Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
People's Care CharmianLicense #496803639 · Covelight Care
Covelight CarePeople's Care CharmianLicense #496803639 · 5087 Charmian Dr, Santa Rosa, CA · (707) 537-9795Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Sonoma County/Santa Rosa/People's Care Charmian
Map · 5087 Charmian Dr

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,450/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,750 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (707) 537-9795

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

PC

Call People's Care Charmian

Santa Rosa · Licensed for 4

(707) 537-9795

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 4 · Santa Rosa

People's Care Charmian

5087 Charmian Dr, Santa Rosa, CA 95409 · Licensed since 2016

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

People's Care Charmian

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,450 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,750 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 4: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 4 residents
  • Hospiceup to 1 resident

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 4 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1

910 - DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED (DD)

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for People's Care Charmian: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,450a month to start

Likely $4,500–$6,750

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,450likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,450likely $4,500–$6,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$6,900
$5,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,250–$10,050
$7,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,500 to $7,600

$4,500$7,600

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,950–$7,100.

  • Serenity Villa IISanta Rosa · 0.1 mi · Mid-size home
    $7,600Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Valley View Care HomeSanta Rosa · 0.6 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Rincon Valley Gardens ISanta Rosa · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Spring Creek LodgeSanta Rosa · 1.6 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marian Gardens Care Home - RCFESanta Rosa · 1.6 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Idaho Care HomeSanta Rosa · 1.6 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sleepy Hollow Assisted LivingSanta Rosa · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • H & M's the Rose GardenSanta Rosa · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Canterbury HomeSanta Rosa · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

5087 Charmian Dr, Santa Rosa, CA 95409Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Providence Santa Rosa Memorial HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.8 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #496803639 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 13 of 19 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20264 state visits · 5 documents

Sep 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit and was greeted by facility caregiver. Administrator (Admin) Guadalupe Garcia arrived later. On 7/29/26 CCL received an Incident Report indicating a medication error for resident (R1). Report indicates that on 7/26/26 Admin was contacted by facility staff requesting verification before administering a PRN medication for R1 due to not having a bowel movement within 12 hours. Admin reviewed the bowel movement tracker and verified the date and time of the last documented PRN dose. Per Incident Report, there was no bowel movement recorded for R1 that day. So, staff administered the PRN medication. However, approximately one (1) hour after the medication was administered, staff (S1) called facility to advise that they remembered that R1 did actually have a bowel movement, but they did not record it on the bowel movement tracker. Admin immediately contacted the on-call nurse to advise of the medication administration in error. On-call nurse advised that no adverse reactions would likely be caused by the PRN medication being administered. Later in the day on 7/26/26 R1 was seen at the Emergency Room due to blood being observed in their private buttock area. Admin advised hospital staff of PRN medication administration error. Per Incident report, Emergency Room physician confirmed that the PRN medication administration error had not caused any harm or adverse reactions. R1 was subsequently evaluated, treated, and discharged back to the facility. Staff monitored R1 for any changes. R1 had a follow-up appointment the subsequent week. Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... LPA reviewed discharge papers and telephone follow up doctor's notes for R1. Discharge papers indicate follow up appointment. LPA reviewed follow-up appointment summary from 7/31/26. No adverse reactions observed. Per Admin, S1 has been terminated due to the pattern and consistency of medication related errors and failure to follow established procedures. All staff received additional training on proper documentation and medication administration. Additionally, Admin advised LPA that additional coaching and corrective action will be provided as needed to reinforce expectations for timely documentation and communication practices. Additionally, LPA discussed two (2) recent Incident Reports submitted in August for R1 falling. LPA discussed with Admin reason for increased falls. LPA reviewed doctor's office visit notes which indicates R1's diagnosis as drug induced Parkinson's who presents with worsening tremor and functional decline. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 is being assessed today for repeat violations within a 12 month period (see LICF21) Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 17, 2026

Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465(a)(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on facility's submitted incident report indicating medication error for R1 which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility to submit copies of termination documentation of S1 by plan of correction due date. Additonally, facility conducted medication training following the medication error. Training records to be submitted to CCL by no later than plan of correction of due date.

Jul 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit and was greeted by facility caregiver. LPA met with Administrator (Admin) Guadalupe Garcia. On 6/5/26 CCL received an Incident Report indicating a medication error for resident (R1). Report indicates that on 5/30/26, at approximately 9:00pm Admin was notified that staff (S1) had signed for Nystatin powder that was not administered to R1. Upon facility investigation, it was determined that R1 missed one 5:00pm dose. Facility terminated S1 on 6/8/26 for falsifying documentation. On 6/16/26 CCL received an Incident Report indicating a medication error for resident (R2). Report indicates that on 6/15/26 Administrator was notified that staff (S2) had administered a dose of Claritin D that is prescribed to be given only once every 24 hours. S2 administered the second dose without verifying the time the previous dose had been administered. R2 was subsequently seen by their physician. Resident was monitored for adverse reactions. No adverse reactions observed. Facility has conducted medication training with staff with an emphasis on reviewing MARs, medication instructions, dosage requirements, and administration procedures. Additionally, Administrator will conduct periodic audits of medication records. S2 will be receiving final written today and a Counseling and Corrective Action (CCA). Admin showed LPA paperwork for corrective action. On 6/17/26 CCL received an Incident Report indicating a medication error for resident (R3). Report indicates that on 6/16/26 facility Administrator was notified by staff that staff (S3) administered two (2) medications prescribed for hypertension. However, R3's blood pressure was reading was outside the administration parameters specified on doctor's orders. Additionally, S3 did not report their error to the Administrator. Upon learning of the error, Administrator immediately contacted nurse consultant for guidance and requested a Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... doctor visit for R3. Resident was monitored for adverse reactions. No adverse reactions observed. R3 was seen by a doctor 7/13/26. Report indicates S3 will receive disciplinary action up to and including termination. Admin advised LPA that S3 is the staff member that verified the falsification records for R1. Due to these incidents, S3 was terminated on 7/6/26. LPA discussed with Administrator the seriousness of these medication errors and actions taken and/or in need of being taken to ensure residents do not experience medication errors. So many errors in such a short period of time indicate a need for a better structure for medication management. LPA and Administrator discussed the times and places at which medications are administered. Perhaps changing the structure of how and when medications are administered will help to eliminate any distractions or confusion for the staff doing the administering. Admin advised LPA that she has already analyzed the medication administration procedure and has begun implementing changes with staff. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 is being assessed today for repeat violations within a 12 month period (see LICF21) Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 17, 2026

Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465(a)(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on facility's submitted incident reports indicating medication errors for R1, R2, and R3 which pose an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility to send copies of disciplinary corrective actions. Facility to submit copies of disciplinary corrective action by plan of correction due date. Additonally, facility to submit written plan idenifying medication administration procedure and medication management program outlining how facility will ensure all residents receive prescribed and PRN medications according to doctor's orders. Copies of disiplinary action forms and written plan due to CCL by plan of correction due date.

May 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit and was greeted by facility designee. Administrator (Admin) Guadalupe Garcia was present. Admin certificate 7030880740 expires 5/4/27. On 5/4/26 CCL received an Incident Report indicating a medication error for resident (R1). Report indicates that on 5/1/26, at approximately 8:45pm R1 was administered one (1) tab of 1mg Benztropine instead of the prescribed two (2) tabs of 1mg Benztropine on 4/29/26 and 4/30/26 (deficiency cited, see 809D). R1 was monitored for adverse reaction and was observed to have no adverse reactions. All required partied were notified. Per Redwood Family Care Network District Manager (DM), Arneatha Simon, the error was observed when the medication bubble pack was reviewed on 5/1/26. Per DM, staff were trained on medication management on 5/4/26. LPA reviewed training records. Additionally, staff responsible for error are to receive disciplinary action, actions are pending corporate review and will be administered within 7 days. On 5/14/26 CCL received an Incident Report indicating a medication error for resident (R2). On 5/12/26, during a medication audit, it was discovered that R2 did not have a doctor's order on file for their Omeprazole 20mg, given twice daily (deficiency cited, see 809D). Per DM, it was determined that R2 arrived at the facility with the medication and a MAR was created for administration. There was record of a request for a formal order from the treating physician with no response. Rene Litzenberg, RN, requested the doctor order on 5/12/26, and DM sent a second request via the KP.org communication portal on 5/13/26. There was no response by the treating physician at the end of the business day. At approximately 7:00pm on 5/13/26 R2 was taken to Kaiser to determine if the medication needed to continue to be administered. R2 returned to the facility at approximately 10:30pm with a doctor order to administer Omeprazole 20mg twice daily. Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... Per DM, facility staff were not responsible for the error. Per DM, the facility Administrator is responsible for logging in medications and ensuring that doctors' orders on file. However, due to administrative actions, the facility was in the interim of hiring an administrator. As of 5/11/26 facility has hired an Administrator, Guadalupe Garcia. LPA discussed with Admin her understanding of medication requirements. LPA and Admin also discussed and went over regulations for medication, food, physician reports, emergency supplies, personnel documentation, and nutrition requirements. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 20, 2026

Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465(a)(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on facility's submitted incident report indicating medication error for R1, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility conducted staff training on 5/4/26 for medication management. Per DM, staff responsible for error will receive disciplinary corrective action, actions are pending corporate review and will be administered within 7 days. Facility to send copies of disciplinary corrective action by no later than 5/26/26. Facility to submit plan to submit copies of disciplinary corrective action by plan of correction due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: May 20, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file, and a label on the medication. Both the physician's order and the label shall contain at least all of the following information.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility Administrator has sole responsible for ensuring doctor's orders are on file. Facility was in the process of finding an Administrator. As of 5/11/26 an Administrator was hired. LPA discussed medication requirement with Admin. Deficiency cleared.

Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Victoria Bertozzi, and acting Regional Manger Kimberly Mota, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo met with licensee Redwood Family Care Network Representatives Arneatha Simon, District Manager (DM), and Kayava Lenoir Regional Director (RD) at the Santa Rosa CCL Regional Office. This Office Meeting is being conducted to discuss the Decision and Order signed on April 21, 2026. The Order states that the Administrator Certificate for Patrick Seawright’s will be revoked effective May 1, 2026. LPM and LPA discussed with DM and RD the need for an administrator to be present at facility and that the removal of Patrick Seawright will need to promptly be addressed as resident care must remain in compliance with Title 22 and Health and Safety Code (HSC). The facility does not currently have a replacement Administrator but the licensee is actively seeking a replacement. Licensee is now recruiting and conducting interviews for a replacement including seeking Administrator Certification for a current staff member. The current House Manger is enrolled in the Administrator Certification course and completion date is expected to be May 14, 2026. Licensee has also reached out to a temporary staffing agency. Licensee representative agrees to continue to update the regional office on their search and will ensure compliance with regulation 87405(a) which states: (a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. The licensee and the administrator may be one and the same person. The administrator shall have sufficient freedom from other responsibilities and shall be on the premises a Continued on 809C.... Continued from 809... sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility as specified in this section. When the administrator is not in the facility, there shall be coverage by a designated substitute who shall have qualifications adequate to be responsible and accountable for management and administration of the facility as specified in this section. The Department may require that the administrator devote additional hours in the facility to fulfill his/her responsibilities when the need for such additional hours is substantiated by written documentation. Exit interview conducted with licensee representatives and a copy of this report given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026
Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo conducted an office meeting with People’s Care licensee representative Kayava Lenoir, regarding the removal of Administrator Patrick Seawright as Administrator of the facility. Also during office meeting, LPA discussed most recent incident report submitted to CCL on 4/13/26. On 4/13/26 CCL received an Incident Report for facility indicating a medication error for resident (R1). Reports states that on 4/9/26 R1 was not given their evening dose of Lisinopril 5mg (deficiency cited, see 809D). Report indicates that R1’s primary care physician was notified. Report indicates that R1 was monitored by staff for adverse reactions and behaviors; none were observed. Report indicates that staff responsible for error will be disciplined accordingly and training will occur. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with licensee representative. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 30, 2026

Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465(a)(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on facility's submitted incident report reporting medication error, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility to submit plan to conduct medication management training for all staff administering medication by plan of correction due date. Training to be completed for a duration of at least 1 hour and completed no later than 5/14/26. Staff disciplinary records to be submitted to CCL by 5/7/26.

20252 state visits · 3 documents

Oct 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a required Annual inspection and was greeted by Patrick Seawright, Administrator. Administrator certificate number 7011807740 expires 5/25/26. Facility currently has two (2) residents in care none of which are currently on hospice. At approximately 10:30am LPA toured the building and grounds. The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature. LPA observed at least a 2 day supply of perishable and 7 day supply of non-perishable food. Food was found to be stored in a safe manner with open items covered and labeled with opened dates present. Cleaning products and laundry soaps are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. All bedrooms were equipped with lighting, night stand, and chest of drawers. All bedrooms were clean and in good repair. Extra hygiene products and linens were available. Resident bathrooms had required bath mats and grab bars. Water temperature in sinks measured at 118.3 degrees F in the kitchen and 117.4 in the bathroom used by residents, both of which are within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F. Fire extinguishers were last inspected 12/16/24. Smoke/Carbon Monoxide detectors located throughout the facility were tested and operational. Facility’s last quarterly disaster drill was conducted on 09/1/25. Facility has a backup generator for use during a power outage. At approximately 10:45pm LPA and Admin reviewed cash resources. No deficiencies cited. Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... At approximately 11:00pm LPA conducted a review of two (2) out of two (2) resident files and five (5) of six (6) staff records. Files complete. At approximately 12:00pm LPA and Licensee conducted a spot check of medication and medication records. Medication is centrally stored in a locked cabinet.. LPA and Admin discussed Infection Control Plan. LPA and Admin discussed Emergency Disaster Plan. No changes to either plan. No deficiencies cited during this inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 3/12/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo met with Administrator Patrick Seawright for a Case Management Regional Office meeting to follow up on substantiated complaint allegations; complaint number 21-AS-20240214082730. On May 16, 2024, the Department concluded an investigation which alleged that a staff did not seek medical attention for a resident (R1) in a timely manner, and due to staff neglect, R1 sustained a blister on their leg. The licensee was cited for violating California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, § 87411(a) Personnel Requirements due to staff severe neglect as resident sustained a blister on their leg when staff put a heating pad on their leg. Additional citation was issued under California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, § 87466 Observation of the Resident, Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner when change of condition was observed. At the time of the complaint visit on May 16, 2024, an immediate civil penalty of $500.00 was issued and the licensee was informed that an additional civil penalty might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code §1569.49. The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that a civil penalty is warranted for serious bodily injury. Per Welfare and Institutions Code §15610.67 defines serious bodily injury as "an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation." This is evidenced by the facility staff putting a heating Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... pad on R1, causing a blister, later to be identified as a 2nd degree burn, failing to seek timely medical care once blister was observed and then continuing to not seek timely medical care until after it had burst. Today, 3/12/25 the Department is issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1569.49 for a violation that the Department constitutes as serious bodily injury in the amount of $10,000. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500 was previously issued on May 16, 2024, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $9,500. A copy of the LIC 421D was given to Administrator Patrick Seawright and originals were signed. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report issued. Appeal rights provided. Administrator Patrick Seawright's signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page two of LIC 421D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit and was greeted by facility administrator, Patrick Seawright. Administrator could not be present for entire LPA visit. LPA conducted exit interview with and gave appeal rights and copy of report to caregiver. On 9/17/24 CCL received an incident report from the facility regarding a medication error. Reports states that on 9/17/24, due to staff error, resident (R1) did not receive their dose of Amuity Ellipta 200mcg. R1 did not receive the medication due it being empty, a refill was not ordered in time. Reports indicates that R1 was monitored throughout the day for any adverse effects. No signs or symptoms of adverse effects observed. Per Admin, facility put in place ordering procedures to mitigate errors in refilling of medications. As of today, 3/12/25 CCL has not received any further incident reports for medication errors from the facility. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with caregiver. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. On 1/13/25 CCL received a SOC341 from the facility self-reporting a case of abuse toward a resident by a staff member. Facility Admin, Patrick Seawright submitted the SOC341 report. Report indicates that on 1/6/25 staff (S1) observed staff (S2) push resident’s (R2) wheelchair on to R2’s knees in an attempt to get them to get into their wheelchair. On 1/6/25 S1 reported this incident to a new hire orientation trainer. The new hire orientation trainer sent an email to People’s Care QA auditor. On 1/8/25 S1 then reported the incident to facility Admin. Facility Admin then immediately went over to R2 to check the status of their legs Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... and observed no marks or bruising. On 1/12/25 facility Admin contacted S2 and placed them on Administrative leave. As of today, 3/12/25 S2 is back on active duty at the facility. Starting on 1/8/25 People’s Care Quality Assurance auditor (QA) began an investigation into the incident. Investigation lasted approximately one week and took another 2 weeks to report their findings. Admin advised LPA they did not receive any written statements from the staff. LPA asked Admin for the findings of the investigation. Admin advised they can produce the findings for CCL by 3/31/25 as they must ask the investigator for a copy of the findings. Per Admin, due to inconsistent details of the incident being reported to the QA investigator over the course of the investigation, S2 has returned work. Facility Admin reports R2 has not had any adverse behaviors observed resulting from the incident. No deficiencies cited for this SOC341 incident. Exit interview conducted with caregiver and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 13, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465(a)(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on facility's submitted incident report reporting medication error, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025

Plan of correction: Facility put in place ordering procedures to mitigate errors in refilling of medications. Facility to submit plan to CCL by plan of correction due date.

20244 state visits · 4 documents

Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a required Annual inspection and was greeted by caregiver. Administrator Patrick Seawright arrived later. At approximately 9:30am LPA toured the building and grounds. The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature. LPA observed at least a 2 day supply of perishable and 7 day supply of non-perishable food. Food was found to be stored in a safe manner with open items covered. Kitchen cabinet containing cleaning supplies was locked. Kitchen drawer with sharp knives locked. All bedrooms were equipped with lighting, night stand, and chest of drawers. All bedrooms were clean and in good repair. Extra hygiene products and linens were available. Resident bathroom had required bath mat and grab bar. Water temperature in sink accessible to residents in care measured at 110.3 degrees F in the kitchen and 114.8 degrees F in the back bathroom which are within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F. LPA and Admin discussed adding either non-skid mat or strips to showers as required per regulation. Fire extinguishers were last inspected 11/27/2023, but are showing as charged. LPA and Admin discussed ensuring fire extinguishers are serviced annually. Smoke/Carbon Monoxide detectors located throughout the facility were tested and operational. Facility’s last quarterly disaster drills were conducted 11/30/24. Facility has a backup generator for use during a power outage. At approximately 10:00am LPA conducted review of 5 staff records. All required documentation present. At approximately 10:30am LPA and Admin conducted a spot check of medication and medication records. Medication is centrally stored in a locked cabinet. No deficiencies Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... At approximately 11:00am LPA conducted a review of 3 resident records. All required documentation present. Patrick Seawright Administrator Certificate 7011807740 expires 5/25/26. LPA and Administrator discussed facility's Infection Control Plan and Emergency Disaster plan. No new updates. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: LIC500- Personnel Report LIC308- Designation of Responsibility Liability Insurance Exit interview conducted with caregiver, Administrator had to leave. Caregiver given permission to sign. A copy of this report was given. No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Aug 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's needs are not being met Personal Rights Facility staff do not have required First Aid and/or CPR certification Facility does not provide activites Facility is not following doctor's orders

At approximately 3:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Patrick Seawright, Administrator. Complaint alleges resident's needs are not being met. RP states that resident is being fed according to another resident’s care plan. During investigation LPA reviewed facility’s meal plan for resident and physician’s report. Per the resident’s physician report, no special diet is required. Per the resident’s Individual Service Plan (ISP) they are to have a mechanical soft diet. Facility has a detailed Daily Routine Cheat Sheet for the resident which outlines very specific foods and mealtime instructions for staff as well as also identifying their care needs that should be attended to each day. LPA finds that daily routine cheat sheet is comprehensive. Facility provided meal meus that are comprehensive and include a wide variety of foods and snacks. Continued on 9099C... Unsubstantiated continued from 9099... During LPA investigative visit, as well as previous visits, LPA observed staff preparing resident’s meal according to resident’s specific dietary needs as outlined in their ISP. Additionally, complaint alleges resident’s legs not being elevated per their care plan because their hospital bed was broken. Investigation revealed that bed’s foot raising feature was broken for approximately one week. However, the primary way by which resident’s legs were elevated is by use of wedges and pillows. The bed being broken did not prohibit resident’s legs from being elevated as the foot raising feature was used as a supplemental aid to help raise and elevate the legs; it was not the main source of elevation. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Complaint alleges Personal Rights. RP states that resident postural support chair (recliner) was not implemented timely by facility which resulted in resident not being able to be in common areas of facility. During investigation, LPA reviewed doctor’s orders and there is no mention of a postural support chair being needed. Resident’s wound care doctor noted that the legs being elevated would be good but did not specify the method by which the legs should be elevated. Investigation revealed that request was made by resident’s POA for a postural support chair in beginning in March. Per LPA interviews, POA wanted the recliner placed in a certain area of the home, in order to accommodate the request, facility needed to stabilize the base of the recliner and made the request to do so with a handyman. On April 18, 2024 facility added the use of a recliner to resident’s care plan. On April 30, 2024 LPA received a request inquiry from facility in regards to the use of a recliner for resident as a postural support chair. LPA and facility discussed maintaining compliance with regulations as pertains to implementing the recliner as part of resident’s care plan. On May 7, 2024 LPA gave the okay for use of the recliner. Per LPA investigation facility addressed recliner request and made the required notifications and requests to licensing within a span of 60 days. The absence of the recliner chair cannot confirm that resident that resident was isolated due to lack of chair. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Continued on 9099C(2)... Continued from 9099C(2)... Complaint alleges Facility staff do not have required First Aid and/or CPR certification. During investigation LPA observed one staff member to not have 1st Aid/CPR training. However, this staff was just recently hired and only ever was scheduled to work with another staff member present at all times. All other staff have current 1st Aid/CPR. Per Health and Safety Code 1569.618(c)(3), the facility shall employ at least one staff member who has cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and first aid training is on duty and on the premises at all times. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Complaint alleges Facility does not provide activities. During investigation LPA observed residents participating in activities. During LPA annual inspection in 2023 and all subsequent visits to the facility in 2024, each time LPA was present at the facility, LPA has observed residents participating in activities. Facility has a readily visible large assortment of games, puzzles, and a wide and varying amount of art supplies available, all of which are stored in front living room. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Complaint alleges Facility is not following doctor's orders. During investigation LPA reviewed doctor’s care notes for resident. Per LPA review of resident’s Individual Service Plan (ISP), current list of doctor’s orders, care notes, and doctor visit summary, facility is following doctor’s orders. Resident’s Daily Routine Cheat Sheet is in line with doctor’s orders, physician’s report, and ISP. Doctor notes wound care is adequate as wound is almost completely healed. Facility In-Service training records show staff training on resident’s specialized equipment and for resident’s wound care. Complainant indicates resident losing weight due to possible neglect. Investigative review of doctor visit summary indicates despite adequate caloric intake, resident is still losing weight. Doctor has referred resident to specialty department for further testing. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240618094648
May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportOfficeDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Office

Licensing Program Manager Victoria Bertozzi and Licensing Program Analyst Christi Coppo conducted an informal office meeting, and met with Administrator, Patrick Seawright and John O'Brien District Manager (DM) for licensee and Michelle Mainez COO of licensee. Informal meeting to address concerns identified by the Department during a recent Complaint Investigation. DM indicated they had lots of meetings about this incident and agree that the course of action taken by Admin was not appropriate and they have addressed it with Admin. Going forward, the staff have all been retrained about communicating about residents' care needs in order to prevent residents from experiencing pain unaddressed. Admin wants it noted that there was not any malice or purposeful neglect to not get the medical attention for R1. The complaint investigation revealed that a client was observed on with a “heat blister” on 2/12/2024 by facility staff. Staff documented the blister on the facility’s internal system and per interviews, Administrator was notified of the blister the same day. The Administrator did not seek medical treatment via the emergency room despite client presenting with a raised blister. Staff noted that on the NOC shift the client was “whining” during repositioning. On 2/13/2024, staff noted that they observed the blister had grown bigger, was red, and filled with liquid. Interviews conducted during investigation revealed that the blister ruptured on 2/14/2024. Administrator did not seek medical treatment via the emergency room when blister ruptured. LPM Bertozzi spoke with Administrator on 2/15/2024 around 2:00pm. Administrator told LPM that they had emailed the client’s doctor between 9:00am and 11:00am but was unsure if the doctor had responded. CCL staff advised the Administrator to seek emergency medical treatment for the client, but Administrator indicated that they were going to wait for the doctor to respond. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 LPM directed Administrator to call the doctor and notify the office staff to assist in expedited guidance from the doctor. Eventually, the client’s doctor directed the Administrator to seek emergency medical treatment, which they did on 2/15/2024 at approximately 4:54pm. LPM spoke directly with Administrator regarding a perceived refusal on the part of the Administrator to seek medical attention for the client. Administrator disagreed that they refused and indicated that they were unsure how to proceed as the injury was not something that they have previously encountered. Parties discussed the changes that facility has made to their protocols to ensure residents' needs are met timely as well as the interaction between the Administrator and CCL staff. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Administrator. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(d)(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2024

87405(d)(a) - (d)The administrator shall have the qualifications specified... (1) Knowledge of the requirements for providing care and supervision appropriate to the residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on CCL complaint inspection, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that facility Administrator did not seek timely medical attention for resident R1, which posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024

Plan of correction: Admin to self-certify on LIC9098 that they have read regulation 87405 and licensee to submit updated protocol procedures including appropriate responses to types of injuries and the related medical response necessary by plan of correction due date.

May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to staff severe neglect resident sustained a blister on their leg Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner

At approximately 9:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Patrick Seawright, Administrator. Due to staff severe neglect, resident sustained a blister on their leg – Complaint alleges that heating pads were brought to the facility by resident’s (R1’s) family member in mid to late January of 2024, and family member instructed staff to use them on R1 at night. On 2/12/2024, staff discovered that R1 had received a severe heat blister from the pads. Per CCL interview, resident’s family denied telling any staff to use the pads, stating that they explained how they (the family member) used the pads when the staff inquired. Identified staff denied inquiring about the pads and stated they did not use the pads on R1. Another staff indicated that they did use the pads after being instructed to use them by another staff, however, that staff, who provided instructions also denied using the pads. R1 was seen at the Hospital on 2/15/2024 where they were diagnosed with a second-degree burn. Continued on 9099C... Substantiated Continued from 9099... Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner – Based on CCL Investigation, R1 was not treated for their burn until four days after it was first discovered by staff and only after the heat blister ruptured. R1’s blister was discovered on 2/12/2024, the incident causing the injury occurred on the PM shift on 2/11/2024, the heat blister ruptured on 2/14/2024, and R1 was first taken to the hospital on 2/15/2024. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Administrator. Failure to correct the deficiencies and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. **An immediate Civil Penalty in the total amount of $500 has been issued for a violation that resulted in the sickness or injury of a resident in care (See LIC-421IM) An additional civil penalty may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), 1568.0822(e) or (f).** Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240214082730

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 17, 2024

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs… This requirement was not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on investigation, interviews, photographic evidence, and observation of R1, due to staff severe neglect, resident sustained a blister on their leg, which posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility to submit detailed and specific plan to CCL indicating the steps that will be taken to assess and how they will address the care needs of residents, medical and otherwise, and how they will properly monitor residents to ensure proper and appropriate care is provided. **An immediate Civil Penalty in the total amount of $500 has been issued for a violation that resulted in the sickness or injury of a resident in care (See LIC-421IM)

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: May 17, 2024

87466 Observation of the Resident The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs… This requirement was not met by licensee as evidenced by: Based on CCL Investigation, R1 was not treated for their burn until four days after it was first discovered by staff and only after the heat blister ruptured.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility to submit plan to CCL on how they will ensure all residents receive timely care, medical or otherwise, attention to their care needs, and that appropriate assistance and attention is provided at all times.

20231 state visit · 1 document

Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a required Annual inspection and was greeted by Patrick Seawright, Administrator. Facility currently has three (3) residents in care. Facility contact information was reviewed. Patrick Seawright Administrator Certificate 6039802740 expires 5/25/2024. At approximately 9:30am LPA and Administrator toured the building and grounds. The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature. LPA observed at least a 2 day supply of perishable and 7 day supply of non-perishable food. Food was found to be stored in a safe manner with open items covered and labeled. Kitchen drawer containing sharp knives was locked. All bedrooms were equipped with lighting, night stand, and chest of drawers. All bedrooms were clean and in good repair. Extra hygiene products and linens were available. Resident bathrooms had required bath mats but did not have non-skid backing. Per Title 22 regulation 87303(e)(5), Non-skid mats or strips shall be used in all bathtubs and showers, see Technical Violation. Water temperature in sink(s) accessible to residents in care measured at 106.7 and 107.5 degrees F, respectively, which is within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F. Fire extinguishers were last inspected November 2023. Smoke/Carbon Monoxide detectors located throughout the facility were tested. Facility’s last quarterly disaster drill was conducted on December 14, 2023. Facility has a backup generator for use during a power outage. Fireplace in dining room not screened. Per Title 22 regulation 87307(d)(7) Fireplaces and open-faced heaters shall be adequately screened, see Technical Violation. Report continued on LIC 809C... Continued from 809... At approximately 11:00am LPA and Administrator conducted a review of 3 out of 3 resident records and 5 of 5 staff records. All required documents present. At approximately 1:00pm LPA and Administrator conducted a spot check of medication and medication records. Medication is centrally stored in a locked cabinet in the living room. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: LIC500- Personnel Report LIC308- Designation of Responsibility Evidence of Liability Insurance Copy of current lease Surety Bond Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 6 documents

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct an Annual Required inspection and met with staff Danah Fischer. Administrator Patrick Seawright was not able to come to the facility, but was available by phone ang gave authorization for staff to sign the report. The inspection is based on Infection Control practices of this facility. Upon arrival, LPA was screened by staff for Covid-19 which included a temperature check and signing in. LPA confirmed that facility is no longer requiring vaccination verification per recent guidance. LPA initiated a walk-through of the facility and observed the following: Facility has COVID-19 posters throughout that include hand washing signs in bathrooms. Facility was a comfortable temperature and exits were free from obstructions. Hand sanitizer is located throughout common areas of the facility. Staff had masks on during this visit. Commonly touched surfaces are disinfected at least once per day. Facility does perform daily screening of staff and residents and documents it in a binder. Facility has a designated visitation area outside and is allowing for visitation in resident rooms per CCL guidance. Staff continue to receive training on infection control and donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment PPE and have been N95 fit tested. Facility has submitted and CCL has reviewed their Covid Mitigation Plan. Facility has more than a 30 day supply of PPE including but not limited to masks, gowns, and hand sanitizer. Facility maintains a 30 day supply of medication. At approximate 2:30pm LPA/staff observed one out of one fire extinguisher was last serviced February 2021. Smoke Detectors and Carbon Monoxide detector were tested and operational. Last disaster drill was conducted on November, 2022. Administrator will submit updates of the following documents by 11/28/22: LIC 308 Designated Administrator, LIC 500 Personnel Summary, LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan, LIC400 affidavit regarding client cash resources and surety bond. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2022
Oct 6, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management Inspection and met with Administrator Patrick Seawright. During today's visit LPA is following up on an incident report received at CCL on 9/9/22 involving resident (R1). Per incident report, on 9/8/22 it was discovered by staff that on 9/8/22 staff (S1) administered to resident (R1) an additional dose of Lamotrigine 25mg. S1 should have administered Lamortrigine 100mg one tablet by mouth instead of Lamortrigine 25mg one tablet by mouth in addition to Lamotrigine 100mg one tablet by mouth resulting in R1 received incorrect dosage. Upon the discovery about the incorrect dosage that was provided to resident. R1 was monitored for any adverse reaction or change in condition observed. Responsible parties including their Physician, NBRC and CCL were notified. S1 was placed on Administrative Leave pending an internal investigation by People's Care in accordance to their policy and procedures. During today’s visit LPA was provided with the Medication Assessment Record (MAR) for the month of September 2022 for C1 that reflects the said medication error. Per Administrator, S1 was aware of the medication changes but apparently got confused when was the start date after been told to start "next week" and did not make an attempt to contact Administrator for guidance. S1 was officially separated from the facility effective 10/5/22. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 1 and the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Civil penalties are issued today in the amount of $250 per repeated violation within 12 months. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator and appeal rights were emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 7, 2022

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (c)...(2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement had not been met as evidence by: Based on records review of facility self-incident report dated 9/9/22 and interviews conducted with Administrator, the facility staff (S1) on 9/8/22 incorrectly assisted resident (R1) and given an extra dosage of medication Lamotrigine 25mg which poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of the clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator to ensure all residents receive their medication as prescribed by their physician. Administrator terminated staff (S1) effective 10/5/22. Administrator agreed to submit LIC9098 that the staff understand the regulation. ***Civil penalties are issued today in the amount of $250 per repeated violation within 12 months.

Jul 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management Inspection and met with Licensee Patrick Seawright. LPA arrived at the facility and had her temperature checked and was logged into a sign-in sheet. During today's visit LPA is following up on an incident report received at CCL on 6/6/22 involving resident (R1). Per incident report, on 6/3/22 at around 5:00pm it was discovered by staff that on 6/2/22 staff (S1) administered to resident (R1) an additional dose of Lamotrigine 25mg. S1 should have administered Lamortrigine 25mg two tablets by mouth instead of three tablets by mouth. Upon the discovery about the incorrect dosage that was provided to resident. R1 was monitored for any adverse reaction or change in condition observed. Responsible parties including their Physician, NBRC and CCL were notified. As a preventive plan, the Administrator will discipline S1 according to facility policy and procedure regarding medication error and S1 will be retrained on the Medication Administration Policy and Procedure then will demonstrate the appropriate skill and knowledge to the Administrator prior to being allowed to administer medications to residents in care. During today’s visit LPA was provided with facility training records for S1 dated 6/6/22 between 1:00pm to 2:00pm. Training subjects include medication management, medication storage requirements and check, medication 15min check, medication errors and reporting, medication competency test and medication certification practicum checklist to remind staff to follow physician’s directions and assist clients with their medications as prescribed. Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 8, 2022

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (c)...(2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement had not been met as evidence by: Based on records review of facility self-incident report dated 6/4/22 and interviews conducted with Administrator, the facility staff (S1) on 6/2/22 incorrectly assisted resident (R1) and given an extra dosage of prescribed medication Lamotrigine 25mg which poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of the clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator/Licensee to ensure all residents receive their medication as prescribed by their physician. Administrator to submit a plan of how they will ensure medication is properly given and logged in the future to be in compliance with regulation by POC due date.

Feb 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Gonzalez Campos arrived unannounced on 02/17/2022 to follow up on an incident received by community care licensing on 01/21/2022. LPA met with Rene Litzenberg Incident report indicated staff had failed to administer one dose of medication to client. Client was monitored for changes of condition upon discovery. No adverse reactions were noted. Facility planned to conduct medication training for staff involved. LPA reviewed facility policy on medication administration and medication errors/reporting which were signed by staff. LPA also reviewed medication checklist which administrator uses to verify staff are following proper procedure. Training materials reviewed by staff were signed on 01/26/2022. No deficiencies cited during this inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report will be emailed to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 17, 2022

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Nov 5, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Gonzalez Campos arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year Inspection at approximately 1:20 PM, and met with administrator Patrick Seawright. The inspection was focused on the Infection Control procedures and practices of this facility. Upon entry administrator screened LPA for COVID symptoms and asked LPA to sign-in on visitor sheet. At primary entrance LPA observed visitor logs and COVID screening sheets. LPA conducted walk through of the facility with administrator. Facility was a comfortable temperature and exits were free from obstructions. Mitigation plan has been submitted and reviewed by Community Care Licensing (CCL). Hand sanitizer is kept throughout the facility. Staff have completed Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)/infection control training. Administrator indicated they have received training to N95 fit test staff. High touch surface areas are disinfected daily. Facility has private bedrooms therefore clients could isolate if necessary in their own bedrooms. Facility has necessary PPE and supplies to support a resident in isolation. All staff and clients are vaccinated. Facility tests one staff a week on rotating basis. There are a total of four staff. Clients' emergency contact information has been updated and staff confirmed they are familiar with 911 procedures and protocols. Toxins are secured and inaccessible in locked laundry room cabinet and in a closet located in the bathroom. Medications are centrally stored in a locked cabinet making them inaccessible to residents. LPA requested updated copies of the following documents: LIC 308, LIC 400, LIC 500, LIC 9020, Emergency Disaster Plan, Liability Insurance, and Administrator Certificate No deficiencies observed during today's inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021
Jul 15, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually abused by staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi conducted an unannounced complaint investigation for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA met Direct Support Personnel (DSP), Danah Ficher, and was granted access into the facility. LPA Sarangi initiated an investigation beginning on June 24, 2021 at approximately 03:29 PM. During the course of the investigation, LPA Sarangi interviewed staff, residents and various outside parties and agencies, including but not limited to responsible parties and witnesses. LPA reviewed client records and obtained a Santa Rosa Police Department Police Report. Complaint alleges that clients (C1) Personal Rights were violated; LPA learned during the course of the investigation that C1 disclosed to his Primary Care Physician (PCP) that his Personal Rights were being violated. An Adult/Elder Abuse Report after the visit with R1s PCP was generated. Report continued on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Upon arrival back to the facility, Administrator was contacted in-person by a Law Enforcement officer utilizing proper identification. An investigation was conducted and based off statements made, and information that was received, the officer determined that the allegation made was false and inconsistent statements were provided by the R1 to the Law Enforcement officer. LPA interviewed C1, C2, C3 and C4. During the confidential interview with C1, there was inconsistent statements made to LPA. In addition, C1 disclosed to the LPA that he didn’t like the previous Caregiver that was provided by the Regional Center. During this interview, LPA observed a new 1 on 1 Caregiver. LPA interviewed C2, C3 and C4 who reported no concerns at this time and observed to be content in placement. Based on interviews with staff and outside parties/agencies LPA learned that although 1 interviewee reported no concerns with the client and that client presents quietly. C1 is reported to have behavioral challenges. C1 has a history of previous known behaviors. Based on the interviews that were conducted and the evidence reviewed, the allegation staff violating Personal Rights will be Unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was signed by Direct Support Personnel (DSP), Danah Ficher, and emailed to the Facility Administrator, Patrick Seawright.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2021 · control 21-AS-20210624105326

4 of 4 beds were occupied at the July 15, 2021 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

People's Care Northern California LLC, licensed since 2016.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2016, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
19
Total complaints
3
Substantiated allegations
2
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2016, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations20
Total complaints30

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about People's Care Charmian

Is People's Care Charmian licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is People's Care Charmian licensed for?

4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has People's Care Charmian been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 19 state visits over the same years.

Is People's Care Charmian still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does People's Care Charmian cost?

$5,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,500–$6,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 23 other homes of a similar licensed size in Santa Rosa that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,125 to $7,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,550 (n = 23 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does People's Care Charmian take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by People's Care Northern California LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital is 2.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can People's Care Charmian keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

People's Care Charmian license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PEOPLE'S CARE CHARMIAN”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #496803639. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to People's Care Northern California LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 19 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 19 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Sonoma County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.1 mi

    Serenity Villa II

    Mid-size home · licensed for 15

    Starting rate

    $7,600 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.4 mi

    Serenity Board and Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.6 mi

    Valley View Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.3 mi

    Serene Vista Board and Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.5 mi

    Yerba Buena Residential Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,450

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.6 mi

    Granada Manor

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Sonoma County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
PC

Call People's Care Charmian

Santa Rosa · Licensed for 4

(707) 537-9795

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask People's Care Charmian

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages