Ivy At Golden Gate, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco, San Francisco County, California — state license #385601148, licensed for 168 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated April 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Ivy At Golden Gate, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 168 residents · San Francisco, CA · San Francisco County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #385601148, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1601 19th Avenue · San Francisco, San Francisco County
Phone
(415) 664-6264
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 121 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 39 AMBULATORY, 121 NON-AMBULATORY, AND 8 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 9, 2026
Occupancy at the May 2, 2025 visit
126 of 168 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 6, 2024 to June 5, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Client's care needs not met by staff

On 6/5/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Regional Operations Specialist, Alan Fox. LPA toured the facility, interviewed residents, staff and outside parties, reviewed records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges client (R1) care needs are not being met by staff regarding R1 being observed in poor condition. Upon interview with R1's responsible party (I1), witness (I2) and facility Executive Director (S1), it was explained that R1 had been transferred to the UCSF emergency room after an incident occurred during a scheduled medical appointment. R1 was transferred from the UCSF primary medical center, not from the residential care facility. Observed wounds were pre-existing and were being treated appropriately by the facility along with additional documented outside medical agency care. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250314144621
May 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed Staff did not maintain current resident records Staff are not communicating with responsible party regarding resident's care service

On 5/2/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Rauhkman. LPA interviewed staff, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff did not distribute resident's (R1) medication as prescribed. LPA conducted a spot review of R1’s medication administration records and did not identify any medication not properly administered. Upon additional interview with Reporting Party, LPA received contradicting information to the initial complaint intake statement. LPA was not provided specific information on medication errors by Reporting Party. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250212155932
May 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was dispensed their medication as prescribed Staff did not refill resident’s medication prescription in a timely manner

On 5/2/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Rauhkman. LPA interviewed staff, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges, staff did not ensure that resident was dispensed their medication as prescribed for resident (R1). Upon interviews with staff and information provided by Reporting Party, LPA found consistent information regarding staff observing resident R1 to be asleep and unable to administer a (as needed/PRN) narcotic to R1 because of R1's observed status. In addition, staff did administer medication upon observation as needed when R1 had awoken later within the hour. Upon review of R1’s medication administration records, LPA was unable to find corroborating evidence supporting the allegation. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250221141055
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not issue a refund

On 12/10/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. LPA interviewed staff, outside parties, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility did not issue a refund to residents (R1 & R2). Reporting party claims that a refund of all expenses paid to the facility, including community move-in fees and first month rent should be owed to R1 & R2. Based upon interviews with staff (S1) and outside party (I1), it was confirmed that residents R1 & R2 had signed an admissions agreement with an effective date of 7/31/2024. Upon review of records, LPA found that In the admission agreement, it is stated that 100% of the community fee will be refunded if residents decide to withdraw prior to assessment and signing agreement. LPA however found that the facility had conducted a pre-apthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240917181205
Dec 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not issue refund

On 12/4/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. LPA Interviewed staff, outside parties and reviewed resident records during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility did not issue refund regarding resident (R1). Upon interview with staff (S1) and outside parties (I1) it was found that resident R1 had been moved out of the facility on 7/13/2024 with all remaining personal property removed by 7/27/2024. Based upon documents gathered, LPA found that R1's responsible party had submitted a written notice on 7/1/2024, to terminate agreement (30) days prior. Based upon R1's admission agreement it is indicated that upon self-termination, "you will continue to be responsible for all fees and charges accruing under this Agreement until the later of the expiration of the thirty (30) day period or you have vacated your Residence..". Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240905102251
Sep 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to provide safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations. Facility failed to provided tray service when resident is ill. Facility staff failed to provide medication according to the physician's directions. Facility staff failed to accord dignity in their personal relationships with other persons. Facility Staff did not clean and disinfect COVID positive resident room.

On September 6, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary findings for a complaint opened on February 7, 2024. LPA Calandra was greeted by Katherine Raukhman, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial visit, LPA gathered information including relevant records and conducted staff interviews. Based on information gathered, the facility provided a work order for carpet cleaning service due to the need for maintenance services because a section of the resident’s room was found to be unsanitary and unclean due to the resident’s temporary illness. The facility was notified by responsible party during a visit that the room needed to be cleaned again on January 18, 2024 and the facility took action on that date. Regarding allegation of meals not being provided to residents who have to isolate in their rooms, there was an occasion where a resident was ill and required to be isolated to his room for appthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240129162503
Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202567020245512023220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Francisco County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (415) 664-6264

Is Ivy At Golden Gate, The licensed?

