Ivy Park At Otay Ranch is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chula Vista, San Diego County, California — state license #374604455, licensed for 137 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 34 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Ivy Park At Otay Ranch

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 137 residents · Chula Vista, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604455, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1290 Santa Rose Drive · Chula Vista, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 779-7400
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 137 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 44 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 137 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 44 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN ANY APARTMENT ON THE 1ST OR 2ND FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 45 times and filed 34 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the September 11, 2025 visit
126 of 137 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 24, 2023 to November 7, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 27 of 34 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect to resident resulting in serious bodily injury. Staff did not ensure resident's needs were met

On 11/7/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Executive Director, Diana Weinstein and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of neglect to resident resulting in serious bodily injury, resident (R1) was sent to the hospital and had undergone surgery. According to records, on 7/15/2024, during medication pass, R1 reported experiencing pain. R1 was asked if he/she had a fall but kept denying. PRN medication was given but was ineffective. Staff asked family to send R1 to hospital for further evaluation. On the same day, R1 was sent to hospital and was evaluated. For the allegation of staff did not ensure resident's needs were met, based on the records reviewed, there is constant alert charting for R1. There are also notes from facility staff about R1s behaviors and daily activities. Based on records review, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240805130104
Sep 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from eloping from facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit and also delivered findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit with Memory Care Director Trobell Orana. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, records review, interviews with staff and resident. It was alleged that facility staff did not prevent Resident 1 (R1) from eloping from the facility. It was reported that R1 eloped from the facility and was not located for several hours. R1's Physician's Report dated August 13, 2025 revealed R1 has a diagnosis of Major neurocognitive disorder. R1 is not able to leave the facility unsupervised and R1 becomes disoriented at times. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250904161054
Aug 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an injury due to lack of supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced visit at the facility to open a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves, stated the purpose of the visit and was greeted by Executive Director (ED) Calais Anguiano. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained an injury due to lack of supervision. It was reported that R1 fell down on two consecutive days, October 21st and October 22nd. On the second incident, R1 sustained a head injury and was sent to the hospital. It was further reported that Staff 1 (S1) was the responsible caregiver during both incidents. LPA reviewed facility resident rosters dated September 2024 through February 2025. LPA also reviewed facility staff rosters dated September 2024 through February 2025. Review of records revealed R1 did not reside at the facility and S1 did not work at the above mentioned facility. LPA interviewed Outside Source (OS) who stated that R1 and S1 were located at athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250212120748
202410 state visits · 10 documents
Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility financially abused resident Staff moved a resident who doesn’t have dementia to the memory care unit Staff instructed residents not to use their pendants, or they will be charged extra for using them

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Maintenance Director Justin Brown and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review and interviews with facility staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that facility staff financially abused Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) It was reported that R1 was paying for three apartments without R1's knowledge. LPA reviewed the standard fee schedule dated January 2024 as well as billing invoices dated June 2024 through August 2024. The billing invoices did not show that R1 was charged for three apartments. A slight price increase occurred on the July invoice when R1 moved to the memory care unit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240729110908
Aug 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglected resident resulting in hospitalization.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Calais Anguiano and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA direct observation, records review and interviews with facility staff. It was alleged that staff neglected Resident 1 (R1) resulting in hospitalization.[an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident.]It was reported that R1 fell in their room and called for staff assistance multiple times. An outside party called emergency services for R1 and R1 was transported to the hospital. Interviews were conducted with seven staff members, during this time period. Of the seven staff members, all reported that staffing was an issue and five of the seven reported that either residents did nthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211115095357
May 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining head injury. Licensee did not address resident's change in condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced a follow up complaint investigation visit, and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Business Office Director Silvia Garcia. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources. It was alleged neglect/lack of supervision resulted in a resident sustaining a head injury. On 05/18/2023, the Department received an SOC 341, a report of Suspected Dependent Adult/ Elder Abuse. It was reported Resident # 1 (R1) had sustained an unwitnessed fall on 5/3/23 and was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. On 5/4/23, 911 was again called to the facility as R1 had sustained another fall resulting in head trauma. (See LIC 9099C form for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230518133003
May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries due to lack of care from staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano, conducted an unannounced Complaint Visit. LPA introduced himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Calais Anguiano. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with facility staff and outside source. It was reported to CCL that Resident 1 (R1)(an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) had an unwitnessed fall and sustained bruising. It was alleged that R1 sustained those injuries due to lack of care from staff. Records review revealed R1 had an unwitnessed fall on February 4, 2024. Hospital discharge records revealed no new findings or new medications. Facility staff notated on February 5, 2024 at approximately 2pm; R1 was confused and crying and a "PRN" was given to R1. R1 refused to eat dinner that same day and was "very confused." Facility staff notified R1's POthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240207120418
Feb 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staffing is not sufficient to meet resident's needs.

Licensing Program Analyst Becky Kennedy concluded the investigatioSilvia Garcia, Business office Manager. LPA advised her of the reason for today's visit and delivered the investigation findings on the above allegation. The investigation into the above allegations consisted of interviews with internal sources, a review of internal and external documents, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the facility’s staffing is not sufficient to meet resident's needs. The investigation revealed that when a resident pushed their call alert button often a staff member responded in less than five minutes, however it was not uncommon for call alerts to be answered in more than 20 minutes, 30 minutes, to over an hour. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211011082146
Jan 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff were not adequately trained. Facility staff mismanaged the residents' medications.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Calais Anguiano and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of LPA direct observation, records review and interviews with facility staff. It was alleged that facility staff mismanaged resident medications and were not adequately trained. It was reported to CCL that med-techs lack proper medication administration training. It was also reported that facility staff are not properly documenting when the residents medications are unavailable. LPA reviewed the training file of three random facility staff members. Staff 1's (S1) training file was reviewed. S1 shadowed another facility staff and completed the following tasks from 11/5/23-11/9/23; 3 hours of "QMAR" videos, using a bubble pack card, readingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240122104916
20233 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide 60-day notice prior to rent increase.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Calais Angiano and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with facility staff. It was reported to CCL that staff did not provide resident with a 60-day notice, prior to rent increase. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the clients) received a rent increase for the months of July and August 2023 without a 60-day prior notice. Records review revealed R1's POA signed an admission agreement on September 14, 2020. The admission agreement indicated the facility would give a 60 days' prior written notice to the resident/POA regarding any change in the monthly fees. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230802150635
Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs Staff did not provide incontinence care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to follow up on the investigation of the above allegations. LPA met with the Executive Director, Calais Angiano to whom she discussed the purpose of the visit. During this visit, LPA conducted a tour of the memory care unit. In addition, LPA conducted additional interviews and reviewed resident and facility records. LPA concluded the investigation and delivered the findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, a review of relevant records, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. On January 25, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not meet a resident’s hygiene needs (R1), [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. (Continue at LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220125092004
Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff spoke inappropriately to residents Staff did not attend to residents’ call buttons in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Executive Director, Calais Angiano, and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, observations, multiple interviews with residents, and staff, and a detailed review of relevant records. On July 27, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that staff spoke inappropriately to residents. Specific details of when this occurred were not obtained. However, during the investigation, facility management indicated that on July 26, 2023, a staff member reported an incident they witnessed when a care staff member made inappropriate comments to a resident. A second incident was also reported on August 8, 2023, of unprofessional misconduct between two care staff members in the presence of an outside source. (continue at LIC9099C) Substanthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230727122042
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations11typical 1
Substantiated complaints14typical 2
Total complaints18typical 7
State visits on file45typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263502025881202410102202367320223302021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 779-7400

Is Ivy Park At Otay Ranch licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Otay Ranch is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chula Vista (San Diego County): California license #374604455, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 137 residents. State records list 34 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy Park At Otay Ranch care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Otay Ranch with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 137 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 44 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN ANY APARTMENT ON THE 1ST OR 2ND FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Ivy Park At Otay Ranch cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Otay Ranch's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Otay Ranch accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Otay Ranch is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

126 of 137 beds occupied (92%) when the state visited on September 11, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Otay Ranch?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 45 state visits and 34 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Otay Ranch; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 7, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect to resident resulting in serious bodily injury. Staff did not ensure resident's needs were met
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/7/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Executive Director, Diana Weinstein and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of neglect to resident resulting in serious bodily injury, resident (R1) was sent to the hospital and had undergone surgery. According to records, on 7/15/2024, during medication pass, R1 reported experiencing pain. R1 was asked if he/she had a fall but kept denying. PRN medication was given but was ineffective. Staff asked family to send R1 to hospital for further evaluation. On the same day, R1 was sent to hospital and was evaluated. For the allegation of staff did not ensure resident's needs were met, based on the records reviewed, there is constant alert charting for R1. There are also notes from facility staff about R1s behaviors and daily activities. Based on records review, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, tCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240805130104
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from eloping from facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit and also delivered findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit with Memory Care Director Trobell Orana. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, records review, interviews with staff and resident. It was alleged that facility staff did not prevent Resident 1 (R1) from eloping from the facility. It was reported that R1 eloped from the facility and was not located for several hours. R1's Physician's Report dated August 13, 2025 revealed R1 has a diagnosis of Major neurocognitive disorder. R1 is not able to leave the facility unsupervised and R1 becomes disoriented at times. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250904161054
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an injury due to lack of supervision
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced visit at the facility to open a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves, stated the purpose of the visit and was greeted by Executive Director (ED) Calais Anguiano. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained an injury due to lack of supervision. It was reported that R1 fell down on two consecutive days, October 21st and October 22nd. On the second incident, R1 sustained a head injury and was sent to the hospital. It was further reported that Staff 1 (S1) was the responsible caregiver during both incidents. LPA reviewed facility resident rosters dated September 2024 through February 2025. LPA also reviewed facility staff rosters dated September 2024 through February 2025. Review of records revealed R1 did not reside at the facility and S1 did not work at the above mentioned facility. LPA interviewed Outside Source (OS) who stated that R1 and S1 were located at aCDSS inspection report, February 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250212120748

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility financially abused resident Staff moved a resident who doesn’t have dementia to the memory care unit Staff instructed residents not to use their pendants, or they will be charged extra for using them
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Maintenance Director Justin Brown and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review and interviews with facility staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that facility staff financially abused Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) It was reported that R1 was paying for three apartments without R1's knowledge. LPA reviewed the standard fee schedule dated January 2024 as well as billing invoices dated June 2024 through August 2024. The billing invoices did not show that R1 was charged for three apartments. A slight price increase occurred on the July invoice when R1 moved to the memory care unit.CDSS inspection report, September 25, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240729110908
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglected resident resulting in hospitalization.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Calais Anguiano and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA direct observation, records review and interviews with facility staff. It was alleged that staff neglected Resident 1 (R1) resulting in hospitalization.[an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident.]It was reported that R1 fell in their room and called for staff assistance multiple times. An outside party called emergency services for R1 and R1 was transported to the hospital. Interviews were conducted with seven staff members, during this time period. Of the seven staff members, all reported that staffing was an issue and five of the seven reported that either residents did nCDSS inspection report, July 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211115095357
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining head injury. Licensee did not address resident's change in condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced a follow up complaint investigation visit, and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Business Office Director Silvia Garcia. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources. It was alleged neglect/lack of supervision resulted in a resident sustaining a head injury. On 05/18/2023, the Department received an SOC 341, a report of Suspected Dependent Adult/ Elder Abuse. It was reported Resident # 1 (R1) had sustained an unwitnessed fall on 5/3/23 and was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. On 5/4/23, 911 was again called to the facility as R1 had sustained another fall resulting in head trauma. (See LIC 9099C form for continuation of report.) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230518133003
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained injuries due to lack of care from staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano, conducted an unannounced Complaint Visit. LPA introduced himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Calais Anguiano. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with facility staff and outside source. It was reported to CCL that Resident 1 (R1)(an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) had an unwitnessed fall and sustained bruising. It was alleged that R1 sustained those injuries due to lack of care from staff. Records review revealed R1 had an unwitnessed fall on February 4, 2024. Hospital discharge records revealed no new findings or new medications. Facility staff notated on February 5, 2024 at approximately 2pm; R1 was confused and crying and a "PRN" was given to R1. R1 refused to eat dinner that same day and was "very confused." Facility staff notified R1's POCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240207120418
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaffing is not sufficient to meet resident's needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Becky Kennedy concluded the investigatioSilvia Garcia, Business office Manager. LPA advised her of the reason for today's visit and delivered the investigation findings on the above allegation. The investigation into the above allegations consisted of interviews with internal sources, a review of internal and external documents, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the facility’s staffing is not sufficient to meet resident's needs. The investigation revealed that when a resident pushed their call alert button often a staff member responded in less than five minutes, however it was not uncommon for call alerts to be answered in more than 20 minutes, 30 minutes, to over an hour. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211011082146
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff were not adequately trained. Facility staff mismanaged the residents' medications.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Calais Anguiano and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of LPA direct observation, records review and interviews with facility staff. It was alleged that facility staff mismanaged resident medications and were not adequately trained. It was reported to CCL that med-techs lack proper medication administration training. It was also reported that facility staff are not properly documenting when the residents medications are unavailable. LPA reviewed the training file of three random facility staff members. Staff 1's (S1) training file was reviewed. S1 shadowed another facility staff and completed the following tasks from 11/5/23-11/9/23; 3 hours of "QMAR" videos, using a bubble pack card, readingCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240122104916

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide 60-day notice prior to rent increase.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Calais Angiano and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with facility staff. It was reported to CCL that staff did not provide resident with a 60-day notice, prior to rent increase. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the clients) received a rent increase for the months of July and August 2023 without a 60-day prior notice. Records review revealed R1's POA signed an admission agreement on September 14, 2020. The admission agreement indicated the facility would give a 60 days' prior written notice to the resident/POA regarding any change in the monthly fees. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230802150635
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's hygiene needs Staff did not provide incontinence care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to follow up on the investigation of the above allegations. LPA met with the Executive Director, Calais Angiano to whom she discussed the purpose of the visit. During this visit, LPA conducted a tour of the memory care unit. In addition, LPA conducted additional interviews and reviewed resident and facility records. LPA concluded the investigation and delivered the findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations, a review of relevant records, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. On January 25, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not meet a resident’s hygiene needs (R1), [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. (Continue at LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220125092004
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff spoke inappropriately to residents Staff did not attend to residents’ call buttons in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Executive Director, Calais Angiano, and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, observations, multiple interviews with residents, and staff, and a detailed review of relevant records. On July 27, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that staff spoke inappropriately to residents. Specific details of when this occurred were not obtained. However, during the investigation, facility management indicated that on July 26, 2023, a staff member reported an incident they witnessed when a care staff member made inappropriate comments to a resident. A second incident was also reported on August 8, 2023, of unprofessional misconduct between two care staff members in the presence of an outside source. (continue at LIC9099C) SubstanCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230727122042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not protect residents in care Staff did not treat resident with dignity
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Calais Anguiano. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care and interviewed staff and the Executive Director. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff did not treat resident with dignity and the Licensee did not protect residents in care. Review of physician’s report for Resident 1 (R1) revealed that R1 had a diagnosis of dementia, was confused and disoriented, and was able to follow directions and make their needs known. R1’s physician’s report did not indicate any wandering, Sundowning, or aggressive behaviors. Continued on LIC9099-C page... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210908164827
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not distribute residents' medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Angela ScottKaplioff and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA direct observation, records review and interviews with facility staff. It was reported to CCL that staff did not distribute medications to Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the residents.] and it was also reported that staff distributed discontinued medications to residents. Records review revealed the facility’s Medication Administration Records (MARs) for R1 indicated R1 was receiving medications as prescribed, by staff daily initialing the MARs as dispensed for the month of November 2022. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 24, 2023 · control 08-AS-20221115153927

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 45 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
14
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
18
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
45
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 779-7400
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Otay Ranch? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.