Yellow Rose Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo County, California — state license #405850002, licensed for 15 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated October 30, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Yellow Rose Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 15 residents · Paso Robles, CA · San Luis Obispo County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #405850002, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4225 Camp 8 Rd · Paso Robles, San Luis Obispo County
Phone
(805) 286-8477
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 15 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR 15 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5 RESIDENTSState service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 30, 2025.

Most recent state visit
October 30, 2025
Occupancy at the July 11, 2024 visit
10 of 15 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 16, 2022 to July 11, 2024. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility in disrepair.

At 10:00am on 07/11/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LAP) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to deliver final findings to the allegations to this complaint. LPA met with Licensee, Abiy Tesfazgy, annoucned who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a coursory tour the the facility. As to the allegation of, “Facility in disrepair.” It was alleged that the facilities kitchen sink, and thermostat for half of the facility's HVAC unit have been inoperable for months. It was discovered through interviews, observation and documentation that on 07/01/2024, LPA Jeffries conducted interviews of 4 of 10 residents. R1- R4 all stated that the facility gets warm, and the administrator provides fans. On 07/01/2024 LPA observed the north side of the facility to be blowing air, however the air was not conditioned to be cold. LPA noted and photographed the thermometer placed on the south side of the facility to be 82* (f) at 10:56am on date of visit. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Substantiatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240626131239
Jul 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 2 documents
Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure that facility has an adequate supply of fresh fruit.

At 10:10am on 10/05/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct the initial investigation visit to the allegation to this complaint. LPA met with Licensee Abiy Tesfazgy, announced who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA additionally conducted the annual inspection of the facility on this visit on a separate report. At 10:30am on 10/05/2023, Licensee and LPA conducted a cursory tour of the facility, focused on the kitchen, pantry, and outside storage shed. LPA observed 2 dozen tangerines, 15 bananas, 5 apples, there was ample supply of fresh vegetables, and meats that were refrigerated. LPA observed at least 2 days supply of perishable foods on hand during this cursory tour of the facility. LPA interviewed Staff 1 and Staff 2 (S1, and S2) who stated that the fresh fruit in the facility is stocked daily if needed and at a minimum of every other day. Both S1 and S2 stated that there is always fresh fruit on hand at the facility. LPA inthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231004120009
Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints5typical 1
State visits on file12typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024331202312020223412021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Luis Obispo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 286-8477

Is Yellow Rose Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Yellow Rose Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Paso Robles (San Luis Obispo County): California license #405850002, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 15 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated October 30, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Yellow Rose Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Yellow Rose Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR 15 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5 RESIDENTS

How much does Yellow Rose Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Yellow Rose Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Luis Obispo County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Yellow Rose Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yellow Rose Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

10 of 15 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on July 11, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Yellow Rose Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Yellow Rose Assisted Living; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 11, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 10:00am on 07/11/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LAP) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to deliver final findings to the allegations to this complaint. LPA met with Licensee, Abiy Tesfazgy, annoucned who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a coursory tour the the facility. As to the allegation of, “Facility in disrepair.” It was alleged that the facilities kitchen sink, and thermostat for half of the facility's HVAC unit have been inoperable for months. It was discovered through interviews, observation and documentation that on 07/01/2024, LPA Jeffries conducted interviews of 4 of 10 residents. R1- R4 all stated that the facility gets warm, and the administrator provides fans. On 07/01/2024 LPA observed the north side of the facility to be blowing air, however the air was not conditioned to be cold. LPA noted and photographed the thermometer placed on the south side of the facility to be 82* (f) at 10:56am on date of visit. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C SubstantiatCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240626131239

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure that facility has an adequate supply of fresh fruit.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 10:10am on 10/05/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct the initial investigation visit to the allegation to this complaint. LPA met with Licensee Abiy Tesfazgy, announced who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA additionally conducted the annual inspection of the facility on this visit on a separate report. At 10:30am on 10/05/2023, Licensee and LPA conducted a cursory tour of the facility, focused on the kitchen, pantry, and outside storage shed. LPA observed 2 dozen tangerines, 15 bananas, 5 apples, there was ample supply of fresh vegetables, and meats that were refrigerated. LPA observed at least 2 days supply of perishable foods on hand during this cursory tour of the facility. LPA interviewed Staff 1 and Staff 2 (S1, and S2) who stated that the fresh fruit in the facility is stocked daily if needed and at a minimum of every other day. Both S1 and S2 stated that there is always fresh fruit on hand at the facility. LPA inCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231004120009

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not being adequately fed. Facility lacks adequate supplies. Facility is odoriferous. Facility lacks a food menu. Facility is in disrepair. Residents are not being given the right medications. Facility lacks a fire extinguisher. Facility does not provide a safe environment for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation to the facility above to issue final findings. LPA met with Abiy Tesfazgy, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Jeffries started the investigation on 9/10/2020 and met with the administrator telephonically, and conducted resident interviews on 10/5/2020. LPA Olson conducted additional staff interviews on 4/14/22, and had additional observations on 3/18/22. On the allegation: Residents are not being adequately fed. To investigate this allegation, the LPA interviewed staff and residents, obtained photographic evidence, and observed the facility during a Facetime video walkthrough. Based on the evidence gathered, it was determined that the facility produces and prepares breakfast, lunch and dinner for all residents of the facility seven days a week and provides snacks. It was observed, photographed and confirmed by interviews that the supply of food was of the quality anCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2022 · control 29-AS-20200909085757
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident left in soiled diaper for extended period of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation to the facility above to issue final findings. LPA met with Abiy Tesfazgy, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Jeffries started the investigation on 1/21/2021 and met with the administrator telephonically. Resident 1 (R1)’s Responsible Party and Power of Attorney (POA) was interviewed on 1/21/2021 at 10:30am. LPA Olson conducted additional staff and resident interviews on 4/14/2022. The complainant’s concern was that on 1/13/2021, R1 went to the hospital at 10:40pm and was observed to have a soiled brief and a UTI. The administrator confirmed R1 went to the hospital on the night of 1/13/2021 for a UTI. The facility is located in a rural area and internet maps showed the hospital is 16 miles or about 22 minutes away from the facility. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2022 · control 29-AS-20210114091037
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff is not following masking guidelines.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint investigation visit to the facility above. LPA met with Abiy Tesfazgy, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with staff and noticed one staff in the kitchen preparing lunch wearing a mask. LPA observed a second staff walking by also wearing a mask. LPA interviewed Administrator, staff and resident (R1) regarding the allegation. Administrator interview revealed that staff always wear masks in the facility. Residents 1 (R1) interview stated the staff usually wear masks in the facility. Continued on 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 16, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220309160335

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Yellow Rose Assisted Living?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Tesfazgy Group Llc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 286-8477
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Yellow Rose Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.