Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Tender Loving Care Guest HomeLicense #374602179 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareTender Loving Care Guest HomeLicense #374602179 · 1430 Sheryl Ln, National City, CA · (619) 399-3552Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/San Diego County/National City/Tender Loving Care Guest Home
This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Agency Initiated”, October 27, 2026.
Map · 1430 Sheryl Ln

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Number on file

Call number on file(619) 399-3552

From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

Small home · National City

Tender Loving Care Guest Home

1430 Sheryl Ln, National City, CA 91950 · Closed in state record

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Tender Loving Care Guest Home

About this record

This page keeps the history of license #374602179. It does not describe current care or pricing at this address.

Browse homes in this area

At a glance

Care approvals recorded under this license
Wheelchair
State licensing record · October 27, 2026
Home size
6 while this license was open
Small care home · the state license record
(619) 399-3552From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

Care and support

These approvals belong to the closed license. They do not establish current care services at this address.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryRecorded under this license · up to 6 residents

Not on file in this record: Dementia / memory care, Hospice care and Bedridden.

State licensing record · October 27, 2026. A different license at this address has its own record.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY CLIENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 27, 2026

Previously reported costs

This license is listed as closed. A current stay cannot be priced under this license.

Published prices are not on file for this license. Browse nearby homes to compare their reported costs.

This license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Daily life

Descriptions collected for this closed license. They do not describe current services at this address.

Daily-life descriptions are not on file for this license. See nearby homes for current listings.

Where it is

1430 Sheryl Ln, National City, CA 91950Address from the public record · October 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Paradise Valley HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 27, 2026 · License #374602179 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 25 of 36 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20265 state visits · 6 documents

Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced case management visit-Legal/non-compliance visit. LPA Serrano identified himself and was granted entry by licensee/operator Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with licensee/operator Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. LPA was immediately informed by Licensee that the facility no longer had residents in care. During today’s visit, LPA Serrano was escorted throughout the facility. LPA inspected each room and the outside perimeter and confirmed that their were no residents in care. Licensee stated that she was advised by the resident's case worker that Resident #1 and Resident #2 were transferred to Carroll's Residential Care and Resident #3 remains at the hospital. No deficiencies were cited or observed on this date. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit-Legal/non-compliance visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by licensee/operator Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with licensee/operator Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During today’s visit, LPA Lopez spoke with licensee/operator Legaspi and resident #1 (R1). LPA verified residents' health and safety, and spoke with licensee/operator Legaspi. LPA confirmed that Ms. Victoria Legaspi was still operating the home as a facility, and three residents still lived at this address. During the visit, LPA provided R1/tenant with the LIC 986 letter as they were onsite. Per Victoria Legaspi, resident #2 (R2)/tenant was out at their day program and would not return until midafternoon, around 3:30 PM; and resident #3 (R3)/tenant was currently being seen at a local hospital. LPA provided Ms. Legaspi with a hard copy of the LIC 986 for R2 and R3 for their review. LPA also provided Ms. Victoria Legaspi a Notice of Operation in Violation of the Law (NOV) letter informing Victoria Legaspi that they are operating without a license. Prior to LPA's exit, LPA removed the license from the facility. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and the NOV letter were provided to operator Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026
Mar 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit. LPA was greeted by and met with Licensee Victoria Legaspi, to discuss the purpose of the visit. On 03/03/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted a follow up visit to the facility regarding information received that the facility had been without a working phone for several days. The licensee had informed the Department on 02/27/2026 that the facility’s phone service had been disconnected due to nonpayment. During the follow up visit, the licensee confirmed to LPA Serrano that the phone had been disconnected but was reconnected on 2/27/26. LPA reminded the licensee that a working phone must be available at all times so staff, residents, and emergency services can reach the facility during urgent situations. LPA advised the licensee that being without a working phone for several days poses a health and safety risk to residents in care. The licensee stated they understood the requirement and agreed to ensure it remains operational going forward.Due to the previous incident involving lack of phone access, a deficiency was cited under Title 22 regulations. The report was discussed, plan of correction was jointly developed, and an exit interview was conducted with Victoria Legaspi. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) was provided to Victoria Legaspi. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87311 · Plan of correction due date: Mar 4, 2026

All facilities shall have telephone service on the premises... Based on information received and interview, the facility did not comply with the requirement to maintain a working telephone. Failure to maintain an operational phone poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee stated that the phone was reconnected on 2/27/26. LPA visually inspected the phone/landline and called the facility landline to verify that it was operational. The POC was cleared on 3/3/26.

Jan 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit-Legal/non-compliance visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During today’s visit, on 01/23/2026, Licensee worked on the notices as described in HSC, Section 1569.38, Posting of licensing reports; disclosure to new resident, and before LPAs exit, LPA confirmed Licensee Legaspi spoke with the residents, their representatives and the LTCO regarding the facility closure due to revocation of facility license and informed them that a written notice is forthcoming. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2026
Jan 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit-Legal/non-compliance visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 01/15/2026, the Department visited the facility for a legal/non-compliance visit. During the visit, LPA Lopez met with Licensee Legaspi, who confirmed they were in receipt of documents informing them of administrative action by the Department to revoke the facility's license. LPA Lopez printed and reviewed Health and Safety Code (HSC), Section 1569.38, Posting of licensing reports; disclosure to new resident. LPA reviewed posting and notification requirements that must be completed by 01/19/2026 (10-days of receipt of documents) to residents, their responsible parties, and the Long-Tern Care Ombudsman, and that failure to follow the requirements stipulated on the HSC would result in the assessment of further civil penalties. During today’s visit, on 01/23/2026, LPA spoke with Licensee Legaspi and confirmed they did not notify residents, their responsible party (RP), or the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO), in writing, regarding their revocation of licensure. Therefore, civil penalty of $100 per day is being assessed per HSC, 1569.38, commencing, 01/20/2026 through 01/23/2026, for 4 days [$100 per day, until the requirement is met or the maximum penalty of $5,000] totaling to $400. During the visit, the Licensee worked on the notices as described in HSC, Section 1569.38, and before LPAs exit, LPA obtained a copy of the notifications to the residents, their RPs, LTCO, and confirmed of the posting of the revocation of licensure was posted in a visible area of the facility. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) There are deficiencies observed and cited during today’s visit, and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D and LIC421 page of this report. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, civil penalty (LIC421), along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.38(g) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 19, 2026

1569.38 Posting of licensing reports; disclosure to new residents: A licensee who fails to comply with the requirements of subdivision (b) or (c) shall be liable for civil pemalties ... this requirment was not met as evidence by: Based on interview with the licensee and records reviewed, the licensee did not notify the residents or their RPs of the revocation of the facility license as required which violated the residents personal rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2026

Plan of correction: This requirement was met during the visit and is deemed cleared.

Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Carmen Lopez and Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced case management visit-Legal/non-compliance visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPAs met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During today’s visit, LPA’s Lopez and De la Cruz toured the facility, requested and obtained relevant documents, spoke with residents and verified their health and safety, and spoke with Licensee Legaspi. LPAs confirmed that Licensee received the documents and understood their contents. LPA’s explained to Licensee Legaspi, the expectations of their daily operations henceforth. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026

202510 state visits · 14 documents

Oct 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Carmen Lopez and Jose De La Cruz made an unannounced visit to conduct a continuation for a Required Annual Inspection that was commenced on 10/20/2025. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with licensee Victoria Legaspi. Due to technical difficulties and time constrains, the annual inspection is being continued on today's date. During today's visit, LPA's Lopez and De La Cruz continued the annual inspection and provided the licensee with the resulted findings. Deficiencies and civil penalties are being cited during today's visit and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D and LIC421 pages of this report. An exit interview, and POCs were jointly developed with Licensee Victoria Legaspi to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit. Signature below serves as confirmation of receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 24, 2025

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 3 staff was not associated to the facility roster, which poses an immediate safety risk to 5 out of 5 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee will submit staff documentation to RO to associate staff, and CC LPA, by POC due date, 10/24/2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025

(a) Except as specified in subsection (b), the licensee shall ensure that ... knives,... which could pose a danger to residents are in locked storage and are ...outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in five out of five sharp objects (knife, cutter, cleaver knives, scissors) which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to 5 out of 5 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee locked away the sharp objects during the visit.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.695(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 6, 2025

(f) A facility shall have both of the following in place: (2) A set of keys available to facility staff on each shift for use during an evacuation that provides access to all of the following: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of two facility keys which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Obtain a second copy of the facility keys for bedroom number 3 and backyard shed by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 6, 2025

(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of three persons which poses/posed a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to five out of five persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to get another person to help 10 hours a week, get their documents and associate them to the facility.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(b)(15) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025

(b) Each resident's record shall contain at least the following information: (15) The admission agreement ..l. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of five residents which poses/posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to add the admissions agreement to the residents’ files and send the signed document to LPA by POC.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 23, 2025

(1) The name, address, and telephone number of each resident's physician and dentist shall be readily available to that resident, the licensee, and facility staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in five out of five residents which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to reach out to the residents case managers and ask if the residents have a dentist assigned, if not, ask case managers to assign one. Send the updated facesheet by POC.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87412(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 6, 2025

(a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one out of three staff members which posed a potential health and safety risk to five out of five persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to send a copy of the LIC503 and TB est to LPA by POC

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87303(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 6, 2025

(1) Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out two cases which posed a potential health, risk to five out of five persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to clean the residence to address the odor as well as the spider webs found on the hallway by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 6, 2025

(a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a licensed medical professional ...to be kept in the resident's record. This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in five out of five persons in care, which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to five out of five persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to schedule the medical appointments for all residents and submit the medical appointment schedule to LPA by POC.

Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst’s (LPA’s) Carmen Lopez and Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced required annual inspection and, in conjunction conducted this case management visit for a Plan of Correction (POC) clearances. LPA Lopez and De La Cruz identified themselves and were granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA's met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During today’s visit, LPA’s Lopez and De la Cruz spoke with the Licensee Legaspi. According to licensee Legaspi, none of the pending POCs have been corrected with the exception of one. On 10/20/25, LPA Lopez reissued a citation that was cleared during today’s visit for CCR Section 87468.1 (a)(1) Personal Rights of Residents in all Facilities, that was issued on 08/25/25. This is deemed cleared during today’s visit. The following deficiencies were formerly issued and have continued as civil penalties for the following uncleared deficiencies: On 05/19/2025, Licensee was issued a citation for Plan of Operations and Reporting Requirements. During today’s visit, the Licensee was unable to produce the documents to clear the citations and civil penalties have been assessed. On 04/24/2025, licensee Legaspi was issued citations for staff training for resident Bill of Rights, Resident Records, Evaluation of Suitability for Admission, Basic Services, Finances, and Health and Safety Code (HSC) for quarterly fire drill, and evacuation chair, and deficiencies were discussed with the Licensee. LPA’s Lopez and De La Cruz confirmed the deficiencies have yet to be cleared and civil penalties will continue to accrue. A failure to correct was issued for each of the deficiencies. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) On 04/17/2025, the Licensee was issued a Type A deficiency regarding false/misleading statements. On 08/25/2025, Licensee was unable to produce the POC to clear the deficiency. During today’s visit, the Licensee was still unable to produce the POC, and a failure to correct was issued for the continued deficiency. On 10/28/2024, licensee Legaspi was issued citations that continued to civil penalties up to date for resident reappraisals, client #1 (C1’s), Personnel Records for staff #1 (S1) and Administrator’s certificate as licensee Legaspi was unable to produce the clearance. Civil Penalties continue to accrue for these citations issued on 10/28/2024. Also, on today's date licensee will be issued a repeat violation for resident records - specifically Physician's Report (LIC602) on their required annual inspection. On 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024, the Licensee was issued civil penalties for a visit conducted on 10/28/24, for Personnel Records, Resident Records, and reappraisals. During today's visit, the Licensee was issued civil penalties as the deficiencies issued on 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024 have yet to be corrected. During today's visit, LPAs did leave the facility to write their reports and returned to deliver their findings regarding today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of the Failure to Correct/Civil Penalties, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 24, 2025

87468.1 (a)(1) Personal Rights of Residents in all Facilities: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons... This was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews with residents and staff, staff did not address the indecent exposure incident for 2 of 4 residents in care when they were informed which posed a potential personal rights risk to 2 of 4 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to move one of the residents to a different room to ensure the incident is not repeated by POC due 5/30/25, but both clients agreed to stay as roommates. As such the POC was re-evaluated and residents signed an agreement which was completed during today’s visit and deemed cleared.

Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Carmen Lopez and Jose De La Cruz made an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPAs arrived at the facility at 9 am. According to the facility’s administrator, the facility has a maximum capacity for six (6) clients, 60 and above, none of which can be non-ambulatory. The facility currently has five (5) residents in care, all of whom are ambulatory. At 9:00 am, LPAs entered the living room, where a bottle of medication, Chloridine HLC for Victoria Legaspi was observed in one of the tables. At 9:05, resident files were reviewed by LPA. At 9:44 am, LPA’s requested staff files, but licensee was busy preparing residents’ meals, in the meantime, LPA took a walk around living room where he found square diapers on the floor, PPE, etc. There is some clutter with boxes in the living room, two vacuum cleaners and fire alarms in boxes. There was a fire extinguisher next to the kitchen that was checked recently. At 10:05 am, LPA interviewed R3 and at 10:10 am R2. At 10:23 am while walking outside, LPA observed furniture on the outside as well as two (2) mattresses and two (2) commodes. At 10:54 am LPA reviewed facility staff files. At 11:34 am, LPA was on R1 and R4’s room. At 11:35 am, LPA was on the restroom where water temperature reached 113.5 F. At 11:40 am LPA was with Licensee at the back yard, where there was a locked shed, to which licensee did not have a key, and a 2-3 inches hole was observed close by. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC809] At 11:48 am, LPA and Licensee were in the kitchen, where water reached out 117F. A seven inches cutter was observed in one drawer and a twelve inches knife and two (2) twelve inches cleaver knives were observed, along with scissors. At 12:01 pm, LPA observed spider webs in the hallway as well as vents. At 12:02 pm, Licensee disclosed that bed on second living room is used by S3. A continuation visit will need to be conducted to finalize the annual inspection as time did not permit for the completion of today's visit. Deficiencies will be cited during continuation Deficiencies will be cited, and jointly developed with licensee Legaspi, at the continuation due to technical difficulties. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit. Signature below serves as confirmation of receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025
Aug 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst’s (LPA’s) Carmen Lopez and Jose De La Cruz conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction (POC) clearance. LPA Lopez and De La Cruz identified themselves and were granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA's met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During today’s visit, LPA’s Lopez and De la Cruz spoke with resident and with Licensee Legaspi. According to licensee Legaspi none of the pending POCs have been corrected. On 08/25/25, LPA’s continued civil penalties for citations on Plan of Operations reissued on 05/19/2025. On 05/19/2025, Licensee was issued a citation for Personal Rights of Residents in all Facilities which was due on 5/30/25. As the citation lapsed, LPA reissued the citation during today's visit. On 4/24/25, Licensee was issued deficiencies for not having fire drills and evacuations chairs, due 05/23/25. During today’s visit, LPA confirmed that the licensee did not have their POC cleared. Civil Penalties are being issued for the deficiencies that were not cleared. On 10/28/2024, licensee Legaspi was issued citations that continued to civil penalties up to date for resident reappraisals, client #1 (C1’s) Physician’s Report (LIC602), Personnel Records for staff #1 (S1) and Administrator’s certificate as licensee Legaspi was unable to produce the clearance. On 04/17/2025, the Licensee was issued a Type A deficiency regarding false/misleading statements. On 08/25/2025, Licensee was unable to produce the POC to clear the deficiency. During today’s visit, the Licensee was still unable to produce the POC, and a failure to correct was issued for the continued deficiency. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) On 04/24/2025, licensee Legaspi was issued staff training for resident Bill of Rights, Resident Records, Evaluation of Suitability for Admission, Basic Services, Finances, and Health and Safety Code (HSC), quarterly fire drill, evacuation chair, and Finances, were discussed with the Licensee. LPA’s Lopez and De La Cruz confirmed the deficiencies have yet to be cleared and civil penalties will continue to accrue. A failure to correct was issued for each of the deficiencies. On 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024, the Licensee was issued civil penalties for a visit conducted on 10/28/24, for Personnel Records, Resident Records, specifically medial assessments, and reappraisals. During today's visit, the Licensee was issued civil penalties as the deficiencies issued on 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024 have yet to be corrected. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of the Failure to Correct/Civil Penalties, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 8, 2025

87468.1 (a)(1) Personal Rights of Residents in all Facilities: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons... This was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews with residents and staff, staff did not address the indecent exposure incident for 2 of 4 residents in care when they were informed which posed a potential personal rights risk to 2 of 4 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to move one of the residents to the a different room to ensure the incident does not repeat by POC was due 5/30/25, but both clients agreed to stay as room mates. As such the POC was reevaluated and residents will sign an agreement and be sent to LPA via email by POC due date 9/8/25.

May 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction (POC) clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 5/19/25, Licensee was reissued citations for Plan of Operations and Reporting Requirements with a due date of 05/26/2025. A plan of correction (POC) was jointly developed with the licensee Legaspi. During today’s visit, LPA confirmed that the licensee did not have their POC for their Plan of Operations and a civil penalty will be issued during today’s visit. The licensee was able to produce the POC for Reporting Requirements, during today’s visit. A civil penalty is still being issued for the time elapsed between 5/26/25 through 05/28/25. On 4/24/25, Licensee was issued deficiencies for not having fire drills and evacuations chairs, due 05/23/25. A POC was jointly developed with licensee during the time of the visit. During today’s visit, LPA confirmed that the licensee did not have their POC cleared during today’s visit. Civil Penalties are being issued for the deficiencies that were not cleared. Also, on 4/24/25, the Licensee was issued multiple deficiencies regarding staff training, residents' functional capabilities assessments, residents' pending medical assessments, activities for residents, and facility financial records. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) At the time of the visit, Resident Records, Evaluation of Suitability for Admission, Basic Services, Finances, and Health and Safety Code (HSC), Section 1569.267 Resident’s Bill of Rights, were discussed with the Licensee. A POC was jointly developed with Licensee. Civil Penalties were issued for the deficiencies not being cleared. During today’s visit, LPA confirmed the deficiencies have yet to be cleared and civil penalties will continue to accrue. A failure to correct was issued for each of the deficiencies. On 04/17/2025, the Licensee was issued a Type A deficiency regarding false/misleading statements. At that time, CCR, Section 87207, was discussed with licensee Legaspi. A POC was jointly developed with Licensee with a due date of 4/18/25. On 4/24/25, Licensee was unable to produce the POC to clear the deficiency, and a failure to correct. During today’s visit, the Licensee was still unable to produce the POC, and a failure to correct was issued for the continued deficiency. On 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024, the Licensee was issued civil penalties for a visit conducted on 10/28/24, for Personnel Records, Resident Records, specifically medial assessments, and reappraisals. During today's visit, the Licensee was issued civil penalties as the deficiencies issued on 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024 have yet to be corrected. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), and the civil penalties issued were provided to Licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2025
May 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not address resident-on-resident indecent exposure

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced visit and,for a complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Victoria Legaspi, Licensee. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Licensee Legaspi. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents and our side sources, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On April 10, 2025, it was said Licensee did not address resident-on-resident indecent exposure. It was specifically alleged that resident #1 (R1) was exposed to indecent exposure by resident #2 (R2) on multiple occasions, and the Licensee was aware and did not address the issue. Interview with an outside source #1 (OS1) said that since R1 had certain underlying medical conditions, they did not know if the allegations were truthful. Substantiated They mentioned that R1 did report to their specialized practitioner, and it was at this time, they were informed regarding the incident. When they spoke with R1, they mentioned to OS1, R2 had masturbated in their room. Interview with the Licensee confirmed that they were informed regarding the indecent exposure incidents. The licensee mentioned they believed that since R1 wanted their own room, they felt it was the reason they had told them about the incidents, and believed that their underlying medical conditions had something to do with it. The licensee later mentioned that they had spoken with R2, who acknowledged they had done the action, but was not hurting anyone. The licensee said that it was their right to do the action, but informed R2 that they would need to do it in the bathroom. An interview with R2 regarding the incident was attempted, but R2 became upset, yelled, and stormed out. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during staff, resident, and outside source interviews, and records reviewed, there is sufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D of this report. The report was discussed, a plan of correction was jointly developed, and an exit interview was conducted with Licensee Victoria Legaspi. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Licensee Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250410105904

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2025

87468.1 (a)(1) Personal Rights of Residents in all Facilities: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons... This was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews with residents and staff, staff did not address the indecent exposure incident for 2 of 4 residents in care when they were informed which posed a potential personal rights risk to 2 of 4 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to move one of the residents to the a different room to ensure the incident does not repeat by POC due date, 05/30/25.

May 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction (POC) clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 4/24/25, the Licensee was issued multiple deficiencies regarding staff training, residents' functional capabilities assessments, residents' pending medical assessments, activities for residents, and facility financial records. At the time of the visit, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Sections 87506 Resident Records, 87456 Evaluation of Suitability for Admission, 87464 Basic Services, 87213 Finances, and Health and Safety Code (HSC), Section 1569.267 Resident’s Bill of Rights, were discussed with the Licensee. A POC was jointly developed with Licensee Legaspi and the deficiencies issued were due between 05/09/2025 through 05/15/2025. During today’s visit, LPA requested copies of their POCs for five (5) of the deficient practice statements that were jointly developed, but they were unable to be produced by the Licensee. A failure to correct was issued for each of the deficiencies on the time elapsed, between the due dates of 5/9/25 through 5/15/25. On 04/17/25, Licensee was issued a deficiency for CCR, Section 87211 Reporting Requirements, due 5/02/25. The licensee was unable to produce the POC, and this deficiency will be reissued and recited during today’s visit. Also, on 04/17/2025, the Licensee was issued a Type A deficiency regarding false/misleading statements. At that time, CCR, Section 87207, was discussed with Licensee Legaspi. A POC was jointly developed with Licensee Legaspi with a due date of 4/18/25. On 4/24/25, Licensee was unable to produce the POC to clear the deficiency, and a failure to correct was issued for the time elapsed, between 4/18/25 through 4/24/25. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) During today’s visit, the Licensee was still unable to produce the POC, and a failure to correct was issued for the continued deficiency. On 04/02/25, Licensee was issued deficiencies for CCR, Sections 87355 Criminal Record Clearance, 87208 Plan of Operations, HSC Sections 1569.605 Liability Insurance, and Section 1669.15 License application. During today’s visit, Section 87208 is being recited and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D page of this report. On 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024, the Licensee was issued civil penalties for a visit conducted on 10/28/24, for a total of 6 deficiencies for Personnel Records, Resident Records, Medical Assessments, and Reappraisals. During today's visit, the licensee cleared two citations for resident records, specifically admission agreement, and physician's report, specifically TB test, but will be issued civil penalties until 5/18/25 as it has cleared on 5/19/25. Licensee was issued additional civil penalties as the deficiencies issued on 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024 have yet to be corrected. Two deficiencies were cleared during today’s visit for citations issued on 10/28/24. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), and civil penalties issues were provided to Licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit (via email to the email on file). The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87208(a)(7)(B) · Plan of correction due date: May 26, 2025

87208 Plan of Operation (a)(7)(B) The licensee shall… operate the facility in accordance with the… plan of operation… Any significant changes… shall be submitted to the licensing agency for approval... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the Licensee changed the use of facility space and did not submit the updated plan to the Department for approval.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to submit an updated plan of operation, including but not limited to: a new facility sketch (LIC999), Personnel Report (LIC 500), and updates to ensure compliance with regulations effective January 1, 2025, by the due date, May 26, 2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: May 26, 2025

87211 Reporting Requirements (a)(1)(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 1 incident were not reported regarding the residents, which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to submit an incident report for the incident that transpired with residents R2 and R3 by the POC due date, May 26, 2025.

