Coronado Retirement Village is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Coronado, San Diego County, California — state license #374603136, licensed for 120 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 18, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Coronado Retirement Village

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 120 residents · Coronado, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603136, held since 2011 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
299 Prospect Place · Coronado, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 437-1777
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES 120 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS, AGE 60 & ABOVE; SEVEN (7) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. FACILITY HAS DELAYED EGRESS FOR DEMENTIA RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWENTY-FIVE RESIDENTSState service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 18, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 5, 2026
Occupancy at the October 14, 2025 visit
84 of 120 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 10, 2022 to October 14, 2025. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee attempted unlawful eviction/discharge of resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s). LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that the licensee attempted unlawful eviction/discharge of resident. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was not allowed to return to the facility once discharged from the hospital. On 10/03/25, R1 was trasported to the hospital due to an order written by R1's physician requiring a psyche evaluation. However, R1 was taken to the incorrect hospital for the evaluation and was discharged and returned the same day to the facility. The Wellness Director explained there was a miscommunication with the hospital but R1 was allowed to return. R1 returned to the facility and went to their room. The Executive Director documented a letter dated 09/09/25 to R1 indicating R1'sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251006121233
Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not meet resident's care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s). LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility staff did not meet resident's care needs regarding Resident #1 (R1). It was reported that on May 5, 2025, R1 fell at the facility, sustained injuries, and did not report the incident to facility staff. R1’s Physician’s Report dated July 18, 2024, indicated R1 was ambulatory and independent with bathing, dressing/grooming, feeding, toileting, medication management, laundry and able to leave the facility unassisted. On May 7, 2025, R1 was observed by staff with a bump the size of a quarter on R1’s forehead and a black eye. An outside source reported staff never saw the injury when it occurred due to not properly checking on R1. The outside source althe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250610103152
Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not seek medical care for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s). LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that the licensee did not seek medical care for a resident. Resident #1 (R1) fell on May 5, 2025, and sustained a bump/cut on their forehead, and a right black eye. R1’s Physician’s Report dated July 18, 2024, indicated R1 was ambulatory and independent with bathing, dressing/grooming, feeding, toileting, medication management and able to leave the facility unassisted. R1’s interview confirmed they fell while walking to the bathroom at nighttime and slipped on some magazines in their room. R1 reported they fell to the ground striking their head against their bed frame. Continued on LIC 9099C. This is an amended version of the original report created on 09/26/2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250626090416
Sep 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not accord resident safe accommodations

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud contacted the facility via telephone, to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA spoke with Executive Director, Rajni Kharbanda. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not accord resident safe accommodation. It was reported that on 06/08/25, Resident #1 (R1) was lying on their bed fully clothed with shoes on and a pillow over their face. R1 had a medical condition that required medical attention. Staff called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital. R1 also has a Major Neurocognitive Disorder and didn’t recall the incident, when interviewed. R1 confirmed they sleep in their bed, on top of their covers, fully clothed, and wearing shoes. R1 also confirmed they do not sleep with a pillow over their face or feel they are in harm. Continued on an LIC 9099C. Unsubthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250609134506
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not administer medications as prescribed. Licensee did not follow resident's care plan. Licensee did not provide services agreed upon in the admissions agreement.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ramin Hashemi, Nacole Patterson and Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPAs introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Wellness Director Camille Nero. On 03/17/2025 it was alleged Licensee did not administer medications as prescribed, Licensee did not follow resident's care plan, and Licensee did not provide services agreed upon in the admissions agreement. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Regarding the allegation, "Licensee did not administer medications as prescribed", it was alleged that multiple medication administrations were missed for Resident 1 (R1). Staff interviews revealed the medication in question was tied to a vitals parameter which the facility could not administer without a twenty-four hour nurse. (Continued on LIC9099 Page 2)the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250317093152
Jul 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not safeguarding resident's personal possessions

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. Executive Director, Rajni Kharbanda arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, resident, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are not safeguarding resident's personal possessions. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was missing $150 dollars in April 2025. Staff were interviewed and denied taking R1's money and were not aware of what happened to R1's money. Staff also stated R1 does not leave the facility unless transported by their PACE program. Therefore, they were not aware R1 withdrawled cash as they are not responsible for R1's cash resources. A review of the Resident Property and Values sheet dated 04/17/24, did not indicate $150 dollars was to be safeguarded by the facility. R1'the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250408110439
Jul 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. Executive Director, Rajni Kharbanda arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, resident, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not give medication as prescribed. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) had a PRN order on file for Desitin paste to be applied for skin irritation. Outside source #1's (OS1) interview revealed on 04/15/25, R1 complained of pain twice in the same day and the Desitin was brought to R1 but not applied. An interview with a Medication Technician (med tech) stated only the med tech's are allowed to administer the cream. Another med tech stated that the med tech dispenses the cream into a cup and the caregivers apply the cream. Staff interviews revealed conflictinthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250418130533
20248 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give medications as prescribed Due to insufficient staff, residents’ needs are not being met Licensee did not abide by admissions agreement Staff are not properly trained

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh and Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPAs were welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit with Administrator Elizabeth Najera. On 05/18/2021, it was alleged that staff did not give medications as prescribed, residents’ needs were not being met due to insufficient staff, Licensee did not abide by admissions agreement, and staff are not properly trained. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210518135552
Dec 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility was unsanitary.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced visit in response to the above-mentioned allegation to deliver an amended report. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Elizabeth Najera. It was alleged that the facility was unsanitary. The Department's investigation consisted of LPA observations, record review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. LPA observed a housekeeper cleaning a lobby restroom. Resident rooms were clean and hallways, elevator, dining room, and resident rooms were sanitary and in order. Staff, residents, and outside sources interviewed said the facility is clean. Outside sources preferred to use their loved one's restroom. LPA reviewed housecleaning schedules and staffing levels were sufficient. Completed tasks were signed off on a daily checklist. According to records and interviews there is insufficient evidence that the alleged violation occurred. Therthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241218165603
Aug 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff dropped resident resulting in multiple fractures. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced complaint visit at the facility to close out a complaint. LPA gained access to the facility and met with Administrator, Liz Najera, and explained the purpose of the visit which was to deliver findings for the above allegations. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that staff dropped resident resulting in multiple fractures. Interviews revealed that on July 23, 2020, on or about 1:00 PM Staff 1 (S1) indicated they were transferring Resident 1 (R1) from the wheelchair to their bed by themself. R1 became combative and S1 believed they were going to lose control of R1, so S1 assisted R1 to the floor. Interviews revealed R1 slid between S1’s legs and R1’s legs twisted as they slid. S1 conducted a body check and observed a skin tear with blood on their left knee and during the check, R1 complained of left knee pain. A review of ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20200807104355
Feb 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident records to resident's authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Liz Najera and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not provide resident records to resident's authorized representative It was reported to CCL that as of December 13, 2023 no facility records have been produced for Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) Interview with Administrator revealed they have been in frequent contact with R1's responsible party as well as R1's authorized representative for many months. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024 · control 08-AS-20231227093312
Jan 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in resident physical abuse by another resident which resulted in serious injury

On 1/5/2024, at about 8:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Erika Avalos, Office Manager. On 06/27/2023, the Department received a complaint, alleging lack of supervision resulted in resident physical abuse by another resident which resulted in serious injury. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, record reviews, and interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources. Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) were both admitted to Memory Care, have a diagnosis of dementia and suffer from severe cognitive impairment. Both residents have shown signs of aggression toward staff and or other residents, but the last documented incident occurred in March of 2023 when R1 punched a staff member and attempted to hit several residents. Both R1 and R2 had medication changes or increases to calm them and make them less aggthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230627133539
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident hit by unknown adult while in care, resulting in injury

On 12/7/2023, at about 8:55 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Erika Avalos, Office Manager. On 6/29/2022, the Department received a complaint, alleging a resident was hit by an unknown adult while in care, resulting in injury. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, record reviews, and interviews with residents, staff and outside sources. Record reviews showed that the incident was reported by facility staff as an unwitnessed fall. Resident 1 (R1)’s records showed that they have Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), history of falls, and visual impairment. The facility records indicate staff reported an incident involving this resident on 6/22/22 where the resident experienced an unwitnessed fall. The resident was transported to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a bruise to the forehead. None of the recorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220629133454
Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was denied visitors Resident was not accorded privacy Medication not given as prescribed Untrained staff provided catheter care Facility staff did not obtain medical attention for resident Facility staff did not notify POA of changes in resident's condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings in the above complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Elizabeth Najera. On June 29, 2023 Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging resident was denied visitors, resident was not accorded privacy, medication not given as prescribed, untrained staff provided catheter care, Facility staff did not obtain medical attention for resident and Facility staff did not notify POA of changes in resident's condition. [Continued on LIC9099C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230629135237
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints18typical 7
State visits on file30typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2011.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020257922024891202333020224412021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 437-1777

Is Coronado Retirement Village licensed?

Yes — Coronado Retirement Village is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Coronado (San Diego County): California license #374603136, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 120 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 18, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Coronado Retirement Village care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Coronado Retirement Village with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES 120 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS, AGE 60 & ABOVE; SEVEN (7) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. FACILITY HAS DELAYED EGRESS FOR DEMENTIA RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWENTY-FIVE RESIDENTS

How much does Coronado Retirement Village cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Coronado Retirement Village's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Coronado Retirement Village accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Coronado Retirement Village through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

84 of 120 beds occupied (70%) when the state visited on October 14, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Coronado Retirement Village?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2021 for Coronado Retirement Village; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 14, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee attempted unlawful eviction/discharge of resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s). LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that the licensee attempted unlawful eviction/discharge of resident. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was not allowed to return to the facility once discharged from the hospital. On 10/03/25, R1 was trasported to the hospital due to an order written by R1's physician requiring a psyche evaluation. However, R1 was taken to the incorrect hospital for the evaluation and was discharged and returned the same day to the facility. The Wellness Director explained there was a miscommunication with the hospital but R1 was allowed to return. R1 returned to the facility and went to their room. The Executive Director documented a letter dated 09/09/25 to R1 indicating R1'sCDSS inspection report, October 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251006121233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not meet resident's care needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s). LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility staff did not meet resident's care needs regarding Resident #1 (R1). It was reported that on May 5, 2025, R1 fell at the facility, sustained injuries, and did not report the incident to facility staff. R1’s Physician’s Report dated July 18, 2024, indicated R1 was ambulatory and independent with bathing, dressing/grooming, feeding, toileting, medication management, laundry and able to leave the facility unassisted. On May 7, 2025, R1 was observed by staff with a bump the size of a quarter on R1’s forehead and a black eye. An outside source reported staff never saw the injury when it occurred due to not properly checking on R1. The outside source alCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250610103152
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not seek medical care for resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation(s). LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that the licensee did not seek medical care for a resident. Resident #1 (R1) fell on May 5, 2025, and sustained a bump/cut on their forehead, and a right black eye. R1’s Physician’s Report dated July 18, 2024, indicated R1 was ambulatory and independent with bathing, dressing/grooming, feeding, toileting, medication management and able to leave the facility unassisted. R1’s interview confirmed they fell while walking to the bathroom at nighttime and slipped on some magazines in their room. R1 reported they fell to the ground striking their head against their bed frame. Continued on LIC 9099C. This is an amended version of the original report created on 09/26/2CDSS inspection report, September 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250626090416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not accord resident safe accommodations
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud contacted the facility via telephone, to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA spoke with Executive Director, Rajni Kharbanda. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not accord resident safe accommodation. It was reported that on 06/08/25, Resident #1 (R1) was lying on their bed fully clothed with shoes on and a pillow over their face. R1 had a medical condition that required medical attention. Staff called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital. R1 also has a Major Neurocognitive Disorder and didn’t recall the incident, when interviewed. R1 confirmed they sleep in their bed, on top of their covers, fully clothed, and wearing shoes. R1 also confirmed they do not sleep with a pillow over their face or feel they are in harm. Continued on an LIC 9099C. UnsubCDSS inspection report, September 2, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250609134506
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not administer medications as prescribed. Licensee did not follow resident's care plan. Licensee did not provide services agreed upon in the admissions agreement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ramin Hashemi, Nacole Patterson and Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPAs introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Wellness Director Camille Nero. On 03/17/2025 it was alleged Licensee did not administer medications as prescribed, Licensee did not follow resident's care plan, and Licensee did not provide services agreed upon in the admissions agreement. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Regarding the allegation, "Licensee did not administer medications as prescribed", it was alleged that multiple medication administrations were missed for Resident 1 (R1). Staff interviews revealed the medication in question was tied to a vitals parameter which the facility could not administer without a twenty-four hour nurse. (Continued on LIC9099 Page 2)CDSS inspection report, August 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250317093152
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not safeguarding resident's personal possessions
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. Executive Director, Rajni Kharbanda arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, resident, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are not safeguarding resident's personal possessions. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was missing $150 dollars in April 2025. Staff were interviewed and denied taking R1's money and were not aware of what happened to R1's money. Staff also stated R1 does not leave the facility unless transported by their PACE program. Therefore, they were not aware R1 withdrawled cash as they are not responsible for R1's cash resources. A review of the Resident Property and Values sheet dated 04/17/24, did not indicate $150 dollars was to be safeguarded by the facility. R1'CDSS inspection report, July 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250408110439
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not give medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Wellness Director, Camille Nero. Executive Director, Rajni Kharbanda arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, resident, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not give medication as prescribed. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) had a PRN order on file for Desitin paste to be applied for skin irritation. Outside source #1's (OS1) interview revealed on 04/15/25, R1 complained of pain twice in the same day and the Desitin was brought to R1 but not applied. An interview with a Medication Technician (med tech) stated only the med tech's are allowed to administer the cream. Another med tech stated that the med tech dispenses the cream into a cup and the caregivers apply the cream. Staff interviews revealed conflictinCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250418130533

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not give medications as prescribed Due to insufficient staff, residents’ needs are not being met Licensee did not abide by admissions agreement Staff are not properly trained
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh and Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPAs were welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit with Administrator Elizabeth Najera. On 05/18/2021, it was alleged that staff did not give medications as prescribed, residents’ needs were not being met due to insufficient staff, Licensee did not abide by admissions agreement, and staff are not properly trained. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210518135552
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility was unsanitary.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced visit in response to the above-mentioned allegation to deliver an amended report. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Elizabeth Najera. It was alleged that the facility was unsanitary. The Department's investigation consisted of LPA observations, record review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. LPA observed a housekeeper cleaning a lobby restroom. Resident rooms were clean and hallways, elevator, dining room, and resident rooms were sanitary and in order. Staff, residents, and outside sources interviewed said the facility is clean. Outside sources preferred to use their loved one's restroom. LPA reviewed housecleaning schedules and staffing levels were sufficient. Completed tasks were signed off on a daily checklist. According to records and interviews there is insufficient evidence that the alleged violation occurred. TherCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241218165603
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff dropped resident resulting in multiple fractures. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced complaint visit at the facility to close out a complaint. LPA gained access to the facility and met with Administrator, Liz Najera, and explained the purpose of the visit which was to deliver findings for the above allegations. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that staff dropped resident resulting in multiple fractures. Interviews revealed that on July 23, 2020, on or about 1:00 PM Staff 1 (S1) indicated they were transferring Resident 1 (R1) from the wheelchair to their bed by themself. R1 became combative and S1 believed they were going to lose control of R1, so S1 assisted R1 to the floor. Interviews revealed R1 slid between S1’s legs and R1’s legs twisted as they slid. S1 conducted a body check and observed a skin tear with blood on their left knee and during the check, R1 complained of left knee pain. A review of thCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20200807104355
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide resident records to resident's authorized representative
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Liz Najera and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of records review, interviews with facility staff and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not provide resident records to resident's authorized representative It was reported to CCL that as of December 13, 2023 no facility records have been produced for Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) Interview with Administrator revealed they have been in frequent contact with R1's responsible party as well as R1's authorized representative for many months. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 25, 2024 · control 08-AS-20231227093312
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in resident physical abuse by another resident which resulted in serious injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/5/2024, at about 8:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Erika Avalos, Office Manager. On 06/27/2023, the Department received a complaint, alleging lack of supervision resulted in resident physical abuse by another resident which resulted in serious injury. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, record reviews, and interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources. Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) were both admitted to Memory Care, have a diagnosis of dementia and suffer from severe cognitive impairment. Both residents have shown signs of aggression toward staff and or other residents, but the last documented incident occurred in March of 2023 when R1 punched a staff member and attempted to hit several residents. Both R1 and R2 had medication changes or increases to calm them and make them less aggCDSS inspection report, January 5, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230627133539

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident hit by unknown adult while in care, resulting in injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/7/2023, at about 8:55 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Erika Avalos, Office Manager. On 6/29/2022, the Department received a complaint, alleging a resident was hit by an unknown adult while in care, resulting in injury. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, record reviews, and interviews with residents, staff and outside sources. Record reviews showed that the incident was reported by facility staff as an unwitnessed fall. Resident 1 (R1)’s records showed that they have Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), history of falls, and visual impairment. The facility records indicate staff reported an incident involving this resident on 6/22/22 where the resident experienced an unwitnessed fall. The resident was transported to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a bruise to the forehead. None of the recorCDSS inspection report, December 7, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220629133454
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was denied visitors Resident was not accorded privacy Medication not given as prescribed Untrained staff provided catheter care Facility staff did not obtain medical attention for resident Facility staff did not notify POA of changes in resident's condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings in the above complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Elizabeth Najera. On June 29, 2023 Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging resident was denied visitors, resident was not accorded privacy, medication not given as prescribed, untrained staff provided catheter care, Facility staff did not obtain medical attention for resident and Facility staff did not notify POA of changes in resident's condition. [Continued on LIC9099C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230629135237
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff prevent resident from going out of the facility Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings Staff speak inappropriately to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to interview residents, and staff and to deliver findings in the above complaint allegations. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Elizabeth Najera. On March 24, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging staff prevented resident from going out of the facility, staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings, and staff spoke inappropriately to resident in care. During investigation, LPA Strong collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation. Based on Resident1’s (R1) Physician Report dated September 20, 2021, R1 is diagnosed with a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, is confused and disoriented, depressed and cannot leave facility unassisted. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220324080455

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
18
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
30
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 437-1777
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Coronado Retirement Village? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.