Maryam Rcfe is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Mesa, San Diego County, California — state license #374604078, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 7, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Maryam Rcfe

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · La Mesa, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604078, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4930 Maiden Lane · La Mesa, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 825-7398
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 AMBULATORY.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 7, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 7, 2026
Occupancy at the March 2, 2026 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 23, 2021 to March 2, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not treat resident's with dignity. Staff do not treat resident's with respect. Licensee is not providing supervision of resident while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Leeda Dost, Administrator. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, Outside Sources, and a review of relevant records. On 9/9/24, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the facility staff do not treat resident's with dignity. LPA interviewed 3 staff members, including caregivers and administrative personnel. All staff consistently stated they have not witnessed or engaged in inappropriate communication with residents. Staff reported they receive ongoing training on resident rights, dignity, and respectful communication as required by Title 22. Staff demonstrated knowledge of facility policies regarding supervision and personal rights. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2026 · control 08-AS-20240909090201
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints2typical 0
State visits on file9typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020252202024110202311020223302021221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
Ask how the 2021 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 825-7398

Is Maryam Rcfe licensed?

Yes — Maryam Rcfe is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Mesa (San Diego County): California license #374604078, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 7, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Maryam Rcfe care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists no specialized-care clearances for Maryam Rcfe (wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden are not on file). A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 AMBULATORY.

How much does Maryam Rcfe cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Maryam Rcfe's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Maryam Rcfe accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Maryam Rcfe is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on March 2, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Maryam Rcfe?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for Maryam Rcfe; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 2, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not treat resident's with dignity. Staff do not treat resident's with respect. Licensee is not providing supervision of resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Leeda Dost, Administrator. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, Outside Sources, and a review of relevant records. On 9/9/24, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the facility staff do not treat resident's with dignity. LPA interviewed 3 staff members, including caregivers and administrative personnel. All staff consistently stated they have not witnessed or engaged in inappropriate communication with residents. Staff reported they receive ongoing training on resident rights, dignity, and respectful communication as required by Title 22. Staff demonstrated knowledge of facility policies regarding supervision and personal rights. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 2, 2026 · control 08-AS-20240909090201

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for resident as requested
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Majida "Maggie" Houaoura. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews, review of records, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff did not seek medical attention for a resident as requested. Interviews and review of Client 1’s (C1) medical records revealed that C1 has a history of physical aggression, yelling, cursing, slamming doors, and throwing and breaking items. San Diego Regional Center has advised staff to ask C1 to talk through C1’s frustrations and redirect C1 to participate in other activities. Review of C1’s medical documents revealed that C1 is able to communicate their needs. Interviews and record review revealed that around 12:30pm on 4/22/2020, C1 began becoming agitated. Staff attempted toCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200428172657
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPhysical abuse by staff towards resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above listed complaint allegation. LPA was met and granted entry into the facility by Caregiver Maria Lerma to whom was explained the purpose for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of staff and outside source interviews . The investigation also included facility, client, and outside source records reviews, observations and interactions with clients in care, and a facility tour. It was alleged that on March 17, 2020 Client1 (C1) (See Confidential Name List LIC 811) sustained bruising by a Staff (S1) member who grabbed C1 by the arm pulling them back into the facility from the facility balcony. An interview with facility staff revealed C1 was upset after an argument with another client and began hitting and scratching themselves out on the facility balcony. Facility staff redirected and coaxed C1 back into the facility. C1 continued to act out and make sCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200317143554

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member records residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes arrived at the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Janet Acosta, Caregiver. LPA previously conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on August 26, 2020, and conducted a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff member records residents. Interviews revealed that Staff #1 (S1) did record C1 while at the facility. Interviews revealed it was mentioned to mangement and management asked S1 why they recorded the client. Interviews revealed there was an incident when S1 recorded C1 because they were sitting on the balcony talking about the buildings and S1 asked C1 if anyone had touched their stuff. C1 responded to S1 that another staff went into their room and touched their stuff. Management wrote S1 up for recording C1. Interviews revealCDSS inspection report, September 14, 2021 · control 08-AS-20200821103147
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member abuses residents and staff Staff member neglects residents' basic care needs Staff member fails to treat residents with dignity and respect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes arrived at the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Sahym Meza, Caregiver. LPA previously conducted interviews, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on August 26, 2020, and conducted a tour of the facility. It was alleged staff member abuses residents and staff. Interviews did not reveal any physical or emotional abuse by staff. Staff 1 (S1) (see LIC811 Confidential Names List) in question denies abusing any residents or staff. S1 does not speak rudely or mean to the other staff or residents. S1 admits to doing the best they can on their job. There were no witnesses to prove staff member abuses residents and staff. Continued... * This is an amended report from 06/23/2021 UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 23, 2021 · control 08-AS-20200821103147

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 825-7398
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Maryam Rcfe? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.