Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

A Peace of Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Oxnard, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #567609929
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 31, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 16, 2026CDSS inspection record

A Peace of Home is a small care home in Oxnard — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about A Peace of Home

Is A Peace of Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is A Peace of Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has A Peace of Home been cited?

3 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is A Peace of Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does A Peace of Home cost?

$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,250–$6,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does A Peace of Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by A Peace of Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

St Johns Regional Medical Center is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can A Peace of Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

A Peace of Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “A PEACE OF HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #567609929. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to A Peace of Home LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 2 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR BEDROOM #4 ONLY.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,200a month to start

Likely $4,250–$6,400

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,200a month

Likely $4,250–$6,550

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,250–$6,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,250–$6,550
$5,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,950–$9,650
$7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$6,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1227 Mika Way, Oxnard, CA 93030Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 18, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
September 16, 2026
Occupied · October 31, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 3, 2022 to October 31, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252212024330202323120222212021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual visit at 10:49 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the facility Administrator Herbert Perey. The Co-Administrator Mischelle Perey arrived to the facility at approximately 11:10 AM. LPA and Co-Administrator were later joined by Administrator. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at approximately 10:50 AM the LPA, along with the facility staff and later the Administrator and Co-Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, hallway, and dining area. LPA observed the living room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The living room contained a television, adequate seating, and locked storage for resident medication and files. Additionally, the living room was observed to contain all required postings, the facility telephone, emergency flashlights, and a complete first aid kit. The hallway was observed to be clean and free from any obstructions. The hallway contained closets that contained storage for linens and care supplies. Additionally, the hallway contained a locked laundry room which contained the facility’s washer and dryer in addition to laundry chemicals and care supplies. The dining area was observed to be equipped with adequate seating for resident use and contained an appropriately screened fireplace. Continued on LIC 809C. COMMON AREAS CONT.: LPA observed the dining area and hallway to contain wall mounted fire extinguishers that were fully charged and last serviced on 05/14/2024 which was more than 12 months from the inspection date. LPA informed the Co-Administrator who purchased new fire extinguishers during the visit and installed them at the facility. The facility’s fire and carbon monoxide alarms were tested at 12:14 PM and were functional at the time of the visit. All exits in the facility were observed to contain functioning auditory alarms. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured under-sink cabinet to contain cleaning chemicals. LPA observed secured drawers to contain knives and other sharp objects. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility; two (2) are dual occupancy resident rooms, two (2) are single occupancy resident rooms. LPA and the Co- Administrator toured all four (4) bedrooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One is designated as a shared/common resident bathroom and one (1) is a private resident bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in all resident showers and near all resident toilets, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured to be between 129.3 and 133.3 degrees Fahrenheit, whish is outside of the range required by regulations. LPA informed the Administrator who adjusted the temperature regulator on the water heater and agreed to submit proof of appropriate water temperature to LPA. The private bathroom contained a secured storage which contained grooming supplies. Continued on LIC 809C. GARAGE: The garage was observed to be locked and inaccessible to clients in care. LPA observed the garage to contain an extra refrigerator/freezer, extra care supplies, and sufficient emergency water supplies. LPA observed the garage to contain two (2) makeshift bedrooms which included supports, wooden walls, and a door. LPA interviewed the Co-Administrator about the rooms. The Co-Administrator stated that the rooms were installed in June of 2025 and facility staff were utilizing the rooms. The Co-Administrator confirmed that they did not obtain building permits for the two (2) rooms, did not inform Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) of the construction, and did not obtain a fire inspection for the rooms. LPA informed the Administrator and Co-Administrator that the constructed rooms are a violation of the facility’s fire clearance which is a zero-tolerance violation and an immediate civil penalty of $500 is being assessed on today’s date (12/18/2025). LPA informed the Administrator and Co-Administrator that failure to remove the structures could result in the assessment of additional civil penalties. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has one (1) emergency exit gate located on the side of the facility; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility had adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed cameras throughout the outdoors of the facility. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 12:19 PM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Five (5) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained all required documentation and trainings. Four (4) resident files were reviewed. All resident files contained the required documentation. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 01:14 PM. Medications for two (2) of four (4) residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Continued on LIC 809C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last logged emergency disaster drill was conducted on 12/01/2025. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed two (2) residents. The residents interviewed stated that staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The residents interviewed had no concerns with the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members. The staff members interviewed were knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and current liability insurance. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited and civil penalty assessed. (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Oct 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez, conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. At 12:25 p.m. the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 1:00 p.m., Co-administrator Michelle Perey arrived and was explained the reason for the visit. On 09/23/2024, the Department received a complaint regarding an allegation of Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision. Staff neglect resulted in Resident 1 (R1) sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization. On 09/25/2024, beginning at 10:45 a.m., LPA Cortez conducted a physical plant tour with the administrator and then began reviewing facility records. Copies of pertinent records were obtained. On 11/22/2024, starting at 12:22 p.m., LPA Cortez conducted four (4) resident and three (3) staff interviews. Medical and Home Health records were requested and reviewed. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. Substantiated On the allegation " Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization"; it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that on 09/18/24, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to St. John’s Regional Medical Center, with a gluteal abscess that was so deep, muscle and fat was able to be seen. RP believes R1 was neglected by facility staff due to their condition and R1 was possibly “never turned” by staff. To investigate the allegation the LPA conducted a file review and interviews. According to medical and home health records reviewed, R1 was initially admitted to Camarillo Health Care Center (CHCC) on 07/21/2024 for “encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system”. On 08/19/2024, R1 was discharged and admitted to the A Peace of Home facility. The discharge paperwork from CHCC did not indicate a pressure injury. However, home health records reviewed indicated that on 08/22/2024, R1’s Patient Information Report notated R1 had a left foot unstageable pressure ulcer and a coccyx stage 3 pressure ulcer: measurements at 6.65 CM X 6.5 CM and that all wounds were acquired prior to board and care transfer. Facility staff able to assist with providing wound care 1 time a week or as needed, with home health twice weekly for a total of 3 times a week. On 08/26/2024, a home health nurse cleansed sacral wound with normal saline and there were no signs or symptoms of infection. New wound orders called in for left heel wound. On 08/29/2024, R1 received wound care, pressure relieving measures with skin management for prevention of skin breakdown, no new skin concerns noted at visit. Diet was noted as a concern for board and care as it was reported R1 eats 15% of total daily solids. R1 and care staff were instructed on the importance of appropriate measures to prevent skin injury/breakdown including routine inspection of skin, turning schedule/offloading, keeping skin clean and dry especially over bony prominences, encourage adequate nutrition and hydration and leave blisters intact. On 09/01/2024, a home health nurse noted that R1 was diagnosed with UTI on Friday August 30th, 2024, R1 did not fully engage in conversation due to increased tiredness, and heart rate range between 110 to 113 throughout visit. Nursing interventions were listed as the following: R1 and caregivers educated on repositioning every 2 hours to help heal pressure injuries and prevent further skin breakdown, educated on increasing protein intake as tolerated if not contraindicated to help with the healing process, and educated on signs and symptoms of infection. On 09/04/2024, a case conference note indicated bedbound, wound care, pressure ulcers, cervical spine issues, recently diagnosed with UTI, on antibiotic as skilled reason for home health services, and that R1 is being seen by mobile wound specialist, waiting to have pet scan and recently had MRI. On 09/05/2024, a home health nurse noted that they called the office of Dr. West and gave report that R1 had not been eating or drinking well for 4 days and a feeding tube was being requested. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 3rd page. Additionally, on 09/06/2025, a home health nurse noted that they were informed by R1’s case manager that R1 was admitted to St. Johns Regional on 09/04/2024 with Dx sepsis, UTI, an abscess, and R1 was on O2. On 09/08/2024, it was noted that R1 was scheduled for drainage procedure later in the day. On 09/13/2024, it was noted R1 was now at USC-Keck Hospital and home health nurse spoke with R1’s nurse at USC. On 09/19/2024, it was noted that R1 was transferred back to St. Johns Regional on 09/18/2024 as R1 was more stable. On 09/25/2024, it was noted a home health nurse spoke with R1’s case manager at St. John’s Regional and it was stated R1 needed a higher level of care as they still had a wound vac in place and wound was not looking good, and it was recommended for R1 to go to SNF instead of Board and care. The Administrator stated that R1 had what appeared to be an "unstageable pressure ulcer” upon admission and that when they did the pre-assessment at CHCC, R1 refused to be seen and went based on photos that were shown to him and the information that was provided. The Administrator revealed that the nurse involved with R1’s care at CHCC let him know he had a diabetic ulcer on their heel, as well as an excoriation on their sacrum, coccyx region, and based on the information that was shared they agreed R1 would be a good fit for the facility. However, upon admission, R1’s wounds were more severe and not as described. The Administrator notified R1’s POA that R1’s wounds were more severe than they thought, they were more of a pressure ulcer and R1 needed a higher level of care, however R1 refused to go the hospital and wanted the home care aspect and nursing visits as opposed to hospitalization. The Administrator further revealed that during R1’s stay at the facility after home health diagnosed the wound as a pressure ulcer, they emphasized to R1’s POA that the facility might not be the appropriate place for R1, and they needed to get treatment at a wound center or the hospital, it did need the clinician care, higher frequency care as it was a pressure injury and the POA eventually was able to convinced R1 to go to the hospital. Staff interviews revealed that staff did not get wound treatment training by a home health nurse. Staff either received training on basic treatment to care for R1’s wound by the Administrator or did not get any training on how to treat the wound, even though R1’s dressing would get changed either by the nurse or sometimes by the staff. Staff further revealed that they would reposition R1 every 2 to 3 hours. Based on record review and interviews conducted, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation occurred. The Administrator admitted and retained R1 with a prohibitive health condition (who needed a higher level of care) in direct violation of regulations. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 4th page. R1 had a rapid progression of a pre-existing Stage 3 pressure ulcer to a severe gluteal abscess and sepsis within 2 weeks. Despite HH visits and staff claiming repositioning R1 every 2 hours, R1’s condition deteriorated rapidly between 08/19/2024 and 09/04/2024. A UTI was diagnosed on 08/30/2024, which, coupled with the existing pressure ulcer, required a higher level of care. Additionally, the care staff should not be changing R1’s dressings as they are not skilled professionals. Furthermore, file review did not provide information or documentation to support which caregivers were provided with training on R1’s wound care. Therefore, the allegation “Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization” is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). An immediate $500 civil penalty was issued today. Administrator Michelle Perey was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) and 1569.49(f). Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240923160550

