Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Luis Obispo
The Residence IV
347 Calle Lupita, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4 RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for The Residence IV: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$6,150a month to start
Likely $5,050–$7,600
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$6,150likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$6,150likely $5,050–$7,600
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,050–$7,750
- $6,150
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,900–$10,850
- $8,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,500 to $10,000
8 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,000–$7,500.
- Welcome Home Residential Care for the ElderlySan Luis Obispo · 0.6 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Chateau RoseSan Luis Obispo · 1.7 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista Rosita Elder CareSan Luis Obispo · 1.9 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista Rosa Elder CareSan Luis Obispo · 1.9 mi · Mid-size home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cuesta Rosa Senior ResidenceSan Luis Obispo · 2.5 mi · Mid-size home$10,000Listed on its own website · private room · seen October 5, 2026
- Foothills Residential Care for the ElderlySan Luis Obispo · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Edna Rose ResidenceSan Luis Obispo · 4.6 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- M & L South Bay Maxi CareLos Osos · 10.0 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
347 Calle Lupita, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- French Hospital Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.6 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #405802295 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 9 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 9:05am, on 4/28/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Meynard Marcos, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. Backup Administrator and LPA conducted a full tour of the facility. This facility is a single-story residential home with six private resident bedrooms and three full bathrooms (one is en-suite and two are for public use). There is a living room, dining space, and a kitchen. Access to the laundry area and garage is through locked doors for resident safety. In the garage is a staff break room, permitted per the Licensee. LPA noted that the backyard has seating and shade for residents and visitors. LPA noted fresh fruit and snacks in the kitchen. The facility has battery operated smoke detectors in each room that are all working, the carbon monoxide detector is in the hallway and functioning normally. LPA observed a fire extinguisher near the kitchen in the green compression range, purchased on 2/28/2026. LPA tested facility hot water at 110.8°F, within regulation temperatures 105-120°F. LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods. LPA noted that the facility has no obstructions in hallways, doorways or exits. Medications are locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records. Staff and client files are locked. LPA conducted a staff and resident file review. During the tour at 9:21am LPA noted in bedroom #1 an L-shaped hole in the east wall approximately three inches long in both directions, on the north wall below a solid faceplate an approximate one inch by one... (Continued on LIC809-C) inch hole in the dry wall, as well as, an electrical outlet with no faceplate and blue painters tape covering the wires. In the public bathroom between bedrooms #4 and 5 a round hole in the dry wall, one inch in diameter. At 9:33am in the living room next to the couch a round indentation in the dry wall approximately two inches in diameter. Many of the interior shelves of the kitchen cabinets have debris and residue. At 9:30am LPA noted in the un-lockable storage room next to bedroom #6 a plastic storage container with multiple drawers. In two of the drawers were two bottles of staff prescription medication and diabetic supplies including insulin pen needles. At 9:37am in the kitchen refrigerator a three code dial locking medication box left unlocked with medication inside of it. At 9:53am on the north side of the backyard a bottle of auto antifreeze approximately a quarter full. LPA and Licensee conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited on the LIC809-D page, report signed, report and appeal rights provided to the Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2026
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yell at residents Staff do not speak to residents with dignity and respect
On 04/22/2025 at 08:16am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived unannounced at the facility to investigate the allegations to this complaint and conduct an annual facility inspection. LPA met with Licensee Meynard Marcos and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff, clients, licensee, and obtained relevant documents. On the allegations: Staff yell at residents and staff do not speak to residents with dignity and respect. It was alleged Staff 1 (S1) aggressively speaks to the residents, yelling at residents several times within a few minutes, and telling them repeatedly to sit down. Interviews revealed S1 will speak with a raised voice to residents and commandingly tell residents to sit down repeatedly. Based on the information obtained, the allegations are deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250421084939
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 6, 2025
(a)Residents... shall have all of the following personal rights: (1)To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when S1 raised their voice commandingly at the residents and repeatedly commanded them to sit down.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to train all staff on Residents Personal Rights and email LPA a signed roster of staff who participated in the training and any documents reviewed at the training by 05/06/2025.
Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 08:16am, on 04/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Meynard Marcos, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. Licensee and LPA conducted a full tour of the facility. This facility has six resident bedrooms, three full bathrooms (one bathroom is on-suite and the other two are for public/shared use). There is a living room, dining room and kitchen. Access to the laundry room and garage is through a locked door for resident safety. LPA noted that the backyard has seating and shade for residents and visitors. LPA noted fresh fruit in the kitchen for residents to enjoy freely. The facility has battery and hard wired smoke/carbon monoxide detectors in each room and througout the facility that are all working. LPA observed a fire extinguisher near the kitchen that was in the green compression range, purchased on 03/10/2025. LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods. LPA noted that the facility has no obstructions in hallways, doorways or exits. Medications are locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area. LPA noted during tour, Resident 1 (R1) had unlocked over-the-counter medications stored in their bathroom and R1's medical assessment states they are not able to safely manage their medications. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records. LPA conducted a staff and resident file review. LPA noted 3 of 5 staff do not have current 1st aid and CPR training. LPA and Licensee/Administrator conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. Exit interview, deficiencies cited on 809-D, report given, and appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff administered a felony drug to resident in care. Staff is not repositioning resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Meynard Marcos and explained the reason for the visit. On the allegation: Staff administered a felony drug to resident in care. On 10/11/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging resident #1 (R1) tested positive for Fentanyl, a felony drug. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Jorge Jauregui. On 10/14/2024, from 1:25 p.m. to 3:50 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melisa Rankin conducted the 10-day complaint visit to the facility. LPA Rankin met with Administrator Meynard Marcos and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested records pertinent to the investigation. The Administrator was informed the complaint was assigned to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigation Branch (IB) and that the investigator would return at a later date to complete the investigation. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated On 10/22/2024, from approximately 11:36am to 3:49pm, Investigator Jauregui conducted interviews with Witness #1 (W1), residents, Administrator, and staff; on 11/06/2024, from approximately 9:05am to 3:46pm, with French Hospital social worker and Central Coast Home Health (CCHH) personnel; on 11/12/2024, at approximately 2:42pm, with R1’s friend; on 11/14/2024, at approximately 1:48pm, with R1’s friend; on 11/19/2024, at approximately 2:55pm, with CCHH personnel; on 11/21/2024, from approximately 2:21pm to 3:44pm, with the Department’s nurse consultant, and attempted interviews with French Hospital social worker and physician; on 12/05/2024, from approximately 2:01pm to 2:52pm, with R1’s friend and attempted to contact French Hospital social worker. In addition, the investigator reviewed French Hospital medical records and facility file documents pertinent to the investigation. A review of R1’s Physician Report, dated 07/06/2024, lists the primary diagnosis as generalized weakness and the secondary diagnosis as Parkinson’s disease. The report documented R1 had mild cognitive impairment, motor impairment/paralysis with stiff and slow movements, needed minimal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), intermittently confused and disoriented, able to follow directions and communicate needs. The report further documented R1 as ambulatory, but not able to independently transfer to and from bed. There was no indication of any drug abuse past or present. A review of the French Hospital medical records for the period of 9/12/2024 through 10/19/2024 revealed denial of illegal substances, and lab work showed no presence of illegal substances for prior visits on 09/12/2024 and 09/30/2024. The records document on 10/07/2024, R1 was admitted to the French Hospital regarding increased weakness. It was determined R1’s mild cognitive impairment/dementia was progressively worsening. According to the 10/07/2024 record “a urine drug test was conducted on R1 which tested negative for opiates.” “The test also showed Fentanyl < (less than) 1.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) were found in R1’s system. The records indicate that to be considered a positive result, the concentration value must be greater than or equal to the cut off which is 1.0 ng/mL…” “The exam did not contain the quantitative results. On 10/08/2024, unknown time, under progress notes, the doctor documented a positive exam for the use of Fentanyl.” According to the hospital, R1’s prescribed medications indicated they would not have caused a positive Fentanyl result. Continued on 9099-C Information obtained from the Department’s nurse consultant’s review of R1’s medical records “confirmed a urine test was conducted on R1 on 10/07/2024. The results of this test were negative for the use of Fentanyl. The urine test returned a result of less than 1.0ng/ml which is below the threshold for a positive result. However, the notes of a doctor’s progress notes documented a “positive test”. The nurse consultant could not confirm if a second test was performed and not documented, or if the note was erroneously based on the negative urine exam. The nurse consultant also reviewed a list of medications from the facility and did not