Small home · Licensed for 6 · Santa Clara
Pruneridge Residential Care Home
3030 Pruneridge Avenue, Santa Clara, CA 95051Licensed since 2004
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OLDER. A FIRE CLEARANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED FOR ONE BEDRIDDEN AND FIVE NONAMBULATORY RESIDENTS. THE LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX.
985 - RCFE / HOSPICE
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on pruneridgecarehomes.com · source dated July 12, 2025.
As needs change
Medicines
Who handles medications: The home organizes medications, keeps stock of inventory, orders refills, and ensures timely administration.
pruneridgecarehomes.com · July 12, 2025
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Pruneridge Residential Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,500a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,500
From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,500likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,650–$5,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,350–$8,900
- $7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $8,500
10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,050.
- Country Style LivingSanta Clara · 1.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise Manor Residential Care HomeSanta Clara · 1.2 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Laurel LodgeSanta Clara · 1.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Pruneridge Residential Care Home, Facility #2San Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Venetian Residential CareSan Jose · 1.7 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Shore Care HomeSan Jose · 1.9 mi · Small home$8,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Caring Hearts Senior Care HomeSan Jose · 2.3 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kimberly's Elder Kare KottageSan Jose · 2.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Bellerose Senior LivingSan Jose · 2.5 mi · Mid-size home$7,450Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Parkview RCH #2Sunnyvale · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Rooms come furnished · Housekeeping
Rooms come furnished
Reported on pruneridgecarehomes.com · source dated July 12, 2025.
Housekeeping
Reported on pruneridgecarehomes.com · source dated July 12, 2025.
Visiting & staying involved (1)Notes on visiting access
Notes on visiting accessAll located in the heart of Santa Clara and nearby all major freeways
Reported on pruneridgecarehomes.com · source dated July 12, 2025.
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
Brand or trade namePruneridge Residential Carehomes
Reported on pruneridgecarehomes.com · seen October 27, 2026.
Where it is
3030 Pruneridge Avenue, Santa Clara, CA 95051Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa ClaraHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #435201557 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 12 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Sep 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA Rai met with Lead Staff, Rose Calungcagin and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 3 staff and 5 residents at the facility. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. There is a pool in the backyard with a locked perimeter fence and 3 locked storage which is not used as habitual space. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed additional food supply areas and secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents. LPA Rai toured the facility to include 4 resident rooms, 1 staff room, living room, dining room, kitchen and garage. 4 Out of 4 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The hot water temperature in the 2 bathroom sinks ranged from 105.6 - 106.1 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 05/20/2026. Facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors was tested on 09/06/2026 and was in working condition. The last disaster drills were conducted on 09/04/2026 and 08/03/2026. LPA Rai observed a complete first aid kit at the facility. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 2 staff and 2 residents. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Lead Staff, Rose Calungcagin and a copy of the report was provided. LIC 858 and LIC 859 were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Case Management visit and met with Rose Calungcagin. The purpose of the visit was to follow up on a deficiency cited during the visit on 09/22/2025 for a bathroom sink that was clogged. LPA Marrufo observed today that the sink was no longer clogged. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Rose Calungcagin and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025
