Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Portola GardensLicense #385601045 · Covelight Care
Covelight CarePortola GardensLicense #385601045 · 350 University St, San Francisco, CA · (415) 337-1587Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/San Francisco County/Portola Gardens
Map · 350 University St

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Starting rate$3,695/mo

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (415) 337-1587

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

PG

Call Portola Gardens

San Francisco · Licensed for 132

(415) 337-1587

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Large community · Licensed for 132 · San Francisco

Portola Gardens

350 University St, San Francisco, CA 94134 · Licensed since 2019

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Portola Gardens

Overview

Starting rate

$3,695 a month

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Languages spoken: English, Spanish, Chinese, Cantonese, German, Tagalog and FilipinoReported on Seniorly · August 24, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 74 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 18 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 14 residents

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER;58 AMBULATORY, 74 NON-AMBULATORY; OF WHICH 14 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE CARE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 18. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY PORTOLA MGMT BSD LLC EFFECTIVE 03/10/2026.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Assistance with transfers

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Works with residents’ own health care providers

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Parkinson's care experience

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Mental health conditions servedBehavioral issues

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • 24-hour supervision claimed

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 18 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Portola Gardens: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,695a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

Costs & moving in

  • How care costs are added to the rentAll inclusive

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Lowest monthly rate stated$3,695/mo

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Rate broken out by room typePrivate Room $7,595 - $9,095/mo · Shared Bedroom $5,795 - $7,296/mo · Private Room $4,595 - $7,995/mo · Shared Bedroom $3,695 - $5,695/mo

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Cost added per care level$500 - $2,600/mo

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$3,695likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,695this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with daily careIncludedper the home

    The home lists its rent as all-inclusive on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026. Ask which care needs would change the monthly rate.

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,695
$3,695
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,695–$7,695
$6,195
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $5,357 to $9,600

$3,695$9,600

This homeA nearby home’s published starting rate

11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $6,200–$8,700.

  • Alma Via of San FranciscoSan Francisco · 3.3 mi · Large community
    $8,015Listed on its own website · assisted living apartment homes, starting at · seen October 27, 2026
  • Victorian ManorSan Francisco · 3.8 mi · Large community
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Ivy at Golden GateSan Francisco · 4.1 mi · Large community
    $8,595Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Coterie Cathedral HillSan Francisco · 4.1 mi · Large community
    $9,600Listed on its own website · coterie cathedral hill · seen October 5, 2026
  • The Sequoias San FranciscoSan Francisco · 4.2 mi · Large community
    $5,357Listed on its own website · garden courts studio starting fee · seen October 27, 2026
  • The Carlisle-Ivy Signature LivingSan Francisco · 4.3 mi · Large community
    $8,695Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Peninsula Del ReyDaly City · 4.3 mi · Large community
    $7,615Listed on its own website · assisted living, studio suite / one bathroom · seen October 27, 2026
  • Rhoda Goldman PlazaSan Francisco · 4.3 mi · Large community
    $7,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at Cathedral HillSan Francisco · 4.3 mi · Large community
    $7,895Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
  • Kokoro Assisted LivingSan Francisco · 4.3 mi · Large community
    $6,559Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sagebrook Senior Living at San FranciscoSan Francisco · 4.4 mi · Large community
    $7,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (17)Private rooms · Outdoor space · Shared / companion rooms
  • Private rooms

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths · Outdoor Common Areas

    Outdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Outdoor Common Areas — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Common areasDining room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · and 4 more

    Dining room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Fitness room · Business room — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Indoor Common Areas — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Private bathroom

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Room typesStudio · Semi-Private · Private · Shared Rooms

    Studio · Semi-Private — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

    Private · Shared Rooms — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • AmenitiesConcierge · Move-in coordination

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Kitchenette in the unit

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Telephone in the room

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (7)Dining style · Vegetarian or vegan options · All-day or flexible dining
  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Kosher foodKosher style

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Food allergy management

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (5)Activity types offered · Trips outside the home · Resident-run activities
  • Activity types offeredMusic programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Activities On-site

    Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

    Activities On-site — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Resident-run activities

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Faith, culture & language (1)Languages spoken by caregivers
  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish · Chinese · Cantonese · German · Tagalog · and 1 more

    English · Spanish · Chinese · Cantonese · German · Tagalog · Filipino — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence (2)Residents may bring a pet · Pet types allowed
  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (3)Support services for families · Transportation costs extra · Transportation
  • Support services for families

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • Transportation costs extraReported no

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

Where it is

350 University St, San Francisco, CA 94134Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1California Pacific Medical Center - Mission Bernal Campus and Orthopedic InstituteHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.5 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #385601045 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 24 of 37 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Substantiated” and 8 “Unsubstantiated”.

20266 state visits · 8 documents

Aug 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent residents from smoking inside the facility

On 08/25/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator, Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff do not prevent residents from smoking inside the facility, the Department conducted an investigation and based on interviews, document review, and information obtained during the visit, there is insufficient evidence to establish that the facility did not take action to address R1's smoking inside the facility. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260501092942
Jul 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not able to communicate with residents.

On 07/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator, Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff are not able to communicate with residents, the Department conducted an investigation and based on interviews, observations, and information obtained during the visit, facility had staff available who were able to communicate sufficiently during emergency situations and respond to residents' immediate health and safety needs. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260522165341
Jul 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 7/22/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived unannounced for the purpose of conducting a case management. The purpose of the case management is to address the corresponding complaint investigation report number 14-AS-20260522165341. LPA met with administrator, Gregory Bogart. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff are not able to communicate with residents, the Department conducted an investigation and based on interviews, observations, and information obtained during the visit, facility had staff available who were able to communicate sufficiently during emergency situations and respond to residents' immediate health and safety needs. At the time of the visit, no residents were observed to be in immediate danger due to communication barriers. Facility should ensure adequate English language proficiency among staff on duty to effectively provide routine care, understand residents' needs, and maintain the level of services required by Title 22. A technical violation was issued and discussed with the administrator. This report was reviewed with the administrator, and a copy was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2026
Apr 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff handled resident in a rough manner -Resident sustained injuries while in care -Staff did not ensure hot water was availabe at the facility for residents' use

On 04/07/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator, Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff handled the resident in a rough manner, the Department conducted an investigation. During interview with residents and staffs, Resident R1 denied that staff handled her roughly and stated that staff were gentle during showering. Regarding the allegation that the resident sustained injuries while in care, the Department conducted an investigation. Resident R1 denied that any injuries occurred during care. No documentation was provided indicating that an injury occurred while in care, and the staff and Administrator reported no injuries requiring medical attention. cont to 9099C Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that staff did not ensure hot water was available for residents’ use, the Department conducted an investigation. Resident R1 reported that hot water was available, and staff denied any ongoing issues. The facility provided documentation of water heater replacement. The LPA tested water temperatures in three shower rooms and found them to be within regulatory compliance. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260127162859
Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff do not follow residents care plans for 2 person assist resulting in a resident injury -Licensee does not ensure staff have the ability to communicate with residents

On 03/24/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator, Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff do not follow residents’ care plans requiring a two-person assist resulting in a resident injury, the Department conducted an investigation. Interviews with resident R1 and staffs indicated that resident R1 received assistance from three staff members, and that R1’s fall was not related to staff assistance. A review of records, including the hospital after-visit summary, documented that R1 was diagnosed with abdominal pain of unspecified causes. Regarding the allegation that the licensee does not ensure staff have the ability to communicate with residents, the Department conducted an investigation. Interviews with staffs and residents indicated that staff are able to communicate with residents. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260112162335
Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 3/24/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived unannounced for the purpose of conducting a case management. The purpose of the case management is to address the corresponding complaint investigation report number 14-AS-20260112162335 and 14-AS-20260127162859. LPA met with administrator, Gregory Bogart. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During complaint investigation, document were reviewed, Facility Progress notes for resident R1 and Hospital after visit summary indicate that R1 suffered a fall resulted in a hospital visit. There was no incident report on file submitted by the facility to CCL documenting the incident involving R1. Physician communication and instructions reported resident R2 was assessed by paramedics and brought to a hospital. There was no incident report on file submitted by the facility to CCL documenting the incident involving resident R2. SOC341 reported allegation of incident involved staff S1 and resident R3. There was no incident report or SOC341 on file submitted by the facility to CCL regarding the incident involving resident R3. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the 809-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 31, 2026

Reporting Requirements: A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of… Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review, facility did not submit a written report to the Department for fall occurrences of R1 and R2 and alleged physical abuse on R3, which is a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility to submit a copy of in-service training regarding reporting requirements with staff who document LIC624s to CCLD by POC due date.

Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/18/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to conduct the unannounced required 1 year annual inspection visit. LPA met staff coordinator, Lea Salazar, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Gregory Bogart arrived later during the visit. LPA toured facility, which consists of shared and private studio apartments on ground and 2nd floors of this 3- story community. Common areas include lobby, sun room, dining room and expansive outdoor space, which includes level patio. There are no accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Medications are stored in locked medication room on 2nd floor and chemicals are stored in locked rooms. All outdoor and indoor passageway were free and clear of obstruction. Kitchen was inspected, sufficient supply of food observed. Infection control practices reviewed. Toxins and sharps stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature was maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant. Carbon monoxide detector and smoke detector system inspected and met the requirements. Fire extinguisher checked and fully charged. Facility has a written emergency disaster plan. First-aid kits are inspected. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact have been reviewed. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and technical violations are cited on following pages. Report was reviewed with LVN Melissa Grace Munoz, copy of report and Appeal Rights are providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived on 02/04/2026 to conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on approved fire clearance. LPA met with Administrator Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The facility submitted a request to increase capacity from 104 to 132. Approved fire clearance for the change from the San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) has been received by licensing office. LPA conducted a tour of the facility with the administrator. Physical plant is consistent with the submitted facility sketch/floor plan. There are 12 double-bed bedrooms in the north wing of second floor, 4 staff rooms on the second floor that will be convert to 4 double-bed bedrooms, 4 double-bed bedrooms in the west wing of second floor, 13 double-bed bedrooms in the south wing of the second floor, 6 single-bed bedrooms in the south wing of the second floor, 30 double-beds on the first floor remind unchanged. Upon review and approval, facility will be sent an updated license showing the change requested. LPA reviewed this report with the administrator, and a copy was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2026

20259 state visits · 11 documents

Dec 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 12/30/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on approved fire clearance. LPA met with Administrator Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The facility submitted a request to increase capacity from 104 to 132. Per the licensee’s communication to the CCL Regional Office, it was reported that the San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) had approved the capacity increase. However, the administrator clarified that the SFFD inspector visited the facility on this date solely to inspect completed fire door work on the first floor and second floor of the north side of the building. The administrator further reported that the facility has not submitted a new request for a fire clearance inspection related to the capacity increase; therefore, no fire clearance approval has been issued for the requested increase. LPA conducted a tour of the facility with the administrator, who demonstrated the installation of new fire-rated doors on the first and second floors of the building’s north wing. The administrator also reported that a new sprinkler system was installed in the ceiling of the chapel and dining hall. LPA reviewed this report with the administrator, and a copy was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025
Nov 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 11/04/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident report. LPA met with Health and Wellness Director, Navpreet Kaur, and Administrator Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On 10/14/2025, Desk Duty LPA received a SOC 341 report regarding an incident in which staff member S1 allegedly made a gesture and struck resident R1. LPA attempted to interview resident R1 to confirm the details of the incident; however, R1 fell asleep during the interview and appeared visibly tired. The facility reported no injury to resident R1, and that although the internal investigation determined the incident to be unsubstantiated, staff member S1 is no longer employed at the facility, and additional training was provided to all staff. The LPA requested that facility submit an incident report in addition to the SOC 341. LPA reviewed this report with the administrator, and a copy was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2025
Sep 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff are not meeting resident's medical needs. - Staff isolates resident. - Resident is not provided with adequate dining accommodations.

THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM AN ORIGINAL REPORT DATED 09/05/2025. On 11/04/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to deliver an amended copy of LIC9099. LPA met with administrator Gregory Bogart and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit on 09/05/2025, LPA interviewed R1’s emergency contact, and collected documents. Regarding the allegation that the staff are not meeting resident's medical needs. Interviews with both the R1 and R1’s personal friend revealed conflicting and contradictory informations, indicating that the reported issues were related to an external medical center and a different facility, not the current facility. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM AN ORIGINAL REPORT DATED 09/05/2025. Regarding the allegation that the staff isolate resident, during the investigation, interviews with multiple residents provided statements that contradicted this allegation. Residents interviewed reported that they were free to socialize, participate in communal activities, and dine with others without restriction. No reported incident of resident experiencing or observing any form of intentional isolation by staff. Observations conducted during the visit did not reveal any evidence of inappropriate seclusion. Facility staff reported that meals may occasionally be served in residents’ rooms based on medical needs or personal preference, but there is no policy or practice of isolating residents. Regarding the allegation that the Resident is not provided with adequate dining accommodations, interviews conducted with multiple residents revealed statements that contradicted this allegation. Residents interviewed expressed satisfaction with the dining services, including food quality, accessibility, and the overall dining experience. LPA observed the dining area and found it to be clean, organized, and appropriately set up for resident use. The Department has investigated the above allegations. The allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250430161305
Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Resident was not accorded dignity in their relationship with staff and other residents

On 07/18/2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Yi Sam Jian met with staffing coordinator, Lea Salazar, to conduct a complaint investigation. Purpose of visit explained. Administrator, Gregory Bogart arrived later during the visit. LPA gathered information relevant to allegations. LPA conducted staff interviews. Regarding the allegation that Resident was not accorded dignity in their relationship with staff and other residents, multiple staff confirmed the comment was made and found it inappropriate. Staff's comment and lack of understanding regarding resident dignity and privacy policies constitute a violation of residents’ personal rights. Based on interviews and file reviews during the course of the investigation it was determined that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegations above are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8 and is noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250502104955

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 28, 2025

Personal Rights requirement: Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall…be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator shall develop and implement a plan to ensure all staff fully understand and uphold residents’ right to dignity in interactions with staff and resident. A copy must be submitted to CCL by the POC due date. Failure to comply may result in a civil penalty.

Jul 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did no allow residents to have visits

On 07/18/2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Yi Sam Jian met with staffing coordinator, Lea Salazar, to conduct a complaint investigation. Purpose of visit explained. Administrator, Gregory Bogart arrived later during the visit. LPA gathered information relevant to allegations. LPA conducted resident interview. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not allow residents to have visits, no evidence was found to support this claim beyond the reporting party’s statement. All other resident interviews indicated that visitation was not denied. The Department has investigated the above allegations. The allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250603154003
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure a comfortable environment was provided for residents.

On 05/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Gregory Bogart, and Health and Wellness Director, Navpreet Kaur, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA interviewed staffs, and collected documents. Regarding staff did not ensure a comfortable environment was provided for residents. The reported noise was temporary and related to essential maintenance work during the installation of a sprinkler system. Earplugs were provided to residents to reduce any discomfort, and measures to mitigate the impact were reviewed. No verified harm was reported, no evidence of residents requiring medical attention, and no additional formal complaints were found. The Department has investigated the above allegations. The allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250523093321
Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior in resident's room. Facility staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs.

On 04/24/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to deliver an amended copy of LIC9099. LPA met with administrator Greg Bogart and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that Staff engaged in inappropriate behavior in resident's room, the department was provided with video evidence showing a female staff lowering her pant in the presence of a male staff while inside the resident’s room. Regarding the allegation that facility staff was not meeting the resident’s hygiene needs: The Service Plan dated 12/06/2024 indicates that the resident was to receive full assistance with bathing on a daily basis. No shower assistance was logged on 12/06/2024-12/07/2024. Based on interviews and document review during the course of the investigation, the department determined that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8 and is noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241205100317

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2025

Personal Rights requirement: Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall…be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on video evidence showing two staffs engaging in inappropriate conduct inside the resident’s room. This serious violation poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025

Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator shall develop and implement a plan to ensure that staff do not engage in inappropriate conduct in resident’s room. A copy of the plan must be submitted to CCL by 04/25/2025. Failure to correct this deficiency by due date may result in a civil penalty

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 29, 2025

Personal rights requirement: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs This requirement was not met, as evidenced by file reviews and interviews indicating that the documentation in the shower log was inconsistent with the bathing schedule outlined in the Service Plan. This violation poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to submit proof of correction with a written plan outlining how this violation will be avoided in the future to licensing office by 04/29/2025. Failure to correct this deficiency by due date may result in a civil penalty.

Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Resident sustained injury due to lack of supervision. -Facility failed to conduct reappraisal of resident after significant change in resident's physical, mental, cognitive, behavioral, or functional condition.

On 04/24/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary finding for this complaint received by the Department on 01/24/2025. LPA was greeted by administrator Greg Bogart and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that Resident sustained injury due to lack of supervision, client’s care, supervision and services were not adjusted in December 2024 to prevent harm to other client, despite documented incidents of client exhibiting harm toward staffs in December 2024. Regarding the allegation that facility failed to conduct reappraisal of resident after significant change in resident's physical, mental, cognitive, behavioral, or functional condition, client was not reappraised after documented incidents of exhibiting harm to staffs. Based on interviews and file reviews during the course of the investigation it was determined that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegations above are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8 and is noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250124101153

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2025

Personal rights requirement: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs This requirement was not met, as evidenced by file reviews and interviews revealed that the client’s care, supervision and services were not adjusted to prevent harm to other client, despite documented incidents of client exhibiting harm toward staffs. This violation poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to submit proof of correction with a written plan outlining how this violation will be avoided in the future to licensing office by 04/25/2025. Failure to correct this deficiency by due date may result in a civil penalty

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87463(b)(1)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2025

Reappraisals requirement: The reappraisal shall document significant changes in…Behavioral expression…that may result in harm to self or others. This requirement was not met, as evidenced by file reviews and interviews, which revealed that the client was not reappraised after documented incidents of exhibiting harm to staffs. This violation poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to submit proof of correction with a written plan outlining how this violation will be avoided in the future to licensing office by 04/25/2025. Failure to correct this deficiency by due date may result in a civil penalty

Mar 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 03/28/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident report. LPA met with Administrator Gregory Bogart, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. On 02/28/2025, Desk Duty LPA received a report regarding a care partner allegedly made sexual comment to resident R1. LPA interviewed R1 to confirm incident. LPA interviewed administrator and reviewed files. The administrator stated that the care partner, who had only been employed at the facility for two weeks and allegedly made the sexual comment, is no longer employed at the facility. Facility to provide copies of Relias staff training on topics such as resident rights, personal boundaries, professionalism, elder abuse, and/or caregiver conduct by 04/08/2025. LPA has reviewed this report with administrator, and a copy of the report was provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2025
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 02/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian, Grace Donato and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) April Cowan arrived at the facility to conduct the unannounced required 1 year annual inspection visit. LPAs and LPM met with Health and Wellness Director, Navpreet Kaur, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Gregory Bogart arrived later during the visit. LPAs and LPM toured facility, which consists of shared and private studio apartments--all of which include sink and vanity--on ground and 2nd floors of this 3- story community. Each room has an emergency pull alarm, which transmits audio and visual signal to monitors in medication room and front desk. Thirty apartments are inspected. Common areas include lobby, sun room, dining room and expansive outdoor space, which includes level patio. There is one elevator and 5 interior stairwells, plus 2 exterior fire exit stairs. There are no accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Medications are stored in locked medication room on 2nd floor and chemicals are stored in locked rooms. A comfortable temperature is maintained and passageways are clear. Hot water temperature checked in bed rooms and common bathrooms within range of 105 - 118 degrees F. There are at least 16 full bathrooms that are equipped with grab bars and nonskid flooring material. Food supply and first-aid kit are inspected. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact have been reviewed. Staff records, including training were reviewed. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are cited on following pages, per record review made today. Report was reviewed with Administrators, copy of report and Appeal Rights are providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025
Jan 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 1/7/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of conducting a case management to follow up on multiple changes within the facility, including an increase in capacity request and a change of license. LPA was greeted by Executive Director, Greg Bogart. LPA and staff toured the facility and inspected resident bedrooms pertaining to the capacity increase request. There are currently 91 residents residing in the facility which is within the current capacity. LPA confirmed count on resident census documentation. The facility's request is to update several bedrooms on the second floor to house ambulatory residents and allow additional double occupancy bedrooms. LPA inspected the non-ambulatory and bedridden portions of the facility and found no concerns or over capacity. San Francisco Fire Department is scheduled to conduct a fire inspection on 1/8/2025. Four rooms currently used as offices and storage space will be converted back into resident use if fire clearance is approved. Additional licensing inspection may follow to confirm resident room accommodation requirements are met. Executive Director will contact LPA upon completion and the fire inspection clearance report to be provided. LPA and Executive Director discussed the plans for change of ownership and sale of the facility. Executive Director stated that the facility is in the process but has not finalized the sale. LPA was provided a copy of the notification letter sent out to residents and families dated 11/29/2024. The letter indicates that the change of ownership will occur on or around 12/31/2024. LPA requested for documentation of the company having notified Community Care Licensing of the intent to change ownership/sell the facility. LPA to conduct follow up visit once documentation is received. No deficiencies cited during visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2025

20243 state visits · 4 documents

Jul 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

To complete annual inspection of 4/16/24, LPA Jeung reviewed client and staff records. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are cited on following pages, per observations made on 4/16/24 and today.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.311 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2024

Every RCFE shall have one or more carbon monoxide detectors in the facility that meet the standards established in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 13260) of Part 2 of Division 12. The Dept. shall account for the presence of these detectors during inspections. This requirement was not met, as carbon monoxide detectors were not present on 4/16/24, per administrator. This poses a potential health and safety risk for clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024

Plan of correction: Plan/proof of correction for installation of carbon monoxide detectors will be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2024

PERSONAL ACCOMMODATIONS & SERVICES Individual privacy shall be provided in all toilet, bath and shower areas. This requirement was not met, as commodes were observed on 4/16/24 in shared rooms 103, 107, 116. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024

Plan of correction: Plan/proof of correction for removal of commodes in shared rooms will be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2024

POSTURAL SUPPORTS A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident’s record. The licensing agency shall be authorized to require other additional documentation if needed to verify the order. This requirement is not met, as MD orders are not maintained for half bed rails for 2 clients, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to clients. Clients #2 & #8 are missing MD orders for half bed rails. On 4/16/24, half bed rails observed for 20 beds, which require MD orders on file.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024

Plan of correction: MD orders for half bed rails for clients #2 & #8 will be sent to CCLD. MD orders should be maintained for all clients who use half bed rails. Plan/proof of correction to be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE

Apr 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Audrey Jeung toured facility, which consists of shared and private studio apartments--all of which include sink and vanity--on ground and 2nd floors of this 3- story community. Each room has an emergency pull alarm, which transmits audio and visual signal to monitors in medication room and front desk. Thirty apartments are inspected. Common areas include lobby, sun room, dining room and expansive outdoor space, which includes level patio. There is one elevator and 5 interior stairwells, plus 2 exterior fire exit stairs. There are no accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Medications are stored in locked medication room on 2nd floor and chemicals are stored in locked rooms. A comfortable temperature is maintained and passageways are clear. Hot water temperature checked in 3 rooms and common bathroom within range of 105 - 120 degrees F. There are at least 16 full bathrooms that are equipped with grab bars and nonskid flooring material. PPE supplies are maintained. Food supply and first-aid kit are inspected. Criminal record clearances or exemptions for facility staff or other individuals who have client contact have been reviewed. Food service staff have current safe food handling certifications, including food and beverage director. Quarterly reviews are completed by a registered dietician and reports are maintained; copies of last 2 reports are given to LPA. Gregory Bogart is a certified RCFE administrator (x 5/24 that oversee facility operations. Some client medications records are reviewed. Staff records, including training, will be reviewed at a later date. The following information is requested to be submitted to CCL by 4/23/24 - Proof of current liability insurance (including coverage limits) - Proof of control of property (signed lease agreement) - LIC 309 Administrative Organization Deficiency of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 is cited today. Also see Technical Advisory Notes--6 pages. Annual inspection to be completed at a later date.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024
Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are sleeping at the facility.

On January 18, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unnannounced complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Greg Bogart and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation staff are sleeping at the facility, according to the reporting party, two staff members on NOC shift have been sleeping in chairs at the facility during their shifts. During the visit, LPA interviewed administrator, assistant administrator, staff and residents. The administrator and the assistant administrator indicated that they have not heard or observed staff sleeping during NOC shift, however they indicated if staff choose to sleep during their (unpaid) 30-minute lunch then it's their decision. Based on 3 staff and 5 residents interviewed, they have not observed or heard of NOC shift staff sleeping during their shift. Although the above allegation may have happened or are valid, there is no evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with Greg Bogart and a copy is provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 14-AS-20231227095941
Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On January 18, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to complaint control #: 14-AS-20231227095941. LPA met with Administrator, Gregory Bogart and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation regarding the above referenced complaint, LPA interviewed 5 residents and discovered 4/5 residents indicated that when they press their call button at night, staff do not respond in a timely manner. In addition, staff interviewed also indicated that he/she has heard complaints in the morning from residents that when they attempted to press their call pendant/button at night, staff either don't respond or respond late. LPA attempted to obtain call button/ call pendant records from the facility for review, however facility was unable to provide any documentation to show staff respond in a timely manner. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.312(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 19, 2024

§1569.312 Basic services requirements..Every facility required to be licensed under this chapter shall provide at least the following basic services:..(a) Care and supervision as defined in Section 1569.2. Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on resident interviewed, 4/5 residents interviewed indicated that when they tried to press their call pendants/buttons, staff will either not respond or not respond in a timely manner which poses an immediate health and safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to submit a written plan to ensure residents call buttons/ call pendants are being responded in a timely manner.

20231 state visit · 1 document

Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

In response to Suspected Abuse Reports (SOC341) submitted to CCLD on 12/1/23 and 12/6/23, LPA Jeung met with administrator to discuss incidents and obtain updates. LPA reviewed clients' files and interviewed clients and staff. Incident reported on 12/1/23 pertains to client #1. Incident reported on 12/6/23 pertains to clients #2 and #3. Administrator is instructed to submit Unusual Incident Reports (LIC624) to CCLD whenever SOC341s are submitted. Administrator to submit completed Incident Reports to CCLD BY 12/12/23 with detailed summary of facility investigations, including names of all persons involved and contacted. Administrator reported to CCLD on Friday 12/8/23 that facility is experiencing a gastrointestinal outbreak. LPA is informed today that report was made to SF Dept. of Public Health, and recommendations were provided to administrator; copy of SFDPH recommendations obtained by LPA, as well as line list of those afflicted. Administrator is reminded to ensure that all resident appraisals and care plans are signed and acknowledged by resident or their authorized representatives. At this time, no deficiencies observed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 13 documents

20233 state visits · 3 documents

Sep 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of fluids while in care - Staff did not ensure the residents were properly fed while in care - Staff did not meet the residents hygiene needs - Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition - Staff did not follow infection control procedures

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to investigate the allegations received and deliver findings on the allegations. LPA met with administrator assistant Lea Salazar and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation interviews were conducted, pertinent resident documents are reviewed, and facility observations are made. It is discovered that there is contradicting information in regards to the allegations received versus what the facility was able to provide via interviews, observations made, and documentation. LPA is unable to prove whether the allegations took place or not due to the conflicting information. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Report is reviewed with Lea Salazar. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230327163312

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Aug 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 8/30/2023 LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrative Assistant, Lea Salazar. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including a random sample of resident rooms, common areas, and kitchen area. LPA observed some residents watching tv near the dining area, some residents were outside the facility talking. While touring the facility it was observed that the temperature was at 78 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the resident bathrooms and the temperature was 110 deg F. Bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid floors. The residents have adequate number of linens and incontinence care items. All personal belongings are intact. Resident bedrooms were observed to be in good repair. Carbon monoxide monitor is working properly. All fire extinguishers have been checked dated 6/8/23. LPA toured the kitchen, and it was observed that anyone entering the kitchen are required to wear hairnets. There is adequate amount of food, 2 days for perishables and & 7 days non-perishable. Food containers are labeled with date opened. Freezers are at required temperature. Emergency drills are done every month. Five resident records and five staff records were reviewed. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic 20hr requirement. Facility has a certified administrator on site with complete certification and training requirements. Facility accepts hospice residents and are following the required waiver requirements. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. LPA interviewed 5 residents and 3 staff. All residents stated that they are being well taken care of and enjoys the food. Activities are offered and residents are encouraged to join. All staff are competent with regards to the care of the residents. LPA received the following documents from the facility: LIC 400 Certificate of Liability Insurance No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023
Apr 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not repair a resident's medical bed while in care

On April 3, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Jeffrey Dillon nd Director of Wellness, Renafe Mosquera and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staff did not repair a resident's medical bed while in care, according to the reporting party, staff reported that Resident 1's (R1's) bed had been broken and not working for a while and could not be adjusted to sit R1 upright. During the investigation, LPA toured facility, observed R1's bed, and interviewed the Administrator and the Director of Wellness. According to the Administrator and the Director of Wellness, it was acknowledged that R1's medical bed was not working. The Director of Wellness had the Maintenance Director check the bed and found that the electical outlet was not working. During the visit today, LPA observed the bed to be in good repair and working condition. Based on interviews and observations conducted during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator and Director of Wellness and a copy is provided with appeals rights. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230327110439

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 10, 2023

87303 Maintenance and Operation : (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times... Violation of this regulation is evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews conducted, it was acknowledged that the electric hospital bed was broken. According to the Director of Wellness, she had the Maintenance Director check the bed and found that the electical outlet was not working.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2023

Plan of correction: Deficiency is corrected and cleared. LPA observed R1's bed to be in good repair and working condition.

20224 state visits · 8 documents

Dec 20, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 20, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on December 2, 2022. LPA met with Administrator, Mindy Han and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility reported on November 27, 2022, Resident #1 (R1) eloped from the facility. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1's file and spoke to Administrator. According to the file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and unable to leave the facility unassisted. According to the Administrator, R1 was last seen in his room during a routine check at 2:40pm. At around 3:40pm, staff observed R1 was not in his/her room or in the community. Staff searched the facility grounds for R1. R1 returned back to the community at 4pm accompanied by a paramedic who observed R1 walking around the neighborhood. R1 did not have any injuries noted. According to the Administrator, after this incident, all required parties were notified and a private caregiver was assigned to R1 until R1 moves into a more secure environment. Based on interviews and file reviewed during the visit, the facility did attempt to ensure basic services were being met for R1. No citations will be issued at this time. Report is reviewed with Administrator, Mindy Han and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2022
Oct 11, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Supervison - Client was injured after leaving the facility unassisted

On October 11, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Mindy Han and Regional Business Development, Jeffrey Dillon and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, neglect/ lack of supervision—client was injured after leaving the facility unassisted, according to the complainant, on September 7, 2021, Resident #1 (R1) was found at the park rolling around naked in the bushes by San Francisco Police Department (SFPD). In addition, it was indicated that R1 was found with scratches and blood all over his body. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed documentation collected. Interviewed staff indicated that when R1 was returned to the facility on 9/7/2021 by SFPD, the facility staff observed lacerations on face, torso, bilateral legs, and bilateral arms which the facility staff treated immediately. In addition, R1 was never taken to the ER after being assessed by both the EMT’s and facility staff. Furthermore, interviewed staff indicated R1 was alert and oriented. According to the physician report dated January 19, 2018, R1 has a diagnosis of Parkinsons, however, was able to leave the facility unassisted. CONT. to 9099C CONT. to 9099C Unsubstantiated In addition, file reviewed indicated that the facility had a written fax order from the Neurologist dated 4/9/2021 indicating that R1 may leave the facility by himself unless he/she appeared confused, drowsy, or unsteady. Although R1 sustained injuries after leaving the facility unassisted, there is no evidence of neglect or lack of supervision as R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted per doctor’s orders. Therefore, based on the information collected, and interviews, the allegation that Neglect/Lack of Supervision - client was injured after leaving the facility unassisted UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report is reviewed with Administrator, Mindy Han and Regional Business Development, Jeffrey Dillon and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2022 · control 14-AS-20211221110610
Oct 11, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On October 11, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Mindy Han and Regional Business Development, Jeffrey Dillon and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation of complaint control number; 14-AS-20211221110610, LPA Charitra reviewed Resident #1's (R1's) file and found R1's physician's report was dated 1/19/2018. The facility failed to keep an updated physician's report for R1 to document R1's change of condition. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator, Mindy Han and Regional Business Development, Jeffrey Dillon and a copy is provided with appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 18, 2022

87458 Medical Assessment: (a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year. The licensee shall be permitted to use the form LIC 602 (Rev. 9/89), Physician's Report, to obtain the medical assessment. Violation of this regulation is evidenced by: Based on record review, facility failed to maintain an up to adte physician's report for R1 which poses a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 11, 2022

Plan of correction: Every month facility will conduct an medical records audit to ensure resident's physician's report (LIC602) is up to date.

Mar 25, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision

On this day at 1100 hours, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with LVN Abella Tolmasoff and explained purpose of todays visit. During the course of the investigation it was found through interviews that there were at least four residents present as well as two staff. One of the caregivers was present at time of fall while the other was the receptionist but was not able to visually supervise residents as she was on the telephone in an office adjacent to the lobby where the resident fell. Interviews conducted identified that there is always a minimum of two staff present in the lobby for supervision and this ratio increases if there are more residents present. This allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that taff did not provide adequate supervision. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. No citations issued. Report discussed with Abella Tolmasoff. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2022 · control 14-AS-20210831121226
Mar 25, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On this day at 1100 hours, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management visit in conjunction with a complaint closure conducted on this day. LPA met with LVN Abella Tolmasoff and explained the purpose of this case management. It was found during the investigation of a complaint received on 08/31/2021 that a staff person (S1) was not associated to the facility. LPA reviewed the staff roster with Abella and confirmed that S1 is still not associated to the facility but does have a fingerprint clearance. This violation results in a civil penalty of $100 per day x 10 days = $1,000 Report is reviewed with Abella Tolmasoff. Appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 26, 2022

Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, licensee failed to request a transfer of criminal record clearance for S1 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care. On 03/25/2022, LPA confirmed with LVN that S1 is still employed with facility and is providing care and supervision to residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator shall ensure to submit a criminal record clearance transfer request to the licensing office for S1 by the POC due date. Also submit proof of correction and a written plan outlining how this violation will be avoided in the future to licensing office by due date. Failure to correct this deficiency by due date may result in a civil penalty of $100 per day. Immediate civil penalty of $1,000 was issued today. $100 x 10 days = $1,000

Mar 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: - Resident was physically abused - Staff is not allowing visitors

Based on information obtained and investigation by LPA Jeung, these allegations are determined to be unfounded, meaning that the allegations could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. Furthermore, despite multiple requests, complainant has failed to provide evidence to support these allegations. On 8/25/21, the Dept. investigated and concluded that a fall event regarding the hospice resident on 7/19/21 was unsubstantiated. This complaint alleges that the resident sustained injuries caused by a physical assault. Information obtained from prior investigation and this investigation--including medical records and interviews with medical professionals who attended resident--indicate that resident sustained injuries that were consistent with a mechanical fall forward, including facial bleeding and bruising. There was no suspicion that resident was assaulted. There is no indication that visitors were not allowed to visit resident based on review of facility visitor logs for July, August, September 2021 and information obtained from staff interviews. During a visit from a relative of this same resident who was verbally disruptive, SFPD were called to respond. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2022 · control 14-AS-20210916092205
Mar 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

During complaint visit, LPA Jeung toured facility and observed the following: - COVID isolation room is not identified as such by signage -- COVID sign should be posted on isolation room - Isolation cart with PPE is not set up outside of isolation room -- PPE should be stored in isolation cart outside of isolation room - Handwashing reminder signs are not posted at each sink in public bathrooms where people wash their hands -- Handwashing reminder signs should be posted at each sink in public bathrooms, not just outside of bathrooms LPA reminded Ms. Galimba to refer to protocols identified in facility's COVID Mitigation Plan.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2022
Mar 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

In the absence of administrator, LPA Jeung met with acting care coordinator and consultant regarding incident reported today to CCLD. Client #1 was admitted yesterday, 3/2/22, and is non-ambulatory per MD report, as well as unable to leave facility unassisted and unable to bathe, dress, feed self or care for toileting needs. MD report and other relevant documents for client #1 are provided to LPA today. According to Ms. Santos, client was admitted for a 30 day respite paid for by Kaiser Hospital. LPA observed location of room where client slept last night, and noted 2 exits nearby. One exit door emitted a loud alarm, and the other emitted a low volume audible alarm. Both alarms ceased when exit doors were closed. Staff do not have to physically respond to alarm to turn it off. Deficiency of the CA Code of REgulations, Title 22 is cited on a following page. During this visit, LPA was requested by the CCLD Investigation Branch to inquire about another client. LPA reviewed file for client #2, who moved out of facility on 3/1/22.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 4, 2022

BASIC SERVICES Basic services shall at a minimum include: Care and supervision, meaning the responsibility for... ongoing assistance with ADLs, without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. This requirement was not met, as client #1 eloped from facility without staff knowledge today. Because Licensee failed to ensure that client was supervised, he left the premises, which posed a immediate risk to his health, safety and welfare.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2022

Plan of correction: Plan of correction to be submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 15, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 15, 2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra and Audrey Jeung conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that occurred on December 8, 2021 and was not reported to Licensing as required. LPAs were greeted by Director of Resident Care, Ivan Emiliano and Administrator, Jeffrey Dillon joined shortly thereafter. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPAs reviewed R1's file. On December 8, 2021, Resident (R1) left the facility and is still missing. According to the LVN, R1 is independent and able to leave the facility unassisted. However, LPAs received written order from R1's MD, dated 12/1/21 stating that R1 is unable to leave the facility unsupervised. Facility LVN denies knowledge of this order nor receipt. Additional information is required. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator; a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2021

Reappraisal: The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition. This requirement is not met as Licensee failed to appraise R1 after several unusual incidents; 12/8/21, 9/7/21,11/20/20, and 3/28/20, some of which required medical intervention. Licensee failed to ensure that appraisal and care plan accurately reflects his needs. This poses a potential health and safety risk to client.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2021

Plan of correction: Plan of care to be developed for R1 to include his unusual behaviors. Copy to be submitted to CCLD by 12/22/2021.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 22, 2021

Reporting; Occurrences, such as...or major accidents which threaten the welfare, safety or health of residents...shall be reported within 24 hours... to the licensing agency This requirement was not met as R1 left the facility on 12/8/21 without staff knowledge and Licensee failed to report this to CCLD as required. Incident report was submitted following LPA's reqeust and contact with facility LVN on 12/10/21. This posed a potention health, safety, and personal rights risk to clients care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator to submit acknowledgement of Title 22 Regulations for prompt reporting of threats to client's health, safety, or welfare by 12/22/2021.

Aug 25, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident fell while in care sustaining injuries. Staff left resident in soiled diapers for extended period of time resulting in bladder infection. Facility is not answering their phones. Residents wheelchair is in disrepair.

On 8/25/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mohamed Filouane conducted a follow-up visit regarding this complaint investigation. LPA Filouane spoke to Administrator Jeffrey Dillon, explained the purpose of the visit, and then delivered the findings. Concerning the allegation of the resident falling while in care and sustaining injuries, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator, and Director of Wellness, as well as reviewed the incident report submitted to the Community Care Licensing Division. This incident involving the resident occurred as an unwitnessed fall, which led to a hospital visit on 07/18/21. Facility staff believe the resident had tried to push themselves off the bed and to their walker. There is no violation under Title 22 regulations for an unwitnessed fall. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Concerning the allegation of staff having left the resident in soiled diapers which resulted in a bladder infection during the 07/19/21 hospital visit, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator, Director of Wellness, as well as reviewed the medical discharge document of the resident on 07/19/21. The Administrator and Director of Wellness denied this allegation. The Administrator stated there is no record of soiled diapers or a bladder infection regarding the resident in question. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Concerning the allegation of the facility not answering their phones, LPA Filouane tested the facility phone line before conducting the 10-day visit, as well as tested the facility phone line during the 10-day visit. Facility staff answered both unannounced calls. The Administrator stated the facility's phone line had days when it was working and not working in past weeks. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Concerning the allegation of the resident's wheelchair is in disrepair, LPA Filouane interviewed the Administrator, Director of Wellness, reviewed resident's record, and toured the resident's room. The Administrator denied the allegation. The Administrator stated the resident used their walker. The Director of Wellness stated they had never seen the resident use their wheelchair. LPA observed the wheelchair as functioning and not in disrepair. After review, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator will receive this LIC9099 report through email to sign. The Administrator will then email the signed version back to the LPA.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2021 · control 14-AS-20210723151722

125 of 132 beds were occupied at the August 25, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Portola Gardens LLC; Portola Mgmt Bsd, LLC, licensed since 2019.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
43
Total complaints
16
Substantiated allegations
6
Type A citations
3
Type B citations
3

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations30
Type B citations31
Substantiated allegations62
Total complaints166

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Portola Gardens

Is Portola Gardens licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Portola Gardens licensed for?

132 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Portola Gardens been cited?

3 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 43 state visits over the same years.

Is Portola Gardens still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Portola Gardens cost?

$3,695 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Francisco that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $6,140 to $8,450 a month, and the middle figure is $7,200 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Portola Gardens take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Portola Gardens LLC; Portola Mgmt Bsd, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

California Pacific Medical Center - Mission Bernal Campus and Orthopedic Institute is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Portola Gardens keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 18 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Portola Gardens license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PORTOLA GARDENS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #385601045. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 132 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Portola Gardens LLC; Portola Mgmt Bsd, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 43 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 43 state visits in that period.
  • 16 complaints and 6 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in San Francisco County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    San Francisco · 0.6 mi

    Merced Girard Residential Care Facility

    Mid-size home · licensed for 42

    Starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Francisco · 1.7 mi

    Merced Three Residential Care Facility

    Mid-size home · licensed for 33

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Francisco · 1.0 mi

    Lynne & Roy M Frank Residences

    Large community · licensed for 220

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$7,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Francisco · 1.7 mi

    Lady of Perpetual Help Rfe #1

    Mid-size home · licensed for 15

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$6,450

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Francisco · 1.8 mi

    RJ Starlight Home

    Mid-size home · licensed for 12

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$6,000
    • Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
  • Map

    San Francisco · 1.9 mi

    Golden Residential Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500
    • Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore San Francisco County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
PG

Call Portola Gardens

San Francisco · Licensed for 132

(415) 337-1587

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Portola Gardens

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages