Belmont Village Sabre Springs is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374603279, with a licensed capacity of 184, listed as probationary license in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 62 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 10, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

The state record lists this home as on probation. The dated documents behind that status are published below; we do not include homes on probation in family match shortlists.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Belmont Village Sabre Springs

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 184 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
On probation — see recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603279, held since 2012 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
13075 Evening Creek Dr S · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 486-5020
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 184 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 23 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 32 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
PROBATIONARY LICENSE FROM 09182025 TO 03172027. THE FACILITY SERVES 184 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; APPROVED FOR 32 BEDRIDDEN AND APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 23. FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH DELAYED EGRESS AND SECURED PERIMETER.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 69 times and filed 62 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 10, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 10, 2026
Occupancy at the August 5, 2025 visit
150 of 184 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 10, 2022 to August 5, 2025. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 41 of 62 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202510 state visits · 13 documents
Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff forcefully administered medication to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff forcefully administered medication to a resident in care. It was reported a nurse/area manager forcefully administered an insulin injection to Resident #1 on 06/10/25. R1 receives medication management from the facility staff. Staff interviewed reported R1 was known for refusing medications but not their insulin. A review of R1’s Medication Administration Records (MARs) for June 2025 indicated R1 refused medications and or insulin on 06/01/25; 06/02/25; 06/08/25; and 06/10/25. Further staff interviews showed that R1 had agitation at times and will refuse medications. Facility’s Progress Notes dated 06/10/25 indthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250612101952
Aug 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are falsifying documentation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are falsifying documentation. It was reported that multiple medication technicians (med tech) are falsely documenting the Medication Administration Record (MARs) as the medications were administered when they were not. An outside source reported it was discovered the medications were present after the time they were documented as administered. On 05/30/25, LPA reviewed multiple medications and did not observe leftover medications or medications not administered. The outside source indicated multiple residents did not receive their medications due to their MARs being falsified as given. Those residents were interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250522103519
May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulting in resident sustaining pressure injury Neglect resulting in resident sustaining an infection in the mouth Staff do not seek medical attention to residents in a timely manner Residents are not treated with dignity Facility does not provide activities for residents in care Facility has rodents Facility is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud contacted the facility via telephone to commence a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA spoke with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple and discussed the elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency and LPA observations. It was reported to CCL neglect resulting in resident sustaining pressure injuries, neglect resulting in resident sustaining an infection in mouth, staff do not seek medical attention in a timely manner, residents are not treated with dignity, facility does not provide activities to residents in care, facility has rodents and facility is in disrepair. Continued on an LIC 9099C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240327115517
Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not respond timely to resident's calls for assistance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged facility staff did not respond timely to Resident #1’s (R1) calls for assistance. R1’s Physician Report dated February 13, 2024, indicated R1 had a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, bedridden status, and receiving hospice services. The report also reflected R1 required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, toileting, feeding, and medication management. R1’s Service Plan dated May 3, 2024, indicated R1 required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, toileting, feeding, two person transfers, and medication management. Facility’s PAL (Personal Assistance Liaison) Approach Chart and Service Plan dated June 2024 indicated R1 required assistancthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240806141711
Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medications not given as prescribed Licensee did not ensure resident medication records were accurate

