Small home · Licensed for 6 · La Jolla
Butterfly Gardens II
5557 Soledad Mountain Road, La Jolla, CA 92037Licensed since 2015
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SHALL SERVE SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS;AGE 60 AND ABOVE. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY OF WHOM (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THREE (3).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
Works with residents’ own health care providers
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
Activities of daily living the home lists help withGrooming · Dressing · Personal hygiene
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
Hands-on help or cueingCautious observation, care, and supervision as required
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
As needs change
Medicines
Level of medication service: assistance with self administration
butterflygardenslajolla.net · October 5, 2026
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Butterfly Gardens II: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,150
- $7,500
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $6,000 to $10,000
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $6,450–$9,550.
- La Jolla Casa FiestaLa Jolla · 0.2 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sea Breeze Senior LivingLa Jolla · 0.2 mi · Small home$10,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- La Jolla VistaLa Jolla · 0.3 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Clairemont Guest HomeSan Diego · 1.3 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Canyon Guest HomeSan Diego · 1.9 mi · Small home$7,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Autumn Villas on Honors DriveSan Diego · 2.1 mi · Small home$8,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Right Choice Senior Living ClairemontSan Diego · 2.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Right Choice Senior Living University CitySan Diego · 2.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (4)Meals provided per day · Follows physician-ordered diets · Snacks available
Meals provided per day3
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
Follows physician-ordered diets
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
Snacks available
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (2)Tour scheduling link · Contact form
- Open on the website
Tour scheduling link
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · seen October 5, 2026.
About the home (2)Brand or trade name · Management company
Brand or trade nameButterfly Gardens
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · source dated February 24, 2023.
Management companyBoyelsun LLC
Reported on butterflygardenslajolla.net · source dated February 24, 2023.
Where it is
5557 Soledad Mountain Road, La Jolla, CA 92037Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- UC San Diego Health La Jolla - Jacobs Medical Center & Sulpizio Cardiovascular CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374603661 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Joselle Rivera. Administrator Leo Espinoza later joined the visit. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6). All may be non-ambulatory of which one (1) may be bedridden. The facility also has a hospice waiver for three (3). During today’s inspection there were six (6) residents in care. LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Hot water at taps used by residents were all compliant. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. One fully gated pool exists on the premises. Per Caregiver Joselle, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. (Cont. on LIC 809-C) (Cont. from LIC 809) LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The files which LPA reviewed contained the required documents. Files were stored in a locked area. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Leo Espinoza to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
May 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Viviana Silva. Administrator Leo Espinosa arrived later in the visit. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6). All may be non-ambulatory of which one (1) may be bedridden. The facility also has a hospice waiver for three (3). During today’s inspection there were six (6) residents in care. LPA and Caregiver Galila toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Bathroom sink in shared client bathroom was 118F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and inaccessible to residents. [Continued on LIC 809-C] [Continued from LIC 809] No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Caregiver Galila, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed one (1) staff and zero (0) clients, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Espinosa to whom a copy of this report was provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not have a staff alert feature at the door
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Joselle Rivera. It was alleged the facility did not have a staff alert feature at the door. On 08/26/2024, it was reported to the Department the facility did not have an auditory alert feature at the entrance door. During multiple visits to the facility, the LPA observed the facility had an auditory alert feature at the entrance door, and the device was emanating sound when the door was opened. The LPA also observed several exit doors and sliding windows used to exit the facility had auditory devices, but these devices were not operating properly. Some of these devices did not produce an auditory sound when engaged or were turned off due to the devices not operating properly. Review of physician’s reports for residents at the facility confirmed they were all diagnosed with dementia and could be confused. Substantiated Based on observations and review of records, the facility did not have auditory devices, or alert features to monitor exit doors. This deficiency was cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and listed on the LIC 9099D. A plan of correction was jointly formulated with Caregiver Joselle Rivera. An exit interview was conducted with Rivera, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided. The agency was not able to provide information of who had signed the subsequent visit forms. The LPA reviewed records for this agency obtained at the facility, and there was no clear indication that R1 had signed any legal documents from that agency. It was alleged the facility did not have a perimeter fence. On 08/26/2024, it was reported to the Department the facility did not have a perimeter fence. An observation by the LPA confirmed the facility did have a perimeter fence securing the facility's patio area. Although this fence did not extend to the front of the facility, the facility did have an auditory signal/ alert device at the main entrance door. Additionally, the facility did not have an approved locked perimeter fire clearance. Based on the evidence obtained, the allegations were unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Rivera, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240826180224
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(j) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 30, 2024
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (j) The licensee shall have an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits, if exiting presents a hazard to any resident. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and review of records, the Licensee did not ensure exit doors had auditory, or alert features to monitor exit doors of residents with dementia, which posed a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to five of five residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024
Plan of correction: Staff agreed to replace all auditory/ alert features monitoring exit doors that are not working properly, and notify the LPA by 11/04/2024.
May 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Leo Espinosa. The facility was approved for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) could be bedridden. The facility also had a hospice waiver for three (3) residents. The LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, and stored in a locked area. A pool was observed to be secured and inaccessible to residents in care. Per staff, no firearms, nor ammunition were kept at the facility. A Carbon monoxide detector was tested and operational. A fire extinguisher, first aid kit and a working telephone were present. Due to time constraints, a return visit on a subsequent day is needed to complete the annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Leo Espinosa, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Applicant Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 3 documents
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Jan 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident(s) with dignity.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Hamilton conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA was greeted at the front entrance by Caregiver, Samanta Galila, and granted entry after identifying herself. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the complaint with the Licensee, Leo Espinosa. The Department’s investigation included records review, and interviews with residents, staff and outside sources. On July 29, 2021, it was alleged that staff did not treat a resident with dignity. It was specifically alleged that on July 27, 2021, staff 1 (S1 – See LIC 811 Confidential Names List) yelled at resident 1 (R1) while assisting them with bathing. Substantiated Interviews with outside sources revealed R1 did not like going into the bathroom and would get agitated when doing so. Interviews further revealed that during the date in question, R1 was agitated and did not want to shower; however, S1 involuntarily made R1 take a shower. S1 then spoke to R1 in a loud and disrespectful manner. Records reviewed confirmed R1 had a diagnosis of dementia and was notated to have severe agitation and combativeness with showers. Records obtained from an outside source and direct witness statements corroborated the incident in the shower and supported the allegation. This Department investigated the allegation that the facility staff did not treat resident(s) with dignity. Based on interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation has been deemed substantiated. A citation is being issued in accordance with California Code of regulations, Title 22, Chapter 1, Division 6 and listed on the LIC9099D and a plan of correction was developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, List of Confidential Names, LIC9099D, and Licensee/Appeal Rights (9058 01/16) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210729125519
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 20, 2023
87468.1(a)(1) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff…This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews S1 did not treat R1 with dignity. This posed a potential personal rights risk to one out of six residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee stated they will hold an outside source training on personal rights and dementia care regarding combativeness. They will submit verification of the staff sign in sheet along with training material to the department by February 20, 2023.
Jan 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Hamilton conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility. LPA was greeted at the front entrance by Caregiver, Samanta Galila and granted entry after identifying herself. LPA met with Licensee, Leo Espinosa and explained the purpose of the visit which was related to a complaint investigation. During this visit, LPA reviewed resident 1’s (R1 – See LIC 811 Confidential Names List) Physician’s Report and Care Plan with Licensee. LPA reviewed Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Article 12, Dementia, Section 8705, Care of Persons with Dementia with Licensee. LPA advised the Licensee Physician’s Reports needed to be conducted annually or sooner if there is a change and dated. LPA further advised Licensee that a reappraisal, or observation indicates that the residents care needs have changed, corresponding changes shall be made in the care plan for that resident and signed and dated. Technical Advisory given. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
May 19, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, visited the facility to conduct an annual required licensing inspection. The LPA was met by Caregivers, Samantha Galila and Joselle Rivera, and was granted entry into the facility, after discussing the purpose of the visit, and identifying himself. The Administrator, Leo Espinosa, arrived during the visit. During today's visit, the LPA toured the facility, and verified compliance with infection control practices. The LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; routine symptom screening initiated at entry for staff, residents and visitors; a sign-in policy enacted for all visitors; signs posted at facility entrance with the facility’s visitor policy and signs throughout the facility to promote hand hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette and physical distancing; face coverings worn by staff; hand sanitizer/hand washing stations readily available; a designated visitation area; emergency agencies’ contact information posted in a location visible to staff and residents; and an adequate supply personal protective equipment. During a tour of the exterior of the facility, Caregiver Samantha Galila, and the LPA observed one lock to a body of water/swimming pool gate to be unlocked. After further inspection, this lock was deemed to be out of order. This deficiency was cited in an LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Leo Espinosa, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 FAS 01/16) were provided to.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Plan of correction due date: May 20, 2022
87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (e) Facilities providing services to residents who have physical or mental disabilities shall assure the inaccessibility of...swimming pools, or similar bodies of water, when not in active use by residents, through fencing, covering or other means. This requirement is not mer as evidenced by: Based on observation, and interviews, the licensee did not ensure the swimming pool to be secured which posed and immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to 6 of 6 residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2022
Plan of correction: Adminstrator will train staff on the importance of secured bodies of water, and submit a log of attendees by 6/2/2022.
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the October 30, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Boyelsun LLC, licensed since 2015.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Butterfly Gardens II
Is Butterfly Gardens II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Butterfly Gardens II licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Butterfly Gardens II been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Butterfly Gardens II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Butterfly Gardens II cost?
$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 197 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,125 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 197 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Butterfly Gardens II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Boyelsun LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
UC San Diego Health La Jolla - Jacobs Medical Center & Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center is 3.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Butterfly Gardens II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Butterfly Gardens II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “BUTTERFLY GARDENS II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374603661. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Boyelsun LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$8,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$8,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,772 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$7,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,750–$8,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$10,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,350–$8,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County