Serenity Villa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California — state license #496803610, licensed for 30 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 2, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Serenity Villa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 30 residents · Sebastopol, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496803610, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
477 Petaluma Avenue · Sebastopol, Sonoma County
Phone
(415) 609-3827
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 30 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 9 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 30 NON-AMBULATORY IN WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 9.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 2, 2025.

Most recent state visit
December 2, 2025
Occupancy at the March 4, 2025 visit
16 of 25 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 28, 2023 to March 4, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Lack of supervision.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cuadra and Contreras arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Maritza Pray (Back up Administrator). The Department received an allegation of lack of supervision. Per Reporting party on 12/13/24 resident (R1) fell out of bed during the night and were left there for hours until shift change came in the morning for assistance. R1 was observed with a visible bruising on left arm. On 12/2/24 resident (R2) waited for long time for assistance (no specific time was provided) R2 was observed with bruising on upper left head and wrist. Based on interviews conducted with staff (S1, S2, S3 & S4), they indicated that there are residents including R1 and R2 who usually do not sleep during the night and their protocol includes keeping an eye on them, offer them food or walk with them. The Department received a self-report notifying that R1 fell out of their bed and was transported to the hospital for further evaluation and dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241209155517
Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility is not following resident's special diet.

Licensing Program Analyst Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Licensee German Sinitsyn. The Department received an allegation of facility is not following resident’s special diet. Per Reporting party, staff report to Licensee that an unknown resident had a recent modification of diet texture (puree) due to potential choking incident, which was then disregarded by the licensee, who permitted staff to provide the resident with a food outside of their diet texture recommendation/order. In addition, there has been a lack of follow-through with diet texture recommendations and education to staff regarding safe and unsafe foods for resident (R1) and another resident (name unknown) where staff have expressed that they "use their best judgement", thereover putting the residents at risk of aspiration, choking, and/or death by not supervising residents during their mealtimes. Continued on LIC9099C... Unthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241015114030
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility did not seek timely medical attention. -Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced at the facility and met with staff Erica Campos to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation above. Licensee Aida Reznik was not able to come to the facility, but was available by phone and gave authorization for staff to sign the report. There was an allegation of facility did not seek timely medical attention. Per Reporting Party, resident’s (R1) sock with blood was observed by a witness, it was surprising that facility staff who assisted resident with daily activities did not discover the sore of considerable size and depth on their right foot sock. During this investigation, The Department investigator conducted interviews with staff and other witnesses, reviewed records associated to the involved R1. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the investigation revealed that on 7/29/23, the pressure ulcer on R1’s right heel was noticed by a witness. According to home health records, R1 received skilled nuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230905113442
Oct 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility is not ensuring safety of residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced at the facility and met with staff Erica Campos to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation above. Licensee Aida Reznik was not able to come to the facility, but was available by phone and gave authorization for staff to sign the report. Complaint received on 9/22/2023 alleged that Facility is not ensuring safety of residents in care. Per Reporting Party, the front door to the residence was observed ajar without any alarm sound. The front door leads down five steep steps to the sidewalk and is adjacent to a busy street. Although most of the residents are non-ambulatory, a few can self-propel throughout the building with walkers and wheelchairs, and this poses a significant threat to safety. Upon inquiry to facility staff, apparently, they were not aware of the significant safety issue nearby. The licensee informed LPA that the front entrance door is challenging at times, it expands during the rainy season and shrinksthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230922100208
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file13typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253302024220202333220222202021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (415) 609-3827

Is Serenity Villa licensed?

Yes — Serenity Villa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sebastopol (Sonoma County): California license #496803610, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 30 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 2, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Serenity Villa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Serenity Villa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 30 NON-AMBULATORY IN WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 9.

How much does Serenity Villa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Serenity Villa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Serenity Villa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Serenity Villa through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sonoma County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

16 of 25 beds occupied (64%) when the state visited on March 4, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Serenity Villa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Serenity Villa; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 4, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Lack of supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cuadra and Contreras arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Maritza Pray (Back up Administrator). The Department received an allegation of lack of supervision. Per Reporting party on 12/13/24 resident (R1) fell out of bed during the night and were left there for hours until shift change came in the morning for assistance. R1 was observed with a visible bruising on left arm. On 12/2/24 resident (R2) waited for long time for assistance (no specific time was provided) R2 was observed with bruising on upper left head and wrist. Based on interviews conducted with staff (S1, S2, S3 & S4), they indicated that there are residents including R1 and R2 who usually do not sleep during the night and their protocol includes keeping an eye on them, offer them food or walk with them. The Department received a self-report notifying that R1 fell out of their bed and was transported to the hospital for further evaluation and dCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241209155517

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility is not following resident's special diet.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Licensee German Sinitsyn. The Department received an allegation of facility is not following resident’s special diet. Per Reporting party, staff report to Licensee that an unknown resident had a recent modification of diet texture (puree) due to potential choking incident, which was then disregarded by the licensee, who permitted staff to provide the resident with a food outside of their diet texture recommendation/order. In addition, there has been a lack of follow-through with diet texture recommendations and education to staff regarding safe and unsafe foods for resident (R1) and another resident (name unknown) where staff have expressed that they "use their best judgement", thereover putting the residents at risk of aspiration, choking, and/or death by not supervising residents during their mealtimes. Continued on LIC9099C... UnCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241015114030

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility did not seek timely medical attention. -Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced at the facility and met with staff Erica Campos to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation above. Licensee Aida Reznik was not able to come to the facility, but was available by phone and gave authorization for staff to sign the report. There was an allegation of facility did not seek timely medical attention. Per Reporting Party, resident’s (R1) sock with blood was observed by a witness, it was surprising that facility staff who assisted resident with daily activities did not discover the sore of considerable size and depth on their right foot sock. During this investigation, The Department investigator conducted interviews with staff and other witnesses, reviewed records associated to the involved R1. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the investigation revealed that on 7/29/23, the pressure ulcer on R1’s right heel was noticed by a witness. According to home health records, R1 received skilled nuCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230905113442
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility is not ensuring safety of residents in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced at the facility and met with staff Erica Campos to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation above. Licensee Aida Reznik was not able to come to the facility, but was available by phone and gave authorization for staff to sign the report. Complaint received on 9/22/2023 alleged that Facility is not ensuring safety of residents in care. Per Reporting Party, the front door to the residence was observed ajar without any alarm sound. The front door leads down five steep steps to the sidewalk and is adjacent to a busy street. Although most of the residents are non-ambulatory, a few can self-propel throughout the building with walkers and wheelchairs, and this poses a significant threat to safety. Upon inquiry to facility staff, apparently, they were not aware of the significant safety issue nearby. The licensee informed LPA that the front entrance door is challenging at times, it expands during the rainy season and shrinksCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230922100208
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident medication Staff did not adequately store medications Staff not adequately trained to meet the needs of resident in care Staff did not provide records to resident's authorized person
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to the facility met with Maritza Pray, Administrator to deliver findings regarding the complaint allegation above. Regarding allegation of Staff mismanaged resident medication. Reporting Party reported that the R1 was prescribed on 1/30/23 a long acting pill twice a day for pain and would continue to have morphine as needed. However, on 2/1/23 R1 was found in excruciating pain, moaning and could not hold still. When they inquired to staff, they were told that the facility had not received medication prescribed. Also, staff told them that they could not give the resident medication if they don’t ask for it. Based on records review R1 was prescribed with Morphine 100mg/5ml oral solution on 1/28/23 as needed every 4 hours/PRN, based on Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction (CSMD) log, the medication was received at the facility on 1/29/23. On 1/31/23 R1 was prescribed 1 tablet of Morphine 15mg every 4 hours as needed for paiCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230209141814

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(415) 609-3827
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Serenity Villa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.