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged medications were not given as prescribed for Resident #1 (R1) and Resident # 2 (R2). It was reported R1 was not given the correct dose of morphine, R2 was provided medication patches that belonged to Resident # 3 (R3), and medications were missing. R1 was receiving hospice services. Staff interviews revealed hospice was changing the morphine orders from half tab to full tab and back to half tab, as frequent as three (3) times in one (1) week. Staff explained the medication orders went directly to the pharmacy contracted by the facility. Once the order was placed, it appeared in their medication administration system, ACCUflo. Staff followed the ACCUflo system tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250312121604
Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring residents are provided with sufficient amounts of food Staff provide dirty dishware to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, and interviews were conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are not ensuring residents are provided with sufficient amounts of food in the memory care unit. Today, 03/26/25, LPA observed lunch being served to the residents. There was a hot food cart brought over by the main kitchen. The hot food cart contained large trays of different food items for the residents, which needed to be portioned out and served individually to each resident. Today, the hot food cart had a large tray of yams, roasted vegetables, and salmon. The salmon was shredded up into small pieces. Per the kitchen staff, the salmon is a 4oz fillet. The kitchen has been made aware to serve the items whole,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250318170800
Jan 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202414 state visits · 22 documents
Nov 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure supervision was provided resulting in resident elopement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not ensure supervision was provided resulting in resident elopement. It was reported that on 11/04/24 at approximately 5:30am, an outside source observed a woman with gray hair wearing a floral bathrobe opened up and no brassiere, walking down the street by the facility. The outside source was unable to confirm if the woman was a resident at the facility and continued to drive away without assisting the woman. The Executive Director's (ED) interview revealed there were no resident elopements on 11/04/24. Staff interviews confirmed there were no elopements on 11/04/24. Resident interviews stated they were not aware of any elopements and denied elopithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241108133911
Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility did not provide adequate food service resulting in resident becoming ill -Facility is not clean and in good repair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility did not provide adequate food service resulting in resident becoming ill. An outside source reported that on 8/15/2024 around noon, they had lunch with their friend/resident at the facility. Both individuals became ill, with symptoms including vomiting and diarrhea, and it was suspected it was due to the salmon served at lunch. Neither individual sought medical attention nor were aware of anyone else getting sick. Multiple caregiver interviews revealed they eat the food served at the facility and have never gotten ill. The Chef Manager was observed on 08/28/24, eating the salmon served by the facility. The Chef Manager explained he eats the food althe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240822100509
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff did not follow resident's care plan -Staff did not respond to resident in a timely manner -Licensee did not arrange appropriate medical care for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not follow resident's care plan. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was receiving the highest level of care the facility offered. The level of care included two (2) persons assist but the facility was not following that. Outside sources also reported R1’s family members had to help with transfers as the facility was not providing the agreed service. R1’s Admission Agreement dated 03/03/21 confirmed the level of care being provided was Enhanced Personal Care II (EPC), which was the highest level the facility provided. The EPC II refers to all activities of daily living, to inclue two (2) persons assist. R1’s Assessment and Service Plan dated 03/03/21 refthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210513114116
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not follow physician's orders

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, reviewed records, and interviewed staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility staff did not follow physician's orders. It was reported Resident #1’s (R1) Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD) was not being followed. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 12/08/23 indicated R1 required a low no added salt diet. On 06/17/24, R1’s physician wrote an order for a “Low-carb diet and decaf coffee only.” The Executive Director (ED) explained the facility received a copy of the order and it’s entered in the computer system to alert the kitchen of the requirement. The ED’s interview revealed the facility offers six (6) diets and Low carbohydrate falls under the category of CCD. ED also explained the facility does not add salt to their food. Therefore, the physicithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240804095825
Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure food is of good quality Licensee did not ensure resident records are current

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Director of Resident Care Service, Keisha Bean. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not ensure food is of good quality by serving burnt, overcooked and undercooked food. The food is cooked and prepared in the main kitchen then delivered to memory care. The breakfast was observed on multiple occasions by staff being of poor quality and returned to the main kitchen. Staff interviews confirmed the bacon was burnt, eggs were watery and green, and the pancakes were powdery. Further staff interviews revealed the main kitchen complains that too much food is being sent back. The main kitchen also sends over hard meat and veggies that are not cooked, which those are hard for residenthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240202133159
Jun 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond timely to residents’ calls for assistance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Director of Resident Care Service, Keisha Bean. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff do not respond timely to residents’ calls for assistance. LPA reviewed the facility’s log of resident requests for assistance initiated via individually assigned pendants. The review of requests that were initiated on November 1, 2022, through December 15, 2022, revealed that in response to five (5) resident requests initiated via pendant, had response times from (1) minute to one (1) hour and forty (40) minutes. There were multiple occasions where more than thirty (30) minutes elapsed before resident pendants were restored. Based upon a review of records maintained by or on behalf of the facility, on tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20221208115812
Jun 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are not receiving medications

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Director of Resident Care Service, Keisha Bean. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged residents are not receiving medications. It was reported multiple residents were not receiving their medications and are given incorrect medications. Staff interviews revealed residents are given their correct medications and there are no medication errors. Resident interviews reflected they believed they were given correct medications but could not be certain. A review of multiple Medication Administrator Records (MARs) for April 2024 reflected medications dispensed and medications not dispensed for various reasons. The MARs have a symbol key indicator, which is documented for the dates the medications werethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240507100826
Jun 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility bathroom was not maintained cleaned