find any Fentanyl prescribed for R1. Information obtained from the interviews conducted found that facility staff denied providing R1 or any other residents with illegal drugs. The residents reported feeling safe at the facility and expressed satisfaction with the staff. R1’s visitors acknowledged occasionally taking R1 out of the facility but denied providing any illegal drugs. One visitor admitted to taking R1 to a pharmacy, where R1 purchased Tylenol, but was unaware of other items purchased on a separate occasion. R1 indicated they received visits from friends but denied any of them provided R1 with any medication or drugs. R1 was aware of the positive test for Fentanyl but indicated they did not know a reason why it was positive. R1 provided various events involving outings with friends while R1 lived at the facility. R1 stated during an outing an event occurred where R1 “wrestled” with individuals who “wanted to fight” and R1 ran away from them but later when investigator summarized R1’s statement, R1 was confused and stated the events never occurred. However, it was noted that R1 is unable to run. Based on the information obtained from interviews and medical records, the Department’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Continued 9099-C On the allegation: Staff is not repositioning resident in care. Hospital records and interviews indicate R1’s medical tests showed R1 had muscle tissue breakdown or Rhabdomyolysis on their right side. Per the allegation, Rhabdomyolysis is common in residents who consistently lay on one side and are not being turned. A review of R1’s Physician Report, dated 07/06/2024, lists the primary diagnosis as generalized weakness and the secondary diagnosis as Parkinson’s disease. The report documented R1 had mild cognitive impairment, motor impairment/paralysis with stiff and slow movements, needed minimal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), intermittently confused and disoriented, able to follow directions and communicate needs. The report further documented R1 as ambulatory, but not able to independently transfer to and from bed. On 2/26/25 LPA interviewed staff regarding R1, both staff stated R1 was able to walk, but was unstable, they also stated R1 would refuse assistance and wanted to be independent. Based on staff interviews, physicians’ documentation, and R1’s ability to leave the facility frequently with visitors, R1 was able to reposition self in bed and could transfer to their wheelchair and walker independently. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241011094730
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Miller arrived at 9:12 am to conduct a 1 year annual visit to the facility above. LPA met with administrator, Meynard Marcos and explained the purpose of the visit. A tour of the inside and outside of the facility was conducted. The following was inspected and noted during the annual visit: Infection Control: The facility has a current Infection Control Plan. The facility has a sign in and out binder for visitors at entry. The bathrooms have toilet paper, paper towels, hand soap, and hand washing signs. The facility has EPA approved disinfectant spray and cleaners stored in garage. The facility has a 30 day supply of PPE. Quarantined or isolated individuals will have meals and medication delivered to rooms. Staff are trained on infection control and the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). There were trash cans in garage without a tight-fitting lid that contained soiled gloves and bed pads, administrator immediately discarded contents of the trashcan and will remind staff to discard trash properly. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA Miller observed the main bathroom toilet seat was not in good repair. Administrator showed LPA the new seat and will replace it today. There is water damage to the wall near shower revealing old blue paint. Administrator advised that he will repaint the wall. LPA also observed that heating vent requires cleaning, as there is a significant amount of dust accumulated. The kitchen door leading to the garage needs cleaning and cabinets and walls have an accumulation of dust and cobwebs that need cleaning. LPA also observed microwave had food splatter and needed cleaning. The area above the stove needs cleaning of grease and food splatter. The fireplace mantel in the living room also needs dusting. LPA observed debris on floors in a bedroom and kitchen. Continued 809-C LPA observed damage to wall near large window in dining room. Administrator stated that damage was due to a wheelchair and will patch the wall as soon as possible. Dining room furniture has significant amount of cat hair on dining room chairs, and couch in living room has significant damage due to cat scratching furniture. Administrator advised that he will use a slip cover over the couch. The fire extinguisher was purchased on June 5, 2022 and is charged and Administrator will replace today. The facility has 6 resident bedrooms,1 staff bedroom and 3 bathrooms currently occupying 6 residents. The staff bedroom is not included on the facility sketch. The facility has smoke and carbon monoxide detectors that were tested. The lighting and lamps are sufficient for the use of the facility and for resident comfort. Toilet, hand washing and bathing facilities are operational and secured grab bars are present. The showers have non-skid mats. The pathways are clear of any obstructions. Facility is well lit inside and outside for safety. Disinfectant and cleaning solutions are inaccessible to residents in care and stored in the garage. The facility has sufficient space inside and outside for activities and visiting. The facility has a fenced backyard for client use with plenty of shade. The facility has telephone and internet service for resident use. Operational Requirements: The facility has a current plan of operation on file with the department. The Facility is operating in compliance with the granted fire clearance. The facility has current liability insurance and expires on July 11, 2024. The facility is approved for a capacity of 6. The fire clearance is granted for 6 non-Ambulatory. Hospice is approved for 4. Staffing: The facility currently employs 7 full time staff, and 1 administrator. Staff records are kept confidential. Files reviewed had current 1st Aid/CPR, Personnel Records/Application, Health screening with TB results, Criminal Record statements. However, one staff member does not have an application on file and will completed on May 6, 2024. Administrator Certificate expires April 10, 2025. Personnel Records & Training: The facility keeps confidential files for each staff member. Staff have annual training completed for various subjects/topics and hours for 2023. Continued 809-C Resident Records & Incident Reports: The facility keeps separate files on each resident confidentially. Facility does submit incident reports to the department when required. LPA reviewed 5 resident files for signed Admission Agreements, Personal Rights, Safeguard for property and valuables, LIC. 602A Physicians report, Pre-appraisals, Appraisals Needs and Services Plan, Emergency and ID forms. Medical Assessments and Appraisal Needs and Services are not current, but will be provided May 6, 2024. Food Service: The facility handles and prepares food safely. The facility has 2 day perishables and 7 day non-perishables to meet the food service requirement. The freezer is kept at 0 degrees and the refrigeration is kept at 40 degrees or lower. All food is covered, stored, and marked appropriately. Cleaning solutions and equipment are stored separately from food supplies. Incidental Medical Services: Facility provides transportation or assist in providing transportation to medical and dental appointments when needed. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) along with the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruct Records (CSMDR). LPA reviewed residents medications, no labels were altered, no medications were expired and all medications were kept in their original containers. Disaster Preparedness: The current emergency disaster forms were posted. The facility last conducted a quarterly disaster drill March 20, 2024. Emergency exits and telephone numbers were posted. A set of keys is available for staff on all shifts to access full facility in an emergency. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility does accept dementia residents in care. The facility has 2 self latching gates on side of the home. The facility currently has 4 hospice residents in care. The facility does not currently have residents receiving Home Health services. The facility does not have delayed egress, locked doors or gates. Exit door alarms are working. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 3 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Apr 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Chavez and De Leon arrived at the facility at 9:22 am and made an unannounced 1-year required annual visit to the facility above. LPAs met with Meynard Marcos, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs requested a staff roster, a resident roster, emergency disaster plan, documentation of quarterly emergency drills. LPAs provided administrator the entrance checklist and asked for a physical plant tour. A tour of the physical plant was assessed, and the following was noted: LPAs observed the license posted, personal rights, LTCO poster, CCL Complaint poster and COVID signs. The facility has 6 bedrooms with 3 bathrooms, kitchen, living room, dining room, garage, and medications locked in a cabinet in the kitchen, covered patio with chairs for resident use outside. Physical plant was checked for cleanliness and condition. Walls and baseboards had markings, the wall in the dining room has a puncture with broken stucco and paint coming off, windows and sliding glass doors have dirt/dust, the ceiling in the entrance way has pieces breaking off and per the licensee, it was leaking water during recent storms, walls in dining area have unfinished painting, and dust on appliances. The sliding door in the dining room was missing an exiting door alarm. The garage storage room has a bent window screen with small holes/breaks in it. The facility needs to fix outside gates to be self-closing and self-latching. The kitchen vent and cabinets above have grease and need cleaning, the microwave has food splattered on the walls, and the kitchen floor is sticky. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature. The facility provides working telephones and on-line communication for resident use. The smoke detectors are hard wired, tested and working properly. The carbon monoxide detector was tested and operational. A fire extinguisher was last inspected 6/5/22 and shows charged in the green. There are no issues with Fire Clearance. Living and dining rooms furniture were functional and in fair condition. Continued on 809-C. LPAs reviewed 5 staff files with required forms were present: Personnel Record, 1st Aid & CPR, Fingerprint clearance and associations, Criminal Records Clearance, however, four staff were missing the Health screenings with TB results. LPAs reviewed Staff Training Records. Training records were present with a total of 17 hours completed and missing 3 hours annually. Additionally, required training included only one 1 hour of medications and 3 hours of hospice and did not meet the minimum 20 hours of annual training. LPAs reviewed 2 residents’ medications, medication reviewed were current on the CSMDR and MAR for 2 residents in care. No issues with medications and records. There are no bodies of water on the premises. There is plenty of lighting available for the safety of the residents. The kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two-day perishable and seven-day non-perishables. Snacks and beverages are available for residents in the facility when they want. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Garbage cans have tight fitting covers. Sharps and knives are locked in a drawer in the kitchen. The Resident rooms have beds with sheets, pillowcase, mattress pad, and blankets which are in good condition. There is at least one chair, nightstand and enough lighting for each resident. There is enough linen available to change weekly or more, if needed. The bathrooms were checked for cleanliness and proper operation. The hot water temperature measured at 110.6 F in bathroom #1, bathroom #2 at 110 F, and bathroom #3 at 109.4 F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. Residents have a sufficient amount of supplies for personal hygiene. Soap and toilet paper are provided by the Licensee. Grab bars are secured in toilet and shower areas. Showers have non-slip mats. Resident records were reviewed for requirements and legibility: LPA reviewed 6 residents’ files for current Medical Assessments with TB results, Current Appraisal Needs and Service plans which were updated, signed Admission Agreements, consent forms, and immunization records. Pre-appraisals were missing from resident files. Planned activities are offered to residents in care. Infection control was evaluated, and the facility is in compliance. Exit interview conducted, Deficiencies cited, Technical Violations issued, and the report and appeal rights given to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2023
The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 6, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility over capacity Staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time Staff are not meeting resident's hygienic needs Staff did not provide food to resident
On 9/06/2022 at 2:40 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez initiated an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the final findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Meynard Marcos, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the reason for the visit. On the allegation “Facility over capacity,” the complainant’s concern was that there were seven (7) residents living at the facility from September through December 2020. To investigate the allegation, LPA interviewed the licensee and witnesses, and reviewed records. On 3/03/21 at 12:13 pm, LPA interviewed the licensee. Licensee stated there were no other people living in the facility except the six residents, not even temporarily, at any time. He said there are “three residence on hospice, and everyone has their own private room.” Continued on 9099-C. Unsubstantiated On 9/01/22 at 9:50 am, LPA spoke with Witness #1 (W1). W1 states “I have never witnessed a person sleeping on the couch permanently, only a resident taking a nap.” W1 says that they spent “a lot of time in the facility.” On 9/6/22 at 10:07 am, LPA interviewed Witness #2 (W2). W2 says that they have never observed a seventh resident living in the facility. On 9/2/22, LPA reviewed resident records. Admission agreements, Register of Facility Clients/Residents (LIC 9020), and Death Reports (LIC 624A) show that the facility had six residents in September and October 2020. There were six residents in November 2020 with one resident passing away and a new resident admitted. In December 2020, there were five residents after one resident moved out. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegation “Facility over capacity” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Interviews and records indicate that the facility was not over its capacity of six residents. On the allegations “Staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time,” and “Staff are not meeting resident's hygienic needs,” the complainant’s concern was that residents’ diapers are only getting changed once a day, and that residents are not getting showers. LPA interviewed the licensee and witnesses, and reviewed records. On 3/03/21 at 12:13 pm, LPA interviewed the licensee. Licensee says residents’ diapers are changed “Every time there’s a bowel movement, in the am, before meals, after meals, every hour, before sleep at night.” On 3/03/21 at 1:51 pm, LPA toured the facility. At 2:03 pm, LPA observed Resident #1 (R1) sleeping in their room. There was a package of 20 diapers in R1’s bedroom closet. LPA observed Resident #2 (R2) in bed in their bedroom with 10 diapers in their bedroom closet. Resident #3 (R3) was in a recliner in their bedroom. LPA did not smell any malodors in the facility. On 9/1/22 at 2:10 pm, LPA toured the facility and did not experience any malodors. During the visit, LPA attempted to interview staff, however, they were busy changing residents’ diapers. On 9/1/22 at 9:50 am, LPA Chavez interviewed W1. W1 says that the licensee and his staff “cared with a great deal of love.” W1 says that R3 wore diapers and that towards the end of R3’s life, R3 was “difficult because R3 didn’t understand what people wanted from R3.” W1 explains that W1 was “never concerned with staff changing R3’s diapers and caring for R3.” On 9/6/22 at 10:07 am, LPA spoke with W2. W2 says the staff took very good care of their mother and that that staff “loved and cared for” their mother. W2 says “There are no problems with how staff were caring for my mother.” Continued on 9099-C On 9/1/22, LPA reviewed the facility’s “Resident Shower, Bowel, Sheet Log” for February 2021 and March 2021. Staff recorded the times they gave a resident a shower and the times they assisted with cleaning a resident after a bowel movement. The Log indicates that staff assisted residents with showers daily and bowel movements as needed. LPA reviewed the facility’s “Resident ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Sheet” for February 2021 through March 5, 2021. Staff recorded the times they assisted residents with “Incontinent care/change” and the Log lists four times a day: “AM, Lunch, 2-3 pm, and Bed.” On every day in February through March 5, 2021, residents were assisted with incontinent needs at minimum three times a day, and sometimes four times a day. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegations Staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time,” and “Staff are not meeting resident's hygienic needs,” are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Interviews and records indicate that staff were attending to residents’ hygiene needs in a timely manner. On the allegation “Staff did not provide food to resident,” the complainant’s concern was that “R1 is in bed all day and doesn’t get lunch because R1 is asleep.” Complainant further reports that “When R1 wakes up, R1 doesn’t get lunch.” To investigate the allegation, LPA interviewed licensee and witnesses, and reviewed records. On 3/03/21 at 12:13 pm, LPA interviewed the licensee. Licensee says residents are offered a large breakfast between 7am and 9am, a lunch between 11am and 12pm, snacks at 3 pm, and dinner between 4pm and 5pm. He explains that if a resident is asleep at lunchtime, when they wake, “they may be offered a snack instead of lunch, if they had a large breakfast.” On 3/8/21, Licensee provided to LPA a summary of care for R1. Licensee writes that R1 “has late stage progress dementia. R1 still knows their name and at times will state their needs, and most of the time will graze their breakfast taking their time to eat. R1 will usually go back for a nap after breakfast and skip most lunches, waking up for snacks and eating full dinner meals. This has been R1’s routine for the past year.” On 3/03/21 at 1:59 pm, LPA observed Resident #4 (R4) snacking at the dining table. On 9/6/22 at 10:07 am, LPA spoke with W2. W2 says that R1 was on hospice the last year and a half prior to passing. W2 describes staff as offering food to R1, but that R1 “didn’t want to eat much.” W2 explains that the hospice nurse kept track of R1’s weight, and R1’s doctor did not want staff to force feed R1. W2 says that R1 was bedridden and didn’t “expend calories.” Continued on 9099-C. On 9/6/22, LPA reviewed records. On R1’s “Resident ADL Sheet,” for February 2021 through March 5, 2021, staff recorded that percentage of food R1 ate at Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner. With the exception of four days in February, R1 ate between 25% and 100% of R1’s meals. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegation, “Staff did not provide food to resident,” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Interviews and records indicate that R1 was provided sufficient food to maintain adequate health. Exit interview conducted and the report emailed to licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2022 · control 29-AS-20210302142537
May 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 5/13/22 at 2:03 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez conducted an unannounced on-site annual infection control visit to the facility above. LPA met with Meynard Marcos, Licensee/Administrator, and Desarae Verry, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with the administrator and observed the following: The facility has infection control signage at the front door. The facility is missing signage in the facility on handwashing, cough etiquette and use of masks. Licensee will post signage throughout the facility, take photos, and send to LPA by 5/16/22. Upon entry to the facility, LPA was screened. Staff are wearing masks. The facility has soap and paper towels in resident bathrooms (3). The fire extinguisher is located on the kitchen island. The extinguisher is fully charged and was purchased on 6/05/21. A panel on the southwest backyard patio covering is coming up in the wind and could be a potential safety hazard, if the panel flew off. Licensee will secure the panel and send a video to LPA by 5/16/22 showing that it is secure. At 2:32 pm, LPA conducted the Infection Control mitigation module with the administrator. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and report emailed to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2022
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 22, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Mam Management Group Inc., licensed since 2018.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 9
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about The Residence IV
Is The Residence IV licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is The Residence IV licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has The Residence IV been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is The Residence IV still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does The Residence IV cost?
$6,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $5,050–$7,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Luis Obispo that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $6,225 to $7,500 a month, and the middle figure is $7,500 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does The Residence IV take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Mam Management Group Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
French Hospital Medical Center is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can The Residence IV keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
The Residence IV license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “RESIDENCE IV, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #405802295. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Mam Management Group Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Luis Obispo County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,150–$7,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,250–$7,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,100–$7,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,250–$7,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,900–$7,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Luis Obispo County