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 3, 2025

87615(a)(1) Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained... (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as R1 had a left foot unstageable pressure ulcer and a coccyx stage 3 pressure ulcer and R1 was not admitted to hospice care at that time, which posed an immediate health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to submit a corrective action plan outlining specific steps to ensure future compliance with all admission, retention, care, assessment and relocation regulations.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(d) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 3, 2025

The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). If the licensee is also the administrator, all requirements for an administrator shall apply. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the Administrator did not demonstrarte sufficient knowledge, and qualifications as an Administrator, admitting & retaining R1 with a prohitivive health condition which poses an immideatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to review reg cited and submit a statement of understanding, along with a written plan on how they will ensure future compliance then send to LPA via email by COB 11/03/2025. health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection at the above-named facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. At the time of arrival, there were three (3) staff on duty and six (6) residents in care. Administrator Herbert Perey arrived at approximately 12:50 pm. Co-Administrator Mischelle Perey arrived at approximately 2:03 pm. Entrance interview conducted. The facility is a one-story Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). Currently, there are two (2) residents on hospice and three (3) residents are bedridden. A tour of the physical environment and accommodations were assessed, and the following was noted: LPA observed the required posting of the complaint poster and Resident’s Rights. LPA inspected the one-story facility for fire safety, personal accommodations, and food service. The physical environment was checked for cleanliness and condition. Walls, windows, ceilings, doors, floors and floor coverings were checked. The facility was seen to be in good repair inside and outside. There are three (3) fire extinguishers, inspection was current as of 5/14/2024. There are approximately seven (7) dual carbon monoxide alarm/smoke alarms detectors are hard wired and in good working order. The kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with seven days of non-perishables. LPA observed a minimal amount of fresh vegetables and fresh fruits. Administrator Perey stated the facility recently had a holiday party with approximately 30-35 attendees. Meals served were catered and home-made ethnic dishes. LPA recommended additional fruits and vegetables be on hand, especially after a special event when food has been served. Upon Co-Administrator's arrival at 2:03 pm, Co-Administrator had purchased several fresh vegetables and fresh fruits. Snacks and beverages are readily available for Residents. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. LPA observed the kitchen cabinets, refrigerator, stove, and counters are clean. Please continue to 809-C, Pg 2. Medications, First Aid kit, and additional first aid supplies are kept in a locked centrally stored cabinet. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Residents participate independently in outside activities such as corn hole, beach ball toss, music, special occasion celebrations, walks in the yard; indoor activities such as reading activities, television watching, Bingo, chess, painting, coloring, and singing. Families visit and take residents out on excursions such as golfing, shopping, and walks in parks. The front yard consists of walkway and well-maintained landscaping. The backyard has walkways, garden sitting areas, and is well-maintained for activities and visits. There are no bodies of water. The recycling bin, green waste bin, and trash bins are standard bins with flip lids. A locked garage is located at the front of the home used for storing supplies. The kitchen, living room, and dining area are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature. There are two private bedrooms and two shared bedrooms. Bedroom #4 is a shared bedroom with a private bath. Each bedroom has a bed, nightstands, and lights and nightstand lamps to provide sufficient lighting. Bathroom #1 is off the hallway near Bedrooms 1, 2, and 3. All residents have access to Bathroom #1. The bathrooms have secure grab bars and no skid flooring. Medication inventory revealed an unexplainable under count of one (1) medication for Resident 1 (R1) and an over count of four (4) medications for R1. Residents’ files were reviewed. LPA noted that on file for each resident was the following: Physician’s Reports, Admission Agreements, Medical Assessments, Identification and Emergency information, Appraisals/Needs Service Plan, and Medication Administration Records (MARs). All persons associated with the facility have criminal record clearance. Administrator certificate is valid. Due to time restraints, the annual inspection will be completed at a later date. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Report and Appeal Rights issued at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jul 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is overmedicating resident Staff is not providing appropriate incontinence care Staff is not allowing resident to have privacy on the phone Resident is not receiving proper nutrition which is causing weight loss Resident has developed wounds for which they are not receiving medical care Facility does not offer activities or exercise to residents Staff pressure resident to go on hospice

LIcensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations. LPA met with administrator Herbert Perey and explained the reason for the visit. On 6/13/2023, LPA conducted a facility tour, interviewed witnesses, residents, and staff; and obtained records. During LPA's visit on 7/29/2024, LPA conducted interviews with staff. Based on interviews with staff and review of records, resident 1 (R1) had no medication that would have made them overly sedated. All medications were given as prescribed and R1 readily took the medication. Therefore, the allegation staff overmedicated R1 is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. (continued on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC9099) Based on interviews with staff and witnesses, R1 was provided incontinence care as needed during the day and at night R1 wore a PureWick external catheter. LPA observed R1 on 6/13/2023, R1 was resting comfortably in bed. There were no foul odors in the room. LPA also observed a clean PureWick external catheter machine at the foot of the bed which was used at night. Therefore, the allegation staff was not providing appropriate incontinence care is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, R1 took phone calls on the facility cordless phone. Staff would take the phone to R1 in their room. R1 would decide whether to use the speaker phone feature or hold the phone to their ear. R1's roommate stated they would leave R1 in the room alone while R1 was on the phone. Therefore, the allegation staff did not allow for privacy on the phone is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, when R1 first moved into the facility R1 would eat meals inconsistently. Staff tried giving R1 their favorite foods and supplements such as protein drinks. During the end, R1 completely lost their appetite and after two days of missing meals R1 was sent to the hospital. Therefore, the allegation resident was not receiving proper nutrition is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, R1 needed to see a podiatrist for issues on R1's feet. R1's POA wanted to make the arrangements for transporation themselves. The administrator offered to make transportation arrangements but the POA refused. R1 did not have any wounds but did have some trouble with their nails/toes. Eventually, R1 was taken to the hospital by ambulance. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses, residents, and staff, the facility offers different activities such as short walks, chair exercises, reading comprehension, and puzzles. Witnesses stated R1 did not have energy to participate in activities. R1 did have frequent visitors for personal interaction. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. (continued on page 3; LIC9099C) (continued from page 2; LIC9099C) Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, the administrator contacted R1's medical Power of Attorney (POA) as R1 had not eaten in two days. The administrator asked the POA to decide whether they wanted R1 taken to the hospital or placed on hospice as the administrator was aware hospice had been part of the converstaion the POA was having with other family members. The administrator only wanted some sort of care for R1; either medical intervention or comfort care measures from hospice. The administrator did not pressure the family to place R1 on hospice. Therefore, the allegation staff pressured resident to go on hospice is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230605162215
Jan 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual continuation visit. LPA met with Administrator Herbert Perey and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA completed record review and medication review. STAFF RECORDS: LPA reviewed staff records for two staff. Training was complete. All staff have CPR/First Aid certifications. All staff scheduled to work at the facility are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. RESIDENT RECORDS and MEDICATION: LPA reviewed two residents' records. Resident files included pre-admission appraisals, needs and services plans, physician's reports, and admission agreements. Medications appear to be given as prescribed based on review of medications and the centrally stored medication and destruction records. EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: The emergency disaster plan was complete. The facility conducts disaster drills quarterly on each shift. LPA interviewed two staff; there were no concerns. LPA attempted to interview two residents. One resident was unable to answer questions due to their condition and one resident was sleeping. No deficiencies observed during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Report emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 8, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 8:17 a.m. LPA met with Administrators Mischelle Perey and Herbert Perey and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The carbon monoxide and smoke alarms were tested and all functioned properly. The fire extinguisher appeared fully charged and was last inspected on 4/24/2023. KITCHEN: LPA observed knives are stored in a locked drawer and chemicals are stored in a locked cabinet under the sink. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and emergency water. Hot water temperature measured 119.8*F. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed two double-occupancy bedrooms and two single-occupancy bedrooms which were clean and furnished appropriately. RESTROOMS: The two restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition. COMMON SPACES: At the time of the visit, the living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings throughout the facility. The backyard patio is equipped with furniture for residents' use. The garage and laundry room were locked. There is additional food stored in the refrigerator in the garage along with refrigerated medication. Medication is also stored in a locked cabinet in the living room. INFECTION CONTROL: The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility has appropriate plans in place in the event of clients and/or staff showing symptoms of COVID or testing positive for COVID. LPA will return at a later date to continue this annual inspection. No deficiencies observed during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Report emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County