Ivy At Golden Gate, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco, San Francisco County, California — state license #385601148, licensed for 168 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated April 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2023, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 9, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 6, 2024 to June 5, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Apr 9, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 1, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 19, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 23, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 3, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 8, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 22, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 5, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Client's care needs not met by staff
On 6/5/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Regional Operations Specialist, Alan Fox. LPA toured the facility, interviewed residents, staff and outside parties, reviewed records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges client (R1) care needs are not being met by staff regarding R1 being observed in poor condition. Upon interview with R1's responsible party (I1), witness (I2) and facility Executive Director (S1), it was explained that R1 had been transferred to the UCSF emergency room after an incident occurred during a scheduled medical appointment. R1 was transferred from the UCSF primary medical center, not from the residential care facility. Observed wounds were pre-existing and were being treated appropriately by the facility along with additional documented outside medical agency care. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250314144621
May 2, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not distribute resident's medication as prescribed Staff did not maintain current resident records Staff are not communicating with responsible party regarding resident's care service
On 5/2/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Rauhkman. LPA interviewed staff, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff did not distribute resident's (R1) medication as prescribed. LPA conducted a spot review of R1’s medication administration records and did not identify any medication not properly administered. Upon additional interview with Reporting Party, LPA received contradicting information to the initial complaint intake statement. LPA was not provided specific information on medication errors by Reporting Party. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250212155932
May 2, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was dispensed their medication as prescribed Staff did not refill resident’s medication prescription in a timely manner
On 5/2/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Rauhkman. LPA interviewed staff, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges, staff did not ensure that resident was dispensed their medication as prescribed for resident (R1). Upon interviews with staff and information provided by Reporting Party, LPA found consistent information regarding staff observing resident R1 to be asleep and unable to administer a (as needed/PRN) narcotic to R1 because of R1's observed status. In addition, staff did administer medication upon observation as needed when R1 had awoken later within the hour. Upon review of R1’s medication administration records, LPA was unable to find corroborating evidence supporting the allegation. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250221141055
Dec 10, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility did not issue a refund
On 12/10/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. LPA interviewed staff, outside parties, reviewed resident records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility did not issue a refund to residents (R1 & R2). Reporting party claims that a refund of all expenses paid to the facility, including community move-in fees and first month rent should be owed to R1 & R2. Based upon interviews with staff (S1) and outside party (I1), it was confirmed that residents R1 & R2 had signed an admissions agreement with an effective date of 7/31/2024. Upon review of records, LPA found that In the admission agreement, it is stated that 100% of the community fee will be refunded if residents decide to withdraw prior to assessment and signing agreement. LPA however found that the facility had conducted a pre-apthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240917181205
Dec 4, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not issue refund
On 12/4/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Katherine Raukhman. LPA Interviewed staff, outside parties and reviewed resident records during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility did not issue refund regarding resident (R1). Upon interview with staff (S1) and outside parties (I1) it was found that resident R1 had been moved out of the facility on 7/13/2024 with all remaining personal property removed by 7/27/2024. Based upon documents gathered, LPA found that R1's responsible party had submitted a written notice on 7/1/2024, to terminate agreement (30) days prior. Based upon R1's admission agreement it is indicated that upon self-termination, "you will continue to be responsible for all fees and charges accruing under this Agreement until the later of the expiration of the thirty (30) day period or you have vacated your Residence..". Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240905102251
Sep 6, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to provide safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations. Facility failed to provided tray service when resident is ill. Facility staff failed to provide medication according to the physician's directions. Facility staff failed to accord dignity in their personal relationships with other persons. Facility Staff did not clean and disinfect COVID positive resident room.
On September 6, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary findings for a complaint opened on February 7, 2024. LPA Calandra was greeted by Katherine Raukhman, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial visit, LPA gathered information including relevant records and conducted staff interviews. Based on information gathered, the facility provided a work order for carpet cleaning service due to the need for maintenance services because a section of the resident’s room was found to be unsanitary and unclean due to the resident’s temporary illness. The facility was notified by responsible party during a visit that the room needed to be cleaned again on January 18, 2024 and the facility took action on that date. Regarding allegation of meals not being provided to residents who have to isolate in their rooms, there was an occasion where a resident was ill and required to be isolated to his room for appthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240129162503
Aug 21, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 23, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Ivy At Golden Gate, The licensed?
Yes — Ivy At Golden Gate, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco (San Francisco County): California license #385601148, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 168 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Ivy At Golden Gate, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy At Golden Gate, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 39 AMBULATORY, 121 NON-AMBULATORY, AND 8 BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.
How much does Ivy At Golden Gate, The cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Ivy At Golden Gate, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Francisco County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Ivy At Golden Gate, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Ivy At Golden Gate, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
126 of 168 beds occupied (75%) when the state visited on May 2, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Ivy At Golden Gate, The?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2023 for Ivy At Golden Gate, The; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 5, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Who runs Ivy At Golden Gate, The?
From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.
Licensed to Well Oak Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 6 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Ivy Park At Simi ValleySimi Valley, CA
- Sea Bluffs, TheDana Point, CA
- Oakmont Of WestparkRoseville, CA
- Ivy Park Of WellingtonLaguna Woods, CA
- Ivy At Wellington, TheLaguna Hills, CA
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(415) 664-6264Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Ivy At Golden Gate, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.