Small home · Licensed for 6 · Redding
Hallmark North
920 Hallmark Dr, Redding, CA 96001Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 6 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 2.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Hallmark North: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Starting monthly rate$5,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,150
- $7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes6 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $5,000
- Westside Assisted LivingRedding · 0.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Redbud Care HomeRedding · 0.1 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunset Comfort CareRedding · 0.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Oaks Senior LivingRedding · 4.3 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Spring Hills Assisted LivingRedding · 4.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Life PasticheRedding · 5.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
920 Hallmark Dr, Redding, CA 96001Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Patients' Hospital of ReddingHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.6 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #455002677 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On May 15 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson arrived at the facility for the purpose of conducting the annual inspection. LPA met Manager Shirley Robichaux at the facility to verify no residents are living at the facility. The facility is owned by Licensee, Quality Care Home, INC. LPA observed and was informed there were no longer any residents at Hallmark North. LPA was informed the licensee intends to keep the license open at this time and possibly serve additional residents at a later date. A copy of this report was provided to Manager Shirley Robichaux, to forward to Licensee. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was left with the manager. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Medication management.
On 08/14/2025 at 1:45PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson, conducted an unannounced visit and met with Facility Manager Michael Moodie. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings submitted on 4-3-25. During todays visit it was discovered no residents are in care at this time. The residents were moved to Westside Assisted Living and Redbud Care Home. During the complaint investigation staff interviews were attempted and the following documents were reviewed: staff schedules, staff list with telephone numbers, residents admission agreements, medical records, hospital visits, medication records, resident daily logs and incident reports. Continued on LIC9099C & LIC9099D Substantiated LPA attempted staff interviews multiple times with no success. Document review revealed, on 3-24-25 at 7:30PM staff reported R1’s 7:00AM medication was still in medication box and not given. Document review revealed on 3-25-25 R1’s 8:00PM medication was given at 8:00 AM. Document review revealed R1’s 8:00AM medication was given at 1:00PM. Document review revealed no incident reports were submitted to Licensing concerning medication errors in March 2025. Based on investigation observations, record review(s) and interviews which were conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and exit interview conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date, civil penalties may be assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250403092452
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 15, 2025
Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as exidenced by: Based on observatin and interview of Staff the licensee did not ensure residents are received medicaion as prescribed. This poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator will have all staff administering medicaion receive training from a professional. Administrator will perform medicaion checks bi-weekly. Administrator will send a copy with staff signatures and topices covered to LPA.
Jul 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On July 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kayla Adkison arrived at the facility for the purpose of conducting the annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPA attempted to make contact with staff at the front door however, there was no answer. LPA was contacted by Lovene Ferrell, staff at Westside Assisted Living, located across the street at 915 Hallmark Drive, Redding. Both facilities are owned by Licensee, Quality Care Home, INC. LPA was informed there were no longer any residents at Hallmark North. The licensee intends to keep the license open at this time and possibly serve additional residents at a later date. A copy of this report was provided to Lovene Farrell, Westside Assisted Living Caregiver, to forward to Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Personal Rights - Resident being sexually harrassed by another resident care.
On 11/06/2024 at 1:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson, conducted an unannounced visit and met with Edward Eric Stadnicki Care Giver. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings. During the complaint investigation staff and resident interviews were performed and the following documents were reviewed: staff list with telephone numbers, residents admission agreements, medical records, medication administration records, PRN medication records and incident reports. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Document review revealed, R1 chooses to walk to R2’s room. Documents reveal R1 chooses to spend time with R2. Documents reveal R1 gets anxious when unable to see R2. Documents reveal R1 has a new medication to treat this anxiety. Document review revealed staff redirect residents when found not in own room or when touching each other. During Staff interviews it was reported that R1 gets anxious when unable to see R2. Staff reported R1 has gone to R2 room and climbed in bed with R2. When staff ask R1 to return to their own room R1 gets anxious and refuses. Staff reported the doctor has ordered anxiety medication to help R1 with anxiety concerning this matter. During staff interviews all staff stated R1 says R2 is their boyfriend. During resident interviews R1 was asked how staff help them R1 stated the staff were nice to R1 and that she is “scared for their life.” When R1 was asked to tell more about being scared for her life R1 did not respond. When R1 was ask if anyone has done anything that bothers them, R1 responded no. When R1 was ask if R2 has done anything that bothers them they responded no. When R1 was ask if they felt safe R1 said “I do, no one has ever tried to hurt me or scare me.” It is noted that R1 has been diagnosed with dementia; however, appears to be able to vocalize what their needs are. Based on investigation, observations, and interviews R1 has been found in R2 bed hugging and staff has returned R1 to own bed. The facility is taking action to keep the residents apart and discourage any type of inappropriate touching of one another. The facility has taken steps to supervise the residents closer so that either party is not receiving unwanted advances. Staff have reported when bathing a resident, it takes about ten minutes and that “takes my attention away from the other residents.” During interviews it has been discovered that R1 has not reported or indicated to staff that anyone has inappropriate touched them. It has been determined the clients are friendly toward one another with some physical contact, however there are no signs of sexual harassment. It was discovered that R1 seeks out R2 by choice and is anxious when unable to see R2. The facility has offered to move the residents but both POA’s have declined. Based on the interviews conducted the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241004083010
May 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Medication Management.
On 5-17-24, at 1:45PM Sarah Benson, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings regarding a complaint that was received on 02/21/24. LPA Benson met with Audra Eneix Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. Interviews were conducted and the following documents were reviewed: staff list with telephone numbers, residents admission agreements, medical records, medication administration records, PRN records and incident reports. continued on 9099-C Substantiated Medication Management. Document review revealed that after moving to Hallmark North home, Seroquel and Ativan were added to resident’s (R1) medication administration log for agitation. During staff interviews, it was reported that a staff person gave the resident an Ativan medication, as the resident was combative. After not calming down and approximately 30-40 minutes later, the staff person gave another type of medication, which was Seroquel. It was stated that the Seroquel was an “as needed” type of medication to calm the resident. It was reported that the resident appeared to be kind of “spacey and a little bit out of it.” It was reported in the last five years only one other resident was this agitated. During witness interviews, it was reported that on 2-10-24 a witness observed the resident in a chair with what seemed to be unconscious state, with her head bent in a way that looked painful. The witness stated when the care staff were asked about the unresponsive condition of resident, the staff responded, "I gave her the medication I was told to give her." The witness couldn't get the resident to respond appropriately, so they took the resident to the hospital where resident was diagnosed as “Over medicated.” Witness reported concern of residents overall sedated condition while in care at the facility. Witness stated previous to living at the facility the resident had been walking one to two miles daily. During the investigation process, it was determined that the facility staff administered the medication as prescribed by the physician; however, when the resident was taken to the hospital it was reported she was over medicated. The staff did not respond with appropriate assistance when observing the resident slumped over and barely responsive. The allegation is substantiated. Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview conducted, a copy of the report, and appeal rights provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240221141404
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 17, 2024
87466 The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental and emotional health and that appropriate assistance is provided...This requirement is not met as exidenced by: Based on observatin and interview of Staff the licensee did not ensure that 1 of 5 residents were regulary observed for changes in physical functioning and that appropriate assistance was provided. This poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator shall have a training of this regulation for staff then contact LPA by POC due date of 6-17-24. Training of carestaff for administratration of medications (PRN) included. Training for carestaff for redirecting residents with behaviors.
May 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 05/17/2024 at 11:30 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with administrator Audra Eneix (cert #6043287740 exp.1-25-25) and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator certificate is current. LPA Benson and administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to five (5) resident rooms, common areas, three (3) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and back yard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Staff and resident files were reviewed. Medications were also reviewed. Medication is locked in a locked closet. The common area was clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. The bathrooms were clean and in good repair. The kitchen was clean and in good repair. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. First aid kit fully stocked and ready for emergency use. Fire extinguisher fully charged. Smoke detectors are all operational. Hot water temperature measured within required Title 22 regulations of 105 degrees F and 120 degrees F. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. There is a schedule of activities planned for the clients. All required postings are displayed within the facility. A pools/bodies of water is on the premises with required fence and gate. No firearms are on premises. The last disaster drill was conducted and documented on 5-2-24, the facility has been conducting drills every 3 months. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jul 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
07/24/2023 01:00 PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with Laura Dale Manager and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Benson and the administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to four (4) resident rooms, common areas, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and back yard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Staff and resident files were reviewed. Medications were also reviewed. Common area was clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bathrooms were clean and in good repair. Kitchen was clean and in good repair. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Medication is locked in a locked closet. First aid kit fully stocked and ready for emergency use. Fire extinguisher fully charged. Smoke detectors are all operational. Hot water temperature measured within required Title 22 regulations of 105 degrees F and 120 degrees F. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. All required postings are displayed within facility. Pools/bodies of water are on premises with locked gate with five foot tall fence. No firearms are on premises. Last disaster drill was conducted and documented on 06-14-2023, the facility has been conducting drills every 3 months. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to Laura Dale Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
May 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 05/04/2022 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Misty Valencia and Dawn Keane, arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPAs met with Audra Eneix, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted Facility Administrator Melissa Johnson and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPAs were screened at the front entrace. LPAs and Administrator toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, resident bedrooms, and common restrooms.. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPAs and Administrator completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2022
20213 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Personal Rights-cameras with audio in the facility
On 12/15//2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Misty Valencia conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the above allegations directed by the department. LPA met with Maria Teibel, Direct Care Staff and explained the reason for the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted Administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical masks. Additionally, LPA was screened by staff at the front door. continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated -cameras with audio in the facility During interviews with Administrator, staff, resident and records reviewed, it was determined; Cameras with audio in the facility to be unsubstantiated. LPA toured the facility, and during the visit, LPA interviewed Six of Six (6 of 6) staff, who reported they have never had any issues or concerns regarding cameras with audio in the facility. LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There were no citations issued during today's visit, copy of report was given. An exit interview was conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021 · control 25-AS-20211004125045
Sep 23, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 09/23//2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Misty Valencia conducted an unannounced Case Management Health and Safety visit as directed by the department. LPA met with Administrator Licensee Gurmeel Singh and explained the reason for the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted Administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical masks. Additionally, LPA was screened by staff at the front door LPA toured the facility inside and out including but not limited to facility dining areas, outside areas, staff break rooms, kitchen area. LPA observed that the facility has had some renovations done. The following renovations has been completed included; Bathroom remodeled, added counters, cabinets in the kitchen area, new flooring and painting throughout facility, a wall that has been removed, bedrooms and bathrooms has been added. LPA asked Licensee if there was a permit application on the changes to the facility. Licensee reported that “my architect is in the process of getting that completed.” LPA explained to Licensee that when there are any kind of alternations to the facility, licensee needs to report such changes and a permit completed prior to the remodel, which also needs to be approved as well as a fire inspection completed. Licensee reported that he was not aware of having to notify LPA but will from now on. LPA asked about residents in care and where have they been throughout the remodeling. Licensee reported that all residents in care have been removed from the facility in process of remodeling. continue on 809-C LPA requested to see documentation that residents and families have been notified of the movements. Licensee reported that they never provided any documentation regarding the moves and that they have been in contact with all residents and their families verbally. LPA explained to Licensee that LPA will be citing Licensee regarding the unreported alternations in the facility, reporting requirements to LPA on changes, no fire clearance on renovations, and illegal evictions. Licensee understood and reported that he will contact LPA with any changes to the facility from here on out. Deficiencies are cited on LIC 809D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report along with appeal rights were giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87305(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2021
Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities (a)Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. This requirement was not met as evidence by: The licensee has made some alterations to the facility and did not seek approval from the licensing agency or the fire marshal, as required. This poses an as a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a floor plan to the licensing agency that indicates the physical floor plan changes. Licensee shall submit the floor plan to the licensing agency by 10/01/2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87202 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2021
All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department...or the State Fire Marshal. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation, licensee did not maintain a fire clearance to the alternations made at the facillity. This poses an as a otential health and safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to get Facility renovations cleared by the fire Marshal and provide clearance to LPA by 10/01/2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2021
Eviction Procedures. (a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed ... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: all residents were moved during facility alterations and not given an approriate 60 day notice. This posed a potential risk to resident's personal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit a statement of understanding of this regulation to LPA by 10/01/2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2021
Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require...(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the... Based on LPA observation, licensee did not maintain a fire clearance to the alternations made at the facillity. This poses an as a otential health and safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to get Facility renovations cleared by the fire Marshal and provide clearance to LPA by 10/01/2021
Jul 7, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Konnor Leitzell arrived at the facility unannounced on 07/07/2021 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain, LPA met with Brenda Myers (Admin) and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 Masks. LPA and Brenda Myers toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, five (5) of five (5) resident bedrooms, three (3) of three (3) bathrooms, kitchen, garage, staff office/laundry room and backyard. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA and admin completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. LPA is requesting the following documents to be submitted by COB 7/23/2021 via fax at (916) 263-4744: Designation of Administrative Responsibility (LIC308); Personnel Report (LIC 500); Control of Property; Limited Liability Insurance. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2021
0 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 14, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Quality Care Home Inc., licensed since 2018.
Operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Redbud Care Home · Redding
- Westside Assisted Living · Redding
- Hallmark House · Redding
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 9
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Hallmark North
Is Hallmark North licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Hallmark North licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Hallmark North been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Hallmark North still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Hallmark North cost?
$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redding that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,750 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Hallmark North take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Quality Care Home Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Quality Care Home Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Patients' Hospital of Redding is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Hallmark North keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Hallmark North license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “HALLMARK NORTH”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #455002677. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Quality Care Home Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Shasta County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,295 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,500–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Shasta County