Small home · Licensed for 6 · Modesto
Sisters Assisted Living
1006 Durant Street, Modesto, CA 95350Licensed since 2020
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 4 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (4) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (4).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Building is wheelchair accessible
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Sisters Assisted Living: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,000a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,000likely a month
Starting monthly rate$3,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on A Place for Mom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$3,600
- $3,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,000–$7,150
- $5,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,800 to $6,000
8 homes like this within 6 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,000.
- St. Stephen's HomeModesto · 1.1 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dutchollow Suites IModesto · 2.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Safe Haven Central ValleyModesto · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Graceful Living at ModestoModesto · 3.5 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Brighter LivingModesto · 3.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on its own website · *starting base price · seen October 5, 2026
- Graceful Living at RiverbankRiverbank · 4.1 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Crossroads ManorRiverbank · 4.1 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Malonzo EldercareModesto · 5.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on A Place for Mom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (8)The room opens directly onto a patio, porch or garden · Laundry · Wifi
The room opens directly onto a patio, porch or garden
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Wifi
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Bath tubs
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Meals provided · Special diets supported · Texture-modified diets
Meals provided
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium · No Sugar
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Texture-modified dietsPureed
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Trips outside the home
Activity types offeredActivities On-site · BBQs or Picnics · Birthday Parties
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (2)Transportation costs extra · Public transit access claimed
Transportation costs extra
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Public transit access claimed
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
Brand or trade nameSisters Assisted Living
Reported on sistersassistedliving.com · source dated June 18, 2026.
Where it is
1006 Durant Street, Modesto, CA 95350Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Doctors Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #502700748 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a Required 1 Year Annual Inspection Visit. LPA was met by administrator. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator. Administrator certificate # 7016725735 expires 04/24/2028. LPA and administrator inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry area, living area and other common areas, as well as outside of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. Facility is a 6 bed facility with a current census of 3. There is entry door is leading to the living room, kitchen with a hallway to the bedrooms and bathrooms. Chemicals and medications noted to be locked to residents in care. LPA also conducted the care tool. a small bird bath was observed in the back yard. Hot water temperature was measured at 116 F degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed the following posted on the facility wall: Facility license, sketch, See Something Say Something poster, Ombudsman poster, Theft and Loss Policy, Resident Bill of Rights, Rights of Resident/Family Councils. LPA observed the facility to have adequate food supply of 7 days non-perishables and 2 days perishables in place. Resident rooms were sanitary and had the required furniture and furnishings. LPA observed, fire extinguishers was purchased on 10/08/2025 and current, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, central heating and air in the facility. The first aid kit was found in compliance. LPA reviewed four (4) staff files. All staff is fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA reviewed two (2) resident facility files, COVID-19 Plan, and survey binder. All necessary documents were in place. LPA offered and explained TSP program to facility administrator. LPA saw current liability insurance. Exit interview held with staff and copies of reports given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2026
Jul 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff has not provided refund after resident's death.
LPA arrived to the facility on 7/21/26 at 9:09Am to conduct a complaint investigation into the above allegations, LPA met with administrator Karen Fomby to explain the purpose of the visit. As to the allegation that Staff has not provided refund after resident's death, the LPA reviewed the cash resources of the resident. in interview with the administrator it was learned the client had paid basic services from march through to the end may in advance, and had passed on 4/19/26, leaving a month and some days of funds that should be returned. LPA reviewed a photo of the sent check for 4160 drafted 5/16/26 payable to "the estate of jack manning" and a recipt for certified mail dated 5/21/26 with the client representative's signiture verifying it was recieved. the check has not been cashed as of 7/21/26 and the facility remains in control of the funds. In interview it was learned the check is likely not been cashed due to the payable line not being directed to the clients representative, in this case the clients offspring who has durable power of attourney. the amount may come into dispute, the facility is obligated to return a prorated value, calculated as the basic services divided by the number of days in the month after the clients property has been removed. The original check value is for 10 prorated days days + 1 month on its purpose line. Continued on C,page. Substantiated Supplemental to the second allegation, record review of the MAR indicated that the prescriptions were given as ordered and PRN administration was documented appropriately. It's unclear by the mar documentation, that a particular medication was given too often, or another medication was not given often enough, as the client has multiple regular medications which can cause chemical restraint type effects. Review of the 602 and medical records both indicated a certain level of psychotropic medication was needed to address agitation with physical violence. LPA gave guidance that if the medication is being noticed as too effective at sedating a client, that would bear health and personal rights risks that should be addressed with client and their the primary care provider/psych. As to the fifth allegation, it was learned in interview with the hospice care nursing administrator that no order for bedrails existed, and no bedrails were supplied to the facility. 602 doesnt indicate the need for bedrails, no doctors order for bedrails is on file at the facility. as to the sixth allegation, it was learned in interview with the administrator that the clients property was released to the clients representative on 4/21/26, for which a previous arrangement was reached on the 4/19. the recovery of the property did not include a signed receipt, as the representative of the client refused to sign, but they allowed a picture of thiery drivers license be taken. LPA gave guidance that per regulation the licensee must allow reasonable access to the property for the collection of safeguarded valuables. LPA toured the facility and the list of safeguarded valuables is not currently within the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. a copy of the report was read and given to the administrator, no citations issued, exit interview was conducted. The LPA issued guidance that the facility is required by regulation to collect a signed receipt of the property that was returned to the clients representative. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations,is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A copy of the report was read and given to the administrator, appeal rights were provided. exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260514144343
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(j)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 19, 2026
87217 Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables (j) Upon the death of a resident, all cash resources, personal property, and valuables of that resident shall immediately be safeguarded. (3) If no executor or administrator has been appointed, the responsible person shall be notified, and the cash resources, personal property, and valuables shall be surrendered to said person in exchange for a signed itemized receipt. This requirement was not followed as evidenced by, record review of the check is issued to the estate without evidance of an executor or administrator of the estate seperate from the DPOA, Not following this requirement posed a risk to the clients in care, via health, saftey, or personal rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2026
Plan of correction: LPA suggested the POC should include canceling the current check and reissuing the refund to the clients representative and sent certified. Licensee agreed to cancel and reissue, sending the LPA pictures of the rewritten check and the signed back certified mail reciept by the poc date
20251 state visit · 1 document
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a 1 year/required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. Census:5 LPA Lund & Administrator Karen Fomby toured/inspected the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 112 degrees F which does the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed facility staff turn down hot water and purchased a new digital thermometer to ensure hot water temperature. LPA observed sufficient seven- day non-perishable and two- day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers (11/3/2025) and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. No deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a 1 year/required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. Census:5 LPA Lund & Administrator Karen Fomby toured/inspected the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 112 degrees F which does the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed facility staff turn down hot water and purchased a new digital thermometer to ensure hot water temperature. LPA observed sufficient seven- day non-perishable and two- day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers (11/15/2024) and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. No deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024
May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not allow a resident a choice of hospice services Facility staff signed a hospice transfer request form without the resident's family authorization Facility staff caused delays in residents at the facility receiving timely hospice services
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation. LPA Lund met with Care Staff Princess Major-Banks and explained the reason for the visit. Care Staff called Administrator Karen Fomby who could not make today visit. Administrator Karen Fomby gave permission to have Care Staff Princess Major-Banks sign any required paperwork. Census:3 Facility staff did not allow a resident a choice of hospice services- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witnesses. Resident (R1) was admitted to Home Health with Progressive Home Health & Hospice on 5/9/2023 through 1/19/2024. Conservator of R1 made the choice to change hospice services on 1/19/2024 from Bristol Hospice Services to Progressive Home Health & Hospice because the familiarity of staff working with R1. Unsubstantiated Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witnesses the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff did not allow a resident a choice of hospice services therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff signed a hospice transfer request form without the resident's family authorization- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witnesses. Resident (R1) was admitted to hospice on 1/17/2024 while at the hospital and was discharged to the facility on 1/18/2024. Conservator for Resident (R1) gave permission to Administrator Karen Fomby to sign the transfer request of Hospice services for R1. Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff signed a hospice transfer request form without the resident's family authorization therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff caused delays in residents at the facility receiving timely hospice services- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witness. Resident (R1) was admitted to hospice on 1/17/2024 and discharged to the facility on 1/18/2024. The transfer on hospice services from Bristol Hospice Services to Progressive Home Health & Hospice was on 1/19/2024. Records indicate that Progressive Home Health & Hospice Services started services with R1 on 1/19/2024 one day after returning from the hospital on hospice. Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff caused delays in residents at the facility receiving timely hospice services therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department (CCLD) has found the allegations. Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was, and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240124192506
May 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to conduct a proof of correction (POC) visit. LPA Lund met with Care Staff Princess Major-Banks and explained the reason for the visit. Care Staff called Administrator Karen Fomby who could not make today visit. Administrator Karen Fomby gave permission to have Care Staff Princess Major-Banks sign any required paperwork. Census:3 LPA Lund received proper POC documentation for the deficiency cited on 2/2/2024. No deficiencies were observed and cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff abandoned a resident at the hospital
On 2/22/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to amend a complaint investigation. LPA Lund met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Lund had to do a new LIC9099 based not having a LIC9099 D on the previous complaint. Facility staff abandoned a resident at the hospital- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witness. Resident (R1) was admitted as a patient at Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center in Merced California. R1 was admitted at the hospital with no responsible party. On September 20, 2022, the hospital paid the admission fee for R1 to stay at the facility. The facility got paid for the three months of service for R1. From January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023 the facility didn't get paid for services rendered. Substantiated On September 20, 2023, the facility filled an Unlawful detainer (UD-23-001136) on September 26, 2023, R1 and Mercy Medical Center was served. On October 6, 2023, the Superior of Court of California County of Stanislaus signed a right to possession. On 12/31/2023 R1 was dropped off at the Emergency Room Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center in Merced California. On 12/31/2023 The licensee left a note with R1 when dropped off which stated R1 has not been paid in 9 months. Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was clear that the facility staff abandoned a resident at the hospital therefore the allegation was deemed SUBSTANTIATED. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240102142039
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 7, 2024
87468.1 (a)(1) to be accorded dignity in their person relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met by: Based on interviews, the licensee left a note with R1 when dropped off which stated R1 has not been paid in 9 months. This poses a potential Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will look over the regulation and email LPA Lund confirming they understand the regulation.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a proof of correction visit. LPA Lund met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Jason Lund received documentation (Proof of correction) for the two deficiencies from the visit on 11/3/2023. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/3/23 at 12:30pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Sisters Assisted Living for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Karen Fomby and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA observed a licensed capacity of 4 residents with 6 residents in placement. Administrator was able to provide LPA with documentation of new fire clearance with a capacity for 6 and communication with the department for an updated capacity and documents required to change capacity. An advisory note was issued in consultation with Licensing Program Manager. LPA and Administrator evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 142 degrees F which does not meet the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed facility staff turn down hot water and purchased a new digital thermometer to ensure hot water temperature. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. LPA requested a copy of the facility liability insurance and facility representative stated they do not have one. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 the following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2023
Aug 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not have resident's authorized representative sign an admission's agreement for care Staff refused to provide resident's authorized representative wth information about resident's care Staff are overcharging resident for care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation. LPA Lund met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. Staff did not have resident's authorized representative sign an admission's agreement for care- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witness. Resident (R1) was admitted as a patient at Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center in Merced California. R1 was admitted at the hospital with no responsible party. The hospital paid the admission fee for R1 for the first four months. R1’s husband has a Durable Power of Attorney for finances dated June 4, 2021, but does not have authorization to make medical and other health-care decisions. R1 husband refused to pick up R1 from hospital and case worker (Hospital) had R1 admitted to the facility on 9/20/2022. Unsubstantiated Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was unclear if staff did not have resident's authorized representative sign an admission's agreement for care therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Staff refused to provide resident's authorized representative with information about resident's care- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witness. Resident (R1) was admitted to the facility on 9/20/2022 from Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center in Merced California. R1 husband refused to pick up R1 from hospital and case worker (Hospital) had R1 admitted to the facility. R1’s husband has a Durable Power of Attorney for finances dated June 4, 2021, but does not have authorization to make medical and other health-care decisions. R1’s LIC602 dated 8/11/2022 stated that R1 needs help with bathing, grooming, and medication management. Based on records review, interviews with, Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was unclear if staff refused to provide resident's authorized representative with information about resident's care therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Staff are overcharging resident for care- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby, Reporting Party (RP) and witness. Resident (R1) was admitted to the facility on 9/20/2022 from Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center in Merced California. Dignity Health Mercy Medical Center signed the admission agreement on 9/20/2022 and R1’s husband has no responsibility for payments due to not signing the admission agreement dated 9/20/2022. R1’s husband does have a Power of Attorney for finances dated June 4, 2021, but does not have authorization to make medical and other health-care decisions. Based on records review, interviews with Administrator Karen Fomby, RP and witness the information provided, it was unclear if staff are overcharging resident for care therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department (CCLD) has found the allegations. Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby and report left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230419111449
20221 state visit · 1 document
Oct 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived at the above address unannounced to conduct an annual/required inspection. LPA met with Administrator Karen Fomby and explained the reason for the visit. Census 4 LPA Lund & Administrator Karen Fomby inspected/toured the facility which include the resident’s bedrooms, bathrooms, dining rooms, common living areas, kitchen, and backyard. There is sufficient lighting around the facility. Residents rooms are equipped with the proper lighting, bedding and linens. The kitchen was observed cleaned and within compliance. Living room is equipped with the proper furniture for the clients. All toxins and sharp objects are locked. Passageways and hallways are free of obstruction. Smoke detectors and Carbon Monoxide detector are equipped around the facility. Medication cabinet has a lock and first aid kit is complete. LPA observed a supply of 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable foods available for the clients. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no violations were observed during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2022
20211 state visit · 2 documents
Oct 26, 2021Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Post Licensing
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived at the above address unannounced to do a Post Licensing & Annual required inspection. LPA explained the reason for the visit to Administrator Karen Fomby. LPA Lund & Administrator Karen Fomby toured the facility which include the resident’s bedrooms, bathrooms, dining rooms, common living areas, kitchen, and backyard. There is sufficient lighting around the facility. Residents rooms are equipped with the proper lighting. Residents rooms have proper bedding and linens for the residents to use. The kitchen was observed cleaned and within compliance. Living room is equipped with the proper furniture for the clients. All toxins and sharp objects are locked. Passageways and hallways are free of obstruction. Smoke detectors and Carbon Monoxide detector are equipped around the facility. Medication cabinet has a lock and first aid kit is complete. LPA observed a supply of 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable foods available for the clients. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no violations were observed during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2021
Oct 26, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived at the above address unannounced to do a Post Licensing & Annual required inspection. LPA explained the reason for the visit to Administrator Karen Fomby. LPA Lund & Administrator Karen Fomby toured the facility which include the resident’s bedrooms, bathrooms, dining rooms, common living areas, kitchen, and backyard. There is sufficient lighting around the facility. Residents rooms are equipped with the proper lighting. Residents rooms have proper bedding and linens for the residents to use. The kitchen was observed cleaned and within compliance. Living room is equipped with the proper furniture for the clients. All toxins and sharp objects are locked. Passageways and hallways are free of obstruction. Smoke detectors and Carbon Monoxide detector are equipped around the facility. Medication cabinet has a lock and first aid kit is complete. LPA observed a supply of 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable foods available for the clients. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no violations were observed during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Karen Fomby and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2021
3 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 21, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Sisters Independent Living and Assisted Living LLC, licensed since 2020.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 15
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Sisters Assisted Living
Is Sisters Assisted Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Sisters Assisted Living licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Sisters Assisted Living been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Sisters Assisted Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Sisters Assisted Living cost?
$3,000 a month to start — listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on A Place for Mom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Modesto that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,300 to $4,900 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Sisters Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Sisters Independent Living and Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Doctors Medical Center is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Sisters Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Sisters Assisted Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SISTERS ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #502700748. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Sisters Independent Living and Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 1, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Stanislaus County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$4,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,950–$4,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$4,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,100–$4,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,100–$4,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,000–$4,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Stanislaus County