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by receptionist Stephanie Runyon. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Tracy Knepple. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations. On March 30, 2022, it was alleged that the resident’s bathroom was not maintained cleaned. It was alleged that the resident’s bathroom floor had splashes of urine and fecal matter. Interview with residents confirmed that they did not have issues with their bathroom being cleaned or being kept clean. During an interview with the Engineer, who oversees housekeeping, they said that the housekeeping staff has a current schedule posted for the staff on the designated areas they mustthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220330150813
May 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained fall due to lack of supervision. Staff did not meet the residents assessed needs. Care staff did not have required training.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA Silveira introduced themselves, met with Executive Director Tracy Knepple and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was to deliver complaint findings for the above-mentioned allegations. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents and outside sources, as well as a facility records review. It was alleged that a Resident #1 (R1), who required assistance while toileting, was left alone in the bathroom by care staff in October 2021 and fell. A review of R1’s assessment records revealed that for October 2021, there was no fall registered for that month. Department interviews with residents who have lived at the facility since October 2021 demonstrated that residents had no concerns over staff not attending to their care needs. Interviews with care staff who worked during October 2021 revealed that there was no recollection of R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220120172307
Mar 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Lack of supervision resulting in resident wandering from the facility -Staff did not treat resident with dignity -Staff can’t communicate with residents due to language barrier -Staff mismanaged residents’ medication -Staff did not meet resident’s medical needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged lack of supervision resulting in Resident #1 (R1) wandering from the facility. R1’s Physician's Report dated 06/15/23 indicated R1 had a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, confusion, wandering behavior, able to follow instructions, and was not allowed to leave the facility unassisted. R1 resided in the secured memory care unit with delayed egress doors. The delayed egress doors have signs that state “Push and hold for 15 sec. Alarm will sound door will open in 15 seconds.” R1 would read the sign, push, and hold, and once the door opened, R1 exited. Staff interviews confirmed R1 would read the sign and follow the directions then exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230821160039
Sep 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations16typical 1
Substantiated complaints16typical 2
Total complaints21typical 7
State visits on file69typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2012.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025101342024142242023780202291312021230
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 486-5020

Is Belmont Village Sabre Springs licensed?

Yes — Belmont Village Sabre Springs is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County), currently on state probation: California license #374603279, shown as “Probationary License” in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 184 residents. State records list 62 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 10, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Belmont Village Sabre Springs care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Belmont Village Sabre Springs with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordPROBATIONARY LICENSE FROM 09182025 TO 03172027. THE FACILITY SERVES 184 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; APPROVED FOR 32 BEDRIDDEN AND APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 23. FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH DELAYED EGRESS AND SECURED PERIMETER.

How much does Belmont Village Sabre Springs cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Belmont Village Sabre Springs's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Belmont Village Sabre Springs accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Belmont Village Sabre Springs is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

150 of 184 beds occupied (82%) when the state visited on August 5, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Belmont Village Sabre Springs?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 69 state visits and 62 dated documents since 2021 for Belmont Village Sabre Springs; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 5, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

19 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff forcefully administered medication to resident in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff forcefully administered medication to a resident in care. It was reported a nurse/area manager forcefully administered an insulin injection to Resident #1 on 06/10/25. R1 receives medication management from the facility staff. Staff interviewed reported R1 was known for refusing medications but not their insulin. A review of R1’s Medication Administration Records (MARs) for June 2025 indicated R1 refused medications and or insulin on 06/01/25; 06/02/25; 06/08/25; and 06/10/25. Further staff interviews showed that R1 had agitation at times and will refuse medications. Facility’s Progress Notes dated 06/10/25 indCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250612101952
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are falsifying documentation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are falsifying documentation. It was reported that multiple medication technicians (med tech) are falsely documenting the Medication Administration Record (MARs) as the medications were administered when they were not. An outside source reported it was discovered the medications were present after the time they were documented as administered. On 05/30/25, LPA reviewed multiple medications and did not observe leftover medications or medications not administered. The outside source indicated multiple residents did not receive their medications due to their MARs being falsified as given. Those residents were interviewCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250522103519
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect resulting in resident sustaining pressure injury Neglect resulting in resident sustaining an infection in the mouth Staff do not seek medical attention to residents in a timely manner Residents are not treated with dignity Facility does not provide activities for residents in care Facility has rodents Facility is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud contacted the facility via telephone to commence a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA spoke with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple and discussed the elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff, clients and outside agency and LPA observations. It was reported to CCL neglect resulting in resident sustaining pressure injuries, neglect resulting in resident sustaining an infection in mouth, staff do not seek medical attention in a timely manner, residents are not treated with dignity, facility does not provide activities to residents in care, facility has rodents and facility is in disrepair. Continued on an LIC 9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240327115517
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not respond timely to resident's calls for assistance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged facility staff did not respond timely to Resident #1’s (R1) calls for assistance. R1’s Physician Report dated February 13, 2024, indicated R1 had a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, bedridden status, and receiving hospice services. The report also reflected R1 required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, toileting, feeding, and medication management. R1’s Service Plan dated May 3, 2024, indicated R1 required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, toileting, feeding, two person transfers, and medication management. Facility’s PAL (Personal Assistance Liaison) Approach Chart and Service Plan dated June 2024 indicated R1 required assistancCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240806141711
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedications not given as prescribed Licensee did not ensure resident medication records were accurate
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged medications were not given as prescribed for Resident #1 (R1) and Resident # 2 (R2). It was reported R1 was not given the correct dose of morphine, R2 was provided medication patches that belonged to Resident # 3 (R3), and medications were missing. R1 was receiving hospice services. Staff interviews revealed hospice was changing the morphine orders from half tab to full tab and back to half tab, as frequent as three (3) times in one (1) week. Staff explained the medication orders went directly to the pharmacy contracted by the facility. Once the order was placed, it appeared in their medication administration system, ACCUflo. Staff followed the ACCUflo system toCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250312121604
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring residents are provided with sufficient amounts of food Staff provide dirty dishware to residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, and interviews were conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are not ensuring residents are provided with sufficient amounts of food in the memory care unit. Today, 03/26/25, LPA observed lunch being served to the residents. There was a hot food cart brought over by the main kitchen. The hot food cart contained large trays of different food items for the residents, which needed to be portioned out and served individually to each resident. Today, the hot food cart had a large tray of yams, roasted vegetables, and salmon. The salmon was shredded up into small pieces. Per the kitchen staff, the salmon is a 4oz fillet. The kitchen has been made aware to serve the items whole,CDSS inspection report, March 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250318170800

