Rose Garden is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Vista, San Diego County, California — state license #374603871, with a licensed capacity of 15, listed as closed, licensee initiated in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated April 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Rose Garden

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Licensee Initiated”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 15 residents · Vista, CA · San Diego County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #374603871, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1266 Pleiades Dr · Vista, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 659-6397
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 15 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 15 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN BDRMS 3,4,5,7,8,9. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 6, 2026
Occupancy at the April 10, 2026 visit
12 of 15 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 25, 2026 to April 10, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20267 state visits · 8 documents
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility Staff are sleeping in resident's rooms.

On April 10, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced at the facility and met with The Administrator, Rolando Corpuz. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and record reviews, pertaining to the listed allegation. It was alleged staff were sleeping in resident bedrooms. It was further stated that staff do not have their own sleeping quarters. An interview with the Administrator, Rolando Corpuz revealed he denied the allegation. The Administrator indicated that the live in staff do have their own sleeping quarters. Interviews with staff were conducted, where 4 of 4 staff reported they do not sleep in the residents rooms. Additionally, the staff reported that none of the residents reported staff members were sleeping in their rooms. Interviews with residents were conducted, where 5 of 12 residents reported they could not recall any times where staff sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250612085546
Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Staff did not keep the facility free from cockroaches. Staff did not keep the facility free of mold.

On February 25, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility regarding the above allegations. LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA, along with staff, toured the facility. The investigation included the following: On February 19, 2026, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the residents' roster dated 11/29/2025, staff roster dated 11/29/2025, and thirteen residents' files (R1-R13). These files included Admission Agreements, Physician Reports, Needs and Service Plans, and Medication Administration Records (MAR). The LPA also obtained two months of invoices from Lloyd Pest Control, dated 01/20, 26, and 02/17/2026. On the same day, the LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, three staff members (S1-S3), and six residents (R1-R6). Report continued on LIC9099C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230922144014
Feb 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has mold. Facility staff do not properly assist resident with toileting needs. Facility staff did not provide resident with medications as prescribed.

On February 25, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA, along with staff, toured the facility. The investigation included the following: On February 19, 2026, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the residents' roster dated 11/29/2025, staff roster dated 11/29/2025, and thirteen residents' files (R1-R13). These files included Admission Agreements, Physician Reports, Needs and Service Plans, and Medication Administration Records (MAR). And R1's Admission Agreement. The LPA also obtained two months of invoices from Lloyd Pest Control, dated 01/20, 26, and 02/17/2026. On the same day, the LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, three staff members (S1-S3), and six residents #2-7 (R2-R7). Report continued on LIC9099C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230605140606
Jan 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jan 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints3typical 1
State visits on file10typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026781202511020241102023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Rose Garden licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Rose Garden in Vista (San Diego County), California license #374603871, as “Closed, Licensee Initiated, formerly licensed for 15 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Rose Garden care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Rose Garden with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 15 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN BDRMS 3,4,5,7,8,9. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Rose Garden cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Rose Garden's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Rose Garden accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Rose Garden is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

12 of 15 beds occupied (80%) when the state visited on April 10, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Rose Garden?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2023 for Rose Garden; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 10, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility Staff are sleeping in resident's rooms.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On April 10, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced at the facility and met with The Administrator, Rolando Corpuz. LPA explained the reason for the visit was to provide findings for the complaint investigation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and record reviews, pertaining to the listed allegation. It was alleged staff were sleeping in resident bedrooms. It was further stated that staff do not have their own sleeping quarters. An interview with the Administrator, Rolando Corpuz revealed he denied the allegation. The Administrator indicated that the live in staff do have their own sleeping quarters. Interviews with staff were conducted, where 4 of 4 staff reported they do not sleep in the residents rooms. Additionally, the staff reported that none of the residents reported staff members were sleeping in their rooms. Interviews with residents were conducted, where 5 of 12 residents reported they could not recall any times where staff sCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250612085546
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair. Staff did not keep the facility free from cockroaches. Staff did not keep the facility free of mold.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On February 25, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility regarding the above allegations. LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA, along with staff, toured the facility. The investigation included the following: On February 19, 2026, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the residents' roster dated 11/29/2025, staff roster dated 11/29/2025, and thirteen residents' files (R1-R13). These files included Admission Agreements, Physician Reports, Needs and Service Plans, and Medication Administration Records (MAR). The LPA also obtained two months of invoices from Lloyd Pest Control, dated 01/20, 26, and 02/17/2026. On the same day, the LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, three staff members (S1-S3), and six residents (R1-R6). Report continued on LIC9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 25, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230922144014
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has mold. Facility staff do not properly assist resident with toileting needs. Facility staff did not provide resident with medications as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On February 25, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA, along with staff, toured the facility. The investigation included the following: On February 19, 2026, LPA Richard reviewed and obtained the residents' roster dated 11/29/2025, staff roster dated 11/29/2025, and thirteen residents' files (R1-R13). These files included Admission Agreements, Physician Reports, Needs and Service Plans, and Medication Administration Records (MAR). And R1's Admission Agreement. The LPA also obtained two months of invoices from Lloyd Pest Control, dated 01/20, 26, and 02/17/2026. On the same day, the LPA interviewed the Administrator (A1), Rolando Corpuz, three staff members (S1-S3), and six residents #2-7 (R2-R7). Report continued on LIC9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 25, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230605140606

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 659-6397
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Rose Garden? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.