Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Masonic Home for Adults

Large community·Licensed for 242·Union City, California

Licensed since 1993Licence #11440129Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$2,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,050–$3,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 242Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit208 of 242 beds occupiedJune 5, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitAugust 27, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderMasonic Homes of CaliforniaSince 1993 · 2 licensed homes

Masonic Home for Adults is a large care community in Union City — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 242 residents since 1993. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Masonic Home for Adults

Is Masonic Home for Adults licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Masonic Home for Adults licensed for?

242 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Masonic Home for Adults been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1993, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 21 state visits over the same years.

Is Masonic Home for Adults still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Masonic Home for Adults cost?

$2,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,050–$3,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 31 other homes of a similar licensed size across Alameda County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,636 to $6,129 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 31 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Masonic Home for Adults take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Masonic Homes of California, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Masonic Homes of California — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Washington Hospital is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Masonic Home for Adults keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 21 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Masonic Home for Adults license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MASONIC HOME FOR ADULTS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #11440129. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 242 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Masonic Homes of California, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1993, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 21 state inspection visits since 1993, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1993, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 21 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1993, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 21 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE 60 AND OLDER. ALL RESIDENTIAL AREAS MAY BE FOR NON-AMBULATORY AND WHEELCHAIRS. SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY ONE(21) RESIDENTS.

938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 21 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$2,650a month to start

Likely $2,050–$3,350

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$2,650a month

Likely $2,050–$3,600

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$2,650likely $2,050–$3,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,050–$3,600
$2,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,550–$6,900
$4,650
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

14 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,550–$5,400.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 34400 Mission Blvd., Union City, CA 94587Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 21 documents for this home, and its records count 21 visits since 1993. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 27, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
21
Most recent visit
August 27, 2026
Occupied · June 5, 2026 visit
208 of 242 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 15, 2023 to June 5, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints3typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1993.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202638020251102024550202333020223302021110

The last 36 months — 15 of 21 documents

20263 state visits · 8 documents
Aug 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 8/27/2026 at 11:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Soledad Martinez, and explained the reason for the visit. On 8/18/26, LPA K. Nguyen received an Unusual Incident report regarding a medication error. LPA interviewed ED regarding the medication error. ED stated that R1 was given a medication the PCP instructed to be given three times a week; however, the medtech gave R1 the medication three times a day. LPA conducted a file review, including but not limited to the MAR, medication orders, and lab reports, which show no cause or damage to R1, and the ED stated that the ED spoke with the resident and has had staff monitor R1 for 7 days. The facility confirmed that the resident is doing well and is receiving regular check-ups with the resident's PCP. The facility had conducted an in-house investigation. ED stated that the facility has conducted in-house training on medication errors for all medtechs and continues to provide training. The facility has taken action and is following its protocol to prevent future medication errors. ED will implement a plan for monthly medication training, including topics and attendance, and provide it to CCLD for the next three months. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview is conducted and a copy of the report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2026
Aug 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 08/27/2026 at 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit to deliver an Exemption Denial letter. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Soledad Martinez, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA hand-delivered the Exemption Denial letter for S1 to Soledad Martinez. The Executive Director (ED) stated that S1 is not currently employed at the facility and will be removed immediately from the facility's Guardian Roster. ED submitted the confirmation of removal letter today, 8/27/26. No deficiencies are being cited on this date.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2026
Jun 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in financial abuse of resident

On 6/5/2026 at 8:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint investigation and deliver findings in regard to the allegation above. LPA met with Executive Director, Soledad Martinez, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted interviews with Resident 1 (R1) and Staff 1 (S1). In addition, the LPA obtained and reviewed relevant records, including but not limited to R1’s Face Sheet, Care Agreement, Uniform Statutory Power of Attorney, Application for Masonic Homes/Masonic Outreach Services (RCFE), Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report (LIC 602A), and Personal Rights documentation. Report continued on LIC 9099c… Unsubstantiated Report continued… It was alleged that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, resulting in the financial abuse of residents. As part of the investigation, the LPA interviewed R1 regarding the alleged financial exploitation. R1 stated that all financial transactions in question were initiated and authorized by R1. Specifically, R1 reported, “I am the one who made those transactions and am fully aware of them. I am my own conservator and do not have a Power of Attorney. I keep track of all my financial transactions on my laptop. I made those transactions to help one of my friends. No one is financially abusing me.” A review of the records obtained during the investigation did not reveal evidence indicating that the facility, its staff, or any other individual associated with the facility had access to or control over R1’s finances. Documentation reviewed further supported that R1 retained authority over personal and financial decision-making and had not designated a Power of Attorney to manage financial matters on R1 behalf. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the investigation did not produce sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the facility lacked supervision, resulting in the financial abuse of residents. Although the allegation may have occurred or may be valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to establish that a violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that the facility lacked supervision, resulting in financial abuse of residents, is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260603090038
Jun 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 6/5/2026 at 11:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Soledad Martinez, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA received a UIR regarding a resident who suffered a fall and was admitted to the emergency on 4/10/26, resulting in a closed fracture of the distal end of the right fibula and a foot fracture. LPA interview: S1 confirmed that R1 is a resident at Masonic in independent living and reviewed the resident's file, including, but not limited to, the roster for RF, identified as the resident's roster for independent and assisted; the admission agreement; physician report; appraisal; medication test; and care note. R1 returns to the community on the same day as R1 admission. No deficiency cited on today's visit. An exit interview is conducted, and a copy of the report is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026
Jun 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 6/5/2026 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Soledad Martinez, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA received a UIR regarding a resident who suffered a fall and was admitted to the emergency on 5/2/26, resulting in a fracture of the femur. LPA interview: S1 confirmed that R1 is a resident at Masonic in independent living and reviewed the resident's file, including, but not limited to, the roster for RF, identified as the resident's roster for independent and assisted; the admission agreement; physician report; appraisal; medication test; and care note. R1 returned to the community and was admitted to skilled nursing for recovery on 5/9/26 and remains there to present. No deficiency cited on today's visit. An exit interview is conducted, and a copy of the report is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026
Jun 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 6/5/2026 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Soledad Martinez, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA received a UIR regarding a resident who suffered a fall and was admitted to the emergency on 5/1/26, resulting in a Subdural Hematoma. LPA interview: S1 confirmed that R1 is a resident at Masonic in level 2 assisted living. LPA reviewed the resident's file, including, but not limited to, the roster for RF, identified as the resident's roster for independent and assisted; the admission agreement; physician report; appraisal; room safety check dated 4/14/26 indicated preventative change to assist R1 due to R1 is fall risk, and care note. Documents reviewed indicate that on the day of the fall R1 sated to one of the staff explained why R1 fell. Noted in care note on 5/1/26 R1 "I try to go to bed by myself when I was near the bed, I lost my balance and fell. I hit my head on the floor after that I call for help". R1 returned to the community and was admitted to skilled nursing for recovery on 5/1/26 on the same day. LPA was informed that R1 never made it back to the community because R1 had passed away on 5/20/26 while in Skill nursing. No deficiency cited on today's visit. An exit interview is conducted, and a copy of the report is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026
Jun 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 6/5/2026 at 1:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Soledad Martinez, and explained the reason for the visit. LPA received a UIR on May 26, 2026, at approximately 2:00 pm. Memory care resident R1 was taken to an on-site appointment by S2, informing the nurse that R1 had left the appointment office. LPA confirmed with S1 that R1 never left the community. R1 walked outside the office building and was found by a staff member within 15 minutes. S1 stated that an internal investigation had found miscommunication between staff. An in-service training session has been conducted on the importance of monitoring residents and not leaving them unattended in the memory care unit. No deficiency cited on today's visit. An exit interview is conducted, and a copy of the report is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026
Feb 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At around 10:00AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and L. Alexander arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection and met with Back up administrator Gladys Nulph hold an administrative certificate: 7017770740 effectives 9/27/25 to 9/26/27. Executive Director, Soledad Martinez was not available at the time of visit. This facility is a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC). The facility provides independent, assisted living and memory care. LPAs with Gladys inspected the following: total of 5 rooms in independent living, assisted living and memory care, kitchen, dining area, activity room and other common areas. All showers/bathrooms were observed with bars and non-skid floors. Multiple fire extinguishers were observed in different locations that appear full and were inspected on 01/05/26. LPAs observed sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods. Hot water temperature measured at 106.8 degrees Fahrenheit in different rooms checked. Memory Care unit has a delayed egress system that was observed functional. Maintenance log for facility generator indicates last weekly inspection was conducted on 12/23/2025 and last monthly test was done on 12/30/2025. Facility has a current disaster plan and supplemental emergency disaster plan dated 11/13/2025. First aid kit was observed complete. Last disaster drill was conducted on 1/23/2026 (lasted 5 days). Liability insurance effective date from 4/1/2025 to 4/1/2026. Reports continued on LIC 809c… LPAs inspected the Wollenberg Building which has 30 Memory Care residents, and Pavillion Building which consist of all AL residents. LPAs reviewed 12 staff and 14 resident files 12 out of 12 staff have health clearance on files. THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES WERE OBSERVED DURING VISIT: · At 1:36 PM during touring of the facility LPA observed assisted living R1's have unlocked medication inside R1’s bathroom cabinet including but not limited to Calcium Antacid, Selenium and Tylenol. · At 1:37PM during touring of the facility LPA observed assisted living R1's have unlocked chemical inside R1’s bathroom cabinet including but not limited 70% Isopropyl Alcohol. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or Health and Safety Code Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Feb 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At around 10:00am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Nguyen and Lori Alexander arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection and met with Executive Director, Soledad Martinez. This facility is a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC). The facility provides independent, assisted living and memory care. LPAs with Soledad inspected the following: total of 20 rooms in independent living, assisted living and memory care, kitchen, dining area, activity room and other common areas. All showers/bathrooms were observed with grab bars and non-skid floors. Multiple fire extinguishers were observed in different locations that appear full and were inspected on 01/09/2025. LPAs observed sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable foods. Hot water temperature measured at 110.1 degrees Fahrenheit in different rooms checked. Memory Care unit has a delayed egress system that was observed functional. Maintenance log for facility generator indicates last weekly inspection was conducted on 2/11/2025 and last monthly test was done on 1/24/2025. Facility has a current disaster plan and supplemental emergency disaster plan dated 1/9/2024. First aid kit was observed complete. Last disaster drill was conducted on 1/16/2025 and 1/23/2025 (lasted 5 days). Liability insurance effective date from 4/1/2024 to 4/1/2025. LPAs inspected the Wollenberg Building which has 30 Memory Care residents, and Pavillion Building which consist of all AL residents. LPAs reviewed 13 staff and 15 resident files. LPA reviewed 13 staff files 13 out of 13 staffs have health clearance on files. No deficiencies were observed in the areas that were evaluated. No citations were issued during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email to Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2025
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are preventing resident from leaving the facility

