Oakmont Of Brookside is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton, San Joaquin County, California — state license #392701057, licensed for 81 residents, listed as licensed/pending increase in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 34 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Oakmont Of Brookside

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 81 residents · Stockton, CA · San Joaquin County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #392701057, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3318 Brookside Road · Stockton, San Joaquin County
Phone
(209) 473-1300
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 81 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 81 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 18.State service designations940 - ADULTS · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 40 times and filed 34 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 24, 2026
Occupancy at the September 22, 2025 visit
77 of 81 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 29, 2022 to September 22, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 21 of 34 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff falsified resident's medical assessment Resident is being charged for services not provided

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Allegation: Facility staff falsified resident's medical assessment. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility provide R1's family with information that was part of the intake and assessment of a resident when they move-in or when information is not available to help determine the level of care. The facility staff did not give a diagnosis, but provides the family with a tool that helps the staff point the families into the right direction to meet the resident's needs. The staff denied giving a diagnosis of any kind. Continued Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250723130553
Aug 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident Staff do not have the required training Staff did not give resident medication.

On 3/14/2024, LPA Johnson arrived unannounce to deliver finding for the above allegations. LPA met with Nadya Rosales. Allegation: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. The allegation is substantiated based on records reviewed and interview with staff. The department discovered through progress notes dated 12/3/2023 that the facility's staff observed R1 on the floor by the bed. R1's family and physician were notified. On 12/6 2023, facility staff called Power of Attorney/ family and informed them that the Primary Care Physician (PCP) wanted to see R1 in the PCP's office. Staff was told by POA/Family, "that's not going to happen. I (POA) will call the doctor to come out and see her." The Doctor never came out to see her and R1 did not go to the doctor office. Continued Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240109094301
Jan 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20235 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met Resident was left in dirty clothing Resident was served contaminated food Facility staff do not provide adequate activities for residents

Allegation: Facility staff did not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met. Based on records reviewed and interviews with the staff the facility documents when a resident has been given hygiene care. LPA was able to confirm that the documentation the facility uses includes: changing clothing, showers, incontinent care, assistance and escorting with reminders for mealtimes. During the course of the investigation the department was unable to confirm that a particular resident's hygiene needs were not met. Allegation: Resident was left in dirty clothing. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility documents when residents are assisted with choosing clothing , dressing and undressing with reminders to maintain privacy, safety, comfort and to report any decline in abilities to assist with this activity. Allegation: Resident was served contaminated food. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility is in compliance with regulatory requirements forthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230927085042
Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff mismanage medications.

This matter was addressed and substantiated on the complaint report with the control number 7-AS-20230807125824 dated 8/28/2023. The facility was given a citation for mismanaging medication for R1 from 1/4/2022 thru 1/13/2022 and 2/6/22 thru 2/8/22. There were two medication not available for R1 on two different occasions. The facility's medication records confirmed that the medications were ordered but not available on-site. The department concluded the initial investigation and the preponderance of evidence standard was met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A citation was given on 8/28/2023 with a plan of correction, therefore the department will not be re- issuing a citation. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230925125951
Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed

Allegation: Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed. Based on records reviewed the facility did not have medications for R1 from1/4/2022 thru 1/13/2022 and 2/6/22 thru 2/8/22. There were two medication not available for R1 on two different occassions. The facility's medication records confirmed that the medications were ordered but not available on-site. The department has concluded the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC-9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230807125824
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints11typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file40typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025550202488120231010220224512021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Joaquin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 473-1300

Is Oakmont Of Brookside licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of Brookside is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton (San Joaquin County): California license #392701057, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 81 residents. State records list 34 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakmont Of Brookside care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Brookside with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 81 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 18.

How much does Oakmont Of Brookside cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Brookside's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Joaquin County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of Brookside accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of Brookside is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

77 of 81 beds occupied (95%) when the state visited on September 22, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Brookside?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 40 state visits and 34 dated documents since 2021 for Oakmont Of Brookside; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 22, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff falsified resident's medical assessment Resident is being charged for services not provided
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Allegation: Facility staff falsified resident's medical assessment. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility provide R1's family with information that was part of the intake and assessment of a resident when they move-in or when information is not available to help determine the level of care. The facility staff did not give a diagnosis, but provides the family with a tool that helps the staff point the families into the right direction to meet the resident's needs. The staff denied giving a diagnosis of any kind. Continued UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250723130553

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical care for resident Staff do not have the required training Staff did not give resident medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 3/14/2024, LPA Johnson arrived unannounce to deliver finding for the above allegations. LPA met with Nadya Rosales. Allegation: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. The allegation is substantiated based on records reviewed and interview with staff. The department discovered through progress notes dated 12/3/2023 that the facility's staff observed R1 on the floor by the bed. R1's family and physician were notified. On 12/6 2023, facility staff called Power of Attorney/ family and informed them that the Primary Care Physician (PCP) wanted to see R1 in the PCP's office. Staff was told by POA/Family, "that's not going to happen. I (POA) will call the doctor to come out and see her." The Doctor never came out to see her and R1 did not go to the doctor office. Continued SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240109094301

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met Resident was left in dirty clothing Resident was served contaminated food Facility staff do not provide adequate activities for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Allegation: Facility staff did not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met. Based on records reviewed and interviews with the staff the facility documents when a resident has been given hygiene care. LPA was able to confirm that the documentation the facility uses includes: changing clothing, showers, incontinent care, assistance and escorting with reminders for mealtimes. During the course of the investigation the department was unable to confirm that a particular resident's hygiene needs were not met. Allegation: Resident was left in dirty clothing. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility documents when residents are assisted with choosing clothing , dressing and undressing with reminders to maintain privacy, safety, comfort and to report any decline in abilities to assist with this activity. Allegation: Resident was served contaminated food. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility is in compliance with regulatory requirements forCDSS inspection report, November 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230927085042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff mismanage medications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This matter was addressed and substantiated on the complaint report with the control number 7-AS-20230807125824 dated 8/28/2023. The facility was given a citation for mismanaging medication for R1 from 1/4/2022 thru 1/13/2022 and 2/6/22 thru 2/8/22. There were two medication not available for R1 on two different occasions. The facility's medication records confirmed that the medications were ordered but not available on-site. The department concluded the initial investigation and the preponderance of evidence standard was met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A citation was given on 8/28/2023 with a plan of correction, therefore the department will not be re- issuing a citation. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230925125951
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Allegation: Staff did not administer resident's medications as prescribed. Based on records reviewed the facility did not have medications for R1 from1/4/2022 thru 1/13/2022 and 2/6/22 thru 2/8/22. There were two medication not available for R1 on two different occassions. The facility's medication records confirmed that the medications were ordered but not available on-site. The department has concluded the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC-9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230807125824

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 40 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
11
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
40
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 473-1300
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of Brookside? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.