Sep 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Concordia Casabar. During visit, LPA toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed locked cabinets for sharp objects and cleaning supplies. LPA observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA reviewed the first aid kit and found it to be complete. LPA toured four out of four resident bedrooms. Each bedroom had working lights and available clothing and storage areas. LPA toured two out of two bathrooms. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The water temperature in one of the two bathroom sinks was 107 F. The sink in the other bathroom was clogged during visit. LPA tested the carbon monoxide and smoke detectors in the hallways and resident rooms during visit. All detectors functioned properly when tested. LPA toured the outside area and observed the exits to be clear of obstructions. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. LPA reviewed five out of five Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR). 4 out of 5 resident CSMDRs were complete. Resident R1's CSMDR was missing 7 medications. LPA reviewed 5 out of 5 resident records and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed 4 staff records. 3 out of 4 staff records were complete. Staff S1 did not have a staff record maintained at the facility, and was missing an LIC501 Personnel Record, LIC503 Health Screening, and current First Aid Certification. LPA reviewed the emergency disaster drill log and found the last drill was recorded on 08/01/2025. Deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. See LIC809-D pages for more information. LPA Marrufo requests updated copies of the following records be submitted to the department within seven calendar days: LIC500 Personnel Report LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility Liability Insurance LIC610E Emergency Disaster Plan This report was reviewed with Concordia Casabar and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on the Type A and Type B deficiencies cited on 9/24/2024. LPA Rai met with Lead Caregiver (S1), Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin and stated the purpose of today's visit. S1 notified Licensee/Administrator Leilani Cortes of LPAs' visit and S1 stated Licensee/Administrator was busy at the time and unable to be present during today's visit. LPA Rai observed 2 staff and 6 residents in the facility. During visit, LPA Rai inspected the kitchen area. LPA Rai observed at random canned foods in the cabinet and 10 out of 10 canned foods were not expired. LPA Rai observed sharps, such as knives, and toxic chemicals locked in cabinet and inaccessible to residents. LPA Rai observed medications were in the locked cabinet and inaccessible to residents. During visit, LPA Rai inspected the backyard and garage. LPA Rai observed the gardening tools and toxic chemicals were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. During visit, LPA Rai inspected the designated office. 2 Out of 2 staff stated the office is not being used as a bedroom and is currently being used as a storage space. During visit, LPA Rai reviewed staff S1's Statement of Acknowledging Requirement to Report Suspected Abuse of Dependent Adults and Elders. During visit, LPA Rai provided letter of the Deficiency Citations cleared. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Lead Caregiver, Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2024
Sep 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring resident's oral hygiene needs are met Staff are not ensuring resident is repositioned every two hours
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Simi Rai and Marcela Yanez conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with Lead Caregiver, Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 2/6/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. It was alleged that R1 was admitted to the hospital on 2/3/2024 and resident had not received any oral care and resident had a pressure injury stage 1 from not being repositioned every 2 hours. On 2/15/2024, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiated Page 2 of 3. Staff are not ensuring resident’s oral hygiene needs are met. On 2/15/2024, LPA Rai interviewed 3 staff, including staff (S1) who was the primary caregiver for R1. One staff (S3) did not provide direct care to R1. Two out of two staff stated the facility staff provided oral care to resident every morning and R1 did not have any issues, pain or redness related to R1’s mouth, gums, or jaws. Two out of two staff stated R1’s responsible party would make arrangements for dentist appointments. Based on review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 4/12/2023, R1 does not wear dentures and does not have special diet. R1 is able to feed himself/herself. R1 is not able to groom himself/herself. Based on review of R1’s Progress Note on 2/1/2023, staff did not note any issues related to oral care or resident refusing oral care. Staff are not ensuring resident is repositioned every two hours. On 2/15/2024, LPA Rai interviewed 3 staff, including staff (S1) who was the primary caregiver for R1. One staff (S3) did not have direct care experience with R1. Two out of two staff stated R1 was observed in the morning of 2/3/2024 before going to the hospital and R1 did not have any bruising or wounds on the buttocks. Two out of two staff stated R1 was able to reposition himself/herself and needed assistance to transfer. Two out of two staff stated the facility staff would assist R1 in sitting in the dining room or living room. S1 stated R1 would be repositioned every two hours or even sooner depending on if R1 wanted to go to dining room or living room. Page 3 of 3. Based on review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 4/12/2023, R1 does not require continuous bed care. R1 does not have a history of skin condition or breakdown. Based on the interviews conducted with clients and staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Lead Caregiver Rosalia (Rose) Calungcagin and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240206092923
