Peninsula Reflections is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Colma, San Mateo County, California — state license #415600976, licensed for 57 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 3, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

23 homes in view

Peninsula Reflections

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 57 residents · Colma, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415600976, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
205 Collins Ave · Colma, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 731-4670
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 57 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 57 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. MAXIMUM OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY AND NO BEDRIDDEN ALLOWED ON SECOND FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 19 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 3, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 3, 2026
Occupancy at the December 5, 2025 visit
35 of 57 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 2, 2021 to December 5, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not answer residents calls for assistance Staff could not communicate with emergency personnel Staff did not have access to residents emergency paperwork for Emergency personnel

On December 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Activities Director, Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not answer residents call for assistance, according to the reporting party, on June 16, 2025, emergency personnel responded to the facility for a resident (R1) complaining of body pain. According to the reporting party, when emergency personnel responded to the facility and went to the second floor, there were no staff member to be seen and R1 was yelling for yelp. In addition, reporting party indicated that R1 was yelling for help for over two hours with no staff attending R1's needs. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the staff on shift that night. According to Staff 1 (S1), he/she worked on the second floor, Staff 2 (S2) worked on the first floor and Staff 3 (S3) was working on both floors. S1 and S2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250701130341
Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Staff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition Staff did not notify authorized representative of change in condition

On November 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Anna Allas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury in care, according to the reporting party, on May 14, 2025, a Registered Nurse (RN) from Home Health found pressure wounds on Resident 1’s (R1’s) feet and an open Stage IV sacral pressure wound. The facility’s LVN was educated on wound care and staff were reminded to ensure R1 is being repositioned and monitored for hydration and eating for wound healing and overall health, however according to reporting party it was observed that R1 sat in a wheelchair for 6-8 hours a day before the wound was reported on May 14, 2025. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator, staff, reviewed R1’s file; including but not limited to, service plan, home health notes, hothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250722131624
Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: - Facility staff are attempting to illegally evict resident

On 05/14/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with the administrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed pertinent documents regarding the resident's admission agreement and status at the facility. According to documentation reviewed show that the resident was not formally evicted by the facility until 05/13/2024 with an formal eviction notice. The resident is under respite services under contract with him/her hospital. The contract reviewed states that the contract is set to expire on 05/13/2024 and also advised on the initiation of sending him/her to the hospital to continue services due to the expiration of the contract. The facility did not initiate the eviction. Additionally it was found that the hospital the resident is under respite contract with discontinued the refillthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240510114244
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff are mismanaging resident's medication

On 04/26/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with the admininstrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews, made facility observations, and reviewed records. Per records reviewed regarding medication, the medication is marked as being administered accurately. Interviews with staff indicate that the resident did swallow the medication when it was provided and the med tech spoke to the resident during this time to ensure it was swallowed. The med tech confirmed this observation. Due to contradicting interview details this allegation is unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240214151800
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff did not prevent another resident from entering resident's room - Staff do not respond to residents' call buttons in timely manner - Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier - Staff do not prevent another resident from waking resident - Staff put a resident in residents room that is not compatable with resident.

On 02/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed resident documents. The resident entering the room of R1 had dementia. This facility is an all dementia facility and rooms do have locks that are accessible by staff via key, but for safety reasons staff do not lock doors. As a result of the resident entering the room of R1, staff began to close and lock the door of R1 as requested by R1 since R1 does not have dementia. Call button requests made by R1 were met to the best of the facilities abilities as there are cargivers assigened to groups of residents. Staff responded accordingly based on operational needs and requirements at the times the requests were made. A delay may have incurred, but not based in intent, but staff availabthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 14-AS-20231113115810
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file19typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253302024770202312020221102021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 731-4670

Is Peninsula Reflections licensed?

Yes — Peninsula Reflections is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Colma (San Mateo County): California license #415600976, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 57 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 3, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Peninsula Reflections care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Peninsula Reflections with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 57 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. MAXIMUM OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY AND NO BEDRIDDEN ALLOWED ON SECOND FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.

