Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Select Senior Living ILicense #565802430 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareSelect Senior Living ILicense #565802430 · 1363 Feather Ave, Thousand Oaks, CA · (805) 852-5059Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Ventura County/Thousand Oaks/Select Senior Living I
Map · 1363 Feather Ave

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,700/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (805) 852-5059

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • selectseniorliving.company↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

SS

Call Select Senior Living I

Thousand Oaks · Licensed for 6

(805) 852-5059

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, selectseniorliving.company:

(805) 777-3855 · main line · seen October 27, 2026

dhull@selecthomecare.com · general email · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Thousand Oaks

Select Senior Living I

1363 Feather Ave, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 · Licensed since 2016

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Select Senior Living I

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,700 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 6 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 6 residents

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Staff walk with residents / ambulation support

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Activities of daily living the home lists help withFeeding · Bathing · Grooming · Dressing · Incontinence · Transfer · and 1 more

    Feeding · Bathing · Grooming · Dressing · Incontinence · Transfer · Ambulation — reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: assistance with self administration

    selectseniorliving.company · October 13, 2017

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Select Senior Living I: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,700a month to start

Likely $4,650–$7,000

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,700likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,700likely $4,650–$7,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,650–$7,150
$5,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,450–$10,300
$8,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $9,500

$3,500$9,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,350–$7,050.

  • Array Assisted LivingThousand Oaks · 0.1 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on its own website · explain how we care for our residents, discuss pricing (starting around · seen October 5, 2026
  • Colony of Thousand Oaks at VenusThousand Oaks · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • The OrchardCamarillo · 4.4 mi · Small home
    $9,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
  • Enduring Oaks Assisted LivingMoorpark · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Nurturing TouchOak Park · 7.4 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Heartland Senior Living at SunnydaleSimi Valley · 7.5 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Via EsmeraldaCamarillo · 8.5 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Brookhaven AlCamarillo · 8.9 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (5)Private rooms · Housekeeping frequency · Monitoring technology
  • Private rooms

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Housekeeping frequencyDaily

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Monitoring technologyAlarm monitoring system

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Shared / companion roomsReported no

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (4)Snacks available · Special diets supported · Assistance with eating
  • Snacks available

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Special diets supportedSpecial diets · Diabetic diets

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Assistance with eating

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (1)Activity types offered
  • Activity types offeredIndoor recreational activities · Outdoor recreational activities · Social activities · Recreational · Social

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

Visiting & staying involved (2)Transport to medical appointments · Contact form
  • Transport to medical appointments

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 13, 2017.

  • Contact form

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated July 19, 2024.

    Open on the website ↗
About the home (1)Family-owned claim
  • Family-owned claim

    Reported on selectseniorliving.company · source dated October 3, 2026.

Where it is

1363 Feather Ave, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Los Robles Hospital & Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.7 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #565802430 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 4 of 9 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.

