Small home · Licensed for 6 · Paso Robles
Paso Senior Care
197 Cardinal Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446Licensed since 2015
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 5 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Paso Senior Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $4,100–$6,150
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $4,100–$6,150
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,100–$6,300
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,500
- $7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $7,000
11 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,250–$6,400.
- Paso Robles Senior LivingPaso Robles · 0.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Royal Home CarePaso Robles · 1.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Annette LodgePaso Robles · 2.3 mi · Mid-size home$5,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Irene's Board & CarePaso Robles · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Heavenly HomePaso Robles · 2.7 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission LodgePaso Robles · 5.6 mi · Mid-size home$6,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Monterey LodgePaso Robles · 5.7 mi · Mid-size home$6,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Country Care HomePaso Robles · 5.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Roses Assisted LivingAtascadero · 7.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Park Place Assisted LivingAtascadero · 9.0 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Garden View InnAtascadero · 9.1 mi · Mid-size home$4,950Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
197 Cardinal Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Adventist Health Twin CitiesHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.7 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #405801985 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide a comfortable environment
At 2:40pm, on 9/10/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate the allegation of this complaint. LPA met with Lead Staff Mylene Cabello announced who he was and the reason for the visit. During today’s visit LPA checked the wellbeing of all residents, documented the temperature in the facility and each resident bedroom, and conducted interviews. On the allegation, facility did not provide a comfortable environment; it was alleged that on 9/8/2026 multiple witnesses reported the facility felt very hot inside and one witness noted rooms in the facility to be over 90°F using a handheld temperature device. There were fans noted throughout the facility and a portable air conditioning (AC) unit that was set up in one resident’s room with the exhaust tube running into the hallway. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Substantiated It was also alleged that Resident #1’s (R1’s) bedroom was also hot and they were noted to be soaking wet in perspiration and had a very high blood pressure. During today’s visit between 2:40pm and 3:00pm lead staff and LPA toured the facility. Using a handheld thermometer, LPA documented resident bedroom and common area temperatures ranging from 79.1°F to 81.6°F, within regulation of 78°F to 85°F. LPA noted this facility has central AC, at 2:42pm LPA noted the unit was on, set to cool to 64°F, the thermostat stated the inside temperature is 79°F, and LPA noted cool air coming from facility vents. Upon arriving to the facility LPA also noted additional portable AC units were being delivered and set up in each resident room with exhaust properly venting outside. Review of multiple resources recorded the highest temperature in Paso Robles, CA on 9/8/2026 at 105°F and as of today’s visit the projected high for the day is 103°F. Multiple witnesses who visited the facility on 9/8/2026 between 11:30am – 4:00pm state the facility felt hot. At approximately 4:00pm one witness took the temperature of the facility with a handheld thermometer noting multiple areas of the facility to be over 90°F. Staff stated that on 9/8/2026 backup staff were working as the primary staff had the day off and the reason they did not turn on the central AC was because they did not know how to operate it. Staff stated on 9/8/2026 there were three portable AC units in the facility one in the bedroom next to the dining room with the exhaust properly venting out the sliding glass door and two in the first and last bedrooms on the left side of the hallway with the exhaust from both venting to the hallway. Resources state that venting a portable AC unit to another area inside the building will make the building hotter. Interviews reported different versions of R1’s condition. Witnesses stated R1 felt hot and sweaty, with blood pressures of 260/86, 246/86, and 160/83 as the facility cooled after the central AC was turned on. Staff stated they took R1’s blood pressure at approximately 5:00pm using an automatic wrist blood pressure device and recall it was 167/80. Witness and staff interviews reveal calling emergency services was not discussed as an option for R1. Interviews and LPA observation noted R1 cannot communicate verbally or in writing. Although the LPA could not conduct clear interviews with most residents due to cognitive impairments, resident interviews did reveal that their have been times the facility was not comfortable due to it being too hot. Licensee was provided a copy of PIN-25-10-CCLD regarding heat preparedness. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Based on all interviews conducted and documents obtained, at this time the above allegation was found to be substantiated, there is a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted with Licensee/Administrator over the phone, deficiency cited on LIC9099-D page, report signed, appeal rights and report provided to the Lead Staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260910132613
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 24, 2026
(b) A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained at all times. (2) The facility shall cool rooms to a comfortable range, between 78 degrees F (26 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C)... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not cool the facility within regulation which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee states in addition to the measures they have taken to cool the facility they will conduct staff training on how to use the various AC units and vent them properly, heat preparedness and signs of heat exhaustion. They will email LPA documentation and signed staff roster by 9/24/2026
