Muirwoods Memory Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Petaluma, Sonoma County, California — state license #496830756, licensed for 80 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 43 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Muirwoods Memory Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 80 residents · Petaluma, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496830756, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
750 North Mcdowell Blvd · Petaluma, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 775-4330
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 80 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; 80 NON-AMBULATORY; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 49 times and filed 43 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 14, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the October 28, 2025 visit
50 of 80 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 25, 2021 to October 28, 2025. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 25 of 43 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 7 documents
Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 11 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not safeguarding resident's personal belongings Staff are not providing adequate laundry services to residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced to deliver investigation findings to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Heather Montgomery. During the course of this investigation LPA conducted 2 facility visits on 9/9/2025 & 10/7/2025 making observations, obtained facility documents, and conducted 11 interviews with staff, residents, and outside parties. Staff are not safeguarding resident's personal belongings & Staff are not providing adequate laundry services to residents in care - Complainant alleges that relatives have found their loved ones clothing being worn by other residents and their clothing have been missing and never found. As well relatives cannot depend on the staff to wash the residents clothing in a timely manner and return to owner. Interview with staff (S1) revealed an Interim executive director changed the laundry system a few months ago replacing individual staff who did laundry with caregivers doing laundry. Continue on LIC9099Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250904040256
Sep 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that a resident's incontinence needs are met

While conducting informal office meeting in the Santa Rosa RO, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Moellers & Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen delivered findings on the above complaint allegations to Administrator Camille Brown. Staff do not ensure that a resident's incontinence needs are met– Complaint alleges that the facility is understaffed, resulting in staff not changing resident’s incontinence briefs regularly, causing the resident to wear soaked briefs. Pictures were provided showing resident in two briefs. Complaint also alleges that staff are double briefing and that staff do not clean resident thoroughly when changing their briefs. Complaint alleges that resident has behaviors resulting in a 30-day eviction, but complainant believes that the behaviors are the result of multiple urinary tract infections. Three of five staff interviewed indicated that they have observed, heard of, or have themselves double briefed residents in care with one staff admitting they double briefethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2025 · control 21-AS-20240719150606
Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator/Executive Director Camille Brown. The Department received an allegation of resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care. Per reporting party, resident (R1) had bilateral bruising on forearms possible injuries appeared to be inflicted by another. On 4/3/24 the staff was asked about it, but it apparently staff said they asked around and no one saw resident screamed out or anyone go near to them to injure R1. R1 was observed with a band-aid on their forearm so someone had to have seen the bruising. Based on records review, on 10/7/24 LPA was provided by an outside party with pictures supposedly taken on 4/2/24 of R1 with bruising noted in their arms along with an office visit note and e-Prescription dated 4/2/2024 where a physical exam was performed describing scrapes, bruises, and extreme itching with sevethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241002083624
Jan 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent an outbreak of scabies. Staff not prevent outbreak of covid.

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. This investigation included three site visits to the facility; a review of pertinent documents; as well as statements taken from staff and witnesses. The following determinations are made: In December of 2023, facility had several cases of Covid; Facility management followed appropriate protocols and made reasonable attempts to keep Covid positive residents isolated; There exists differing opinions as to whether or not the facility had an outbreak of scabies in the Fall of last year; Ten resident files were selected on a random basis and reviewed for indications of scabies; Ten of ten files were negative for any indications of scabies diagnosis; several files indicated various skin issues or rashes but none were identified as scabies. Although the complaint allegations may be true or valid, based upon statements and reviewed documents, there is not a preponderance of evidencethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240109100757
Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient staffing to meet residents care needs Staff do not have adequate training