Apr 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced visit for a POC correction and, in conjunction, completed this comprehensive visit initially initiated on April 17, 2025. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Victoria Legaspi, Licensee. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the visit with Licensee Legaspi. During today’s visit, LPA completed the Comprehensive Visit Inspection Tool. There were deficiencies observed and cited and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview and a POC was jointly developed with Licensee Legaspi during this visit. A copy of this report, LIC 811 and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 3/22) were provided to the Licensee Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025

The state marks this report as 27 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction (POC) clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 04/17/2025, the Licensee was issued a Type A deficiency regarding false/misleading statements. At that time, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Section 87207, was discussed with Licensee Legaspi. A POC was jointly developed with Licensee Legaspi with a due date of 4/18/25. During today’s visit, LPA requested a copy of their POC statement of the uncleared individual which Licensee was unable to provide. A failure to correct was issued for the time elapsed between the due date of 4/18/25 through, 4/24/25. On 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024, the Licensee was issued civil penalties for a total of 6 deficiencies for Personnel Records, Resident Records, Medical Assessments, and Reappraisals. During today's visit, the licensee was issued additional civil penalties as the deficiencies issued on 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024 have yet to be corrected. Civil Penalties were issued during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025
Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportAnnual/RandomReport on file

Type of visit: Annual/Random

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced Comprehensive Annual Visit as deemed during the NCC on 4/02/2025. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi, and discussed the purpose of the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory in at any given time at the facility site. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 4 residents living at the facility. There were 4 residents present at the facility site during the inspection, but one left during the visit. LPA, accompanied by Licensee Legaspi, toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were also compliant: sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 116.2 degrees Fahrenheit; and sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 119.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff also had an assigned bathroom #3 and delivered hot water at 122.4 degrees Fahrenheit, and according to the Licensee, residents do not use the staff bathroom. There was a cautionary sign posted. The kitchen sink measured hot water at 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Licensee said the residents do not use the kitchen sink. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking, dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals or poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per licensee Victoria Legaspi, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and the facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present (02) but not serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and accessible. LPA interviewed staff and residents and reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 3 residents on the facility premise. The files which LPA reviewed required additional documents. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. LPA did leave the facility premise for approximately one hour duration, during the inspection to have their lunch break. There were deficiencies observed cited during today's comprehensive visit and may be reviewed on the LIC809-D page of this report. Due to unforeseen circumstances, LPA will need to conduct a continuation for this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Victoria Legaspi to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025

The state marks this report as 27 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction (POC) clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 04/02/2025, the Licensee was issued a deficiency regarding their expired Liability Insurance. At that time, Health and Safety Code, sections §1569.605 Liability insurance, was spoken with Licensee Legaspi and a hard copy provided to them. A POC was jointly developed with Licensee Legaspi with a due date of 4/16/25. During today’s visit, LPA requested a copy of their Liability Insurance Declaration page which Licensee was able to provide. Although, the POC was deemed cleared during today’s visit, a civil penalty was assessed for failure to correct was issued for the time elapsed between the due date of 4/16/25 and the time the POC was provided, 4/17/25. On 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024, the Licensee was issued civil penalties for a total of 6 deficiencies for Personnel Records, Resident Records, Medical Assessments and Reappraisals. During today's visit, the licensee was issued additional civil penalties as the deficiencies issued on 12/05/2024 and 12/06/2024, were not yet corrected. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), and copies of the LIC421's, were provided to Licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025
Apr 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance. LPA Lopez identified herself and was allowed entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. On 04/02/2025 the facility was issued a civil penalty (CP) due on 04/03/2025. During today’s visit, LPA confirmed that the CP was cleared on 04/09/2025. The CP was not cleared within the allotted time frame and had lapsed 5 days. New deficiencies were cited during today’s visit and may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee Victoria Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87761 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 10, 2025

87761 (b) Penalties: (b) Notwithstanding Section 87761(a) above, an immediate penalty of $100 per cited violation per day for a maximum of five (5) days shall be assessed if any individual required to be fingerprinted under Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) has not obtained a California clearance or a criminal record exemption, requested a transfer of a criminal record clearance or requested and be approved for a transfer of an exemption as specified in Section 87355 (e) prior to working, residing or volunteering in the facility… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on record review, a clearance was not obtained for T2 until after the due date for 1 of 2 individuals prior to residing at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025

Plan of correction: Cleared during today's visit.

Apr 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportOfficeDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Office

During an office visit with the Licensee, Victoria Legaspi, the San Diego Regional Manager (SDRM), Jerry Romero, Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Robyn Clark, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Carmen Lopez, provided this case management report for recurring issues at the facility. SDRM Romero, LPM Clark, and LPA Lopez identified themselves at the commencement of the visit. SDRM, LPM, and LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. During today’s visit at the San Diego Regional Office, SDRM, LPM, and LPA spoke with the Licensee regarding the chronic issues pending at their facility. Deficiencies were cited during today’s visit and may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted, a plan of correction was jointly developed, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22), were provided to Licensee Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2025

87355 (e)(3) Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review… shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility (3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance… this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on record review, interview, and observation, a criminal record clearance transfer was not obtained for 2 of 7 individuals prior to residing at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to submit transfer documentation to associate both tenants to their facility roster by POC due date, 4/03/2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87208 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 30, 2025

87208 Plan of Operation (a) (7)(B) The licensee shall… operate the facility in accordance with the… plan of operation… Any significant changes… shall be submitted to the licensing agency for approval... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the Licensee changed the use of facility space and did not submit the updated plan to the Department for approval.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to submit an updated plan of operation including but not limited to: a new facility sketch (LIC999), Personnel Report (LIC 500) and updates to ensure compliance with regulations effective January 1, 2025, by due date, April 30, 2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.605 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 16, 2025

§1569.605 Liability insurance; coverage requirements: On and after July 1, 2015, all residential care facilities for the elderly… shall maintain liability insurance… in the amount of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and three million dollars ($3,000,000) in the total annual aggregate, caused by the negligent acts or omissions to act of, or neglect by, the licensee or its employees... This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and interview, the Licensee did not have an updated liability insurance for the facility which posed a potential health and safety concern for 4 of 4 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to obtain a liability insurance quote and submit it to the Department by due date, April 16, 2025. Declaration page will be obtained once the insurance has been purchased and will be submitted to the Department by POC due date, 4/16/2025.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC1569.15 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 2, 2025

HSC §1569.15 License application; information required; change of information; penalties: (d) The information required… shall be provided to the department upon… licensure, and any change in the information shall be provided to the department within 30 calendar days… of that change. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not notify the Department of change in control of property in 2015, which posed a potential Health, Safety and personal Rights risk to 4 of 4 Residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025

Plan of correction: This citation was cleared during the time of the visit, on 4/2/2025, as the property's owner had submitted a copy of a lease for the rental property.

Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a health and safety check for residents in care. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility, spoke with residents and staff, and obtained records pertinent to this visit. LPA informed Licensee Legaspi that possible telephone calls or visits may be necessary to obtain further information. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025

20245 state visits · 5 documents

Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance and in conjunction conducted a health and safety check for clients in care. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 10/28/24, the facility was issued a deficiency regarding updated Administrator’s Certificate. During today’s visit, Licensee informed LPA that deficiency has not been corrected. Civil penalty is being issued for failure to correct and will be ongoing until corrected. No new deficiencies were issued today. Civil penalty issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024
Dec 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance and in conjunction conducted a health and safety check for clients in care. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 10/28/24, the facility was issued six deficiencies regarding updated Administrator’s Certificate, and incomplete staff and client files. During today’s visit, Licensee informed LPA that deficiencies have not been corrected.Civil penalties are being issued for failure to correct and will be ongoing until corrected. No new deficiencies were issued today. Civil penalties were issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024
Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Victoria Legaspi. According to the facility’s license, the facility is licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory clients. There was a total of four (4) residents in care. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each client bedroom. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. Hot water temperature was in compliance. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water on premises. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher and first aid kit present. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and reviewed multiple staff/client files. Staff files were not available for LPA review. Client files did not contain all required documents. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 809-D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2024
Mar 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit for a Plan of Correction clearance and in conjunction conducted a health and safety check for clients in care. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA met with Licensee Legaspi and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 11/01/23, the facility was issued four deficiencies regarding updated Insurance information, updated CPR training, updated Administrator’s Certificate, and the kitchen being unsanitary and free from rodents and vermin. During today’s visit, LPA inspected the kitchen area and observed that the facility was free from insects and vermin. Licensee had made a contract with a pest control company who renders services to the facility every three months. Licensee provided LPA with their invoices. As such, this deficiency is deemed to be cleared and corrected. Per Licensee Legaspi, the other deficiencies are pending. Based on the information obtained and review of the annual inspection, the facility is being recited during today’s inspection and citations may be reviewed on the attached LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview was conducted, a plan of correction was jointly developed, and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Licensee Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.605 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 1, 2024

On and after July 1, 2015, all residential care facilities for the elderly, except those facilities that are an integral part of a continuing care retirement community, shall maintain liability insurance covering injury to residents and guests in the amount of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and three million dollars ($3,000,000) in the total annual aggregate, caused by the negligent acts or omissions to act of, or neglect by, the licensee or its employees. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Licensee interview and record review of the facility file, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above for 5 out of 5 residents in care which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee will obtain liability insurance for the facility and submit a copy of their insurance to LPA by POC due date, 4/01/24.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC1569.618(c)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 1, 2024

(c) The facility shall employ, and the administrator shall schedule, a sufficient number of staff members to do all of the following: (3) Ensure that at least one staff member who has cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and first aid training is on duty and on the premises at all times. This paragraph shall not be construed to require staff to provide CPR. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review of the Licensee's CPR/First Aid certification, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above for 5 out of 5 residents which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee will make an appointment to obtain their CPR and first aid training. Licensee will submit a copy of their CPR/First Aid training to LPA by POC due date, 4/01/24.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87412(d) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 1, 2024

(d) The licensee shall maintain documentation that an administrator has met the certification requirements specified in Section 87406, Administrator Certification Requirements or the recertification requirements in Section 87407, Administrator Recertification Requirements. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Licensee interview and record review of the Administrator's Certificate, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above for 5 out of 5 residents which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee will be submitting payment to the Department as a last step to receive their certificate and submit a copy of their payment to LPA by POC due date, 4/01/24. Once Licensee receives their Administrator's Certificate they will submit a copy to LPA.

Jan 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is retaining a resident who requires a higher level of care. Licensee does not provide a comfortable temperature for resident. Resident has sores possibly due to neglect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding in the above mention complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Victoria S. Legaspi. During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that the Licensee was retaining a resident who requires a higher level of care. LPA Domingo observed 3 Residents at the facility. Resident 1 (R1) through Resident 3 (R3) (See LIC811 Confidential Names list), was observed ambulating without any assistance and able to communicate needs. R1 through R3 Physician's report was reviewed and the report accurately reflected R1 through R3 abilities to complete activities of daily living, ability to communicate and ambulate. [Continue on LIC9099C] Unsubstantiated [Continued from LIC9099] It was alleged that the Licensee does not provide a comfortable temperature for residents. LPA Domingo observed the temperature at 70 degrees Fahrenheit. R1 through R3 were interviewed and none of the Resident's had any complaints of the temperature of the facility being uncomfortable. Outside source 1 (OS1) was interviewed and there were no complaints with the temperature of the facility. It was alleged that a Resident has sores possibly due to neglect. Records were reviewed of residents at the facility and no residents had any documentation of sores. Interview with Staff 1 (S1) concurred with records that no residents have any sores. R1 through R3 were interviewed and verbalized they had no sores. Based on LPA's interviews, and record reviews there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee , to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20200923122416
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 11 documents

20235 state visits · 7 documents

Nov 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection continuation. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Legaspi. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) non-ambulatory elderly residents at any given time at the facility site. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census was three (3) residents living at the facility; of whom 3 were present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by the Licensee, toured the interior sections of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was cleaned and sanitized and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in a locked area. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors and facility telephone were all in working condition. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. First aid kit and handbook were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] LPA interviewed residents, and reviewed resident records. During today’s visit there were 3 residents on the facility premise. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. There were deficiencies observed during today's annual inspection. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, is being cited on the attached LIC9099-D. The report was discussed, a plan of correction was jointly developed, and an exit interview was conducted with Licensee Victoria Legaspi to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Licensee Legaspi to submit a current Personnel Report LIC 500, and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms available at www.ccld.ca.gov. A current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308 was submitted to the licensing office.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2023

The state marks this report as 17 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Nov 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

See LIC809 attached dated 11/01/23 for report summary.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2023

The state marks this report as 17 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Oct 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by Licensee Victoria Legaspi. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Legaspi. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) non-ambulatory elderly clients at any given time at the facility site. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census was four (4) residents living at the facility; of whom 4 were present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by the Licensee, toured the interior and exterior sections of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility needed to be cleaned and sanitized but was in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order, but needed to be sanitized. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. Due to unforeseen circumstances of the facility grounds and staff and resident documentation, an annual continuation was determined during the visit. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Victoria Legaspi to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Licensee Legaspi to submit a current Insurance Certificate, Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500 and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms available at www.ccld.ca.gov. A copy of Licensee’s Administrator Certificate will be submitted to LPA by 11/01/23the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023

The state marks this report as 17 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

May 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address drug activity at the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Victoria Legaspi, Administrator. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Victoria Legaspi, Administrator. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents and outside sources, and records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On May 1, 2023, it was alleged that the facility staff did not address drug activity at the facility. It was specifically alleged that resident #1 (R1, see LIC 811 for disclosure of resident name) obtained and used illegal drugs while in care of the facility. Interview with an outside source said that the resident disclosed using an illegal drug while residing at the facility. According to the outside source, the resident had obtained the illegal drug from another unidentified resident #2 (R2) while at the facility. Unsubstantiated Interview with staff said that they had not witnessed illegal substances being used at the facility. Interview with Licensee said they were aware R2 used illegal substances outside the facility but were unaware they used any illegal substance at the facility. According to Licensee, R2 walked to a nearby park and upon their return to the facility, R2 was observed as not at their baseline and in an altered state. Licensee said that R1 did not have issues that they were aware of with using illegal substances at the facility. A review of records revealed that R1 did use an illegal substance on or about April 28, 2023, and had elevated levels in lab results. Additional records showed that R1’s physical health status was extensive but did not have current substance abuse. Further records indicated that R1 did have substance abuse history. Records showed R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted. On May 9, 2023, LPA toured the facility with the Licensee and inspected the shared bedroom for R1 and R2. LPA did not observe any illegal substances or drug paraphernalia in R1 and R2’s bedroom. Based on the information obtained there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during staff, resident and outside source interviews, records reviewed, and LPA observations, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Administrator Victoria Legaspi. A copy of this report, Confidential Names list (LIC811), along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) was provided to Administrator Legaspi at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230501152520
May 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced case management visit at the facility. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Victoria Legaspi, Administrator. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the case management visit with Administrator Legaspi. During a complaint investigation, it was discovered that resident #1 (R1) would leave the facility unassisted. According to the R1’s Physician’s Report, R1 is not allowed to leave the facility unassisted. Per the Administrator, R1’s records need to be updated to reflect R1 is able to leave the facility unassisted. R1 returns to the facility that same day when R1 is out in the community. R1 is able to transport in the community on their own. Per Administrator, R1’s responsible party is aware and purchases their transportation pass. No deficiencies were cited during this visit, but a Technical Assistance (LIC9102) notice was provided to the Administrator. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Legaspi and a copy of this report, LIC 811 and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2023
May 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Carmen Lopez, conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and in conjunction conducted this Case Management visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by Victoria Legaspi, Administrator. LPA Lopez stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the basic elements of the visit with Victoria Legaspi, Administrator. During the visit it was discovered there were two incidents which transpired at the facility one on March 2, 2023, for resident #1 (R1 - See LIC811 Confidential Names list) and second incident transpired on April 28, 2023, for resident #2 (R2 – see LIC811 Confidential Names List) and needed to be reported to the Department. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility, briefly spoke with staff and residents, and requested and obtained resident records. LPA did obtain a copy of the incident reports while at the facility. Two technical advisories and one deficiency were given per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations (see LIC9102 and LIC809-D). This report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Victoria Legaspi, Administrator, to whom a copy of this report, Confidential Names list (LIC811), and the Licensee appeal Rights (LIC9058) were provided via email. An electronic email receipt confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(b) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2023

87355 (b) Criminal Record Clearance Prior to the Department issuing a license, the applicant, administrator and any adults other than a client, residing in the facility shall have a criminal record clearance or exemption. … this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews with staff and Administrator, Staff #1 (S1) did not have a background clearance. This posed a potential safety risk to 4 of 4 residents (R3, R4, R5, and R6) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator made an appointment for the individual to have fingerprints conducted for background clearance. Appointment was made for 5/9/23. A confirmation receipt will be submitted to LPA by POC due date 5/10/23.

Mar 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in a resident AWOL.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding in the above mention complaint allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Victoria Legaspi. On 10/24/22, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging lack of supervision resulting in a resident AWOL. During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff and outside sources. Based on Resident 1’s (R1) (Please see LIC811 confidential names list) Physician’s Report dated 03/01/23, R1 was deemed to not require continuous care, and had no cognitive deficits. In addition, R1’s Individual Care Plan dated 3/16/22, revealed R1 was (Continued on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated independent with dressing, eating and ambulatory without an assisted device. R1 was found by outside source 1 (OS1) and R1 was unable to communicate with OS1 due to language barrier. OS1 sought out communication services and was then able to communicate with R1. During the time frame of the report, R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted. Based on LPA's interviews with staff, outside source interviews, and record reviewed there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20221024162057

20223 state visits · 3 documents

Dec 15, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Licensee did not provide supervision to residents in care -Licensee did not provide daily diet to meet the residents needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud concluded the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility and met with Administrator, Victoria Legaspi. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not provide supervision to residents in care. It was reported the licensee was the only staff working on Sunday, 09/20/20 and left the facility from 8am-9pm, leaving the residents unsupervised. Licensee’s interview revealed she has never left the residents unsupervised. Licensee stated if she needed to leave the facility she would ensure there was staff coverage. Staff interviews revealed they do not work on the weekends, the licensee covers the weekend shift. Therefore, they were not present on 09/20/20. Staff also revealed the licensee would not leave the residents unsupervised, in their opinion. In addition, staff revealed residents did not complain or mention being left unsupervised. Resident interviews revealed they have not been left unsupervised, as staff and/or licensee are present. Outside source interviews revealed never witnessing the residents left unsupervised. Unsubstantiated It was also alleged the licensee did not provide a daily diet to meet the residents needs. It was reported that due to the licensee leaving the residents unsupervised on 09/20/20 from 8am-9pm, the residents did not receive any food during those hours. Resident interviews revealed they received their meals and have not had to go without food. Resident interviews revealed the kitchen is off limits to the residents. However, the kitchen is not locked and accessible to all. Licensee confirmed the kitchen is off limits to the residents for safety reasons. Anything the residents may need, staff or the licensee will provide it to the residents. Staff interviews revealed the kitchen is off limits to residents, but the kitchen is also accessible to all, as there is no lock or gate. Outside source interviews revealed the residents had access to the kitchen and were able to obtain food at any time. On 09/29/20, LPA observed sufficient perishable and non-perishable food items. LPA confirmed there are no gates or locks to the kitchen area, making it accessible to all. Based on observations and interviews conducted, the investigation revealed inconsistent statements and information obtained did not present a preponderance of evidence to support or corroborate the allegations. The allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Administrator, Victoria Legaspi whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200922132853
Oct 21, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall, conducted an unannounced Required 1 – Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA met with Victoria Legaspi, Administrator and we discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, both inside and outside. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA evaluated and observed the facility's implementation of their mitigation plan to include disinfection, testing surveillance, and screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited on this date. Technical advisory notes on wearing masks, and emptying trash bins daily were provided. An exit interview was conducted. The Licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC9058 03/22), along with a copy of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2022

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 24, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not assure facility has sufficient resources to meet operating costs for residents in care. Facility has no telephone. Licensing not notified of a notice of intent to terminate facility electricity.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above listed complaint allegations. LPA was met and granted entry into the facility by Licensee, Victoria Legaspi to whom was explained the reason for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of staff, and outside source interviews, record reviews and a virtual tour of the facility. It was alleged that the facility did not maintain sufficient resources to meet the facility's operating costs due to non-payment of the gas/electricity bill (SDGE). An interview with an outside source revealed on May 26,2020 Client1 (C1) was attending a medical appointment and disclosed the facility’s electricity and phone had been shut down for the past three days. C1 used another client's phone to make their re-occurring medical appointment. Unsubstantiated An interview with the Licensee revealed the electrical bill was consistently paid and up to date, however the facility was experiencing issues with their electrical panel causing intermittent outages in certain areas of the facility. The Licensee used alternative means to keep the facility operational. A facility tour revealed a back up refrigerator the perishable food had been transferred to, and emergency lighting if needed. The Licensee also revealed the outage was intermittent and only in certain areas of the facility. It was also alleged the facility did not have a landline available to clients in care. This was also due to technical issues beyond the Licensee's control during trying times. The Licensee revealed she allowed clients to use her personal cell phone if needed but most of the clients have their own phones. At the time COVID-19 made appointments to have an electrician come out to the facility difficult. On approximately June 1, 2020 the Licensee was able to have electricians come out and fix the panel. Since then the facility has never experienced another electrical issue. An interview with an outside source corroborated the facility had electrical issues, and the Licensee had the entire panel replaced two weeks prior. The outside source revealed the current electrical outage was due to a technical issue from the new installation in the left side of the panel that caused the outage. The outside source corroborated that on June 1, 2020 two electricians went to the facility and fixed the issue. A record review revealed no gaps in services due to non-payment, and proof of payment to the electricians was provided. In regards to the allegation regarding the Licensee failed to notify Licensing intent to terminate electricity, interviews with facility staff, outside sources and a record review the Licensee never intended to terminate the facility's electricity, and the electricity was intermittent and only in certain areas due to a technical issue. Due to lack of corroborating evidence, the findings regarding the above allegations were established to be unsubstantiated. This finding means although the allegation may have happened or could be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. LPA Correia conducted an exit interview with Licensee Legaspi. After the conclusion of the exit interview Licensee Legaspi was emailed a copy of the Complaint Investigation Report (LIC9099) and Licensee Rights (LIC9058 01-2016), and reply response via email confirms receipt of the reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200526141423

20211 state visit · 1 document

Oct 18, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA met with Administrator, Victoria Legaspi and we discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. LPA conducted a tour of the facility both inside and outside. LPA observed and interacted with clients in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA provided technical assistance, evaluated, and observed the facility's implementation of their mitigation plan to include disinfection, testing surveillance, and screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited on this date. The Licensee was provided a copy of her appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was emailed to the Administrator, Victoria Legaspi with an electronic read receipt as confirmation of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2021

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 19, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

Held this license

Legaspi, Victoria S., license first issued in 2005.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2005, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
34
Total complaints
3
Substantiated allegations
1
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
1

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2005, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations10
Substantiated allegations10
Total complaints30

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Tender Loving Care Guest Home

Is Tender Loving Care Guest Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Agency Initiated,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

How many residents is Tender Loving Care Guest Home licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Has Tender Loving Care Guest Home been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. Those records count 34 state visits over the same years.

Is Tender Loving Care Guest Home still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

What does Tender Loving Care Guest Home cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Among 198 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 198 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Tender Loving Care Guest Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Legaspi, Victoria S., per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Paradise Valley Hospital is 0.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Tender Loving Care Guest Home keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license.

Tender Loving Care Guest Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “TENDER LOVING CARE GUEST HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374602179. The state lists this license as “Closed, Agency Initiated,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by Legaspi, Victoria S., per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • 34 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. The same records count 34 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    National City · 0.5 mi

    Bliss Assisted Living & Memory Care

    Large community · licensed for 85

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    National City · 0.7 mi

    Paradise Valley Manor

    Large community · licensed for 50

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    National City · 0.8 mi

    Parkview Memory Care at Paradise Village

    Large community · licensed for 70

    Starting rate

    $7,800 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    National City · 0.7 mi

    Pacific Coast Assisted Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    National City · 0.7 mi

    Daleina's Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $4,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Diego · 0.9 mi

    Opalec Board and Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore San Diego County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
How we source information
Call number on file
Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages