Large community · Licensed for 100 · Redding
The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care
3030 Heritagetown Drive, Redding, CA 96002Licensed since 2008
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 100: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 100 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 8 residents
- Bedridden
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
100 RESIDENTS, ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY OR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 8 RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
Assisted living
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 8 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,390a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Costs & moving in
What the base rate includesFood · Utilities · Housekeeping
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Assessment before move-in
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Physician's report required
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$5,390likely a month
Starting monthly rate$5,390this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$1,000this home · one time
The home lists this one-time fee on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,390–$5,990
- $5,390
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,390–$6,990
- $6,390
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes7 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,894 to $7,355
- Oakmont of ReddingRedding · 2.5 mi · Large community$5,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Willow Springs Alzheimer's Special Care CenterRedding · 3.6 mi · Large community$7,355Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Sundial Assisted LivingRedding · 3.8 mi · Large community$3,600Listed on its own website · shared suite · seen October 5, 2026
- Sierra Oaks of ReddingRedding · 3.9 mi · Large community$2,894Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Hilltop Springs Senior LivingRedding · 4.3 mi · Large community$5,495Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakdale Heights of ReddingRedding · 5.0 mi · Large community$4,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lassen House Senior LivingRed Bluff · 28 mi · Large community$5,295Listed on its own website · deluxe studio · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (6)Private rooms · Shared / companion rooms · Private bathroom
Private rooms
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Room typesFamily room · Shared room
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (1)Meals provided
Meals provided
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (1)Activity types offered
Activity types offeredMeal · Activity · Event
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a petYes — “We do allow pets as long as the resident is able to care for them or arrangements have been made with an outside service to care for the pet.”
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (2)How often the care plan is reviewed · Office or phone hours as published
How often the care plan is reviewedQuarterly
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Office or phone hours as publishedMonday–Sunday: Open 24 Hours
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
About the home (2)Brand or trade name · Management company
Brand or trade nameThe Vistas Assisted Living and Memory CareWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Management companyRidgeline Management Company
Reported on vistasalf.com · source dated September 30, 2026.
Where it is
3030 Heritagetown Drive, Redding, CA 96002Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Shasta Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #455002049 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On September 23, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila, conducted a case management visit. LPA met with facility representative, Administrator Nate Echols and explained the purpose of the visit. The department is following up on an Incident Report submitted by the facility on September 08, 2026, involving a resident. LPA obtained further information regarding R1's medical evaluation after a fall where R1 was diagnosed with fractured ribs. R1 is back at the facility after R1's hospital discharge. Facility is currently monitoring R1 for any changes. LPA reviewed multiple incident reports that were submitted to the department involving residents. Several topics were discussed. No deficiencies cited during today's in inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2026
May 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are administering oral liquids to a resident Staff are not keeping medications in their original bottle
On May 20, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Nate Echols and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation process, interviews and records review were initiated. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff are administering oral liquids to a resident.” Staff reported that medications are given to residents as perscribed in the physician orders. Staff reported that hospice residents are given medications as needed, which include liquid medications and staff follow physician orders in administering the medication. Staff reported a resident can refuse the medication and staff will then document the medication refusal and inform the resident's responsible party. -----Continued on LIC9099-C----- Unsubstantiated LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff are not keeping medications in their original bottle.” Staff reported that all staff adhere to their company policy regarding medications. Staff reported that in instances where residents are going on vacation, away from the facility with family, the original medications are signed out by family members and documented. Staff reported that a form is signed by both staff and family which documents the amount of medication being signed out and an audit is performed before and after the resident returns from their trip. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Findings that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251117161325
20251 state visit · 2 documents
Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On November 13, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit and met with Nate Echols. Today’s visit is regarding an incident report that was submitted to licensing regarding an incident that occurred on August 22, 2025. It was reported that on August 22, 2025 at approximately 8:20 PM that R1 was found on the floor by R1's door after attempting to use a folding basket for support. R1 was not using their walker or pendant. EMS was called, and R1 was transported to the hospital. On August 23, 2025, the responsible party reported that R1 required surgery. R1 has a history of falling and has a walker but forgets to use it, so staff provides cuing. R1 did not have their pendant on hand as R1 forgets to wear it. The care plan was updated to reflect additional assistance needed with transferring and cuing. LPA obtained and reviewed documentation pertaining to R1. LPA will conduct a follow-up visit if deemed necessary. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today's visit. Exit interview was conducted. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025
Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On November 13, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Nate Echols and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured within the required range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and ten (10) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/14/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Debra Wyman and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Debry Wyman toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured at 114 degrees. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and eight (8) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024
20231 state visit · 3 documents
Nov 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not addressing residents who are exhibiting fall risk behaviors
On November 30, 2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an announced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Nate Echols and explained the reason for the visit. On 08/31/2023 R1 had a fall and sustained a skin tear on right hand and nosebleed. NOC shift notes stated that R1 was running down the halls and two falls were witnessed by staff. The first was caused by R1 running by double doors in the common area and ran into the wall. The second fall was due to R1 tripping over a recliner and hit their shoulder. Staff could not prevent R1 from falling but continued to monitor R1s activities. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated During the investigation process interviews and a records review was initiated. LPA Avila reviewed incident reports and physician report. Records reviewed indicated that resident falls are in large part due to physical and medical implications. LPA Avila reviewed facility records and each fall was documented and sent to the Department and Hospice Services. The facility has updated care plans for residents addressing fall behaviors. According to R1s physician’s report that was completed on 09/05/2023, R1 is ambulatory. R1 is not a fall risk. The physician report stated facility is to provide physical assistance to and from the dining room and or community activities as needed. Interviews that were conducted stated when residents would fall, staff immediately would assist residents. A minimum of two staff members would assist the resident who had fallen. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Nate Echols.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230914092705
Nov 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not providing adequate assistance to residents during meals
On November 30, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an announced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Nate Echols and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation process interviews and a records review was initiated. LPA Avila reviewed R1s medical documentation and physician report. R1s physician report indicates that they do not need assistance with meals, but staff escorts R1 to every meal. According to R1’s physician’s report that was completed on 09/05/2023, R1 can feed self. R1 is ambulatory. The facility is to provide physical assistance to and from the dining room and or community activities as needed. LPA Avila reviewed staff schedules and sign in sheets and facility has sufficient staff. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiated During the interview process it was stated that R1 would get up from the dinning table after staff would escort R1 to meals. R1 would get up and not sit still and staff redirected R1 to sit and eat. R1 would eat a couple bites of food then get up again and pace around the facility. Staff continued to redirect R1 to meals but R1 did not stay seated for long to eat. Staff would make R1 sandwiches so R1 could walk around and eat food. Staff also provided milk shakes to R1 and snacks if R1 did not finish their meal. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Nate Echols.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230915104232
Nov 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/30/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Nate Echols and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured at 117 degrees. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but at not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed seven (7) staff, and seven (7) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies during todays visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was provided to Nate Echols.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident rights were violated. Staff are not properly trained to interact with dementia residents.
Donna Gurriere and Sarah Benson, Licensing Program Analysts were in contact and met with Brenda Saephan, Manager. LPAs Gurriere and Benson completed the required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID 19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA Gurriere ensured that hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility. continued Substantiated Resident rights were violated. During the interview process, ten staff persons were interviewed. The residents were observed to be sitting in the living room watching a television program. They were checked in on and spoken to by LPA Gurriere; however, were not interviewed due to their dementia status. Various documents were obtained and reviewed to include Physicians Reports, Admission Agreements, Appraisal and Needs, and Medication Logs. Training documents for staff were obtained and reviewed also. During the investigation process, it was reported that a resident’s rights were violated when it was suggested by the family that when the resident (Resident 1) asks where his wife is, the staff are to tell him that his wife had died. Staff were interviewed and it was reported that at times, the staff have advised the resident that his wife had died. Due to the resident’s dementia status, it was reported that this caused the resident to be distraught, as he relived the news that his wife had died. It was reported that this issue was addressed in a meeting with staff by the administrator and the manager in which they provided training as to how to interact with the resident. In addition, it was reported that staff raised their voices at two residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). It was stated by several persons that they didn’t believe that staff raised their voices; however, but that the staff were “stern” in asking Resident 2 to be seated. Residents are to be treated with dignity in their personal relationships with staff. Advising a resident several times, that his wife has died is a violation of personal rights, as it was reported that it caused the resident to be distraught. Staff that are stern with a resident indicates an assertion of authority and strictness over a resident. Both examples are personal rights violations. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Staff are not properly trained to interact with dementia residents. During the investigation process, it was stated that because of the reported issue with Resident 1, advising that the resident’s wife had died, the administrator and manager provided training to the staff persons in the dementia unit. In addition, it was reported that staff have been “stern” with Resident 2, which indicates a lack of training of the staff persons. During the interview process, numerous staff persons stated that they felt that they could benefit from additional training. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date; civil penalties may be assessed. Staff are not following appropriate medication dispensing methods. During the interview process, ten staff persons were interviewed. The residents were observed to be sitting in the living room watching a television program. They were checked in on and spoken to by LPA Gurriere; however, were not interviewed due to their dementia status. Various documents were obtained and reviewed to include Physicians Reports, Admission Agreements, Appraisal and Needs, and Medication Logs. Training documents for staff were obtained and reviewed also. During the investigation process, it had been reported that a staff person rubbed down a pill to make it smaller and then gave it to a resident. Several staff persons were interviewed, and it was reported that staff were unaware of staff not following appropriate medication dispensing methods. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230329135015
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(1)(10) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2023
Personal Rights – To be accorded with dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents and other persons. To be free from neglect financial exploitation, involuntary seclusion, punishment, humiliation intimidation and verbal, mental physical or sexual abuse. The licensee did not ensure that the personal rights of the residents were implemented.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2023
Plan of correction: The administrator shall arrange for an outside vendor to conduct a personal rights and dementia training for all staff in the dementia unit. The training shall include person-centered approaches to dementia care and understanding dementia behaviors.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(d) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2023
Basic Services - A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs… The licensee did not ensure that the staff were trained to interact appropriately with dementia residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2023
Plan of correction: The administrator shall arrange for an outside vendor to conduct a personal rights and dementia training for all staff in the dementia unit. The training shall include person-centered approaches to dementia care and understanding dementia behaviors.
Jan 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
LPA Parks arrived on Wednesday January 11, 2023 to conduct the annual inspection. Prior to the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 mask. LPA, Administrator, Health Services Director, and Resident Services Director completed the infection control domain together and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. LPA, Administrator, Health Services Director, and Resident Services Director toured the facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. In the areas toured, no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Facility has a supply of 30 days of full PPE. LPA requested updated copies of LIC500, LIC610E and current liability insurance by end of month. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was left at the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Jan 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportAnnual/RandomReport on file
Type of visit: Annual/Random
01/02/2021 10:45 AM Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain. LPA met with adminstrator Izabella Robinson and Debra Wyman LVN and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. In addition LPA was screened by the administrator. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 Mask, gloves LPA Knight Ms. Robinson and Ms. Wyman toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, laundry room, common (2) bathrooms, dining room, storage areas, and outside visitor area. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPAs Knight and the administrator and LVN completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Technical assistance was provided. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was emailed to administrator Izabella Robinson.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2022
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Dec 21, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/21/21 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Misty Valencia arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the infection control domain, LPA met with Izabela Robinson, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the annual inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical Mask. Additional LPA was screen at the front door before entering faiclity. LPA Valencia and Ms Robinson toured facility together to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, two (2) resident apartments, kitchen, storage areas, and inside visiting area . In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. LPA Valencia and the Admin completed the infection control domain and facility was found to be in substantial compliance at this time. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of todays inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was emailed to Ms. Robinson.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2021
69 of 100 beds were occupied at the May 20, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Redding Assisted Living, LLC & Ridgeline Management, licensed since 2008.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 13
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care
Is The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care licensed for?
100 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care been cited?
2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care cost?
$5,390 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living studio, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redding that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,600 to $5,495 a month, and the middle figure is $4,695 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Redding Assisted Living, LLC & Ridgeline Management, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Shasta Regional Medical Center is 4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 8 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VISTAS ASSISTED LIVING & MEMORY CARE, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #455002049. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 100 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Redding Assisted Living, LLC & Ridgeline Management, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Shasta County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Shasta County