Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Acacia Creek - Union City
Large community·Licensed for 376·Union City, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$3,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,850–$4,700
- Home sizeLicensed for 376Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit175 of 376 beds occupiedMay 22, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitMay 6, 2026CDSS inspection record
Acacia Creek - Union City is a large care community in Union City — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 376 residents since 2010. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Acacia Creek - Union City
Is Acacia Creek - Union City licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Acacia Creek - Union City licensed for?
376 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Acacia Creek - Union City been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Acacia Creek - Union City still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Acacia Creek - Union City cost?
$3,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,850–$4,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 31 other homes of a similar licensed size across Alameda County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,636 to $6,129 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 31 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Acacia Creek - Union City take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Masonic Homes Cal & Acacia Creek, Masonic Sen Liv, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Washington Hospital is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Acacia Creek - Union City keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Acacia Creek - Union City license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ACACIA CREEK - UNION CITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #15601302. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 376 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Masonic Homes Cal & Acacia Creek, Masonic Sen Liv, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 6 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 6, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 376 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 5 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. BUILDING A ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIVE (5) RESIDENTS. CHANGE OF LICENSE EFFECTIVE 04/08/15.
938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
caring.com · 2026-09-09
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Level of medication serviceReminders only
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Therapies availablePhysical therapy
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pharmacy services on site
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,650a month to start
Likely $2,850–$4,700
From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$3,650a month
Likely $2,850–$4,900
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,650likely $2,850–$4,700
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,850–$4,900
- $3,650
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,450–$8,000
- $5,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
14 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,650–$5,400.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Fremont HillsFremont · 1.2 mi · Large community$2,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Pacifica Senior Living Union CityUnion City · 1.2 mi · Large community$3,150Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aegis GardensFremont · 2.6 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Fremont VillageFremont · 3.6 mi · Large community$2,295Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Carlton Plaza of FremontFremont · 4.1 mi · Large community$3,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aegis Assisted Living of FremontFremont · 4.1 mi · Large community$5,970Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Bellara Senior LivingHayward · 6.4 mi · Large community$4,350Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at HaywardHayward · 6.5 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Baywood CourtCastro Valley · 6.9 mi · Large community$3,615Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Landmark VillaHayward · 7.4 mi · Large community$2,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Carefield Castro ValleyCastro Valley · 7.8 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The ParkviewPleasanton · 7.8 mi · Large community$6,182Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Emerald ValleyDublin · 8.7 mi · Large community$5,400Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Carefield PleasantonPleasanton · 9.6 mi · Large community$5,400Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Where it is
- 34400 Mission Blvd., Union City, CA 94587Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2010. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 6, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 13
- Most recent visit
- May 6, 2026
- Occupied · May 22, 2025 visit
- 175 of 376 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 28, 2023 to May 22, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints6typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2010.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents
May 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On today’s date at around 9:00 am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P. Manalo arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection and met with Executive Director (ED) Julie Mammad. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit to the Executive Director. The facility has a main building with 5 floors and 4 cottages. The resident apartments were located on the first 4 floors of the main building and 4 cottages. The facility consists of a dining room, a bar, a game room, a boardroom, an art room, a multipurpose room, a library room, swimming pool, beauty salon, etc., all around the facility LPAs toured the facility with the Wellness Manager and inspected 6 rooms. The facility was observed to be clean and odor-free. The ED states that residents have pendants or use their telephones if they need assistance. Out of 184 residents, all are in assisted living. Multiple fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 1/21/26. The last fire alarm inspection was conducted on 8/18/25. The fire drill was last conducted on 01/15/2026. Liability insurance is effective from 04/01/2026 to 04/01/2027. LPAs reviewed 6 staff files; 6 out of 6 staff have health clearance on their files. LPAs reviewed 7 residents’ files. The facility will submit an updated Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610E) by 05/16/2026. THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY WAS OBSERVED DURING VISIT: At 10:23 AM, LPAs observed moldy tangerines in the kitchen walk-in fridge. The Facility was cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiency by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted with Executive Director. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2026
May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff are keeping resident against their will.
*****THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM VISIT 05/22/2025***** On 05/22/2025 at around 10:00 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Wellness Manager, Viarmina Paje-Forsythe (Mina), and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA received via text from Executive Director Sandra Simon, for Mina to sign the report. Allegation: Staff are keeping resident against their will - UNFOUNDED During the course of the investigation, LPA K. Nguyen reviewed the resident roster from 2017- May 22, 2025. LPA conducted an interview with S1, S1 stated R1 never resided at the facility. A review of rosters reveals that the individuals involved in the incident are not residing at this facility; therefore, the above allegation is unfounded. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiency observed or cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250516101416
Apr 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff did not refund the entrance fee as required by the continuing care contract
On 04/16/2025 at around 1 p.m Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P. Manalo arrived at facility unannounced to deliver findings for the complaint investigation related to the above listed allegation. LPAs met with Executive Director, Sandra Simon and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of this investigation, the Department reviewed Acacia Creek Residence and Care Agreements, a California Standard Admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Intermediate Care Facilities, an Assignment of Benefits Agreement form, Emergency Contact documentation, Pre-Admission Questionnaire, Physician’s Report, Mini-Mental State Examination report, entrance fee check copies, deposit check copies, bank account statements, Entrance Fee Refund Letter, refund checks, Deposit Worksheets and refund check calculation documents. ***Report Continued on LIC 9099c*** Unfounded The investigation revealed that Resident 1 (R1) entered into an agreement for residency at the community in June of 2016 and occupied a residential living unit for independent living until July of 2017 when he required a higher level of care. In July of 2017, R1 entered a skilled nursing facility affiliated with the community and remained there through the end of life until, March of 2019. To enter the community and receive the benefits of a continuum of care, R1 paid an entrance fee that is refundable based on a 36 month amortization. The beneficiaries to R1’s estate claim that the entrance fee should have been amortized based on the time frame beginning from entering into the agreement through entering into the skilled nursing facility, however the amortization was based on the date of death. The Residence and Care Agreement, document number 1243823.17, was approved by the Department for use. It states under Section VI – Termination, subsection E Refund to Resident it states that “Any refund paid under this Section VI.E.1 shall be made within fourteen (14) days after all of the following events occur: (1) you or your estate makes your Apartment available to Acacia in its original clean condition ( excluding normal wear and tear); (2) if applicable, you vacate any facility operated by Acacia Creek Union City (ACUC) or Masonic Homes of California (MHC) pursuant to this Agreement; and (3) you or your estate executes a document releasing Acacia from any and all duties and obligations under this Agreement.” In this case, R1, the subject of the complaint entered into a skilled nursing facility operated by MHC and therefore would not be entitled to refund. The allegation of “Staff did not refund the entrance fee as required by the continuing care contract” is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250310213049
Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On today’s date at around 9:30am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P. Manalo arrived unannounced to conduct annual required inspection and met with Executive Director, Sandra Simon. LPAs explained to Executive Director purpose of the visit. The facility has a main building consists of 5 floors and 4 cottages. The resident apartments were located on the first 4 floors of the main building and 4 cottages. The facility consists of dining room, bar, game room and board room, art room, multipurpose room, library room, etc. all around the facility LPAs toured facility with Wellness Manager and inspected 6 rooms. The facility has a swimming pool and beauty salon that were locked and enclosed. Executive Director states that there is no lifeguard on duty. However, there are cameras installed in the area. The facility was observed to be clean and odor free. Administrator states that residents have pendants or use their telephone, if they need assistance. Out of 171 residents, all are in the assisted living. There was multiple fire extinguishers observed that appear full and were last serviced on 01/10/2025. The last fire alarm inspection was conducted on 02/19/2025. The fire drill was last conducted on 02/19/2025. The liability insurance is effective 04/01/2025 to 04/01/2026. LPAs reviewed 6 staff files, 6 out of 6 staffs have health clearance on files. LPAs reviewed 10 residents’ files. No deficiencies were observed in the areas that were evaluated. No citations were issued during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 03/19/2025 at 2:30 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and P.Manalo conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit related to the previous complaint 15-AS-20241204123458. LPAs met with Vilarmina Paje-Forsythe, Wellness Manager, and explained the purpose of the visit. Executive Director was unavailable during the visit and gave authorization on the phone for staff to sign the report. LPAs reviewed Resident 1’s (R1) record shows facility did not have proper documentation of the resident’s care plan. Care Plan did not indicate what services was needed for the residents to have 1:1 care. Plan of correction is for the facility to review all resident’s care plan and physician’s report to indicate what services the residents do or do not need. No deficiency cited during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025
Mar 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries due to lack of care and supervision from staff Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met
*****THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM VISIT 3/7/25***** On 3/25/2025 at 1p.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings for the above complaint allegation. LPA met with Sandra C. Simon, Excutive Director explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Resident sustained injuries due to lack of care and supervision from staff: Unsubstantiated On 3/07/2025, The department reviewed record of R1 including medical record, discharge summary, report and progress notes indicated R1 was admitted to ER due to an unwitnessed fall on 11/26/24. R1 was in the hospital Report Continue on LIC9099... Unsubstantiated *****THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM VISIT 3/7/25***** On 3/7/2025, the department interviewed staff (S1), resident (R1), and owner of assisting hands home care agency (OSA). The department reviewed staff roster with contact numbers, physician's report, care plan, emergency information, progress notes, Unusual Incident/ Injury report (UIR), and resident dinner check off list to for date confirmation. R1 physician report shows R1 is independent with only need of toileting assist. R1 needs and service plan shows that R1 is not a fall risk and doesn’t need staff to come unless R1 press the pendant. S1 confirmed that S1 only attended to R1 only when R1 press the pendant. This was confirmed with R1 during the interview regarding to the facility care staff attending to R1 only when R1 press the pendant that’s when facility care staff comes. R1 stated the reason why R1 hired a private caretaker due companionship and for R1 personal needs such as clean R1 apartment daily, because the facility only cleans the apartment once a week. R1 want private caretaker to wash dishes daily, laundry, take out the trash, ect. R1 did not sustained any major injury, but R1 sustained minor cut on R1 eyebrow. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met On 3/7/2025, the department reviewed R1 care plan, and interviewed resident (R1), showed that R1 toileting needs were met. R1 care plan shows that R1 is not a fall risk and only press the pendant when R1 needs assistance from facility care staff. R1 stated “I have no complaint of any care staff because when I need assistance with toileting, they provided to me”. R1 stated staffs are very friendly and helpful. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2025 · control 15-AS-20241204123458
Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 12/05/24 at 2:15PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen conducted an unannounced Health and Safety check due to the department receiving a priority 2 complaint. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Executive Director, Sandra Simon. During the health and safety check, LPA observed facility is preparing for the tree light event. LPA toured facility with Executive Director, including but not limited to bedrooms, kitchen, dining rooms, activities rooms, bathroom, outdoor garden and common areas. LPA observed residents comfortable in their surroundings, relaxing in their apartment, and common areas with family and friends. Residents in care appear to be safe and there are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. No deficiencies cited during the health and safety check. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024
May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At around 9:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct annual required inspection and met with Administrator Chuck Major. LPA explained to Administrator purpose of the visit. The facility has a main building consists of 5 floors and 4 cottages. The resident apartments were located on the first 4 floors of the main building and 4 cottages. Dining room, bar, game room and board room are all located on the 5th floor. LPA with Administrator inspected 5 rooms. The facility has a swimming pool and spa that were locked and enclosed. Administrator states that there is no lifeguard on duty. However, there are cameras installed in the area. The facility was observed to be clean and odor free. Administrator states that residents have pendants or use their telephone, if they need assistance. Out of 159 residents, 6 are in the assisted living. There were multiple fire extinguishers observed that appear full and were last serviced on 01/17/2024. The last fire alarm inspection was conducted on 4/26/2024. There was sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods observed. Freezer temperature was observed at -2- and 0-degrees Fahrenheit. Refrigerator temperature measured at 37.5- and 35.4-degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was observed complete. Vehicle insurance and registration were verified as current. continuation on Lic 809C LPA reviewed 6 staff files 6 out of 6 staffs have health clearance on files. LPA reviewed 6 residents files. No deficiencies were observed in the areas that were evaluated. No citations were issued during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email to Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
AmenitiesSwimming Pool · Hot Tub Spa
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
Family may eat with the resident
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
Activity types offeredGolf · Offsite Museums · Concerts · Offsite Theater · Wineries · Lectures · and 17 more
Golf · Offsite Museums · Concerts · Offsite Theater · Wineries · Lectures · Discussion Groups · Book Club · Art Studio · Model Shop · Sewing Center · Church · Bible Study · Water Aerobics · Dance Classes · Fitness center · Tai Chi · Sit · Be Fit · Gardening · Badminton · Bocce Ball · Putting Green — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Overnight guests
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Transport for group outings
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Alameda County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Masonic Home for Adults
Union City · Large community · 0.0 mi away
$2,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Fremont Hills
Fremont · Large community · 1.2 mi away
$2,995 a month to start · Listed by the home
Pacifica Senior Living Union City
Union City · Large community · 1.2 mi away
$3,150 a month to start · Listed by the home
Cedar Home at Niles Grove
Fremont · Small home · 1.4 mi away
$4,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Ageway Boarding Care #3
Union City · Small home · 1.4 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Oak Home at Nilesgrove
Fremont · Small home · 1.4 mi away
$4,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate