Huntington Manor is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Poway, San Diego County, California — state license #374604454, licensed for 21 residents, listed as licensed/pending increase in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 13, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Huntington Manor

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 21 residents · Poway, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604454, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
14755 Budwin Ln · Poway, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 748-3381
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 21 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 21 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 29 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated July 13, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 13, 2026
Occupancy at the August 14, 2025 visit
21 of 21 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 25, 2021 to May 28, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. Staff did not clean resident's room as often as needed. Staff spoke disrespectfully about resident. Facility has not provided a written statement of rate increases. Facility has not provided a copy of the updated admissions agreement. Facility did not meet resident's dietary needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility in order to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was granted entry to the facility by Lynn Drummond, Cheif Operating Officer, after identifying herself and explaining the reason for the visit. It was alleged regarding Resident 1 (R1) that: • Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. • Staff did not clean resident's room as often as needed. • Staff spoke disrespectfully about resident. • Facility did not meet resident's dietary needs. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220831114557
May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 11 documents
Nov 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulted in serious injury Facility was not sanitary. Staff did not centrally store medication. Facility did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents. Facility was in disrepair. Staff did not accord dignity to resident. Staff were not able to communicate with residents.

On 11/7/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Administrator, Zayden Chen and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of neglect which resulted in serious injury, Reporting Party (RP) stated that staff will handle the residents in a rough manner. RP states, it has been observed that staff S1 is rough with residents. S1 does not handle residents with care and will toss them around. RP states, R1 have sustained multiple unexplained injuries and fractures in care. Staff do not communicate. RP states, R1 was in pain and took R1 to hospital. The doctor informed that R1 has sustained fractures to the wrist. During the investigation, staff members were interviewed, and records were reviewed. R1 was seen on 08/24/2023 by R1s doctor (DR), after R1 was referred from occupational therapy due to finding R1s left hand swollen. DR stated R1 had discoloration on both hands, R1 was able to move each finger withouthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230804114458
Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has an accessible body of water. Licensee did not keep facility free from trip hazard. Facility is in disrepair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence and conclude a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted by Caregiver Marissa Sabrino and Med-tech Gerald Madla identified herself, and was allowed entrance into the facility and later met with Administrator Lynn Drummond to whom was explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included a facility tour, staff interviews, a facility records review, and secured photos. The facility is Licensed for 21 residents ages 60 and over, all of which may be non-ambulatory, 12 may be bedridden, and the facility is approved for 15 residents receiving Hospice care services. Staff interviews and a review of facility records revealed during today’s visit the census was 21 residents, which included four (4) that were receiving Hospice services and three (3) who were bedridden. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250805124533
Jun 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident had an unwitnessed fall resulting in the resident being on the floor for an extended period of time Staff are not following the feeding/drinking care plan Staff are not ensuring the residents diapers are changed timely

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Fulton conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Med Tech Gerald Mad. The Department's investigation consisted of LPA observations, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources, as well as records reviews. It was alleged that the resident had an unwitnessed fall, resulting in the resident being on the floor for an extended period of time. It was reported that resident fell out of their bed and was left on the floor by staff members. Resident 5 (R5) is bedridden and needs to be rotated every two hours. However, after a review of R5's progress notes from the day the incident occurred at 10:05 am, staff did a round of checks and rotated R5 and did not note that the resident had a fall. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240809113551
20244 state visits · 4 documents
May 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulted in stage 4 pressure injury. Neglect resulted in multiple stage 2 pressure injuries. Licensee did not seek timely medical attention for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Tess Derafera, Administrator, to whom LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, review of facility and outside source records, and interviews of resident, staff, and outside sources. It was reported to Community Care Licensing that Resident 1 (R1) developed a stage 4 pressure injury and multiple stage 2 pressure injuries due to neglect by facility staff. According to evidence obtained during the investigation, R1 moved into the facility on 2/28/2020. In addition to services provided by facility staff, R1 hired two personal nurses (PN 1 and PN 2), as R1 required full assistance in care. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230821153534
May 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulted in sexual abuse of resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud Conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Tess Derafera. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged neglect resulted in sexual abuse of Resident #1 (R1). It was reported Resident #2 (R2) sexually assaulted R1. However, evidence obtained revealed R1 was not sexually assaulted by R2 but was sexually assaulted by Staff #1 (S1), which was reported to the facility on 10/25/23. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 05/04/23 indicated a diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorder and R1 required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, toileting, and medication management. During R1’s interview they were qualified as alert and oriented and able to state pertinent details. Interviews were conducted with the staff members that were sexually harassedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240201100243
Apr 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not address resident's medical condition timely -Staff did not ensure resident's call pendant was working -Staff did not address bed bug infestation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Tess Derafera. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not address Resident #1’s (R1) medical condition timely. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 09/26/22 indicated R1 was unable to handle their activities of daily living (ADL) such as toileting, showering, and dressing/grooming. R1’s Resident Appraisal dated 02/22/23 indicated R1 required full assistance with ADL's, had right side paralysis and was not mentally stable. The appraisal also stated R1 was verbally abusive with a tendency to become violent. The facility provided the following services to R1, bathing, grooming/dressing, help moving about the facility, eating, medications, and toileting as R1 was incontinent of both bothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240109081821
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints10typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file29typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202655020258111202444220223412021111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 748-3381

Is Huntington Manor licensed?

Yes — Huntington Manor is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Poway (San Diego County): California license #374604454, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 21 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated July 13, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Huntington Manor care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Huntington Manor with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 21 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.

How much does Huntington Manor cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Huntington Manor's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Huntington Manor accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Huntington Manor through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

21 of 21 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on August 14, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Huntington Manor?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 29 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2021 for Huntington Manor; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 28, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. Staff did not clean resident's room as often as needed. Staff spoke disrespectfully about resident. Facility has not provided a written statement of rate increases. Facility has not provided a copy of the updated admissions agreement. Facility did not meet resident's dietary needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility in order to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was granted entry to the facility by Lynn Drummond, Cheif Operating Officer, after identifying herself and explaining the reason for the visit. It was alleged regarding Resident 1 (R1) that: • Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. • Staff did not clean resident's room as often as needed. • Staff spoke disrespectfully about resident. • Facility did not meet resident's dietary needs. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 28, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220831114557

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect resulted in serious injury Facility was not sanitary. Staff did not centrally store medication. Facility did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents. Facility was in disrepair. Staff did not accord dignity to resident. Staff were not able to communicate with residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/7/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Administrator, Zayden Chen and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of neglect which resulted in serious injury, Reporting Party (RP) stated that staff will handle the residents in a rough manner. RP states, it has been observed that staff S1 is rough with residents. S1 does not handle residents with care and will toss them around. RP states, R1 have sustained multiple unexplained injuries and fractures in care. Staff do not communicate. RP states, R1 was in pain and took R1 to hospital. The doctor informed that R1 has sustained fractures to the wrist. During the investigation, staff members were interviewed, and records were reviewed. R1 was seen on 08/24/2023 by R1s doctor (DR), after R1 was referred from occupational therapy due to finding R1s left hand swollen. DR stated R1 had discoloration on both hands, R1 was able to move each finger withouCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230804114458
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has an accessible body of water. Licensee did not keep facility free from trip hazard. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence and conclude a complaint investigation. LPA was greeted by Caregiver Marissa Sabrino and Med-tech Gerald Madla identified herself, and was allowed entrance into the facility and later met with Administrator Lynn Drummond to whom was explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included a facility tour, staff interviews, a facility records review, and secured photos. The facility is Licensed for 21 residents ages 60 and over, all of which may be non-ambulatory, 12 may be bedridden, and the facility is approved for 15 residents receiving Hospice care services. Staff interviews and a review of facility records revealed during today’s visit the census was 21 residents, which included four (4) that were receiving Hospice services and three (3) who were bedridden. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250805124533
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident had an unwitnessed fall resulting in the resident being on the floor for an extended period of time Staff are not following the feeding/drinking care plan Staff are not ensuring the residents diapers are changed timely
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Fulton conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Med Tech Gerald Mad. The Department's investigation consisted of LPA observations, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources, as well as records reviews. It was alleged that the resident had an unwitnessed fall, resulting in the resident being on the floor for an extended period of time. It was reported that resident fell out of their bed and was left on the floor by staff members. Resident 5 (R5) is bedridden and needs to be rotated every two hours. However, after a review of R5's progress notes from the day the incident occurred at 10:05 am, staff did a round of checks and rotated R5 and did not note that the resident had a fall. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 8, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240809113551

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect resulted in stage 4 pressure injury. Neglect resulted in multiple stage 2 pressure injuries. Licensee did not seek timely medical attention for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Tess Derafera, Administrator, to whom LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, review of facility and outside source records, and interviews of resident, staff, and outside sources. It was reported to Community Care Licensing that Resident 1 (R1) developed a stage 4 pressure injury and multiple stage 2 pressure injuries due to neglect by facility staff. According to evidence obtained during the investigation, R1 moved into the facility on 2/28/2020. In addition to services provided by facility staff, R1 hired two personal nurses (PN 1 and PN 2), as R1 required full assistance in care. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230821153534
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect resulted in sexual abuse of resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud Conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Tess Derafera. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged neglect resulted in sexual abuse of Resident #1 (R1). It was reported Resident #2 (R2) sexually assaulted R1. However, evidence obtained revealed R1 was not sexually assaulted by R2 but was sexually assaulted by Staff #1 (S1), which was reported to the facility on 10/25/23. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 05/04/23 indicated a diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorder and R1 required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, toileting, and medication management. During R1’s interview they were qualified as alert and oriented and able to state pertinent details. Interviews were conducted with the staff members that were sexually harassedCDSS inspection report, May 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240201100243
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not address resident's medical condition timely -Staff did not ensure resident's call pendant was working -Staff did not address bed bug infestation
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Tess Derafera. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not address Resident #1’s (R1) medical condition timely. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 09/26/22 indicated R1 was unable to handle their activities of daily living (ADL) such as toileting, showering, and dressing/grooming. R1’s Resident Appraisal dated 02/22/23 indicated R1 required full assistance with ADL's, had right side paralysis and was not mentally stable. The appraisal also stated R1 was verbally abusive with a tendency to become violent. The facility provided the following services to R1, bathing, grooming/dressing, help moving about the facility, eating, medications, and toileting as R1 was incontinent of both boCDSS inspection report, February 5, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240109081821

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 29 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
10
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
29
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Huntington Manor?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Hm Acquisition, Llc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 748-3381
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Huntington Manor? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.