Yes — Ivy At Golden Gate, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco (San Francisco County): California license #385601148, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 168 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy At Golden Gate, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy At Golden Gate, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 39 AMBULATORY, 121 NON-AMBULATORY, AND 8 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Ivy At Golden Gate, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy At Golden Gate, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Francisco County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy At Golden Gate, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy At Golden Gate, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

126 of 168 beds occupied (75%) when the state visited on May 2, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy At Golden Gate, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2023 for Ivy At Golden Gate, The; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 5, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedClient's care needs not met by staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6/5/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Regional Operations Specialist, Alan Fox. LPA toured the facility, interviewed residents, staff and outside parties, reviewed records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges client (R1) care needs are not being met by staff regarding R1 being observed in poor condition. Upon interview with R1's responsible party (I1), witness (I2) and facility Executive Director (S1), it was explained that R1 had been transferred to the UCSF emergency room after an incident occurred during a scheduled medical appointment. R1 was transferred from the UCSF primary medical center, not from the residential care facility. Observed wounds were pre-existing and were being treated appropriately by the facility along with additional documented outside medical agency care. Continued onto LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250314144621
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed Staff did not maintain current resident records Staff are not communicating with responsible party regarding resident's care service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5/2/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Rauhkman. LPA interviewed staff, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff did not distribute resident's (R1) medication as prescribed. LPA conducted a spot review of R1’s medication administration records and did not identify any medication not properly administered. Upon additional interview with Reporting Party, LPA received contradicting information to the initial complaint intake statement. LPA was not provided specific information on medication errors by Reporting Party. Continued onto LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 2, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250212155932
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident was dispensed their medication as prescribed Staff did not refill resident’s medication prescription in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5/2/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Rauhkman. LPA interviewed staff, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges, staff did not ensure that resident was dispensed their medication as prescribed for resident (R1). Upon interviews with staff and information provided by Reporting Party, LPA found consistent information regarding staff observing resident R1 to be asleep and unable to administer a (as needed/PRN) narcotic to R1 because of R1's observed status. In addition, staff did administer medication upon observation as needed when R1 had awoken later within the hour. Upon review of R1’s medication administration records, LPA was unable to find corroborating evidence supporting the allegation. Continued onto LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 2, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250221141055

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not issue a refund
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 12/10/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. LPA interviewed staff, outside parties, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility did not issue a refund to residents (R1 & R2). Reporting party claims that a refund of all expenses paid to the facility, including community move-in fees and first month rent should be owed to R1 & R2. Based upon interviews with staff (S1) and outside party (I1), it was confirmed that residents R1 & R2 had signed an admissions agreement with an effective date of 7/31/2024. Upon review of records, LPA found that In the admission agreement, it is stated that 100% of the community fee will be refunded if residents decide to withdraw prior to assessment and signing agreement. LPA however found that the facility had conducted a pre-apCDSS inspection report, December 10, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240917181205
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not issue refund
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/4/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. LPA Interviewed staff, outside parties and reviewed resident records during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility did not issue refund regarding resident (R1). Upon interview with staff (S1) and outside parties (I1) it was found that resident R1 had been moved out of the facility on 7/13/2024 with all remaining personal property removed by 7/27/2024. Based upon documents gathered, LPA found that R1's responsible party had submitted a written notice on 7/1/2024, to terminate agreement (30) days prior. Based upon R1's admission agreement it is indicated that upon self-termination, "you will continue to be responsible for all fees and charges accruing under this Agreement until the later of the expiration of the thirty (30) day period or you have vacated your Residence..". CCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240905102251
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to provide safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations. Facility failed to provided tray service when resident is ill. Facility staff failed to provide medication according to the physician's directions. Facility staff failed to accord dignity in their personal relationships with other persons. Facility Staff did not clean and disinfect COVID positive resident room.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On September 6, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary findings for a complaint opened on February 7, 2024. LPA Calandra was greeted by Katherine Raukhman, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial visit, LPA gathered information including relevant records and conducted staff interviews. Based on information gathered, the facility provided a work order for carpet cleaning service due to the need for maintenance services because a section of the resident’s room was found to be unsanitary and unclean due to the resident’s temporary illness. The facility was notified by responsible party during a visit that the room needed to be cleaned again on January 18, 2024 and the facility took action on that date. Regarding allegation of meals not being provided to residents who have to isolate in their rooms, there was an occasion where a resident was ill and required to be isolated to his room for appCDSS inspection report, September 6, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240129162503

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Ivy At Golden Gate, The?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Well Oak Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 6 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(415) 664-6264
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy At Golden Gate, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.