On 11/26/20224 at 1:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Greg Clark and Ardalan Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint investigation and deliver findings in regard to the allegation above. LPA met with Memory Care Manager Deanne Rehberg, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs interviewed W1, S1,R1 and reviewed R1s file. LPAs also toured the memory care unit. Documentation in R1s file showed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 09/13/2024 with diognosis of dementia as documented on the physician report dated 07/23/2024. By reviewing the physicians report, LPAs observed that the physician statead that R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted. R1 is currently residing in the memory care unit at the facility.R1 was transferred from another Masonic Facility due to exhibiting dangerous behavior. That faciility deoes not have a memory care unit so was not able to meet R1's increased level of care. **REPORT TO CONTINUE ON 9099 C** Unsubstantiated **REPORT CONTINUED FROM 9099** LPAs interviewed S1. S1 stated that she has worked at the facility for about one year and has known R1 since R1 was admitted to the facility. S1 further stated that she well aware of R1's desire to move back to southern California and that R1 does not accept the fact that she has the diagnosis of Dementia. S1 stated that from time to time, she is able to get R1 to participate in the activities at the facility and that R1 seems to enjoy herself during that time. S1 stated that she feels that R1 is appropriately placed in the memory care unit.. LPAs interviewed R1 who stated that she is very unhappy and she wants go back to southern California to be with her friends. R1 does not think that she needs to live in Memory Care. R1 further stated that she is very unhappy with the fact that she was moved here against her will and feels like she should be able to determine where she lives and with who. R1 would like to live with a friend she has in southern California. LPAs interviewed W1 who stated he has known R1 for about four years. He lived at the same facility as R1 in southern California. W1 stated that R1 was recently diagnosed with dementia, and her driver license was taken away and needed a higher level of care that was not available at the facility in Southern California. W1 stated that he is very happy with the level of care that R1 is receiving at her current facility. W1 also knows that R1 is not happy and and refuses to accept that she has dementia and needs a higher level of care. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging facility staff are preventing resident from leaving the facility. We have found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024 · control 15-AS-20241119151951
Oct 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 10/31/2024 at 9:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Soledad Martinez and explained the reason for the visit. LPA received a SOC 341 regrading a self-reporting from R1 stated R1didn’t want to stay at the facility. R1 stated R1 was placed at the facility without knowing. Previously R1 resided at Clear Water in Southern California. R1 have a POA (friend) that is 75-year-old. LPA interview R1 regrading the SOC 341 received on 10/28/24. R1 stated R1 feel bored at the facility and missed R1 friend a lot. R1 felt abandon by R1 friend, and just want to stay with R1 friend in Southern California at R1 previous facility. R1 stated “feel safe, staff are not mis-treating R1, but they are boring”. When asked R1 knows that R1 is residing at Masonic, but just want to go back to Southern California. During the interviewed session LPA observed that R1 forgets what R1 was saying, and repeats alot. R1 physician report states R1 diagnose with dementia/ short term memory. According to ED R1 previous facility do not have a memory care unit, also R1 does not like Clear Water, and that's the reason why R1 is placed here by POA. LPA reviewed R1 files including but not limited to physician report, ID notes, and Health Care POA. No citation issue on today date. Exit interview is conducted and a copy of this report is provided to ED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2024
Jul 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 7/17/2024 at 10:15AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Vice President of Clinical Services, Chris Gershtein and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director Soledad Martinez was no available during the time of the visit. LPA received a UIR regrading a resident got admitted to SNIF due to wound care. LPA interview S1, review resident files including but not limited to admission agreement, physician report, updated appraisal needs, and care note including home health care notes. Resident is on a CCRC contract. Resident was in SNIF in 11/1/23 and graduated back to AL in 12/23/23. During that time when resident was in assisted living home health was assisting resident with wound care. During the time resident wound was at a stage between one and two. This resident has been back and forth with SNIF and RCFE multiple times. This resident has home health that assisting him during the whole duration of the time. LPA interview S1 indicate that this resident was refusing care because he very independent and doesn’t want help from anyone. That’s the reason why he back and forth between assisted and SNIF. According to S1 resident is doing better but is still in SNIF due to his care for wound. Resident wants to be back to assisted living, but S1 indicated he did not pass his room safety check. That’s the routine that facility does for any resident want can be potential to graduate from SNIF. Resident is doing better and is still in SNIF. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2024
Feb 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At around 9:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection and met with Executive Director, Soledad Martinez. This facility is a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC). The facility provides independent, assisted living and memory care. LPA with Soledad inspected the following: total of 8 rooms in independent living, assisted living and memory care, kitchen, dining area, activity room and other common areas. All showers/bathrooms were observed with grab bars and non-skid floors. Multiple fire extinguishers were observed in different locations that appear full and were inspected on 1/23/2024. LPA observed sufficient supply of perishable and non perishable foods. Hot water temperature measured at 118 degrees Fahrenheit in different rooms checked. Memory Care unit has a delayed egress system that was observed functional. Maintenance log for facility generator indicates last weekly inspection was conducted on 2/27/2024 and last monthly test was done on 2/27/2024. Facility has a current disaster plan and supplemental emergency disaster plan dated 1/08/2024. First aid kit was observed complete. Last disaster drill was conducted on 2/21/2024 and 2/23/2024 (lasted two days). LPA inspected the Wollenberg Building which has 20 Memory Care residents, and Pavillion Building which consist of 4 Memory care residents. Five residents and 4 staff were interviewed. LPA reviewed 4 staff and 8 resident files. LPA reviewed 4 staff files 4 out of 4 staffs have health clearance on files. No deficiencies were observed in the areas that were evaluated. No citations were issued during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email to Executive Director.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2024
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 1/09/24 at 2:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of an email sent to CCL regarding a boiler in one of the facility's buildings being inoperable resulting in no heat in the residents apartments. LPA met with Administrator, Soledad Martinez and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured facility including but not limited to 3 apartments, hallway and common areas. LPA also interviewed S1 and 3 residents (R1, R2 and R3). The building without heat is part of the facility's independent living residences. S1 stated that the boiler in still down in the South Building. A replacement part has been ordered and is expected in 3 weeks time at which time the unit will be repaired. S1 further stated that she has keep in communication with the residents in the South Building via memos and has offered them all space heaters and extra blankets. Only 14 of the 36 residents in the building have requested space heaters. LPA interviewed R1 who has a space heater but is not using it. R1 also stated that he feels that the staff at the facility are doing a "great job" keeping the residents informed of the issues with repairs. R2 stated that he has a space heater but only uses it during the daytime hours. R2 also stated that he feels that the staff are keeping the residents informed of the issues with repairs. R3 stated that she has a heater but only used it during the day. R3 thinks the staff are "doing their very best" in dealing with this issue. LPA requested proof of the completed repair work be sent to him via email and documentation that the unit is now functional. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are abusing residents in care Staff are mismanaging resident's medications

On 11/15/2023 at 11:55 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint visit and deliver findings. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Soledad Martinez. On the allegation facility staff are mismanaging resident's medications. Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility staff will pre pour residents medications and leave them locked in the medication room. Based on interviews with staff the medications are not pre-poured over 24 hours in advance and are given to the residents the same day they are poured. The residents medication is keep separated and marked to avoid residents receiving the wrong dosage. On the allegation facility staff are abusing residents in care. In an interview with S1they stated that S2 was rude to residents in care. R1 and R2 stated that they did have a disagreement with S1 and brought it to the Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated ... Continued from LIC9099 attention of facility management. R1 and R2 state that since then all has been well and they feel that S2 work is well and better. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023 · control 15-AS-20230628101622
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Masonic Homes of California, licensed since 1993, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Alameda County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Alameda County