Westmont At San Miguel Ranch is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chula Vista, San Diego County, California — state license #374603509, licensed for 105 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 37 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Westmont At San Miguel Ranch

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 105 residents · Chula Vista, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603509, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2325 Proctor Valley Rd · Chula Vista, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 271-4385
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
THE FACILITY SERVES ONE-HUNDRED AND FIVE (105) ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; TWELVE (12) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN ON THE GROUND FLOOR ONLY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 42 times and filed 37 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 29, 2026
Occupancy at the March 10, 2025 visit
89 of 105 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 16, 2022 to November 10, 2025. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 29 of 37 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 6 documents
May 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death

On 11/10/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Business Office Director Ellen Arguello and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of questionable death, reporting party (RP) stated that aspiration occurred due to routine medications being given to the resident by facility staff (not hospice) which led to aspiration pneumonia and the death of the resident. R1 was under hospice care. Facility staff were following doctors’ orders in administering medication. On 2/16/2025, around 12:41pm, facility received fax from doctor to discontinue medication. On the evening of same date, other medications were administered. R1 was routinely checked until passing on 2/17/2025. Death certificate did not indicate that R1 passed due to aspiration pneumonia. Based on records review, the department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250318135957
Mar 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident charged for services not rendered

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Office Director, Ellen Arguello. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff and residents, and a detailed records review, including medical records, health and service evaluation/assessment reports, service care plans, invoice billing statements and other relevant evidence pertinent to this investigation. On May 31, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that Resident (R1) was charged for services not rendered. [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the Resident]. (Continue at LIC9099) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240531124436
Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202411 state visits · 12 documents
Oct 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is intoxicated of alcohol while caring and supervising residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Jessica Zepeda and discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency. It was reported to CCL that facility staff (S1) was intoxicated while caring for and supervising residents in care. [Continued on LIC 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240515104136
Oct 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/ Lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining injuries

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Jessica Zepeda. Throughout the investigation the Department requested records, and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining injury while in care. A source alleged Resident # 1 (R1) suffered multiple falls, including one on June 4th, 2018, and a second fall on January 31st, 2019, that resulted in hospitalization, and lacerations requiring stitches. R1, a Seventy-Nine (79) year old memory care resident, was diagnosed with Dementia and assessed as a high fall risk during admission to the facility. A medical assessment revealed R1 could be confused and agitated at times. A service plan dated February 19th, 2019, revealed the facility assisted the resident with incontinence care, escortingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024 · control 08-AS-20200625151823
Aug 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's care plan does not accurately represent the care provided

Licensing Program Analyst Becky Kennedy concluded the investigation which began on 3/18/21. LPA Kennedy made an unannounced visit to the above facility today and met with Ellen Argullo, Business Office Manager. LPA advised them of the reason for today's visit and delivered the investigation findings on the above allegation. It was alleged that Resident 1’s (R1) care plan does not accurately represent the care provided. The investigation included interviews with internal and external sources, review of records, and a virtual tour of the facility. Interviews revealed that R1 had an insurance Policy that would reimburse R1 for some services. R1 had multiple conversations with facility administration to modify the care plan so that R1 could access insurance reimbursements. It was further revealed that R1 would periodically refuse services that were on the care plan and request services that were not on the care plan. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210212154050
May 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Jessica Zepedaand discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency. It was reported to CCL that facility staff mismanaged resident’s medication. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240122152834
May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs.

Licensing Program Analyst Becky Kennedy concluded the investigation which began on 7/29/21. LPA Kennedy made an unannounced visit to the above facility today and met with Jessica Zepeda, Executive Director. LPA advised Ms.Zepeda that the reason for today's visit is to deliver the investigation findings on the above allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with internal sources, a review of reports and records, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) (see LIC 811 for confidential names) requested incontinence care from facility staff and the care was not provided for approximately six hours when R1 called again to request care. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210726092242
Mar 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not communicate with responsible party of fee increases for resident's care plan.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Services Director Eva Amorim and discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency. It was reported to CCL that staff did not communicate with responsible party of fee increases for resident’s care plan. [Continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240112134103
Jan 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing residents with food Staff did not meet the needs of incontinent resident (s) Staff did not administer medications as prescribed Facility staff falsified a document Staff are not following residents care plan Facility did not ensure that hazardous items were inaccessible to residents Facility did not maintain comfortable temperature for residents Facility staff failed to follow reporting requirements

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. Throughout the investigation, the Department requested pertinent records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not provide residents food. It reported to the Department staff would not assist residents with feeding, and often food trays were witnessed to be untouched. Interviews with internal and external sources revealed the facility used food trays to deliver food to residents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. These sources did not corroborate witnessing lack of assistance with feeding, nor witnessing undelivered food trays. It was also revealed staff had provided the resident in question with different options, including cultural food choices. (See LIC 9099-C for continuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024 · control 08-AS-20200713094709
Jan 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20235 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Insufficient staff to respond to residents' call buttons timely

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Alyssa Antolin, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On September 20, 2023, it was alleged that there were insufficient staff to respond to residents’ call button timely resulting in injuries. Interview with residents did not coincide. Upon interviews, most residents did say that the staff response time once their call buttons were pushed were timely. One resident reported staff responding to call buttons untimely of about 20 minutes or not at all. None of the residents reported being injured in the process of staff response to theithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230920152253
Dec 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff did not meet training requirements

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings of a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Alyssa Antolin, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On October 2, 2023, it was alleged that staff did not meet training requirements. It was specifically alleged that staff #1 (S1) was inappropriately trained to provide medications to residents. Interview with S1 confirmed that they assisted with passing out medications, but there was always an assigned Medication Technician (Med Tech) dispensing the medications into a cup for the residents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231002095754
Sep 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff are inappropriately restraining residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit and delivered investigation findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Paola Partida, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and outside sources, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations of the residents’ living arrangements. On September 18, 2023, it was alleged that the staff inappropriately restrained residents in care. It was specifically alleged that there were 17 bed rails being used as a restraint. Interviews with residents and outside sources were consistent. Neither the residents nor outside sources had concerns regarding the bed rails being used as a restrictive device towards residents, to limit their movement or prevent thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230915082323
Sep 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility did not obtain resident’s Physician’s Report prior to admission

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Amanda DeLeon, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and resident, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations of the residents’ living arrangements. On September 14, 2023, it was alleged that the facility did not obtain resident’s Physician’s Report prior to admission. A review of records revealed that resident #1 (R1) and resident #2 (R2) were admitted to the facility on 08/10/2023, per their Admission Agreement. The Physician’s Report for R1 and R2 were dated 08/21/23, which was after their admission date. Basthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230914094405
Sep 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff placed bedridden residents on second floor of facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Paola Partida, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations of the residents’ living arrangements. On August 29, 2023, it was alleged that the facility placed bedridden residents on the second floor of the facility. An outside source claimed that the facility had about four residents on the second floor who were either bedridden or required more assistance with their activities of daily living. The Executive Director mentioned that there were no bedridden residents, but there were residents who did require additional assistance. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230829095420
Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints20typical 7
State visits on file42typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265602025330202411122202371022022460
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 271-4385

Is Westmont At San Miguel Ranch licensed?

Yes — Westmont At San Miguel Ranch is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chula Vista (San Diego County): California license #374603509, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 105 residents. State records list 37 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Westmont At San Miguel Ranch care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Westmont At San Miguel Ranch with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordTHE FACILITY SERVES ONE-HUNDRED AND FIVE (105) ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; TWELVE (12) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN ON THE GROUND FLOOR ONLY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS.

How much does Westmont At San Miguel Ranch cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Westmont At San Miguel Ranch's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Westmont At San Miguel Ranch accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Westmont At San Miguel Ranch through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

89 of 105 beds occupied (85%) when the state visited on March 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Westmont At San Miguel Ranch?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 42 state visits and 37 dated documents since 2022 for Westmont At San Miguel Ranch; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable death
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/10/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Business Office Director Ellen Arguello and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of questionable death, reporting party (RP) stated that aspiration occurred due to routine medications being given to the resident by facility staff (not hospice) which led to aspiration pneumonia and the death of the resident. R1 was under hospice care. Facility staff were following doctors’ orders in administering medication. On 2/16/2025, around 12:41pm, facility received fax from doctor to discontinue medication. On the evening of same date, other medications were administered. R1 was routinely checked until passing on 2/17/2025. Death certificate did not indicate that R1 passed due to aspiration pneumonia. Based on records review, the department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence toCDSS inspection report, November 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250318135957
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident charged for services not rendered
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Office Director, Ellen Arguello. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff and residents, and a detailed records review, including medical records, health and service evaluation/assessment reports, service care plans, invoice billing statements and other relevant evidence pertinent to this investigation. On May 31, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that Resident (R1) was charged for services not rendered. [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the Resident]. (Continue at LIC9099) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240531124436

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is intoxicated of alcohol while caring and supervising residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Jessica Zepeda and discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency. It was reported to CCL that facility staff (S1) was intoxicated while caring for and supervising residents in care. [Continued on LIC 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240515104136
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/ Lack of supervision resulted in resident sustaining injuries
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Jessica Zepeda. Throughout the investigation the Department requested records, and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining injury while in care. A source alleged Resident # 1 (R1) suffered multiple falls, including one on June 4th, 2018, and a second fall on January 31st, 2019, that resulted in hospitalization, and lacerations requiring stitches. R1, a Seventy-Nine (79) year old memory care resident, was diagnosed with Dementia and assessed as a high fall risk during admission to the facility. A medical assessment revealed R1 could be confused and agitated at times. A service plan dated February 19th, 2019, revealed the facility assisted the resident with incontinence care, escortingCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2024 · control 08-AS-20200625151823
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's care plan does not accurately represent the care provided
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Becky Kennedy concluded the investigation which began on 3/18/21. LPA Kennedy made an unannounced visit to the above facility today and met with Ellen Argullo, Business Office Manager. LPA advised them of the reason for today's visit and delivered the investigation findings on the above allegation. It was alleged that Resident 1’s (R1) care plan does not accurately represent the care provided. The investigation included interviews with internal and external sources, review of records, and a virtual tour of the facility. Interviews revealed that R1 had an insurance Policy that would reimburse R1 for some services. R1 had multiple conversations with facility administration to modify the care plan so that R1 could access insurance reimbursements. It was further revealed that R1 would periodically refuse services that were on the care plan and request services that were not on the care plan. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210212154050
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Jessica Zepedaand discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency. It was reported to CCL that facility staff mismanaged resident’s medication. [Continued on LIC9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240122152834
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's incontinence care needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Becky Kennedy concluded the investigation which began on 7/29/21. LPA Kennedy made an unannounced visit to the above facility today and met with Jessica Zepeda, Executive Director. LPA advised Ms.Zepeda that the reason for today's visit is to deliver the investigation findings on the above allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with internal sources, a review of reports and records, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) (see LIC 811 for confidential names) requested incontinence care from facility staff and the care was not provided for approximately six hours when R1 called again to request care. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210726092242
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not communicate with responsible party of fee increases for resident's care plan.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Resident Services Director Eva Amorim and discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency. It was reported to CCL that staff did not communicate with responsible party of fee increases for resident’s care plan. [Continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240112134103
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing residents with food Staff did not meet the needs of incontinent resident (s) Staff did not administer medications as prescribed Facility staff falsified a document Staff are not following residents care plan Facility did not ensure that hazardous items were inaccessible to residents Facility did not maintain comfortable temperature for residents Facility staff failed to follow reporting requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. Throughout the investigation, the Department requested pertinent records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not provide residents food. It reported to the Department staff would not assist residents with feeding, and often food trays were witnessed to be untouched. Interviews with internal and external sources revealed the facility used food trays to deliver food to residents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. These sources did not corroborate witnessing lack of assistance with feeding, nor witnessing undelivered food trays. It was also revealed staff had provided the resident in question with different options, including cultural food choices. (See LIC 9099-C for continuCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2024 · control 08-AS-20200713094709

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Insufficient staff to respond to residents' call buttons timely
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Alyssa Antolin, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On September 20, 2023, it was alleged that there were insufficient staff to respond to residents’ call button timely resulting in injuries. Interview with residents did not coincide. Upon interviews, most residents did say that the staff response time once their call buttons were pushed were timely. One resident reported staff responding to call buttons untimely of about 20 minutes or not at all. None of the residents reported being injured in the process of staff response to theiCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230920152253
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff did not meet training requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings of a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Alyssa Antolin, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On October 2, 2023, it was alleged that staff did not meet training requirements. It was specifically alleged that staff #1 (S1) was inappropriately trained to provide medications to residents. Interview with S1 confirmed that they assisted with passing out medications, but there was always an assigned Medication Technician (Med Tech) dispensing the medications into a cup for the residents. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231002095754
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff are inappropriately restraining residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit and delivered investigation findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Paola Partida, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and outside sources, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations of the residents’ living arrangements. On September 18, 2023, it was alleged that the staff inappropriately restrained residents in care. It was specifically alleged that there were 17 bed rails being used as a restraint. Interviews with residents and outside sources were consistent. Neither the residents nor outside sources had concerns regarding the bed rails being used as a restrictive device towards residents, to limit their movement or prevent theCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230915082323
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility did not obtain resident’s Physician’s Report prior to admission
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open a complaint investigation. While at the facility LPA investigated and delivered findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Amanda DeLeon, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and resident, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations of the residents’ living arrangements. On September 14, 2023, it was alleged that the facility did not obtain resident’s Physician’s Report prior to admission. A review of records revealed that resident #1 (R1) and resident #2 (R2) were admitted to the facility on 08/10/2023, per their Admission Agreement. The Physician’s Report for R1 and R2 were dated 08/21/23, which was after their admission date. BasCDSS inspection report, September 18, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230914094405
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff placed bedridden residents on second floor of facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Paola Partida, concierge. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Michael Sokolowski. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations of the residents’ living arrangements. On August 29, 2023, it was alleged that the facility placed bedridden residents on the second floor of the facility. An outside source claimed that the facility had about four residents on the second floor who were either bedridden or required more assistance with their activities of daily living. The Executive Director mentioned that there were no bedridden residents, but there were residents who did require additional assistance. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 14, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230829095420
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in resident elopement.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Hamilton conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA gained access to the facility, identified herself and met with Operations Specialist, Patrick Frazier. LPA explained the purpose of the visit which was to deliver findings for the above allegation. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, interviews with staff and outside sources. On March 03, 2023, it was alleged that staff lacked supervision of resident 1 (R1 – See LIC 811- Confidential Names List) which resulted in elopement. On January 25, 2023, the facility self-reported an absence without leave (AWOL) incident report to the Department. The report indicated that on January 23, 2023, at approximately 6:20 pm, staff 1 (S1) heard the alarm go off on an exterior door in memory care. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230303100738

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 42 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
20
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
42
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Westmont At San Miguel Ranch?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Westmont Manager Gp Llc; Westmont Living Inc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 271-4385
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Westmont At San Miguel Ranch? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.