Vila Monte is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435202509, licensed for 28 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 32 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Vila Monte

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 28 residents · Morgan Hill, CA · Santa Clara County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #435202509, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
17090 Peak Avenue · Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County
Phone
(408) 500-2693
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 28 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 3 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE 28 NON-AMBULATORY ADULTS AGES 60 AND OVER WHICH 3 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 36 times and filed 32 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 7, 2026
Occupancy at the November 9, 2024 visit
25 of 28 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 20, 2022 to November 9, 2024. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 27 of 32 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 13 documents
Nov 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to prevent resident from being harmed by another resident Staff failed to safeguard resident's money

On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Staff failed to prevent resident from being harmed by another resident. It was alleged that the staff failed to prevent resident from being harmed by another resident. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility documentation. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that the facility conducted an internal investigation and found that there was no incident that involved R1 and R2 that was reportethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230501121143
Nov 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not follow a physician’s order for a special diet Resident was yelled at in the facility Resident did not feel safe at the facility

On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Facility did not follow a physician’s order for a special diet It was alleged that the facility staff did not follow a physician’s order for a special diet. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that on 09/01/2023, R1 was sent out to the hospital due to consistent throat pain and was discharged with a blended diet. When R1 came back to the facility and their new diet was implemented, R1 refused to eat what was provided to them. Unsubstathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230808140941
Nov 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from making threatening comments towards another resident

On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from making threatening comments towards another resident It was alleged that staff did not prevent resident from making threatening comments towards another resident. Based on interviews conducted the facility conducted an internal investigation and found that the staff member alleged to have stated a threatening denied that they make a threatening comment. It was learned that R1 would lie and would make inapprothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231218162242
Nov 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has bed bugs

On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Facility has bed bugs It was alleged that the facility has bed bugs. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility documentation. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that the facility was notified that there may be bed bugs in a residents room. The facility obtained pest control services as soon as they were notified and provided treatment. It was learned that the bed bugs were secluded in thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240117134530
Nov 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at resident Staff used inappropriate language with resident

On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Staff yelled at resident It was alleged that facility staff yell at resident. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted resident and staff interviews. Based on 3 staff interviews, it was denied that staff yelled at a resident in the facility. 3 out 3 staff members deny that they have witnessed any other staff members yelling at residents during their shifts. An interview with 5 residents were conducted, 5 out 5 residents state denthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231020085113
Oct 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify Resident Representative of resident's change in health insurance carrier. Facility is not assisting resident with medical care.

On 10/30/2024, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Nicholas Inneh and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of Staff did not notify Resident Representative of resident's change in health insurance carrier and facility is not assisting resident with medical care, reporting party (RP) stated that when resident (R1) turned 65, RP signed R1 up for Medicare and had also signed up for Santa Clara Family Health Plan. Without informing RP, Director (S1) signed R1 up for another insurance provider (Anthem). RP had no idea until he/she received a letter from Santa Clara Family Health Plan stating that R1 was "cut off". RP discovered that S1 had signed R1 for Anthem in April of 2021, without consulting RP. After RP found out, RP signed R1 up again with Santa Clara Health Plan and S1 got upset with RP and is now refusing to help with getting R1 medical treatments, setting up and take R1 to doctor's appointmethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210817095116
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee is not ensuring that facility is kept free of rodents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh. On 10/21/2024, the Department received the complaint. On 10/22/2024, the initial complaint investigation was conducted. Documents were obtained to include the LIC500, resident roster, a resident's progress notes, and the facility's policy. It was alleged that the licensee is not ensuring the facility is kept free of rodents as a resident has seen mice in the facility for the past month. On 10/22/2024, 3 staff members were interviewed. Based on staff interview, S1 states there were 2 residents who informed S1 of the observation of either a mouse or rat in their bedroom. S1 was first made aware of a rat inside resident (R1)'s bedroom on 10/10/2024. After S1 was made aware, S1 searched R1's room and did not observe any rodents or rodent droppings. Page 1 of 2. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241021095103
May 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not properly maintain the facility grounds

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh. On 11/01/2023, the Department received a complaint alleging the staff do not properly maintain the facility grounds. On 11/02/2023, the intial complaint investigation was conducted. During visit, LPA toured the facility with the Administrator (ADM) to include 15 resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, 1 shower room, dining room, kitchen, medication room, hallways, and exterior. Based on observation, LPA observed spider webs along the walls and ceiling of the hallways and resident bedrooms. The resident bedrooms were not properly clean and contained dust and dirt along the walls, base boards, windows, and floors of the bedrooms. Resident bedrooms floors contained missing and/or broken tiles. SEE LIC9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 26-AS-20231101121001
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file36typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020255502024713120235912022221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Clara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (408) 500-2693

Is Vila Monte licensed?

Yes — Vila Monte is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Morgan Hill (Santa Clara County): California license #435202509, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 28 residents. State records list 32 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Vila Monte care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Vila Monte with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE 28 NON-AMBULATORY ADULTS AGES 60 AND OVER WHICH 3 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

How much does Vila Monte cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Vila Monte's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Vila Monte accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Vila Monte is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

25 of 28 beds occupied (89%) when the state visited on November 9, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Vila Monte?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 36 state visits and 32 dated documents since 2022 for Vila Monte; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 9, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to prevent resident from being harmed by another resident Staff failed to safeguard resident's money
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Staff failed to prevent resident from being harmed by another resident. It was alleged that the staff failed to prevent resident from being harmed by another resident. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility documentation. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that the facility conducted an internal investigation and found that there was no incident that involved R1 and R2 that was reporteCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230501121143
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not follow a physician’s order for a special diet Resident was yelled at in the facility Resident did not feel safe at the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Facility did not follow a physician’s order for a special diet It was alleged that the facility staff did not follow a physician’s order for a special diet. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that on 09/01/2023, R1 was sent out to the hospital due to consistent throat pain and was discharged with a blended diet. When R1 came back to the facility and their new diet was implemented, R1 refused to eat what was provided to them. UnsubstaCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230808140941
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from making threatening comments towards another resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from making threatening comments towards another resident It was alleged that staff did not prevent resident from making threatening comments towards another resident. Based on interviews conducted the facility conducted an internal investigation and found that the staff member alleged to have stated a threatening denied that they make a threatening comment. It was learned that R1 would lie and would make inapproCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231218162242
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has bed bugs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Facility has bed bugs It was alleged that the facility has bed bugs. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility documentation. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that the facility was notified that there may be bed bugs in a residents room. The facility obtained pest control services as soon as they were notified and provided treatment. It was learned that the bed bugs were secluded in theCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240117134530
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yelled at resident Staff used inappropriate language with resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA learned that the Facility Designated Administrator (FDA) was unable to visit the facility at this time, however, LPA was able to contact FDA via phone and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current Census was 25. A brief interview with FDA Inneh was conducted. Allegation: Staff yelled at resident It was alleged that facility staff yell at resident. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted resident and staff interviews. Based on 3 staff interviews, it was denied that staff yelled at a resident in the facility. 3 out 3 staff members deny that they have witnessed any other staff members yelling at residents during their shifts. An interview with 5 residents were conducted, 5 out 5 residents state denCDSS inspection report, November 9, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231020085113
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify Resident Representative of resident's change in health insurance carrier. Facility is not assisting resident with medical care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/30/2024, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Nicholas Inneh and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of Staff did not notify Resident Representative of resident's change in health insurance carrier and facility is not assisting resident with medical care, reporting party (RP) stated that when resident (R1) turned 65, RP signed R1 up for Medicare and had also signed up for Santa Clara Family Health Plan. Without informing RP, Director (S1) signed R1 up for another insurance provider (Anthem). RP had no idea until he/she received a letter from Santa Clara Family Health Plan stating that R1 was "cut off". RP discovered that S1 had signed R1 for Anthem in April of 2021, without consulting RP. After RP found out, RP signed R1 up again with Santa Clara Health Plan and S1 got upset with RP and is now refusing to help with getting R1 medical treatments, setting up and take R1 to doctor's appointmeCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210817095116
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is not ensuring that facility is kept free of rodents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh. On 10/21/2024, the Department received the complaint. On 10/22/2024, the initial complaint investigation was conducted. Documents were obtained to include the LIC500, resident roster, a resident's progress notes, and the facility's policy. It was alleged that the licensee is not ensuring the facility is kept free of rodents as a resident has seen mice in the facility for the past month. On 10/22/2024, 3 staff members were interviewed. Based on staff interview, S1 states there were 2 residents who informed S1 of the observation of either a mouse or rat in their bedroom. S1 was first made aware of a rat inside resident (R1)'s bedroom on 10/10/2024. After S1 was made aware, S1 searched R1's room and did not observe any rodents or rodent droppings. Page 1 of 2. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 22, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241021095103

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not properly maintain the facility grounds
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh. On 11/01/2023, the Department received a complaint alleging the staff do not properly maintain the facility grounds. On 11/02/2023, the intial complaint investigation was conducted. During visit, LPA toured the facility with the Administrator (ADM) to include 15 resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, 1 shower room, dining room, kitchen, medication room, hallways, and exterior. Based on observation, LPA observed spider webs along the walls and ceiling of the hallways and resident bedrooms. The resident bedrooms were not properly clean and contained dust and dirt along the walls, base boards, windows, and floors of the bedrooms. Resident bedrooms floors contained missing and/or broken tiles. SEE LIC9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 26-AS-20231101121001
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being financially abused
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Ryker Heberle (LPA) conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the complaint investigation finding regarding the above allegation. LPA met with facility Administrator Nicholas Inneh (Admin). On 09/20/2021, the depratment conducted an audit investigaiton of the facility, during the investigation, a cash count was performed to ensure that the amount of money for individual residents matched what was stipulated on the client ledger (LIC 405). After concluding the cash count, it was determined that 11 residents had, on average, $1-$10 more in their individual cash stocks than what was recorded officially on the LIC 405. 6 residents had no variance, and one resident had $4 less than what was recorded. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 2, 2023 · control 26-AS-20201216153905

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not keep the facility free from pests
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh. During visit, LPA toured the facility with the Administrator to include the resident bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, dining room, and storage. LPA interviewed 3 residents and the Administrator (S1). LPA obtained the following records: resident roster and bug treatment log from May 2022 – current day. LPA and Administrator entered 4 resident bedrooms. LPA and Administrator inspected 4 resident beds for pests to include the insect, bed bugs. LPA and Administrator observed 3 out of 4 resident beds to contain bed bugs. LPA and Administrator observed a bed bug crawling on a resident’s (R2) clothing. Administrator immediately removed the bed bug from R2’s clothing and immediately removed the bedding and linens from 2 out of 3 resident beds. LPA and Administrator observed a bedroom to contain bed bugs on the walls. SEE LIC9099-C. SubstanCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2022 · control 26-AS-20221013105435

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 36 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
36
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(408) 500-2693
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Vila Monte? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.