Sep 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Marcela Yanez and Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPAs met with Lead Caregiver (S1), Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin and stated the purpose of today's visit. S1 notified Licensee/Administrator Leilani Cortes of LPAs' visit and S1 stated Licensee/Administrator was busy at the time and unable to be present during today's visit. LPAs observed 2 staff in the facility, 5 residents at the facility and 1 resident out of the facility. LPAs observed 3 cameras in common areas of the facility. S1 stated the cameras only record video and no audio. LPAs observed 1 staff bedroom where in the door does not have locking capabilities. Staff S1 stated she resides in the staff room by herself. LPAs observed 7 day pill box on top of a table in staff room which was unlocked and accessible to residents in care . S1 stated the pill box belongs to her and the pill box contains prescription medication and vitamins. S1 removed the medication pill box and placed it in locked facility closet. LPAs observed office area which was converted to a living space for staff S2. LPAs observed a foldable mattress and S2's medication in a paper bag which were not locked and accessible to residents. S1 and S2 confirmed S2 is a live-in staff and sleeps at night in the office area 7 days out of the week. LPAs toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and 7 days of nonperishable food. LPAs at random inspected 10 canned foods and observed 2 cans of food and 2 yogurts cups that had expired. While touring the kitchen LPAs observed a small pill cup contained 2 medication tablets which was left unattended in the kitchen cabinet which did not have locking capabilities. LPAs also observed 2 knives and 1 multi-purpose scissors on the kitchen counter, hidden underneath a kitchen towel by S1, which was unlocked and accessible to residents in care. Fire extinguisher located in the kitchen was observed last serviced on 01/20/2024. Continuation on LIC 809-C, Page 1 of 3. Page 2 of 3. LPAs observed 4 resident bedrooms. LPAs observed resident R1 was laying in bed and LPAs observed the bed was attached with full bed rails. S1 stated R1 was not under Hospice Services at this time. LPAs observed 1 bottle of hydrogen peroxide in resident R3's bathroom cabinet unlocked and accessible located in R3's bedroom. LPAs toured the garage and noted the door to the garage was unlocked during inspection. LPAs observed drawers in the garage, drawer which contained toxic chemicals such as Disinfecting wipes, Dishwasher Detergent and Spackle and tools such as Box Cutter Razor Blade, Hammer and Wrench. LPAs observed the garage drawer was unlocked and accessible to residents in care. Laundry area was observed laundry detergent was locked and inaccessible to residents. During visit, LPAs toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPAs observed 1 shed which contained tools that were accessible to residents in care. The shed door was not locked and staff had placed a round brick to stop the door from opening. LPAs observed 1 locked shed used for storage space. Both sheds were used as storage space and not habitual space. LPAs observed a pool in the backyard with two gates door which were locked and inaccessible to residents. LPAs observed Chlorine tablets near the pool filter in an unlocked gated area. LPAs observed all windows and screens in good repair and working condition. During inspection LPAs observed facility disaster drill which was conducted on 09/01/2024. LPAs inspected 3 bathrooms which all had non slip surface and grab bars in the showers. LPAs observed hot water temperature measured by thermometer which ranged from 108.9 - 109.2 degrees F. LPAs observed 1 prescription lotion, 3 ointment bottles and 1 multi-purpose scissors in the cabinet in Bathroom #1 which were unlocked and accessible to resident in care. LPA Yanez reviewed and inspected resident files and medication at random for two residents and all medications were recorded on the Centrally Stored Medication Record. LPAs reviewed 2 staff files. LPAs observed staff S2 did not have Statement of Acknowledging Requirement to Report Suspected Abuse of Dependent Adults and Elders. Staff S1 confirmed S2 did not have the document in S2's file. Page 3 of 3. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, please see LIC 809-D. Technical Violation was provided during today's visit. Failure to correct the cited deficiency, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Licensee/Administrator was not present during exit interview. This report was reviewed with Lead Caregiver (S1), Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
87555 (b)(8) All food shall be of good quality. Commercial foods shall be approved by appropriate federal, state and local authorities. Food in damaged containers shall not be accepted, used or retained. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee did not ensure food stored at the facility were not expired wherein LPA Rai observed 4 out of 10 canned foods and packaged food were expired which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator was not present during today's visit. Licensee/ Administrator to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will ensure all food stored at the facility is not expired and in-service training is scheduled by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87705(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (1) Knives, matches, firearms, tools and other items that could constitute a danger to the resident(s). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee did not ensure multiple knives were stored inaccessible to residents which LPAs observed in the kitchen, bathroom, garage and backyard which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/ Administrator was not present during today's visit. Administrator to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will ensure knives are stored inaccessible to residents and in-service training is scheduled by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
87705(f)(2) Over-the-counter medication, nutritional supplements or vitamins, alcohol ... and toxic substances such as certain plants, gardening supplies, cleaning supplies and disinfectants. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, Licensee did not ensure over-the-counter medication, supplements/vitamins, toxic substances, gardening supplies were stored inaccessible to residents with Dementia in staff room, backyard, office and bathroom which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/ Administrator was not present during today's visit. Administrator to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will ensure over-the-counter medication, supplements/vitamins, toxic substances, gardening supplies were stored inaccessible to residents and in-service training is scheduled by POC due date. (con't) or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
87465 (h)(2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPAs observed R1's medication was placed in small container in a cabinet which did not have locking capability which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator was not present during today's visit. Administrator to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will ensure centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place and in-service training is scheduled by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
87202 (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPAs observed a mattress and S2's medications in the office area. S1 and S2 stated S2 is a live-in staff and uses the office area as a bedroom which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/ Administrator was not present during today's visit. Administrator to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will ensure facility maintains fire clearance and create a plan to occupy the office as a living space for S2 by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87608(a)(5)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
87608 Postural Supports (a)(5)(B) Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited except for residents who are currently receiving hospice care and have a hospice care plan that specifies the need for full bed rails. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPAs observed resident R2 using a full bed rail and S1 confirmed R2 was not on hospice services which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/ Administrator was not present during today's visit. Administrator to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and to submit an exception request if R2 will continue to use a full bed rail by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87412(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2024
87412 Personnel Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, 1 out of 2 staff files was incomplete and did not contain Statement of Acknowledging Requirement to Report Suspected Abuse of Dependent Adults and Elders which poses/posed an potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/ Administrator was not present during today's visit. Administrator to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will ensure staff files are complete by POC due date.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 23, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conduced an unannounced case management visit and met with Lead Caregiver, Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin. LPA Rai stated the purpose of today's visit to assess the facility's request for an exception for R1's prohibited condition. The licensee has submitted an exception request for R1 who is depend on others to perform all activities of daily living. Staff were interviewed concerning R1's care and the requirement of the exception. R1 is not receiving Hospice services at this time. At approximately 8:32pm, LPA Rai observed R1 in a reclined position in bed. R1 was awake and LPA Rai attempted to conduct an interview but R1 did not respond to questions. R1 was not able to move arms, legs or hands. R1 was observed with contractures in the hands and R1 was unable to grab items such as a glass of water or hairbrush. S1 stated the facility staff provide assistance to R1 in all areas of activity of daily living. At this time, the Department is reviewing Licensee's request for the exception for R1. No deficiencies were cited. Exit interview conducted with Lead Caregiver, Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2023
Sep 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA Rai met with Lead Caregiver (LC), Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin and stated the purposed of today's visit. LC could not get a hold of Licensee Leilani Cortes and left a message. LPA Rai observed 3 staff in the facility, 4 residents sitting in living room, 1 resident sitting in the dining room, and 1 resident in the resident room. LPA Rai observed 3 cameras in the facility. One camera is located in the living room, one camera is located in the dining room and one camera is located in the kitchen S1 stated the cameras only record video and no audio. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility with Staff (S1). When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food. LPA Rai did not observe at least 7 days of nonperishable food. LPA Rai observed approximately 20 canned foods and approximately 5 boxes of various flour. LPA Rai observed an emergency food supply in the living room next to the TV, but the food supply box was open LPA Rai could not verify if the recorded pouches of food in the box were the correct number of pouches inside the box. Licensee (LC) Leilani Cortes stated she will follow up with the staff to ensure the emergency food supply box stays closed and ensure the facility maintains one week worth of non perishable foods which will be sufficient for 3 meals and 3 snacks for 6 residents for one week. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents in the garage area. LPA Rai observed a podium in the garage and LC clarified they do not use the podium and the garage area is used as activity room for the residents. LPA Rai observed swimming pool in the backyard is fenced and inaccessible to the residents. Continuation on LIC 809-C, Page 1 of 4. Page 2 of 4. During tour of the resident rooms, LPA Rai observed 6 out of the 6 beds have half bed side rails. S1 stated residents do not receive Hospice services. LPA Rai reviewed 6 resident files and did not observe written order from a physician for half bed side rails. LPA Rai observed oxygen tank in resident R6's room. S1 stated R6 is discharged from hospice services since yesterday 9/19/2023 and does not have home health services at this time. S1 stated R6 has dementia diagnosis and R6 is not mentally and physically capable of operating the equipment, R6 is not able to determine his/her need for oxygen, and R6 is not able to administer it him/herself. S1 stated R6 does not have an appropriately skilled professional performing oxygen administration. S1 stated R6 requires total care and R6 is bedridden not able to reposition his/herself in bed. LPA Rai notified S1 that total care is a prohibited condition and S1 stated R6 was on hospice services but was discharged from services yesterday 9/19/2023. S1 stated there are no assessments completed for R6 to go back to hospice services or initiate home health services. The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The shower had grab bars and non-skid mats. The water temperature in the bathroom sinks ranged from 105.1F-106.5F. The water temperature in the kitchen sink was 105.3F. Facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in working condition. 4 out of 4 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 6 residents. LPA observed 3 residents did not have an appraisal/needs and services plan since their admission date. LPA Rai observed 1 resident did not have a medical assessment completed, such as the LIC 602A Physician's Report, since their admission date. LPA Rai observed 3 out of 6 residents with dementia diagnosis did not have annual needs and services plan, last needs and services plan on file was completed in 2020. LPA Rai observed 4 out of 6 residents with dementia diagnosis did not have annual medical assessment completed, such as the LIC 602A Physician's Report, last medical assessment on file was completed in 2019, 2020, and 2021. LPA Rai did not observe TB test results for R3 in resident's file. Page 3 of 4. LPA Rai reviewed 4 of 6 resident's weight log. LPA Rai did not observed the weight record of R3 and R6. S1 stated R3 was recently admitted and did not have a weight log. Based on record review, R3 has been admitted to the facility for 3 months and did not have any recorded weight log. S1 and S3 weighed R3 during today's visit and initiated weight log. Based on LPA Rai's observation and S1's interview, R6 is bedridden was discharged from Hospice yesterday 9/19/2023. LPA Rai did not observe any Hospice notes or facility notes on resident's weight log. S1 stated Hospice sometimes measures R6's arm, but LPA Rai did not observe any progress notes mentioning resident's arm measurements. S1 could not located records with arm measurements. S1 could not locate a tape measurement in the facility. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. LPA Rai and S1 counted the medications for R2 and R5. LPA Rai reviewed R2's and R5's Centrally Stored Medication Records with the stored medications. During a random review/audit of resident's medication bottle and LIC 622 Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record, 4 out of 7 medications prescribed to R2 was not given as prescribed by the doctor. LPA Rai along with Staff (S1) counted the tablets from the medication bottles. R2's medication #1 were counted 10 tablets instead of 0 tablets, since the medication bottle should have been empty if medication was administered according to the MD's prescription and order on the prescription bottle.R2's medication #2 were counted 140 tablets instead of 142, which concluded there were 2 medication pills missing from the prescription bottle. R2's medication #3 were counted 32 tablets instead of 34 tables, which concluded there were 2 medication pills missing from the prescription bottle. R2's medication #5 were counted 41 tablets, when there should have been 40 tablets, which concluded there were 1 tablets extra and resident was not given one dose of the medication. S1 stated R2's physician did not place any medications on hold and LPA Rai did not observe any MD orders in R2's file for a medication hold. S1 stated R2 was not admitted to the hospital or left the facility for long periods of time which would cause for resident to miss a dose of medication. S1 stated R2 did not refuse any medications. S1 stated S1 is a live-in staff and S1 is the only staff member who administered the medications to the resident. Page 4 of 4. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 809-D. 87411 Personnel Requirements - General is being cited during today's visit. LPA Rai would like to clarify the facility personnel being in sufficient in numbers is not the concern, however the facility personnel's actions and documentation are observed to be not competent to provide the services necessary to meet the resident's needs. LPA Rai spoke with Licensee Leilani Cortes over the phone and went over today's report and deficiencies cited during today's visit. Administrator agreed and understood. LPA Rai went over Administrator expectations of the administrator being present in the facility at least 20 hours a week. Licensee Leilani Cortes is the administrator of this facility. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Leilani Cortes. A copy of this report was provided to Lead Caregiver, Rose (Rosalia) Calungcagin. Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2023
The state marks this report as 12 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 11. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Sep 22, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christine Dolores and Simi Rai arrived unannounced to conduct the facility's annual inspection focusing on infection control. LPAs met with lead caregiver, Rosalia "Rose" Calungcagin. During visit, LPAs toured the facility to include the living room, kitchen, resident rooms, bathrooms, garage, and backyard. All exit routes were free and clear of obstruction. Swimming pool observed fenced and locked. Facility temperature maintained at 71 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff present are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. All staff observed wearing a face mask. N95 fit testing conducted by the Administrator. Facility has a central entry point for symptom screening and temperature check for all visitors. LPA Dolores advised to create a symptom screening log for all staff prior to starting their shift. Hand sanitizer made available. Bathrooms supplied with hand washing sign, paper supplies, and hygiene products. LPAs observed facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies. Facility has a designated visitation area and visitation procedures. Facility staff are trained on infection control. LPA reviewed the facility's procedures to isolation and monitoring for symptoms and temperature. The following posters observed to include required mask, COVID-19 precautions, symptoms of COVID, and visitation procedures. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Advisory note provided. This report was reviewed with Rosalia "Rose" Calungcagin and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2022
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20211 state visit · 3 documents
Sep 13, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow hospice care plan resulting in resident's fall.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joanne Roadilla conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation to deliver the investigation findings on the above allegations. LPA spoke to Licensee/Administrator Leilani Cortes to discuss the purpose of the visit. On 02/19/21, the department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 02/26/21, LPA conducted an initial 10-day investigation tele-visit. LPA interviewed licensee, two regular staff (S1-S2) and two temporary staff (S3-S4) at the facility. LPA also requested for residents’ records. Continued on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated During licensee’s interview, licensee stated that she was notified of the incident around 8am that day. Licensee then notified the hospice nurse (RN) of the incident so they can check R1’s condition. On 05/17/21, LPA interviewed RN. During the interview, hospice RN stated that RN visits R1 once a week and as needed. RN checks on R1’s as needed care management, and if there is any concern, licensee calls RN and RN would go and visit to check on R1. LPA interviewed RN. During the interview, RN verified a call from the licensee was recorded on 02/19/21 at 8:49am to notify RN about the incident with R1. RN stated R1 was visited and checked the day of the report. Per staff (S2) interview, R1 is not a fall risk. Based on records review, R1 is not a fall risk. Hospice care plan dated 10/01/20 stated per staff, no fall for the past 2 months and fall precautions reviewed/implemented with staff. There is no record of any incident of fall since R1 was admitted on 05/14/20. The department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews and records review, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur. Therefore, the Department found the above allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. No citations were issued per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Report was reviewed and a copy provided to Rosalia Calungcagin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2021 · control 26-AS-20210219100622
Sep 13, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident fell while in care. Licensee did not provide medical assistance in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joanne Roadilla conducted an unannounced Complaint Investigation to deliver the investigation findings on the above allegations. LPA spoke to Licensee/Administrator Leilani Cortes to discuss the purpose of the visit. On 02/19/21, the department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 02/26/21, LPA conducted an initial 10-day investigation tele-visit. LPA interviewed licensee, two regular staff (S1-S2) and two temporary staff (S3-S4) at the facility. LPA also requested for residents’ records. Continued on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated Resident fell while in care Based on staff interviews, 4 out of 4 stated that they did not hear resident (R1) fall out of bed. All staff stated they found R1 already on the floor at around 8am on 02/19/21. One staff stated R1 was last checked around 7:10am that day while staff was doing rounds on the residents and R1 was awake and laying on the bed. Licensee did not provide medical assistance in a timely manner From staff interviews, 4 out of 4 staff stated that licensee was notified when R1 was found on the floor around 8am on 02/19/21. Temporary staff stated that they called the licensee several times that day as soon as they found R1 on the floor. During licensee’s interview, licensee stated that she was notified of the incident around 8am that day. Licensee then notified the hospice nurse (RN) of the incident so they can check R1’s condition. Afterwards, licensee instructed the two temporary staff to take turns watching R1 until RN arrived at the facility. Licensee stated that RN called her after the visit and notified her that R1 was fine, was not in pain, there was no bruising, no bleeding, R1’s vitals were good and that R1 responds to RN. Licensee also stated that when the temporary staff notified her the next day that R1 has some bruising on the right leg, licensee called and reported the bruising to RN and was advised to ice the leg 3x a day. On 05/17/21, LPA interviewed RN. During the interview, RN verified a call from the licensee was recorded on 02/19/21 at 8:49am to notify RN about the incident with R1. RN stated R1 was visited and checked the day of the report. The department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews and records review, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur. Therefore, the Department found the above allegations to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. No citations were issued per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Report was reviewed and a copy provided to Rosalia Calungcagin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2021 · control 26-AS-20210219094337
Sep 13, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joanne Roadilla conducted an unannounced Infection Control site visit today. LPA initially met with staff Rosalia Calungcagin and Administrator (ADM) Leilani Cortes arrived shortly after. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and out with staff. Facility was observed to have a designated entry point for universal symptom screening. Hand sanitizers were available throughout the facility and all staff present were observed wearing masks. All bathrooms were inspected and observed supplied with hygiene products and paper towels. Bedrooms, kitchen, dining room, living room, and the outside grounds of the facility were inspected. All fire exit routes were clear of obstruction. Facility also observed to have adequate supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs). LPA reviewed the facility COVID-19 related infection control policies and procedures with ADM including screening, surveillance testing, disinfecting, staffing, training, isolation, PPE use and inventory. Per ADM, all staff and residents are 100% vaccinated. No deficiencies issued per Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. LPA reviewed report with, and a copy provided to Leilani Cortes.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the September 24, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Cortes, Geoffrey & Leilani, licensed since 2004.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2004, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 9
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2004, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Pruneridge Residential Care Home
Is Pruneridge Residential Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Pruneridge Residential Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Pruneridge Residential Care Home been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Pruneridge Residential Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Pruneridge Residential Care Home cost?
$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 78 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,900 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 78 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Pruneridge Residential Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Cortes, Geoffrey & Leilani, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Santa Clara is 0.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Pruneridge Residential Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Pruneridge Residential Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PRUNERIDGE RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435201557. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Cortes, Geoffrey & Leilani, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Santa Clara County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Santa Clara County