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure supervision was provided resulting in resident elopement
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not ensure supervision was provided resulting in resident elopement. It was reported that on 11/04/24 at approximately 5:30am, an outside source observed a woman with gray hair wearing a floral bathrobe opened up and no brassiere, walking down the street by the facility. The outside source was unable to confirm if the woman was a resident at the facility and continued to drive away without assisting the woman. The Executive Director's (ED) interview revealed there were no resident elopements on 11/04/24. Staff interviews confirmed there were no elopements on 11/04/24. Resident interviews stated they were not aware of any elopements and denied elopiCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241108133911
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility did not provide adequate food service resulting in resident becoming ill -Facility is not clean and in good repair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility did not provide adequate food service resulting in resident becoming ill. An outside source reported that on 8/15/2024 around noon, they had lunch with their friend/resident at the facility. Both individuals became ill, with symptoms including vomiting and diarrhea, and it was suspected it was due to the salmon served at lunch. Neither individual sought medical attention nor were aware of anyone else getting sick. Multiple caregiver interviews revealed they eat the food served at the facility and have never gotten ill. The Chef Manager was observed on 08/28/24, eating the salmon served by the facility. The Chef Manager explained he eats the food alCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240822100509
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not follow resident's care plan -Staff did not respond to resident in a timely manner -Licensee did not arrange appropriate medical care for resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not follow resident's care plan. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was receiving the highest level of care the facility offered. The level of care included two (2) persons assist but the facility was not following that. Outside sources also reported R1’s family members had to help with transfers as the facility was not providing the agreed service. R1’s Admission Agreement dated 03/03/21 confirmed the level of care being provided was Enhanced Personal Care II (EPC), which was the highest level the facility provided. The EPC II refers to all activities of daily living, to inclue two (2) persons assist. R1’s Assessment and Service Plan dated 03/03/21 refCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210513114116
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not follow physician's orders
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, reviewed records, and interviewed staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility staff did not follow physician's orders. It was reported Resident #1’s (R1) Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD) was not being followed. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 12/08/23 indicated R1 required a low no added salt diet. On 06/17/24, R1’s physician wrote an order for a “Low-carb diet and decaf coffee only.” The Executive Director (ED) explained the facility received a copy of the order and it’s entered in the computer system to alert the kitchen of the requirement. The ED’s interview revealed the facility offers six (6) diets and Low carbohydrate falls under the category of CCD. ED also explained the facility does not add salt to their food. Therefore, the physiciCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240804095825
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure food is of good quality Licensee did not ensure resident records are current
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Director of Resident Care Service, Keisha Bean. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not ensure food is of good quality by serving burnt, overcooked and undercooked food. The food is cooked and prepared in the main kitchen then delivered to memory care. The breakfast was observed on multiple occasions by staff being of poor quality and returned to the main kitchen. Staff interviews confirmed the bacon was burnt, eggs were watery and green, and the pancakes were powdery. Further staff interviews revealed the main kitchen complains that too much food is being sent back. The main kitchen also sends over hard meat and veggies that are not cooked, which those are hard for residenCDSS inspection report, June 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240202133159
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond timely to residents’ calls for assistance
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Director of Resident Care Service, Keisha Bean. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff do not respond timely to residents’ calls for assistance. LPA reviewed the facility’s log of resident requests for assistance initiated via individually assigned pendants. The review of requests that were initiated on November 1, 2022, through December 15, 2022, revealed that in response to five (5) resident requests initiated via pendant, had response times from (1) minute to one (1) hour and forty (40) minutes. There were multiple occasions where more than thirty (30) minutes elapsed before resident pendants were restored. Based upon a review of records maintained by or on behalf of the facility, on tCDSS inspection report, June 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20221208115812
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not receiving medications
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Director of Resident Care Service, Keisha Bean. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged residents are not receiving medications. It was reported multiple residents were not receiving their medications and are given incorrect medications. Staff interviews revealed residents are given their correct medications and there are no medication errors. Resident interviews reflected they believed they were given correct medications but could not be certain. A review of multiple Medication Administrator Records (MARs) for April 2024 reflected medications dispensed and medications not dispensed for various reasons. The MARs have a symbol key indicator, which is documented for the dates the medications wereCDSS inspection report, June 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240507100826
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility bathroom was not maintained cleaned
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by receptionist Stephanie Runyon. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director Tracy Knepple. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations. On March 30, 2022, it was alleged that the resident’s bathroom was not maintained cleaned. It was alleged that the resident’s bathroom floor had splashes of urine and fecal matter. Interview with residents confirmed that they did not have issues with their bathroom being cleaned or being kept clean. During an interview with the Engineer, who oversees housekeeping, they said that the housekeeping staff has a current schedule posted for the staff on the designated areas they mustCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220330150813
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained fall due to lack of supervision. Staff did not meet the residents assessed needs. Care staff did not have required training.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA Silveira introduced themselves, met with Executive Director Tracy Knepple and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was to deliver complaint findings for the above-mentioned allegations. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents and outside sources, as well as a facility records review. It was alleged that a Resident #1 (R1), who required assistance while toileting, was left alone in the bathroom by care staff in October 2021 and fell. A review of R1’s assessment records revealed that for October 2021, there was no fall registered for that month. Department interviews with residents who have lived at the facility since October 2021 demonstrated that residents had no concerns over staff not attending to their care needs. Interviews with care staff who worked during October 2021 revealed that there was no recollection of R1CDSS inspection report, May 31, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220120172307

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Lack of supervision resulting in resident wandering from the facility -Staff did not treat resident with dignity -Staff can’t communicate with residents due to language barrier -Staff mismanaged residents’ medication -Staff did not meet resident’s medical needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged lack of supervision resulting in Resident #1 (R1) wandering from the facility. R1’s Physician's Report dated 06/15/23 indicated R1 had a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, confusion, wandering behavior, able to follow instructions, and was not allowed to leave the facility unassisted. R1 resided in the secured memory care unit with delayed egress doors. The delayed egress doors have signs that state “Push and hold for 15 sec. Alarm will sound door will open in 15 seconds.” R1 would read the sign, push, and hold, and once the door opened, R1 exited. Staff interviews confirmed R1 would read the sign and follow the directions then exit.CDSS inspection report, October 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230821160039
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Medications not given as prescribed -Facility did not meet resident's incontinent needs -Facility did not provide basic laundry services
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud concluded the investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA discussed the findings with Executive Director, Tracy Knepple. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) did not receive their medications on 12/25/22. R1’s Physician’s Report was not dated or updated, as R1 was receiving services from an outside agency for a medical condition that was not listed on the report. The report indicated R1 was able to communicate their needs, and required assistance with bathing, dressing/grooming, toileting, and medication management. The report also stated R1 was ambulatory but required extensive assistance. Facility’s assessment of R1 was conducted on 10/01/22 indicated R1 required escort service to and from the Wellness Center or Medication Cart to receive their medications. Staff voiced R1 receivCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230105085446

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 69 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
16
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
16
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
21
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
69
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 486-5020
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Belmont Village Sabre Springs? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.