Jun 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:00am, on 6/23/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Lead Staff Mylene Cabello, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. At 9:05am Lead Staff and LPA conducted a full tour of the facility. This facility is a single story residential home with five resident bedrooms (one is dual occupancy), three and a half bathrooms (one is en-suite to the dual occupancy resident room, two are for public use, and the half bathroom is for staff and located off the laundry room). There is a living room, dining room, and kitchen. A staff bedroom is located off the dining room. Access to the laundry room and garage is through a locked door for resident safety. LPA noted that the backyard has seating and shade for residents and visitors. LPA noted fresh fruit in the kitchen for residents to enjoy freely. The facility has battery operated smoke detectors in each bedroom and hallway leading to bedrooms that are all working, the carbon monoxide detector is in the hallway and functioning normally. LPA observed a fire extinguisher near the kitchen that was tagged current and in the green compression range, purchased on 2/28/2026. LPA tested facility hot water at 111.4°F, within regulation temperatures 105-120°F. LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods. LPA noted that the facility has no obstructions in hallways, doorways or exits. Medications, staff and resident files are locked in a cabinet in the dining room. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records. LPA conducted a staff and resident file review. LPA and Lead Staff conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. There were no deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted, report signed, and report provided to the Lead Staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2026
The state marks this report as 10 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jun 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:30am on 06/11//2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Lead Staff Mylene Cavello (S1), LPA and S1 called administrator Maynard Marcos by phone who provided permission for S1 to sign for inspection visit. LPA noted that S1 has a LIC308, Designation of Facility Responsibility for this facility on file. S1 and LPA conducted a full tour of the facility. This facility is a single-story residential home with 5 resident bedrooms (one is dual occupancy), three and a half bathrooms (one is on-suite and two are for shared/public use). A staff bedroom is located off the dining room and the half bath located near the laundry room is for staff use. There is a living room, dining room, and kitchen. Access to the laundry room and garage is through a locked door for resident safety. LPA noted that the backyard has seating and shade for residents and visitors. LPA noted fresh fruit just outside the kitchen for residents to enjoy freely. Near the dining room there is a piano for residents, visitors, and staff to play. During visit LPA observed residents engaged in coloring and brain stimulating activities. LPA also observed multiple Home Health and Hospice staff visiting residents. The facility has battery operated smoke detectors in each room that are all working, the carbon monoxide detector is in the hallway and functioning normally. LPA observed a fire extinguisher near the kitchen that was in the green compression range, purchased on 03/10/2025. LPA tested facility hot water at 107.3*(f), within regulation temperatures 105*-120* (f). LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods. LPA noted that the facility has no obstructions in hallways, doorways or exits. (Continued on LIC809-C) Medications are stored in a locked cabinet. Staff and client files are locked in a cabinet in the dining room. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records, finding no violations. LPA conducted a staff and resident file review. LPA and S1 conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. There were no deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview, report signed, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2025
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:30am on 07/12//2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with care giver Mylene Cavello (S1), who called administrator Maynard Marco by phone who provided permission for S1 to sign for inspection visit. LPA noted that S1 has a LIC308, Designation of Facility Responsibility for this facility on file with CCLD. S1 and LPA conducted a physical tour of the facility. LPA noted that all exits were free and clear of hazards. LPA noted that all rooms have a working combination carbon monoxide/smoke detector unit that are all hardwired and currently working. LPA noted that all rooms are properly finished with correct bedding linin, personal storage and lighting in accordance with regulations. LPA noted that there is ample linin and personal hygiene and incontinence supplies for all 5 residents presently at the facility. This facility has 5 resident bedrooms, 4 are single occupancy and 1 in double occupancy. The facility has 3 bathrooms all meeting regulations standards. Water in the facility was tested at bathroom 1 and bathroom 3 and found to be within the regulation temperature range of 105*-120* (f). LPA observed there to be more than 2 days of perishable foods and more than 7 days of non-perishable foods for the 6 residents and staff. LPA observe the outside grounds of the facility and noted that patio tables have table umbrellas for shade when residents are utilizing outdoor area of facility. LPA noted that the facility to be clean and in good repair with no hazards present on facility physical tour. LPA found no technical, violations or citations during the physical tour at this time. S1 and LPA conducted a full review of the control tools modules. It was discovered that annual staff training was not completed per regulations for the past 12 month period and a citation was issued for staff annual training (Health and Safety Code 1569.625(b)(2)); It was also discovered that there had been no emergency drills conducted over the past 12 months and no documentation of drills (Health and Safety Code 1569.695(c)). LPA issued two citations, with plan of corrections for two violations. LPA concluded the annual facility inspection. Exit interview, report read, citations issued, appeal rights and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 12, 2024
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jun 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 8:45am on 06/20/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct the annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Meynard Marcos, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. Administrator and LPA conducted a physical tour of the facility. LPA noted that all exits were free and clear of hazards. LPA noted that all rooms have a working combination carbon monoxide/smoke detector unit that are all hardwired and currently working. LPA noted that all rooms are properly finished with correct bedding linin, personal storage and lighting in accordance with regulations. LPA noted that there is ample linin and personal hygiene and incontinence supplies for all 6 residents presently at the facility. This facility has 5 resident bedrooms, 4 are single occupancy and 1 in double occupancy. The facility has 3 bathrooms all meeting regulations standards. Water in the facility was tested at bathroom 1 and bathroom 3 and found to be within the regulation temperature range of 105*-120* (f). LPA observed there to be more than 2 days of perishable foods and more than 7 days of non-perishable foods for the 6 residents of the facility. LPA observe the outside grounds of the facility and noted that patio tables have table umbrellas for shade when residents are utilizing outdoor area of facility. LPA noted that one screen needed replacement and one screen needed minor repair acknowledged by Administrator to be already scheduled for repair. LPA noted that the facility to be clean and in good repair with no hazards present on facility physical tour. LPA found no technical, violations or citations during the physical tour at this time. Administrator and LPA conducted a full review of the annual control modules tools. LPA noted that there were no technical, violations or citations issued as a result of the annual control module care tools kit. There were no technical, violations, or citations issued as a result of this full annual inspection. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2023
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 20, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 12:10pm on 06/20/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived at the facility to conduct the annual infection control inspection. LPA met with lead house care giver Mylene Cabello (CG1) and announced the reason for the visit. Licensee/Administrator Maynard Marcos was in Philippines and was contacted by phone at 12:30pm, at that time allow Licensee allow for CG1 to sign for this inspection. At 12:35pm CG1 and LPA conducted the infection control module portion of the annual inspection. At that time there were no deficiencies discovered in the infection control module portion. LPA noted that the 10 day supply of PEE was questionable. Administrator called back at 12:44pm and placed an Amazon order for additional PPE supply's to meet or exceed the 30 day requirement. No other issues were found on the infection control module. And deficiencies cited on the infection control module portion. CG1 and LPA conducted a tour of the facility. The facility has 5 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms a living room, kitchen area, laundry room, kitchen and backyard that has shade from residents. The facility has ample food supply in accordance with regulations. During the tour LPA did not observe any noticeable deficiencies at this time and no decencies were cited. . Exit interview, report signed and copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2022
May 19, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injury while in care. Staff did not report changes in resident's condition to responsible parties. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident.
At 8:30am on 05/19/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived at the facility and conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the above facility to deliver final findings. LPA met with Maynard Marcos (via telephone, as he was COVID positive at his personal residence) and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Jeffries started the investigation on 11/13/2020 at 12:40pm, and interviewed licensee Maynard Marcos over the phone and requested relevant documents. On 4/27/2022, LPA Olson conducted interviews via telephone with Licensee Meynard Marcos at 4:30pm and Resident 1 (R1)’s POA at 4pm. On 4/28/22 at 1:15pm LPA Olson interviewed Staff (S1) in person at the facility. On 5/18/2022 at 3:30pm, LPA interviewed R1’s physician’s physician assistant, who spoke with R1’s physician about the case. On 5/13/22 and 5/17/20 LPA Olson reviewed Hospice notes and visit summaries. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated On the allegation: Resident sustained unexplained injury while in care. The licensee stated R1’s hospice nurse visited on 11/4/2020 and stated that R1 was in good condition. The next day, 11/5/2020, R1 was more tired than usual and did not respond to questions. The licensee and staff stated at the time, they thought R1 was just have a “bad day.” Licensee Maynard Marcos stated R1 “does this at times,” where R1 “will sleep all day and then wake up the next day and be back to normal it was not out of the ordinary.” The next day, 11/6/2020, when R1 still presented as very tired and less responsive, staff notified hospice of R1’s decline. According to hospice records, hospice was called at 3pm on 11/6/2020 to note R1’s change of condition and decline. Hospice arrived at 3:45pm and observed R1. Hospice Nurse, licensee, and staff were present during the visit. Hospice nurse observed redness/bruising on R1’s left hip. Licensee and staff stated R1 did not sustain an injury or fall around the time the redness/bruise appeared. Licensee thought the redness/bruising could be due to R1 preferring to lay on their left side, and the lack of muscle and fat rubbing against the bone caused redness. Licensee and staff stated R1 had no other injuries or bruises at the time, and the licensee stated that supports that R1 did not sustain a fall around this time. Hospice notes from 11/6/2020 at 3:45pm state, “Left hip with 9x6 cm area of pink and purplish discoloration, with small amount swelling around the discolored area.” Hospice nurse conducted a televisit with R1’s physician to assess the redness on R1’s hip. R1’s physician suggested ordering an x-ray of the hip to determine if there was any injury, but R1’s POA declined the x-ray and decided to pursue comfort care instead. R1’s physician’s physician assistant (PA) discussed the case with R1’s physician. PA stated in an interview according to the physician, it was possible for older residents to have weakened blood vessels that break and then pool at a section that is a dependent part, like the hip the resident is laying on, and the redness/bruising may or may not have been due to an injury. When R1’s POA was interviewed on 4/27/2022, 17 months after the incident, they stated they thought R1 slipped out of bed around the time of the redness/bruise, but did not remember a large bruise or injury. R1’s POA was satisfied with the care and supervision R1 received at the facility. Based on the information obtained, there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation at this time. Therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C On the allegation: Staff did not report changes in resident’s condition to responsible parties. R1’s POA stated the facility always informed the POA promptly on Resident 1’s condition. R1’s POA had no concerns about notification regarding R1’s condition. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. On 11/5/2020, licensee and staff noticed R1 was more tired than usual and was less responsive than usual. The licensee and staff stated at the time, they thought R1 was just have a “bad day.” Licensee Maynard Marcos stated R1 “does this at times,” where R1 “will sleep all day and then wake up the next day and be back to normal it was not out of the ordinary.” The next day, 11/6/2020, when R1 still presented as very tired and less responsive, staff notified hospice of R1’s decline. A hospice nurse visited R1 on 11/6/2020, and R1’s physician had a televisit with R1 on 11/6/2020. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report signed and copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2022 · control 29-AS-20201109093650
Apr 28, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not following face mask requirements
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint investigation visit to the facility above. LPA met with May Cabello, Staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility at 12:30 and observed 2 staff wearing their masks properly. LPA interviewed Maynard Marcos, Administrator over the telephone. Administrator stated that most staff wear masks but sometimes they forget and we have to remind them. LPA interviewed 2 staff regarding the allegation. Staff (S1) interview revealed it may have been them. S1 was alone in the kitchen sorting mail and took off mask to breath. Staff (S2) stated the staff are always wearing masks, it's protocol. A credible witness (W1) stated on 4/22/2022, W1 observed one caregiver not wearing a mask, and did not have it on their person. Based on credible witness statement and interviews, this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Continued on 9099-C Substantiated The facility failed to protect the personal rights of residents in care to be able to receive safe and healthful accommodations, in that the facility staff failed to wear face coverings properly while providing care and supervision to residents in care. This is a violation of official government orders requiring the wearing of face coverings while working under specified conditions. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited, copy of report and appeal rights emailed to Licensee/Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220425085516
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 29, 2022
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities ...To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on credible witness observation and interviews, the licensee did not ensure staff were wearing face masks in the facility, which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to immediately notify all staff to wear masks at all times in the facility. Administrator agreed to hold training with all staff about proper mask-wearing and COVID-19 prevention protocol, and provide training records to CCL by 4/29/2022.
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the September 10, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Sdm Care, Inc. DBA Paso Senior Care, licensed since 2015.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Paso Senior Care
Is Paso Senior Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Paso Senior Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Paso Senior Care been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Paso Senior Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Paso Senior Care cost?
$5,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,100–$6,150. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Paso Robles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,000 to $6,250 a month, and the middle figure is $5,475 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Paso Senior Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Sdm Care, Inc. DBA Paso Senior Care, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Adventist Health Twin Cities is 4.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Paso Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Paso Senior Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PASO SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #405801985. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Sdm Care, Inc. DBA Paso Senior Care, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 10, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Luis Obispo County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,695 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Paso Robles · 0.6 mi
Creston Village Assisted Living and Memory Care
Large community · licensed for 130
Typical starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Typical in San Luis Obispo County · likely $3,150–$7,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Luis Obispo County