and tidy. LPA observed the floors to be in very good condition. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Furniture in common area was observed to be in good repair. There are no issues with Fire Clearance. Infection control: Facility mitigation plan to make sure licensee was following current infection control recommendations. LPA obtain a copy and reviewed the infection control plan during this visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry and exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The facility has a swimming pool, it is locked and fenced up. The garage is attached and is used for storage. LPA found expired medication from previous resident who had passed. Deficiency will be cited on LIC 809-D. Laundry service: There is enough linen available to change weekly or more if need. LPA found cleaning supplies are being stored in an unlocked cabinet in the laundry area and is located beside the kitchen. Deficiency will be cited on LIC 809-D. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to ensure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Office space is beside the dining table. Records were checked for expired or missing certificates and clearances: LPA conducted a file review of staff for criminal record clearances and current First Aid. LPA did a record review for S4 file and their missing a current CPR training. Citation will be issued in LIC 809- D. The administrator file was reviewed for current first aid, fingerprint clearance, administrator certificate, and HIV/AIDS and TB training. Continue to LIC 809-C Medications: LPAs observed that the medication are kept in the living room in a locked cabinet and inaccessible to residents in care, however, review of R1's random medication revealed that the facility was supposed to start Quetiapin Fumarate 25 MG (schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) a new bubble pack on 10/20/2024. During today's visit LPAs counted R1's medication and it was discovered that there was a discrepancy, and three (3) extra pills were in the bubble pack. LPA asked the Administrator and the staff for explaining and both staff could not provide any answers. Additionally, LPAs also observed Centrally Stored Medication (LIC 622) records for R5 and did not observe staff filling the form when the medication start date. A deficiency will be cited. First-aid has all proper items and is current. Resident records were reviewed for requirements and legibility: Planned activities are offered. LPA reviewed six (6) of the six (6) records and LPA found all files to be complete. Facility is within CA code of Regulations Title 22 or Health and Safety Code. Deficiencies were found, exit interview conducted, copy of report has been issued and discussed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced Required 1-year inspection at this facility at approximately 12 NN LPA were greeted by staff, Shake Sargysyan and was explained the reason for the visit. at 12:10 PM the administrator arrived and was disclosed the purpose of the visit. LPAs conducted a tour of the physical plant at approximately 12:04 PM to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Common areas were observed for the ability to safely serve the needs residents. These included the kitchen, dining room area and living room. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality. Common areas observed to be furnished appropriately. LPA reviewed the food service areas, food storage and supply (perishable and nonperishable foods). The kitchen food supply was observed and sufficient for the five (5) residents currently residing there. Two (2) days of perishable food observed. The freezer is stocked with meats and frozen vegetables. Sharps are stored in locked kitchen drawer. The resident medications are locked in office cabinets near the kitchen. The medications were observed to be inaccessible to residents. There is one (1) fire extinguishes located in the kitchen. Fire extinguishers observed to be charged at 11.1.2023. Laundry room beside the kitchen and has an attached garage. The appliances observed to be functional. Due to time constraints this required annual will be completed at a later time. Exit interview conducted/Copy of report giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024
Feb 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are unable to communicate with residents. Staff do not ensure residents are served food of good quality.
On 02.21.2024 License Program Manager (LPM) Nichelle Gillyard and Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the determination on the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Staff #1 (S1) who granted access. S1 contacted the administrator Yelena Aladadyan (S2) to advised that LPA was at the facility. Administrator arrived at 9:28 AM, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. At 9:10 AM LPM and LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Allegation #1: Staff are unable to communicate with residents. Continue to LIC 9099-C Substantiated Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted a subsequent complaint visit. Regarding the allegation above it is alleged that facility staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier. On 02-14-2024 LPAs investigated this complaint. LPAs conducted interviews and concluded that the one and only staff on duty at the time of this investigation was unable to effectively communicate with the residents of which the majority speak English. Staff used a translator to attempt to communicate. Staff was unable to effectively communicate on how to address an emergency should one happen. Staff on duty was unable to effectively communicate in English. At 9:30 AM LPA initiated interviews with six(6) residents. Four (4) out of six (6) residents have trouble communicating with staff for their basic needs. LPA then asked a series of questions to S1 regarding basic needs and care for the residents. S1 was confused, unable to respond or answer any of the questions. This complaint allegation, Staff are unable to communicate with residents is substantiated. Allegation #2: Staff do not ensure residents are served food of good quality. To investigate this allegation, License Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted toured the home, observed food service, conducted file reviews, and interviewed residents at 9:38AM. LPA observed there to be 2 days of non-perishable and one week of perishable foods. Foods observed were high is sodium and sugar. Foods included frozen pizza, mini-sausages, pizza, cans of soup canned corn, canned peas, pasta and Sunny D. LPAs observed minimal fresh fruit and or vegetables. LPAs reviewed resident’s records and per the resident’s physicians reports 6 out of 6 resident are on modified diets. LPA interviewed four (4) out of six (6) residents who stated the LPAs that the facility does not provide fresh food and the food is mostly canned with too much salt. Residents gave sample of food that was serve: microwaved soggy pizza that is un-edible, canned corn/ peas, or spaghetti with ketchup. During the visit, LPA observed canned chicken noodle soup, mini-sausages, untoasted one (1) slice of white bread smeared with butter, and bottled sunny-d orange juice was served for lunch. Moreover, an interview with staff confirmed that the facility does not follow the sample food menu posted in the kitchen to provide quality food to the residents. LPA requested staff training regarding food service and modified diets. There was no training. Based on the information gathered, there is sufficient evidence to conclude allegation is substantiated. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued To investigate the allegation License Program Analysts (LPAs) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda & Perchui Khurshudyan conducted an initial visit on 02.14.2024. LPAs reviewed six (6) out of six (6) Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR). Records indicated the name and quantity of medication when R1 arrived at facility on 1.29.2024, this is then accounted for during LPAs visit. Base on LPA observation, medication was accounted for all the residents on CSMDR and medication in the facility. Based on medication records, interviews and observation, there is not enough evidence that medications were not given or misplaced. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240205143554
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 21, 2024
Personnel Requirements - General (d) (3) Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision, including the ability to communicate with residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on an interview with the Administrator, during a previous visit conducted by the staff did not comply with the section cited above by not having staff that could communicate with residents, which poses and immediate Health and Safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will have to train and ensure staff to have staff to properly comnunicate with the residents. This will be submitted to regional by 3.6.2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 21, 2024
General Food Service Requirements: The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents and shall meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council. All food shall be selected stored, prepared, and served in a safe and healthful manner. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation facility did not served healthy food to the residents, which poses and immediate Health & Safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will need to have a new menu available for residents for breakfast, lunch, snacks and dinner. This will be submitted to regional office by: 3.6.2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 21, 2024
All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them. This training/ related experience shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following, as appropriate for the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance: (1) Principles of good nutrition, good food preparation and storage, and menu planning. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Facility was serving canned and frozen food.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will need to have a new menu available for residents for breakfast, lunch, snacks and dinner. This will be submitted to regional office by: 3.6.2024.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jun 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident is provided clean drinking ware.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Yelena Aladanyan and explained the reason for the visit. ---Staff does not ensure resident is provided clean drinking ware. It was alleged that straw seemed like it had mildew and water did not look clear. To investigate the allegation on 05/16/2023 LPA conducted physical plant tour at around 10:00 AM, interviewed staff at 11:30 AM, and interviewed residents at 01:30 PM. During the physical plant tour LPA observed that Resident #1’s drinking cup and straw were not clean. During interviews with residents, R1 stated that the cup, straw and water are always clean. (CONT. on LIC 9099-C) Substantiated Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3), Resident #4 (R4), and Resident #5 (R5) all stated that they are given water in a plastic bottle, they do not use a straw and that both water and bottle are clean. LPA was unable to interview Resident #6 (R6). During interviews with staff, Staff #1 (S1) stated that if residents are using cups, the cup is washed after each use, a new straw is given with each new cup of water, and they only provide bottled drinking water. Based on observation, there is enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued. Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3), Resident #4 (R4), and Resident #5 (R5) all stated that staff follow shower schedule and get assistance with all hygiene as needed. LPA was unable to interview Resident #6 (R6). During interviews with staff, Staff #1 (S1) stated all residents have a shower schedule, that R1 has third party assistance with showering and staff assist with washing R1’s face and brushing teeth every morning. Based on observation and interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. --- Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier. It was alleged that employee was not able to communicate because of a language barrier. To investigate the allegation on 05/16/2023 LPA interviewed staff at 11:30 AM and interviewed residents at 01:30 PM. During interviews with residents, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 all stated they can communicate with all staff and staff are able to meet all their needs. LPA was unable to interview Resident #6 (R6). During interviews with staff, S1 corroborated all residents’ statements, however, LPA was unable to interview Staff #2 (S2) in English as they did not understand the questions being asked. Although LPA was unable to interview S2, all interviewed residents can communicate with S2, and all needs are being met. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230512145658
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 14, 2023
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)…(2)To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, Resident #1 was not provided safe and healthful equipment as the cup and straw were not clean. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator will review regulation and submit a written letter certifying that, moving forward, they will ensure to follow and adhere to CCR Title 22 87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities; The written letter must be sent to the LPA by the POC due date.
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 16, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow proper COVID-19 infection control guidance at the facility on several occasions.
At 9:30am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegation above. LPA was greeted by Staff #1 (S1), who granted access to the facility. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPA explained the reason for the visit. Upon arrival LPA observed S1 was not wearing a mask and LPA was not screened for an infection control. LPA asked S1 to wear the mask and S1 immediately complied. From approximately 9:45am-10:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and interviewed S1 and the Administrator. Interviews with the Administrator and S1 confirmed that sometime, around January 2022, a random visit was made by a credible witness who observed facility staff were not wearing masks. Although, the facility has a Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiated "Mask Required" policy, Administrator admitted that sometimes S1 doesn't wear the mask when helping the residents. Administrator informed LPA that a meeting will be conducted with all staff regarding InfectionControl Guidance promptly. Based on an interview conducted with the Administrator and LPA observation this allegation is substantiated at this time. Deficiencies were issued per CA code of Regulations Title 22 on LIC9099-D with this report. Appeal rights issued. Report signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221109141505
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87470(c)(1)(F) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 17, 2022
87470(c) Infection Control Requirements shall be developed by the licensee... (1) The Infection Control Plan shall include: (F) Staff shall demonstrate knowledge... appropriate to the job assigned and... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on an interview with the Administrator, the licensee/administrator stated that during a previous visit conducted by the credible witness, staff did not comply with the section cited above by not wearing masks, which poses and immediate Health and Safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agreed to provide in house training with all staff regarding Infection Control Requirements and COVID Protocol. A written statement signed by all staff regarding such training shall be emailed to LPA no later than 11/17/22.
Sep 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs were granted access by staff Armen Hovhannisyan and the administrator, Yelena Aladadyan met us shortly after and LPAs explained the reason for the visit. At 11:40am, with the assistance of staff, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors are dual. They are hardwired and interconnected. The fire extinguisher is located by the dinning area, next to the kitchen. The charge date is 1/28/2022. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPAs found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the cabinets in the dinning area. Bedrooms: There were four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. All four bedrooms, in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured at 124 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. LPAs observed that a swimming pool in the backyard of the facility has two open unlocked self-latching gates making the pool accessible to persons in care. Swimming pool has a five foot fence installed around its parameters. The laundry area and detergents are located by the kitchen. Cleaning supplies also stored in the laundry area were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were review for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted / Appeal Rights Discussed / A Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Aug 10, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pitz conducted an unannounced infection control visit on this day. LPA was greeted upon entry and screened for COVID-19 symptoms. LPA toured the facility with administrator Armine Dishoyan and confirmed that they do have an approved mitigation plan on file. LPA utilized the infection control domain of the RCFE inspection tool to verify that the facility was in compliance with various aspects of the mitigation plan, including but not limited to: screening visitors, having ample handwashing/ sanitizing supplies on site, having adequate PPE on site, having signs posted throughout the facility to remind residents and staff of various Covid precautions. LPA did not note any concerns at the time of visit. Report reviewed, signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted, no deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 10, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the February 21, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Amazing Senior Care, Inc., licensed since 2019.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 9
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 4
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 4 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Amazing Senior Care
Is Amazing Senior Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Amazing Senior Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Amazing Senior Care been cited?
1 Type A and 4 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Amazing Senior Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Amazing Senior Care cost?
$4,750 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,900–$5,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Amazing Senior Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Amazing Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Northridge Hospital Medical Center is 2.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Amazing Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Amazing Senior Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AMAZING SENIOR CARE, INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609860. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Amazing Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 4 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 10, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County