Small home · Licensed for 6 · Fair Oaks
A Hearty Care Home IV
8734 Sotheby Ct, Fair Oaks, CA 95628Licensed since 2020
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 3 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH (3) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (6). (3) BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS ON 1ST FLOOR ONLY.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for A Hearty Care Home IV: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,500
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,450likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,900
- $6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $9,000
9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$7,450.
- Splendor Oaks Senior Living #3Fair Oaks · 1.4 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- All Seasons HialeahFair Oaks · 1.9 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Crown JewelOrangevale · 1.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ettys' CareOrangevale · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Magnolia Elderly Care HomeFair Oaks · 2.6 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Shearwater ResidenceOrangevale · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 2.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
8734 Sotheby Ct, Fair Oaks, CA 95628Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Mercy San Juan Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.4 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #342700856 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 11 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Aug 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure residents were served food of good quality.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the care home and met with Administrator, Maria Clardy, to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation listed above. Over the course of the investigation, LPA toured the premises on multiple dates. The results of the investigation are as follows: During visits conducted on December 8, 2025, and December 31, 2025, LPA observed multiple food items on the premises that had expired past their expiration date. During both visits, staff cleared the premises of the expired food items discovered by LPA during the inspection. Based on observations, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. Substantiated LPA visited the care home R1 moved to on December 9, 2025 and obtained records on site, including R1’s Admission Agreement to the new home, Preplacement Appraisal, Needs and Services Plan, and Medical Assessment upon Admission. LPA observed R1’s Admission Date Listed for the new care home was November 19, 2025. LPA observed R1’s Medical Assessment upon admission to the new care home was dated November 7, 2024. R1’s Medical Assessment indicated that R1 was non-ambulatory and had diagnoses that included acute stroke due to occlusion of right middle cerebral artery, Dermatitis, chronic low back pain with lumbar radiculopathy, left wrist joint pain, headache, history of ischemic stroke with unspecified residual deficits, Hemiplegia, right carotid artery occlusion, Hypothyroidism, unspecified anxiety disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without retinopathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with peripheral neuropathy, ADHD unspecified, restless legs syndrome, daytime somnolence, sleep apnea, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperlipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, bilat sensorineural hearing loss, cervical spondylosis, allergic rhinitis, history of gastric bypass surgery, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). LPA observed R1’s Preplacement Appraisal and Needs and Services Plan were dated November 22, 2025. LPA did not observe any new conditions on R1’s Preplacement Appraisal and Needs and Services Plan that were not listed on R1’s Medical Assessment dated November 7, 2024. LPA observed a Discharge Instructions Document for R1’s visit to the hospital on November 22, 2025. Document indicates that R1 was diagnosed with Cellulitis, chronic radicular low back pain, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Hypothyroid, Hemiplegia, and Headache. LPA observed Cellulitis as a change in condition for R1. Based on LPA's observations and records obtained during the investigation, there was approximately three (3) days between R1 moving out of the care home into another care home and R1 being sent to the hospital, where they were diagnosed with Cellulitis as a new diagnosis. It cannot be determined whether or not the care home R1 moved from would have sent R1 to the hospital sooner had they not moved to a new care home. Therefore, the allegation that the care home did not provide medical attention in a timely manner is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not respond to resident's call bell in a timely manner. ** Report continued on 9099-C ** LPA conducted interviews with residents R2 and R3, as well as staff members S1, S2, and S3. R2 and R3 indicated that they have used a call button to obtain assistance from care staff. Interviews conducted with residents did not indicate any concerns regarding wait times before receiving assistance from staff after using their call button. Interviews with staff indicated wait times that ranged from immediate to 15 minutes in which a resident would have to wait for assistance from care staff after using their call button. LPA observed progress notes for R1 and observed staff acknowledge R1 using their call button and staff providing assistance in response to R1 using their call button. Allegation: Staff did not ensure the home was clean and in good repair. LPA conducted interviews with residents R2 and R3, as well as staff members S1, S2, and S3. Interviews conducted with residents and staff did not indicate any concerns regarding the care home being unclean or in disrepair. The Department conducted visits at the care home on December 8, 2025, December 31, 2025, July 14, 2026, August 11, 2026, and August 12, 2026. LPAs who conducted visits did not observe care home to be unclean or in disrepair. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. LPA received a pest control invoice dated December 5, 2025, which was prior to LPA opening the complaint investigation. Pest control invoice dated December 5, 2025 indicates that there was no pest activity noted. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251201155214
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2026
87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (8) All food shall be of good quality. (…) This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA’s observations, the care home did not ensure that food items on the premises were of good quality as multiple food items were past their expiration date, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure to purge expired food items from the care home regularly. Facility will conduct staff training regarding food safety with all staff and provide proof of training to LPA by POC due date of September 11, 2026.
Aug 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the care home and met with Administrator, Maria Clardy, to conduct a case management visit regarding information obtained during a separate inspection conducted on August 12, 2026. During visit, LPA requested documentation pertaining to resident (R1). R1 moved out of the care home on November 19, 2025. LPA requested records pertaining to R1’s residency at the care home as it pertained to their care needs while they resided at the care home. Facility could not provide requested documentation to LPA by the conclusion of this inspection. Per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Section 87506 "(e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident.” During visit, LPA reviewed documentation pertaining to resident (R2). LPA observed R2's Admission Agreement, which included an "Addendum re Hospice Care." The addendum states the following: "The Hospice rate for this facility (...) is a set fee that is non-refundable." Interview with Administrator indicated that, if a resident who is receiving hospice care passes away while residing at the care home, the family is not issued a refund for fees paid in advance. ** Report continued on 809-C ** Per Health and Safety Code §1569.652(c), “A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to the individual, individuals, or entity contractually responsible for the fees or, if the deceased resident paid the fees, to the resident’s estate, within 15 days after the personal property is removed.” Per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Section 87507(h)(4), “The admission agreement shall not contain the following: Any provision that violates the rights of any residents including but not limited to those specified in Section 87468 and in Health and Safety Code section 1569 et seq.” As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(e) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2026
87506 Resident Records (e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and records reviewed, the facility did not ensure to maintain resident (R1’s) records for a minimum of three (3) years as they could not provide R1’s records to LPA by the conclusion of their inspection, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87506 and submit statement to LPA by POC due date of September 11, 2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87507(h)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2026
87507 Admission Agreements (h) The admission agreement shall not contain the following: (4) Any provision that violates the rights of any residents including but not limited to those specified in Section 87468 and in Health and Safety Code section 1569 et seq. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility did not ensure that admission agreements for the residents did not violate rights indicated in Health and Safety Code section §1569.652(c), which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility will update Admissions Agreement Addendums for all residents and ensure that there is nothing included that violates any rights specified in Section 87468 and in Health and Safety Code section 1569 et seq. Facility will submit updated Admissions Agreement Addendums to LPA by POC due date of September 11, 2026.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on November 19, 2025 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and seven (7) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 117 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA reviewed two (2) residents' medications. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit was interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025
Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada conducted an unannounced case management visit on October 10, 2025. This visit is to confirm ORDER TO LICENSEE/FACILITY FOR IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION FROM FACILITY. LPA initially met with staff, Irene Hinampas and Eilaisa Niutabua. While waiting for the Administrator to arrive, LPA and staff, Irene, toured the interior of the facility and observed (6) residents to be resting in their private rooms. Also present was staff, Nancy Hubbs and another staff, Cef Olandria, along with a hospice nurse who arrived when LPA arrived was attending to one of the (2) residents currently under hospice care. The Administrator, Maria Clardy, arrived at 2:00 pm. . LPA stated the purpose of visit and provided the Administrator with a copy of the above order. Facility understands this is an Immediate Exclusion effective October 10, 2025 and (S1) is excluded and cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Therefore, the Department orders the facility to remove (S1) from any contact with clients and not allow this employee to be physically present in the facility. Administrator stated (S1) has not worked at the facility since on/around October, 2023. LPA confirmed that there was a change in Administrator on/around October 2024. LPA to advise the current assigned LPA of this change who can follow up. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided on this date. A signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these forms.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/26/24 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and seven (7) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 120 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of today's inspection, a deficiency is being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Deficiency is listed on the attached 809-D page. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024
Mar 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility to conduct a health and safety check and follow-up regarding technical assistance that was provided to the facility during an inspection conducted on 11/28/2023. During today's inspection, LPA toured the facility and conducted a file review for four (4) staff and four (4) resident files. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 regarding hazardous items being accessible to residents and staff missing health screenings on file. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 7, 2024
87309 Storage Space (a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observation, facility did not ensure that knives and cleaning products were inaccessible to residents in care, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure that all hazardous items are locked and inaccessible to the residents in care at all times. Administrator will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87309 and submit to LPA by POC due date of 3/7/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87412(a)(11) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 4, 2024
87412 Personnel Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on (...) each employee. Each personnel record shall contain (...) (11) A health screening as specified in Section 87411 (...). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 4 staff records included a health screening, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will obtain health screenings for all staff. Facility will submit a copy of each employee's health screening to LPA by POC due date of 4/4/2024.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/28/23 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six bedrooms and seven bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 117.3 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed three (3) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. LPA also requested a copy of an active Administrator certificate, staff roster, and infection control plan. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit was interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 28, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 4 documents
20222 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff restrained resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Maria Clardy, to open a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA wore an N-95 mask. Facility staff wore masks while on the premises. During today’s visit, LPA conducted interviews and toured the facility. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Staff restrained resident ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiated On 10/3/2022, the Department received an email from Administrator indicating that "a resident on hospice" (R1) became "very agitated" and staff "gave [them] an activity to entertain" themselves. Administrator indicated that activity (fidget blanket) was given to them via Sutter Hospice. Email from Administrator stated that "the belt was tied up behind [R1's] chair...instead of [R1's] waist." Email included a picture of the fidget blanket, which has two straps to wrap around the waist of an individual. During inspection conducted on 10/7/2022, LPA observed fidget blanket and chair R1 was sitting in when strapped with the fidget blanket. LPA interviewed Administrator, who stated that, on 10/1/2022, fidget blanket was strapped around R1 while they were sitting in their chair and staff member did not notice that blanket was wrapped around the chair instead of R1's waist. Administrator stated that staff were with R1 during the time when fidget blanket was wrapped around R1's chair. Once staff observed that fidget blanket was strapped around R1's chair, fidget blanket was removed from R1. Based on interviews conducted by the department and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Administrator's signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022 · control 25-AS-20221003122644
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 22, 2022
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility did not ensure that R1 was not restrained in their chair by a fidget blanket, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022
Plan of correction: Facility will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87468.1. Facility will submit statement of understanding to LPA by POC due date of 10/22/2022.
Oct 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/7/2022 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Administrator, Maria Clardy, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA ensured to apply hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 Mask. LPA toured the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: 6 bedrooms and 7 bathrooms for residents, common areas, kitchen, laundry room, backyard, and storage. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and Administrator completed the infection control domain. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022
Jun 30, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 6/30/2022 at 9:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived to the facility to conduct a case management regarding late fees. LPA arrived to the driveway when met with Administrator, Maria Clardy, and a resident. It was then when LPA was informed the facility recently reported a resident testing positive for COVID-19 to LPA Angela Hood on 6/21/2022. Prior to initiating today's visitation, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA was not screened by staff, and did not enter the community due to active COVID-19 case. LPA ensured the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 mask. LPA asked if there was a co-Administrator available for her to talk to since Administrator, Maria, was taking a resident to an appointment. Maria confirmed co-Admin, Jhona Pettit, was present at the facility. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Jhona. LPA stated the facility has an annual fee overdue of $742.00. Jhona explained that Maria is the owner who handles the payments for the facility and will informed Maria when she returns to the facility. LPA informed Jhona the payment was due 11/13/2021. LPA further explained Maria will need to take care of the payment right away along with the late fees. As a result of this visit, no deficiency was found as LPA did not inspect the facility due to the active COVID-19 positive case. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was left with co-Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Oct 27, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/27/21 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted licensee. LPA completed a facility risk assessment upon arrival. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Administrator is present at the facility to conduct an annual inspection. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility together with staff to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, laundry room, and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA, Administrator, and Infection control Leader completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. LPA advised the following: update symptom screen and document all staff, residents and visitors symptom screening and Fit Test N-95s for staff prior to quarantines (if needed). LPA offered N-95s, gowns and face sheilds for facility to pick up at the regional office. LPA also advised that LIC 602 and care plan be updated for R1. LPA requested: updated facility sketch to include generator, a copy of Resident Roster, LIC 500, Administrator's Certificate, signature page of LIC 610E- emergency/disaster plan and Liability Insurance. Documents to be submitted to LPA via email by 11/3/21. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2021
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 12, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Mjp Care Homes, LLC, licensed since 2020.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 13
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about A Hearty Care Home IV
Is A Hearty Care Home IV licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is A Hearty Care Home IV licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has A Hearty Care Home IV been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is A Hearty Care Home IV still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does A Hearty Care Home IV cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 54 other homes of a similar licensed size across Sacramento County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 54 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does A Hearty Care Home IV take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Mjp Care Homes, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 4.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can A Hearty Care Home IV keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
A Hearty Care Home IV license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “A HEARTY CARE HOME IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #342700856. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Mjp Care Homes, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,100 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$4,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Sacramento County