Oak Place Residential Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Camarillo, Ventura County, California — state license #565850108, licensed for 36 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

26 homes in view

Oak Place Residential Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 36 residents · Camarillo, CA · Ventura County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #565850108, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
50 Oak St. · Camarillo, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 586-4086
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 8 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (36) AMBULATORY, OF WHICH (8) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the November 6, 2025 visit
36 of 36 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 7, 2022 to November 6, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity or respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted a 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegation. LPA met with Administrator Flordeliza "Baby" Hipolito and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. LPA conducted an interview with the administrator at 10:00 a.m., record review at 10:10 a.m., toured the physical plant to ensure there were no health and safety concerns, and interviews with staff and clients from 10:45 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The following was then determined: It was alleged that “Staff did not treat resident with dignity or respect”. It was reported that the facility driver (S1) observed shouting and speaking to Client #1 (C1) in a rude/aggressive manner. Interview with the administrator revealed that there was an off-site incident in which S1 transported C1 to a doctor’s appointment and became upset during the visit. Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025 · control 29-AS-20251028223301
Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff intimidates residents Staff blocks residents from coming and going Facility failed to safeguard resident's personal property

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations. LPA met with back-up administrator Flordeliza "Baby" Hipolito and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted an interview with the administrator at 9:46 a.m., record review at 10:00 a.m., facility tour at 10:20 a.m., and interviews with staff and clients from 10:38 a.m. to 12:37 p.m. The administrator stated the name of the alleged staff intimidating residents is actually a resident at the facility and not a staff. LPA interviewed the alleged victim, resident 1 (R1), who voiced no complaints or concerns regarding staff or missing items. R1 explained in the past, under previous facility owners, R1 had a roommate who would take their shoes but with the help of the administrator that was worked out. (continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240502091135
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints4typical 7
State visits on file12typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025231202422020232202022440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 586-4086

Is Oak Place Residential Care licensed?

Yes — Oak Place Residential Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Camarillo (Ventura County): California license #565850108, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 36 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oak Place Residential Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oak Place Residential Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (36) AMBULATORY, OF WHICH (8) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

How much does Oak Place Residential Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oak Place Residential Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oak Place Residential Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oak Place Residential Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

36 of 36 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on November 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oak Place Residential Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2022 for Oak Place Residential Care; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity or respect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted a 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegation. LPA met with Administrator Flordeliza "Baby" Hipolito and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. LPA conducted an interview with the administrator at 10:00 a.m., record review at 10:10 a.m., toured the physical plant to ensure there were no health and safety concerns, and interviews with staff and clients from 10:45 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The following was then determined: It was alleged that “Staff did not treat resident with dignity or respect”. It was reported that the facility driver (S1) observed shouting and speaking to Client #1 (C1) in a rude/aggressive manner. Interview with the administrator revealed that there was an off-site incident in which S1 transported C1 to a doctor’s appointment and became upset during the visit. Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2025 · control 29-AS-20251028223301

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff intimidates residents Staff blocks residents from coming and going Facility failed to safeguard resident's personal property
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations. LPA met with back-up administrator Flordeliza "Baby" Hipolito and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted an interview with the administrator at 9:46 a.m., record review at 10:00 a.m., facility tour at 10:20 a.m., and interviews with staff and clients from 10:38 a.m. to 12:37 p.m. The administrator stated the name of the alleged staff intimidating residents is actually a resident at the facility and not a staff. LPA interviewed the alleged victim, resident 1 (R1), who voiced no complaints or concerns regarding staff or missing items. R1 explained in the past, under previous facility owners, R1 had a roommate who would take their shoes but with the help of the administrator that was worked out. (continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 8, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240502091135

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect caused a resident to be hospitalized while in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 11:51 AM and met with facility designee Flordeliza Hipolito, who is authorized to sign reports. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, LPA interviewed facilty designee and obtained a copy of the facility's resident roster. Interview and review of roster revealed that Resident #1, whom the complaint is in reference to, does not reside at this facility. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed UNFOUNDED at this time. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is either false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 10, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230209112701

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 586-4086
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oak Place Residential Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.