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Camille Brown. Insufficient staffing to meet residents care needs – Complainant alleges due to lack of staffing, tasks such as laundry are not being completed as scheduled, leaving residents without clean clothing and unable to assist residents with activities of daily living (ADL)’s, toitleting & hygiene services. LPA’s record review & interview with administrator revealed facility has 6 med techs & 23 caregivers. LPA was informed one of the washing machines has had some operating issues and the facility is addressing repairs. Administrator informed LPA of alternative plan if there is a backlog of laundry to ensure it is completed timely. Interviews were conducted with (5) staff who were consistent in informing LPA residents’ rooms are cleaned tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231024151946
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents' needs are not being met Facility is not handling resident's incontinence care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Camille Brown & Lupe Villa-Guerrero, Director of Health Services. Residents' needs are not being met – Complainant alleges when resident (R1) moved into facility they forgot their toothbrush and toothpaste. Family realized this two weeks later and asked staff how they handle this situation, staff allegedly replied it is family’s responsibility to bring these items and if the resident didn’t have them, staff don’t brush their teeth. On 8/17/2023 LPA was informed by Director of Health Services Guadalupe Villa-Guerrero that residents are suppose to bring their own hygiene products but if they don’t, the facility has back up supplies and will provide to the residents and then inform the family of the need. LPA’s file review of care plan indicates R1 othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230815133258
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Camille Brown. Resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff – Complainant alleges resident (R1) sustained a fractured shoulder due to staff not picking up bathroom rug and R1 tripped over it in the middle of the night. LPA’s interview with staff (S1) & S2 revealed S1 was conducting routine, two-hour rounds of facility residents at approximately 5 AM. This was S1’s second round of R1’s room in less than 2 hours. R1 usually has the lights on, although they were not so S1 turned them on when seeing R1 was walking back to the bed from using the bathroom. S1 greeted R1 and R1 began to turn around by the bed and lost footing and went down hitting their shoulder. S1 went to R1 and called S2 to come help and assess. Continue on LIC9099-C Uthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231016084025
Sep 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file49typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026670202591122024440202378120227902021440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 775-4330

Is Muirwoods Memory Care licensed?

Yes — Muirwoods Memory Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Petaluma (Sonoma County): California license #496830756, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 80 residents. State records list 43 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 14, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Muirwoods Memory Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Muirwoods Memory Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; 80 NON-AMBULATORY; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Muirwoods Memory Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Muirwoods Memory Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Muirwoods Memory Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Muirwoods Memory Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

50 of 80 beds occupied (63%) when the state visited on October 28, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Muirwoods Memory Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 49 state visits and 43 dated documents since 2021 for Muirwoods Memory Care; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 28, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not safeguarding resident's personal belongings Staff are not providing adequate laundry services to residents in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen arrived unannounced to deliver investigation findings to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Heather Montgomery. During the course of this investigation LPA conducted 2 facility visits on 9/9/2025 & 10/7/2025 making observations, obtained facility documents, and conducted 11 interviews with staff, residents, and outside parties. Staff are not safeguarding resident's personal belongings & Staff are not providing adequate laundry services to residents in care - Complainant alleges that relatives have found their loved ones clothing being worn by other residents and their clothing have been missing and never found. As well relatives cannot depend on the staff to wash the residents clothing in a timely manner and return to owner. Interview with staff (S1) revealed an Interim executive director changed the laundry system a few months ago replacing individual staff who did laundry with caregivers doing laundry. Continue on LIC9099CCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250904040256
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that a resident's incontinence needs are met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
While conducting informal office meeting in the Santa Rosa RO, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Moellers & Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen delivered findings on the above complaint allegations to Administrator Camille Brown. Staff do not ensure that a resident's incontinence needs are met– Complaint alleges that the facility is understaffed, resulting in staff not changing resident’s incontinence briefs regularly, causing the resident to wear soaked briefs. Pictures were provided showing resident in two briefs. Complaint also alleges that staff are double briefing and that staff do not clean resident thoroughly when changing their briefs. Complaint alleges that resident has behaviors resulting in a 30-day eviction, but complainant believes that the behaviors are the result of multiple urinary tract infections. Three of five staff interviewed indicated that they have observed, heard of, or have themselves double briefed residents in care with one staff admitting they double briefeCDSS inspection report, January 29, 2025 · control 21-AS-20240719150606
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator/Executive Director Camille Brown. The Department received an allegation of resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care. Per reporting party, resident (R1) had bilateral bruising on forearms possible injuries appeared to be inflicted by another. On 4/3/24 the staff was asked about it, but it apparently staff said they asked around and no one saw resident screamed out or anyone go near to them to injure R1. R1 was observed with a band-aid on their forearm so someone had to have seen the bruising. Based on records review, on 10/7/24 LPA was provided by an outside party with pictures supposedly taken on 4/2/24 of R1 with bruising noted in their arms along with an office visit note and e-Prescription dated 4/2/2024 where a physical exam was performed describing scrapes, bruises, and extreme itching with seveCDSS inspection report, January 7, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241002083624

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent an outbreak of scabies. Staff not prevent outbreak of covid.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. This investigation included three site visits to the facility; a review of pertinent documents; as well as statements taken from staff and witnesses. The following determinations are made: In December of 2023, facility had several cases of Covid; Facility management followed appropriate protocols and made reasonable attempts to keep Covid positive residents isolated; There exists differing opinions as to whether or not the facility had an outbreak of scabies in the Fall of last year; Ten resident files were selected on a random basis and reviewed for indications of scabies; Ten of ten files were negative for any indications of scabies diagnosis; several files indicated various skin issues or rashes but none were identified as scabies. Although the complaint allegations may be true or valid, based upon statements and reviewed documents, there is not a preponderance of evidenceCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240109100757
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing to meet residents care needs Staff do not have adequate training
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Camille Brown. Insufficient staffing to meet residents care needs – Complainant alleges due to lack of staffing, tasks such as laundry are not being completed as scheduled, leaving residents without clean clothing and unable to assist residents with activities of daily living (ADL)’s, toitleting & hygiene services. LPA’s record review & interview with administrator revealed facility has 6 med techs & 23 caregivers. LPA was informed one of the washing machines has had some operating issues and the facility is addressing repairs. Administrator informed LPA of alternative plan if there is a backlog of laundry to ensure it is completed timely. Interviews were conducted with (5) staff who were consistent in informing LPA residents’ rooms are cleaned tCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231024151946

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents' needs are not being met Facility is not handling resident's incontinence care needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Camille Brown & Lupe Villa-Guerrero, Director of Health Services. Residents' needs are not being met – Complainant alleges when resident (R1) moved into facility they forgot their toothbrush and toothpaste. Family realized this two weeks later and asked staff how they handle this situation, staff allegedly replied it is family’s responsibility to bring these items and if the resident didn’t have them, staff don’t brush their teeth. On 8/17/2023 LPA was informed by Director of Health Services Guadalupe Villa-Guerrero that residents are suppose to bring their own hygiene products but if they don’t, the facility has back up supplies and will provide to the residents and then inform the family of the need. LPA’s file review of care plan indicates R1 oCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230815133258
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hansen conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced on this day for the purpose of delivering findings of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Camille Brown. Resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff – Complainant alleges resident (R1) sustained a fractured shoulder due to staff not picking up bathroom rug and R1 tripped over it in the middle of the night. LPA’s interview with staff (S1) & S2 revealed S1 was conducting routine, two-hour rounds of facility residents at approximately 5 AM. This was S1’s second round of R1’s room in less than 2 hours. R1 usually has the lights on, although they were not so S1 turned them on when seeing R1 was walking back to the bed from using the bathroom. S1 greeted R1 and R1 began to turn around by the bed and lost footing and went down hitting their shoulder. S1 went to R1 and called S2 to come help and assess. Continue on LIC9099-C UCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231016084025
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not meet residents care needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Bertozzi arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Administrator, Camille Brown. During investigation, LPAs conducted interviews, reviewed documents and made observations. Facility did not meet residents care needs – Complaint alleges that resident’s care needs were not met including staff not observing that resident was exhibiting symptoms of a possible Urinary Tract Infection and failing to contact the resident’s doctor to request that resident be tested, not adding teeth brushing assistance to resident’s care plan resulting in resident not receiving assistance and ultimately having cavities, staff not following up on a rash resulting in responsible party having to contact the doctor and get a prescription to treat the rash and staff storing resident’s hearing aid batteries in medication room but not changing the batteries in resident’s hearing aids. Per staff interviews, resident was independent and oftenCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230503124650
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to meet residents incontinence care needs Facility staff are not providing basic laundry service in a timely manner Facility staff are not administering resident's medication as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Bertozzi arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations and met with Administrator, Camille Brown. During investigation, LPAs conducted interviews, reviewed documents and made observations. Facility failed to meet residents’ incontinence care needs – Complaint alleges that resident was observed mid-morning with fecal matter in their incontinence brief and bed as well as urine-soaked sheets. Additionally, resident was observed later in the day with a soiled incontinence brief. Staff interview indicated that resident was dry and had a bowel movement while being assisted by caregiver. Interview denied that resident was observed with feces on the bed and indicated that all residents are checked every two hours and assisted with incontinence care, if needed. Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230517151246

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 49 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
49
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 775-4330
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Muirwoods Memory Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.