Rancho Santa Fe Villa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374603125, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Rancho Santa Fe Villa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603125, held since 2011 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8292 Run Of The Knolls · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 361-3322
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGE SIXTY (60) AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVAL FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS. FOUR BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS IN ROOMS #1,#4,#5 AND #6.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 2, 2026
Occupancy at the May 20, 2025 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 23, 2023 to May 20, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 5 documents
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff were unqualified. Facility did not have an auditory device at exit doors Facility did not have sufficient staff to meet a resident’s needs Staff did not follow admission agreement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Ray Baha. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff were unqualified. On August 26th, 2024, it was reported to the Department that staff were not able to communicate with residents. Interviews with internal and external sources did not reveal any concerns with staff not understanding residents or not being able to communicate. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240826160702
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Ray Baha. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not meet a resident's needs. On September 5th, 2024, it was reported staff were not meeting Resident # 1’s (R1) needs. The reporting party reported the facility administrator mentioned R1’s spouse, Resident # 2 (R2), had declined a hospital bed for R1, as ordered by home health. This allegedly hindered the facility’s ability to meet R1’s needs. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240905151848
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility had uncleared staff. Required postings were not visible. Facility did not conduct emergency drills

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Weny Labuguin. Administrator Ray Baha arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged the facility had uncleared staff. On August 26th, 2024, it was reported to the Department the facility had hired Staff # 1 (S1), but S1 was not background cleared to work at the facility. Interviews with internal and external sources revealed S1 was a private caregiver providing services to a resident at the facility. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240826160702
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file14typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2011.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265502025351202411020232212022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 361-3322

Is Rancho Santa Fe Villa licensed?

Yes — Rancho Santa Fe Villa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374603125, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Rancho Santa Fe Villa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Rancho Santa Fe Villa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGE SIXTY (60) AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVAL FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS. FOUR BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS IN ROOMS #1,#4,#5 AND #6.

How much does Rancho Santa Fe Villa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Rancho Santa Fe Villa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Rancho Santa Fe Villa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Rancho Santa Fe Villa is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on May 20, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Rancho Santa Fe Villa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2022 for Rancho Santa Fe Villa; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 20, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff were unqualified. Facility did not have an auditory device at exit doors Facility did not have sufficient staff to meet a resident’s needs Staff did not follow admission agreement
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Ray Baha. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff were unqualified. On August 26th, 2024, it was reported to the Department that staff were not able to communicate with residents. Interviews with internal and external sources did not reveal any concerns with staff not understanding residents or not being able to communicate. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240826160702
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Ray Baha. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not meet a resident's needs. On September 5th, 2024, it was reported staff were not meeting Resident # 1’s (R1) needs. The reporting party reported the facility administrator mentioned R1’s spouse, Resident # 2 (R2), had declined a hospital bed for R1, as ordered by home health. This allegedly hindered the facility’s ability to meet R1’s needs. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240905151848
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility had uncleared staff. Required postings were not visible. Facility did not conduct emergency drills
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Weny Labuguin. Administrator Ray Baha arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged the facility had uncleared staff. On August 26th, 2024, it was reported to the Department the facility had hired Staff # 1 (S1), but S1 was not background cleared to work at the facility. Interviews with internal and external sources revealed S1 was a private caregiver providing services to a resident at the facility. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240826160702

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff restrained resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was greeted by Caregiver, Angelita Hernandez, to whom she identified herself. LPA met with Administrator, Ray Cyrus Baha, to whom she discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department investigated the above listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of observations made during a tour of the facility, multiple interviews with staff and outside sources, and records review, including resident and facility records relevant to this investigation. On March 24, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that staff restrained a resident. It was specifically alleged that a Resident (R1), [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify (R1)] was observed sitting in their wheelchair with a gait belt wrapped around the resident and tied in the back. (Continue at LIC9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220324162817

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 361-3322
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Rancho Santa Fe Villa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.