Marbella Marysville is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Marysville, Yuba County, California — state license #585000698, with a licensed capacity of 72, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Marbella Marysville

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

The state also licenses a home at this address today: Marbella Marysville · licence #585920293

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 72 residents · Marysville, CA · Yuba County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #585000698, held since 1999 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
515 Harris Street · Marysville, Yuba County
Phone
(530) 749-1786
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 72 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
72 NON AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE FOR 9. NEW MGMT CO; INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MGMT LLC; EFFECTIVE 01/23/2025State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 9, 2026
Occupancy at the October 29, 2025 visit
43 of 72 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 22, 2021 to October 29, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 21 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Staff who is not an appropriately skilled professional administered medication to resident 2. Staff did not keep accurate resident records

Licensing Program Analyst conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with Executive Director Tracy Freudendahl. LPA interviewed witnesses, staff, and residents. LPA also reviewed facility records. 1. Title 22 regulations does not allow staff to put medications directly into a resident's mouth. Interviews stated staff do put medications directly into residents' mouths. One med tech stated they always discuss medications with the residents and explains the processes and asks the residents if they want their medications put directly into the mouth. While this is a good idea the med tech is still not allowed to put the medication directly into a resident's mouth. Based on interviews, the allegation is substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251006085922
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not keep resident's room cleaned

Licensing Program Analyst conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with Executive Director Tracy Freudendahl. LPA interviewed witnesses, staff, and residents. Based on the interviews the resident rooms are not cleaned thoroughly and some of the bathrooms were not cleaned at all. Based on the information gathered through interviews, LPA was able to determine that the allegation is substantiated. Therefore, the Department finds the allegation to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Please see 9099-D for the deficiency sited Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250225121819
May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medication(s) not given as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with Executive Director Tracy Freudendahl. The facility has had twelve medication errors in the past five weeks. One medication was present in the facility and staff didn't know it. The eleven was because a med tech called out and no one covered the shift. This is based on incident reports the facility submitted as required to Community Care Licensing Division. LPA cannot determine one incident if the resident suffered ill-effects was caused by the missed medication and the resident has since recovered. The other residents did not suffer any ill-effects. The facility staff did notify the doctors of the eleven residents about the missed medications. Based on the above the allegation is substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250414150539
May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1999.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020254632024220202322020222202021461
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$8,000 /mo
our estimate — broad statewide California range, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Marbella Marysville licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Marbella Marysville in Marysville (Yuba County), California license #585000698, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 72 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Marbella Marysville care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Marbella Marysville with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record72 NON AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE FOR 9. NEW MGMT CO; INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MGMT LLC; EFFECTIVE 01/23/2025

How much does Marbella Marysville cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Marbella Marysville's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Yuba County typically runs $4,000–$8,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$7,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Marbella Marysville accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Marbella Marysville is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

43 of 72 beds occupied (60%) when the state visited on October 29, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Marbella Marysville?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2021 for Marbella Marysville; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 29, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Staff who is not an appropriately skilled professional administered medication to resident 2. Staff did not keep accurate resident records
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with Executive Director Tracy Freudendahl. LPA interviewed witnesses, staff, and residents. LPA also reviewed facility records. 1. Title 22 regulations does not allow staff to put medications directly into a resident's mouth. Interviews stated staff do put medications directly into residents' mouths. One med tech stated they always discuss medications with the residents and explains the processes and asks the residents if they want their medications put directly into the mouth. While this is a good idea the med tech is still not allowed to put the medication directly into a resident's mouth. Based on interviews, the allegation is substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 29, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251006085922
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not keep resident's room cleaned
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with Executive Director Tracy Freudendahl. LPA interviewed witnesses, staff, and residents. Based on the interviews the resident rooms are not cleaned thoroughly and some of the bathrooms were not cleaned at all. Based on the information gathered through interviews, LPA was able to determine that the allegation is substantiated. Therefore, the Department finds the allegation to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Please see 9099-D for the deficiency sited SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250225121819
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedication(s) not given as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst conducted the investigation into the allegation above. LPA met with Executive Director Tracy Freudendahl. The facility has had twelve medication errors in the past five weeks. One medication was present in the facility and staff didn't know it. The eleven was because a med tech called out and no one covered the shift. This is based on incident reports the facility submitted as required to Community Care Licensing Division. LPA cannot determine one incident if the resident suffered ill-effects was caused by the missed medication and the resident has since recovered. The other residents did not suffer any ill-effects. The facility staff did notify the doctors of the eleven residents about the missed medications. Based on the above the allegation is substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250414150539

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify residents family of residents death.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On Friday May 5, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Parks arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegation listed above and met with Health Services Director Sherri. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. Allegation: Staff did not notify residents family of residents death. Based on interviews conducted and file reviewed, facility notified POA of R1s passing, which meets Title 22 reporting requirements. Therefore, the allegation is unfounded meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted with Sherri and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230321152737

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident hit other resident in care. Resident pushed other resident in care. Facility is short staffed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kerry Hiratsuka, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Complaint Investigation Visit. LPA conducted COVID-19 Precautionary prescreening, and wore a surgical mask while at facility. LPA was screened by Front Desk. LPA Hiratsuka, investigated the allegation “Resident hit other resident in care; Resident pushed other resident in care; and Facility is short staffed.” LPA interviewed staff and reviewed resident's record. LPA also obtained parts of a resident's file as well. Title 22 Regulations and the CA Health and Safety Code does not require staff to be with residents every minute of the day. The incidents did occur; however, what LPA cannot determine is the reason why the incidents occurred. The facilty has record of reaching out to the responsible party and doctor of the resident who pushed and hit the other resident. The facility has daily notes on what and how they monitored the resident in question's behavior. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 2, 2022 · control 25-AS-20211026131842

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(530) 749-1786
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Marbella Marysville? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.