How much does Peninsula Reflections cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Peninsula Reflections's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Peninsula Reflections accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Peninsula Reflections is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

35 of 57 beds occupied (61%) when the state visited on December 5, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Peninsula Reflections?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 19 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2021 for Peninsula Reflections; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 5, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not answer residents calls for assistance Staff could not communicate with emergency personnel Staff did not have access to residents emergency paperwork for Emergency personnel
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On December 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Activities Director, Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not answer residents call for assistance, according to the reporting party, on June 16, 2025, emergency personnel responded to the facility for a resident (R1) complaining of body pain. According to the reporting party, when emergency personnel responded to the facility and went to the second floor, there were no staff member to be seen and R1 was yelling for yelp. In addition, reporting party indicated that R1 was yelling for help for over two hours with no staff attending R1's needs. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the staff on shift that night. According to Staff 1 (S1), he/she worked on the second floor, Staff 2 (S2) worked on the first floor and Staff 3 (S3) was working on both floors. S1 and S2CDSS inspection report, December 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250701130341
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Staff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition Staff did not notify authorized representative of change in condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On November 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Anna Allas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury in care, according to the reporting party, on May 14, 2025, a Registered Nurse (RN) from Home Health found pressure wounds on Resident 1’s (R1’s) feet and an open Stage IV sacral pressure wound. The facility’s LVN was educated on wound care and staff were reminded to ensure R1 is being repositioned and monitored for hydration and eating for wound healing and overall health, however according to reporting party it was observed that R1 sat in a wheelchair for 6-8 hours a day before the wound was reported on May 14, 2025. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator, staff, reviewed R1’s file; including but not limited to, service plan, home health notes, hoCDSS inspection report, November 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250722131624

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility staff are attempting to illegally evict resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 05/14/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with the administrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed pertinent documents regarding the resident's admission agreement and status at the facility. According to documentation reviewed show that the resident was not formally evicted by the facility until 05/13/2024 with an formal eviction notice. The resident is under respite services under contract with him/her hospital. The contract reviewed states that the contract is set to expire on 05/13/2024 and also advised on the initiation of sending him/her to the hospital to continue services due to the expiration of the contract. The facility did not initiate the eviction. Additionally it was found that the hospital the resident is under respite contract with discontinued the refillCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240510114244
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff are mismanaging resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/26/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with the admininstrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews, made facility observations, and reviewed records. Per records reviewed regarding medication, the medication is marked as being administered accurately. Interviews with staff indicate that the resident did swallow the medication when it was provided and the med tech spoke to the resident during this time to ensure it was swallowed. The med tech confirmed this observation. Due to contradicting interview details this allegation is unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefoCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240214151800
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff did not prevent another resident from entering resident's room - Staff do not respond to residents' call buttons in timely manner - Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier - Staff do not prevent another resident from waking resident - Staff put a resident in residents room that is not compatable with resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed resident documents. The resident entering the room of R1 had dementia. This facility is an all dementia facility and rooms do have locks that are accessible by staff via key, but for safety reasons staff do not lock doors. As a result of the resident entering the room of R1, staff began to close and lock the door of R1 as requested by R1 since R1 does not have dementia. Call button requests made by R1 were met to the best of the facilities abilities as there are cargivers assigened to groups of residents. Staff responded accordingly based on operational needs and requirements at the times the requests were made. A delay may have incurred, but not based in intent, but staff availabCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2024 · control 14-AS-20231113115810

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Services provided were not conducted so as to continue and promote, to the extent possible, independence and self-direction for resident - Staff were not sufficient in numbers and competent to provide services to meet resident's needs - Staff did not ensure changes in resident's physical condition were reported to the resident's physician and/or responsible party. - Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs - Communications from authorized representative have not been answered promptly or appropriately by staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an un-announced complaint investigaton visit to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA spoke to Wellness Director Kathy Nguyen and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investiagtion LPA conducted interviews and reviewed pertinent documents relating to the care of R1. According to interviews with staff, they acknowledge that the resident was independent and that they obliged by her requests when they were made. It was said that the resident preferred to either be in her bed, chair, or wheel chair, and so they allowed her to do so. They did not promote her to stay or remain in those items. She chose it on her own. Continued on next page LIC9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2023 · control 14-AS-20220513145858
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Resident contracted lice while in care - Facility does not inform resident's responsible party of changes in resident's condition - Facility staff mismanaged resident's medications
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an un-announced complaint investigaton visit to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. LPA spoke to Wellness Director Kathy Nguyen and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews, reviewed records of R1, and made observations of the resident. It cannot be determined the source of the lice. No other residents or staff had lice before or after R1. There were not many visitors to R1. LPA could not determine the source. In regards to informing the responsible party of changes in resident's condition, and medications mismanagement, LPA could not determine if either are true. Facility says updates and informing of the the responsibily pary did happen at all times. In regards to medications, there was a flow of information issue between doctor and responsible party with the facility that disrupted or caused issues with medication information being shareCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2023 · control 14-AS-20221021124700

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 19 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
19
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 731-4670
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Peninsula Reflections? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.