20251 state visit · 1 document

Oct 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Barutyan arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 10:22AM. LPA met with staff upon arrival and Administrators Kim Anderson and Dylan Hull who arrived shortly thereafter. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 10:34AM, the LPA, along with Administrator Anderson, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN/GARAGE: At 10:34AM, LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area. Kitchen appliances appeared clean and were in operable condition at the time of the visit. The facility had a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and emergency food and water. Knives and sharps are stored inaccessible in a locked drawer. The garage is adjacent to the kitchen and is maintained locked and inaccessible. LPA observed cleaning supplies, additional refrigerator/freezer, and a washer and dryer in the garage. BEDROOMS: There are seven (7) total bedrooms in the facility; six (6) bedrooms are designated as private resident rooms and one (1) is designated as a staff room. The staff room is kept locked. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. All resident bedrooms have exits to the exterior and were equipped with functional auditory exit alarms. BATHROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for resident use and one (1) is a staff/guest restroom. LPA observed bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in operating condition with slip-resistant surfaces and grab bars. Hot water temperatures were measured in bathrooms and were between 105.3-115.9 degrees F, which is within the required range. Report Continued on LIC 809-C COMMON AREAS: These include the living room and dining area. Common areas were appropriately furnished and in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Smoke detectors, fire doors, and carbon monoxide detector were tested at 10:50AM and were operable. LPA observed a fire extinguisher which was fully charged and purchased on 06/23/2025. Required posters were displayed throughout the common areas. Activities were observed in the common areas. A non-functional fireplace was noted in the living room. OUTDOOR AREA: The backyard has a covered patio area with patio furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. All passageways were observed to be clear. LPA observed one (1) self-latching gate that was equipped with a functional alarm. There is an outdoor storage area which contained additional supplies. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 10:55AM; medications are centrally stored and kept inaccessible in a locked cabinet by the kitchen. LPA reviewed medications for two (2) residents. All medications, including PRNs were labeled, stored, and locked inaccessible to residents. PRNs were properly documented and logged. Medications were observed to be properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record and were in compliance with regulation, state, and federal law. RECORD REVIEW: LPA began record review at 11:10AM. LPA reviewed five (5) out of five (5) resident files for documents including, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, and consent forms. LPA reviewed four (4) personnel records for documents including, but not limited to: health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All resident and personnel files were in order and had no missing documents. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster plan is updated annually as required. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly as is required, with the last drill conducted on 09/13/2025. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2025

20243 state visits · 3 documents

Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident fell sustaining injuries due to staff neglect. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Staff are overmedicating resident. Staff are not meeting resident's needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced investigation visit for the allegations listed above. The LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted by staff, and the LPA informed them of the visit. The staff contacted the Licensee Dylan Dylan Hull on the phone to inform them of the visit. Kim Anderson Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) arrived and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. On 07/24/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial investigation visit for the allegations listed above. The LPA arrived at the facility and met with Administrator Dylan Hull and Kim Anderson and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:30 a.m., the LPA interviewed the administrator, and staff and at 12:00 p.m., conducted record review pertinent to the investigation. At this time LPA Urena found that further investigation is needed. Continues on LIC 9099C ... Unsubstantiated Pg 2. Resident fell sustaining injuries due to staff neglect. On the allegation that the resident sustained a fall due to staff neglect, it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that R1 has fallen a few times since R1 moved into the facility on 05/06/2023. RP stated that on 5/22/2023, R1 was taken to the ER due to a fall and brought back to the facility, only to fall again the next day. To investigate the allegation LPA Urena conducted interviews and record review. Record review of the Unusual /Injury/Incident Reports (LIC 624) submitted to the Regional Office (RO) indicated that R1 had an unwitnessed fall on 05/29/2023 at approximately 6:40 p.m. Staff found R1 on the floor trying to fix their shoe and noticed that R1 sustained two small skin tears to the top of their hand. Furthermore, on the second page of the LIC 624 indicates that Home Health was notified to provide wound care. Staff interviews revealed that they found R1 on the floor and after doing an assessment they noticed a skin tear to the top of the right hand. The staff contacted the licensee and the licensee contacted R1’s physician and home health were contacted to provide wound care to R1’s hand.Staff stated that during the day R1 was closely monitored to assist and tried to prevent falls. Record review of the Home Health “Visitor Care Notes”, revealed that Home Health was providing wound care for R1. On 07/24/2023, LPA Urena interviewed the Licensee. Per the licensee, R1 would get up at night and try to ambulate to the bathroom on their own, and this is the time when R1 sustained the falls. Night supervision is one (1) staff to six (6) residents. Motion detectors devices are placed in each room to detect residents getting up from there bed, consequently alerting the night staff. The LPA observed the motion detector monitor located in the living room and a voice is heard saying the name of the room where the movement was detected. Staff attended to the alert coming from the residents’ bedrooms. Although R1 fell and sustained a laceration to the top of the right hand due to a fall, the staff provided first aid and notified the licensee. The licensee in turn contacted the physician’s and order home health. Based on the information obtained through interviews and record review, there is insufficient evidence to find that staff were neglectful. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continues on LIC 9099C... pg.3 Pg 3 Staff did not seek medical attention for resident. On the allegation that staff did not seek medical attention for R1, the RP stated that they visited R1 on 6/28/2023 and there were no signs that R1 was sick, however, when RP visited on 07/02/2023, R1 was unresponsive, had shallow breathing, and looked bad. RP stated that the staff didn’t know what to do and called the facility nurse. RP stated that the nurse came in and said, “What do you want me to do?” RP stated that they couldn’t believe that staff couldn’t tell there was something wrong with R1. RP stated that staff checked R1’s oxygen levels, and it was at 90%. RP stated that RP had to tell the staff to call 911. R1 was taken to the hospital, and R1 was diagnosed as having pneumonia. The staff interviews revealed that R1 appeared to be normal on the days preceding the incident, however, on 07/02/2023 R1 was lethargic during the day, however there were no signs of distress, no high temperature, skin looked normal. R1’s representative was visiting with R1 on 07/02/2023, and the representative noticed that R1 did not look well. Staff checked the R1’s oxygen level, which was measured at 90% (normal level is 95%). Staff contacted the facility’s LVN and told the LVN that R1’s representative was requesting to call 911 for R1. Staff called 911, and R1 was transported to the hospital for evaluation. R1 was diagnosed as having pneumonia. Based on the interviews, observation, record review, there is insufficient evidence to prove that staff failed to seek medical attention for resident. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff are over medicating resident. It is alleged that R1 was being over medicated by staff, however the RP does not know what was being given to R1 to cause R1 to appear sedated, and lethargic. To investigate the allegation, on 07/24/2023 and 11/19/2024, LPA Urena conducted record review of the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (LIC 622), and interviewed the administrator, the LVN, staff, and RP. The record review indicated that all the medications were prescribed by R1’s physician. One of the medications prescribed to R1, indicate that the side effects may be drowsiness, dizziness, nausea and headache. The staff interviews revealed that they assisted R1 with the medication per the instructions on the LIC 622. The facility LVN stated that R1 was prescribed Temazepam for agitation. The interview with the RP revealed that all medications being given to R1 were prescribed by R1's physician. Based on the information obtained through interviews and record review; staff was assisting R1 with medications as prescribed by R1’s physician. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Pg. 4 Staff are not meeting resident's needs. On the allegation that staff are not meeting the resident’s needs, it is the concern of the RP that although a home health care nurse was taking care of R1’s skin tear, RP had to take care of the wounds on the days home health nurse was not present, because the staff weren’t taking care of it properly. To investigate the allegation the LPA conducted interviews and record review. The interviews revealed that R1 sustained a skin tear on top of their hand, and Home Health was providing wound care. Record review revealed that home health was providing wound care every three days starting on 05/29/2023 through 06/29/2023. Facility staff understand that they are not skilled professional, consequently they cannot provide wound care. Staff kept wound dry by preventing it from getting wet during showers. Based on the interviews and record review, R1 was receiving wound care by a skilled professional as indicated by the physician’s orders. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230718163058
Oct 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to issue a refund Facility failed to comply with resident's admission agreement

This is an amended report. On 10/22/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek met with Facility Designee Kim Anderson with the purpose of issuing final findings on the allegations above. Administrator/Licensee Dylan Hull arrived at 10:05AM. Entrance interview conducted. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez (Cortez) conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility above on 08/16/2023 from 09:40am to 03:45pm. LPA Cortez met with Kim Anderson, Facility Designee. LPA Cortez interviewed staff and residents. LPA Cortez toured the inside and outside of the facility. LPA Erika Miller conducted additional interviews on 10/15/2024. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated This is an amended report. On the allegations: Facility failed to issue a refund and facility failed to comply with resident's admission agreement This is an amended report. On the allegations: Facility failed to issue a refund and facility failed to comply with resident's admission agreement. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that on 07/02/2023, R1 was hospitalized for 8 days. RP alleges that they advised S1 on 07/06/2023 that R1 will not return to facility, due to their medical condition. R1 was discharged from the hospital and moved into a skilled nursing facility. RP alleges that S1 advised, if R1’s personal items are removed, R1 will be entitled to a refund. On 07/06/2023, RP removed R1 personal belongings from facility. Dylan Hull, Licensee, subsequently refused to issue a refund, citing that RP was required to provide the facility a 30-day prior notice before vacating. R1 was admitted to facility on May 6, 2023, and was taken to hospital on July 2, 2023. A pre-admission refund was provided as required by Title 22 Regulations. LPA Miller reviewed the Admission Agreement dated May 1, 2023, which states in part, “All charges will be refunded on a prorated basis upon notice that the Resident’s medical condition will not allow a return to the facility when all the resident’s personal belongings are removed from the facility and the personal property form (LIC621) is completed. If the resident leaves the facility other than a medical condition, a thirty (30) day notice to the facility is required.” The admission agreement does not contain explicit language stating which “medical conditions” meet the degree to which a 30-day notice is no longer required and does not state that the medical condition must be a restricted or prohibited condition. The contract language is vague and ambiguous. R1 suffered a medical emergency on 07/02/2023 and was transported the hospital after a 9-1-1 call was placed. R1 was diagnosed with pneumonia and was subsequently discharged to a skilled nursing facility on 07/10/2023. Licensee acknowledged in a prior interview that the facility cannot provide the same level of care as a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The resident’s belongings were removed on 07/06/2023. R1 remained at the SNF until 08/15/2023. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C This is an amended report This is an amended report. LPA obtained documentation consisting of a copy of the 07/10/2023 hospital discharge that reflects, “Discharge Disposition: Skilled Nursing Fac” and the discharge summary from Post Acute care that confirms R1 stayed in a SNF from 07/10/2023 through 08/15/2023. LPA also reviewed 09/05/2023 correspondence from their physician that states, “patient is unable to return to board and care facility due to [their] medical condition” and R1 requires 24/7 supervision due to their dementia. The document does not specify any medical condition other than dementia. Licensee stated they were verbally notified around 07/06/2023 that R1 would not be returning after being sent to the hospital. However, a written 30-day notice was not submitted. Although the documentation from 09/05/2023 states R1 was unable to return to the board and care facility due to their “medical condition,” it only states R1 needed 24/7 supervision due to their dementia, which would be within the scope of this facility. Additionally, this documentation is from approximately 2 months after R1 entered the SNF, at which time R1’s condition could have changed. Licensee stated they were willing to take R1 back from the hospital with pneumonia and would have implemented additional care as needed to meet their needs. Licensee also stated R1 did not have a prohibited health condition. The admission agreement states a 30-day notice was required unless the resident’s medical condition did not allow them to return to the facility. The investigation revealed no medical documentation indicating R1 could not return to the facility from on or around 07/06/2023, when RP removed R1’s personal belongings from the facility and provided verbal notice that R1 would not be returning to the facility. The Licensee maintains they could have met R1’s needs. The investigation determined the admission agreement was followed and R1 was not owed a refund. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230811095354

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 00000 · Plan of correction due date: Nov 5, 2024

Citation has been removedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024
Oct 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit and entered the facility at 9:55 a.m. Upon arrival, LPA Mosley was greeted by Kimberly Anderson, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator/ Licensee Dylan Hall arrived shortly after. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Upon arrival LPA observed residents finishing up breakfast followed by activities such as puzzles. KITCHEN: The LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at 9:58 a.m. Knives and sharps were observed in a locked drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, furniture in the common areas was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. At 11:29 a.m., smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were tested and operational at the time of the visit. The fire extinguisher was observed to be purchased and fully charged on 06/28/2024. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. The last emergency disaster drill took place on 08/22/2024 and conducted monthly. Activities were observed in the common areas. A non-functional fireplace was noted in the living room. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... RESTROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for resident use and one (1) is a staff/guest restroom. Resident restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in all bathrooms and measured from approx. 10:06 am – 10:30am and measured between 109.9 – 112.7 degrees Fahrenheit all within the required range. BEDROOMS: There are seven (7) total bedrooms in the facility; six (6) bedrooms are designated as private resident rooms and one (1) staff room. The staff room is kept locked. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. GARAGE/BACKYARD: The garage is maintained locked at all times. There is a washer and dryer on premises. LPA observed an adequate amount of emergency food and water. Cleaning supplies, PPE and incontinence supplies are kept in the garage locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The backyard has a covered patio area with patio furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. All passageways were observed to be clear. LPA observed one (1) self-latching gate. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. RECORDS: Resident Records were reviewed beginning at 10:25 a.m. and personnel records at 11:00 a.m. Six (6) resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, LIC627(c) Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. Four (4) personnel files including the Administrator’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809C... MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at approximately 12:30 p.m. The medications are locked in a cabinet adjacent to the kitchen. Medications for four (4) clients were reviewed. Medications reviewed were found to be self-administered as prescribed and documented on the centrally stored medication and destruction records. INTERVIEWS: Two (2) staff interviews were conducted. Two (2) resident interviews were conducted during the inspection. LPA obtained the following documents: LIC 500, LIC9040, and current liability insurance. No deficiencies were cited during today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA initially met with facility staff. Administrator Dylan Hull was contacted via telephone and arrived at 11:20AM. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 11:30AM, the LPA, along with Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Fire extinguisher is fully charged and purchased on 05/15/2023. Hardwired combination smoke/carbon monoxide detectors and fire doors were tested at 01:48 PM and were functional. A copy of the current liability insurance was obtained during today's visit. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room and dining room areas. LPA observed common area to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. An non-functional fireplace was noted in the living room. BEDROOMS: There are seven (7) total bedrooms in the facility; six (6) bedrooms are designated as private resident rooms and one (1) staff room. The staff room is kept locked. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. BATHROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms. Two (2) are designated for resident use and one (1) is a staff/guest restroom. Resident restrooms were observed to be equipped with nonskid surfaces and contain nonskid mats. Grab bars were observed in the bathrooms. The water temperature was measured in both resident bathrooms and measured within the required range. Report Continued on LIC 809-C OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered patio area with patio furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. All passageways were observed to be clear. There were no bodies of water on the premises. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of seven (7) days non-perishable and two (2) days perishable food. Cleaning supplies are located in a locked cabinet under the kitchen sink. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. GARAGE: Garage was observed locked and contained laundry area, extra food, PPE and incontinence supplies, and emergency food and water. RECORD REVIEW: Began at 11:55AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. All five (5) staff files and five (5) resident files observed were in compliance with regulation. MEDICATION REVIEW: Began at 12:57PM. Medications for two (2) residents were observed. All medications observed were labeled, stored, and properly documented at the time of the visit. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill conducted on 09/28/2023. Emergency disaster plan was observed to be complete and updated annually, as required. INTERVIEWS: During today's visit, LPA interviewed two (2) staff and two (2) residents. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of today's report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2023
Aug 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced Case Management -Deficiencies visit in conjunction with an initial 10-Day complaint visit (Complaint Control #29-AS- 20230811095354). The purpose of the visit is to issue citations for deficiency observed during the complaint investigation which is not related to the complaint. The LPA met with Administrators Dylan Hull and Kim Anderson and the reason for the visit was explained. During facility tour at 9:53 a.m., the LPA observed UltraClean premium laundry detergent tide pods located on a shelf on top of the washer and dryer and tools in the garage accessible to residents in care located on top of cabinets. Upon observation, the administrator stated that the garage is locked, however the LPA observed that the garage is locked from the inside of the garage and anyone in the home has access to the garage and all items inside. During facility tour, at 9:57 a .m., the LPA observed an unlocked staff room with personal hygiene items inside. Staff room was locked and garage door knob was changed to lock from inside the garage making all items inaccessible to residents in care during the visit. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted. Copy of the report and appeal rights given to administrator .Dylan Hullthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 17, 2023

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (f)(2) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (2) Over-the-...and toxic substances such as certain plants, gardening supplies, cleaning supplies and disinfectants.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observations, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed detergent and tools inside a garage accessible to residents which poses an potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee properly locked both the garage and staff room and agrees to install digital locks on both staff room and garage by 8/17/2023.

20221 state visit · 2 documents

Sep 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not follow resident's admission agreement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith arrived unannounced for an initial 10-day visit. The LPA met with House Manager Tracy Varnell and Administrator Dylan Hull and explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, the LPA interviewed staff at 9:50 a.m., 10:10 a.m., 10:35 a.m., and 10:40 a.m.; toured the kitchen area at 9:55 a.m., and obtained documents. Regarding the allegation: Facility did not follow resident's admission agreement. It was alleged that the licensee failed to follow the admission’s agreement regarding Resident #1 (R1). A review of documentation indicated that documents were signed on 7/11/2022. Per the admission’s agreement, there is a non-refundable pre-admission’s fee of $7500. However, it was decided that R1’s responsible party would pay a pre-admission fee of $3750, at a 50% discounted rate. Substantiated A review of the signed admission’s agreement indicated the above-mentioned amount. However, R1 moved out of the facility on 8/17/2022. Per the agreement, as the contract was terminated during the second month of residency, R1 would be entitled to a refund of 60% of the balance after a $500 deduction. It was alleged that as of today, R1 had not received a refund per the admission agreement. In addition, concerns were raised due to the claim that R1 was charged a full month’s rent from 8/15/2022 – 9/14/2022, even though R1 was moved out of the facility on 8/17/2022. R1’s responsible party provided notice to the licensee on 8/15/2022 that R1 would be moving out of the facility. Interviews confirmed it was not a 30 day notice, but notice that R1 would be leaving the facility immediately. However, per the admission’s agreement, ‘if the Resident leave the facility other than a medical condition, a thirty (30) day notice to the facility is required’. If the thirty-day notice is not provided, the remaining 30 days are due to the facility. Interviews confirmed that R1 moved out of the facility on 8/17/2022, two days after providing notice to the facility. In addition, whereas R1 moved into the facility on 7/15/2022, paperwork was signed on 7/11/2022. Per the documents and interview, the room was designated for R1 as of 7/11/2022. Based on the information obtained, whereas R1 is responsible for paying the remaining thirty (30) days as R1's responsible party did not provide thirty (30) day notice to the facility, R1 is entitled to a partial refund of the pre-admission fee, even though the pre-admission fee was decided upon at a discounted rate. The allegation ‘facility did not follow resident’s admission’s agreement’ is Substantiated at this time. See 9099-D for deficiencies. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued. Staff interviews revealed that residents have the option to have fresh fruit and vegetables throughout the day. Staff admitted that residents will also eat food items such as lasagna, sandwiches, different proteins and so on, but stated that they also will attempt to customize meal options per the preference of the resident. Interviews and records review revealed that R1 was on mechanical/chopped diet. However, R1 did not have specific restrictions on food items that they could or could not eat. The LPA observed both refrigerators on the property and observed an abundance of raspberries, strawberries, and blueberries, as well as fresh vegetable options for resident consumption. The LPA also observed oranges, bananas, and apples on the counter in good condition. At the time of the visit, the facility had a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. A review of the facility menu displayed a variety of foods that was of good quality and quantity. It was communicated that grocery shopping takes place weekly, and staff are able to obtain a variety of fresh foods as needed and/or requested. Staff admitted that if concerns were raised regarding what R1 was consuming, it was more so due to preference and not necessarily due to an inability to provide nutritious and food of good quality to R1. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the facility did not serve resident fresh and nutritious foods while in care. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220908153854

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.651(h)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 16, 2022

1569.651(h)(3) Preadmission fee or deposit for elderly at residential care facilities. (3) If the resident leaves the facility for any reason during the second month of residency, the resident shall be entitled to a refund of at least 60 percent of the preadmission fee amount in excess of five hundred dollars ($500). This requirement is not met as evidenced by; Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above for Resident #1 (R1) as they moved out during the 2nd month of residency and did not receive a refund, which poses a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2022

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to do the following: 1. Issue the refund as required per regulation. Inform CCL when this has happened, but no later than 9/16/2022

Sep 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices. The LPA met with House Manager Tracy Varnell and Administrator Dylan Hull and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and to ensure compliance with regulations. KITCHEN: Knives and chemicals are locked inaccessible. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. BEDROOMS: Bedrooms had appropriate furniture, clean linens and sufficient lighting. Rooms were clean and clear of obstructions. Both the single-occupancy resident rooms and staff rooms were observed. RESTROOMS: The three restrooms were clean and sanitary with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature measured at 105.1 F. Restrooms were stocked with soap and paper towels. Hand-washing signs were observed in all restrooms. COMMON SPACES: The facility maintained a temperature of 74 degrees. Medications, staff and resident files are locked inaccessible. Fire extinguishers were fully charged. The backyard and exterior area of the facility had furniture and a covered area for resident use. No obstructions observed in the exterior or interior. No bodies of water noted. INFECTION CONTROL: There is a central entry point for screening and temperature checks. Staff were wearing appropriate face coverings. Signs were posted that promoted good hand hygiene, physical distancing, and cough/sneeze etiquette at the front door and the entrance. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. There is record of staff and resident vaccinations. The facility can designate a room to isolate persons if there is a confirmed case of COVID-19. Staff are up to date regarding guidelines around visitation and vaccine requirements. The policies and procedures pertaining to infection control were adequate. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Nov 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff has not posted the Ombudsman poster inside of the facility

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ashley Smith and Elsie Campos arrived unannounced for an initial 10-day complaint visit. The LPAs met with Administrator Dylan Hull and explained the reason for the visit. During today’s visit, the LPAs conducted a physical plant tour at 9:00 a.m. and spoke with the Administrator. Regarding the complaint, it was alleged that the facility did not have the Ombudsman poster in the facility. During the physical plant tour, whereas it was observed that the number to the Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) was posted in the entryway, the facility did not have the required Ombudsman poster in the entryway. During today’s visit, the Administrator instructed staff to obtain the poster from the LTCO Ventura Office. Based on the investigation, this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. See 9099-D for deficiencies. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2021 · control 29-AS-20211109135558

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(10) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 19, 2021

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. The licensee shall post the telephone numbers and addresses for the local offices of the ...ombudsman program... conspicuously in the facility foyer, lobby, residents’ activity room, or other location easily accessible to residents This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as the Ombudsman poster was not observed in the facility, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2021

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to do the following: 1. During today's visit, staff went and obtained the poster. The poster was posted while the LPAs were in the facility. Plan of Correction met.

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the November 19, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Select Senior Living LLC, licensed since 2016.

Operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Select Senior Living II · Thousand Oaks
  • Select Senior Living III · Thousand Oaks
  • Select Senior Living IV · Thousand Oaks
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2016, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
10
Total complaints
4
Substantiated allegations
2
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
2

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2016, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations20
Substantiated allegations20
Total complaints40

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Select Senior Living I

Is Select Senior Living I licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Select Senior Living I licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Select Senior Living I been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Select Senior Living I still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Select Senior Living I cost?

$5,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,650–$7,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,688 to $6,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,700 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Select Senior Living I take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Select Senior Living LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Select Senior Living LLC — at least 4 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Select Senior Living I keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Select Senior Living I license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SELECT SENIOR LIVING I”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565802430. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Select Senior Living LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 17, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Ventura County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Thousand Oaks · 0.1 mi

    Array Assisted Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $6,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Thousand Oaks · 0.2 mi

    Brio Manor

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Thousand Oaks · 0.1 mi

    Compassionate Care Residence-Hendrix

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Thousand Oaks · 0.1 mi

    Tiara Del Sol

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,900–$7,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Thousand Oaks · 0.1 mi

    Omnicare II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,800–$7,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Thousand Oaks · 0.2 mi

    Lovely Community Healthcare 2

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Ventura County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
SS

Call Select Senior Living I

Thousand Oaks · Licensed for 6

(805) 852-5059

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, selectseniorliving.company:

(805) 777-3855 · main line · seen October 27, 2026

dhull@selecthomecare.com · general email · seen October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Select Senior Living I

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages