Small home · Licensed for 6 · National City
VMB Ultimate Care
344 E 27th St, National City, CA 91950Licensed since 2004
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 25, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 25, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. FACILITY APPROVED FOR ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT AND TWO (2) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 25, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Diabetes care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 25, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for VMB Ultimate Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,500a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,500likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$4,100
- $3,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,500–$7,650
- $6,000
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,000
15 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,900–$5,800.
- Ideal Home CareNational City · 2.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Daleina's Home CareNational City · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Morningside ManorSan Diego · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sarasona Home CareBonita · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Royal Garden Guest HomeChula Vista · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Victoria Care HomeSan Diego · 3.1 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Faith VillaChula Vista · 3.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- A Caring Heart ResidenceChula Vista · 3.5 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Amariah Home CareChula Vista · 3.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Berland Home CareChula Vista · 3.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Warm Heart Senior LivingBonita · 3.8 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Archangel's Residential CareSan Diego · 4.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seniors Dignity Home and CareSan Diego · 4.1 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Chula Vista Home CareChula Vista · 4.2 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mayflower Home CareSan Diego · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Room types · Roll-in / accessible shower
Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Roll-in / accessible shower
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Trips outside the home
Activity types offeredActivities On-site
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (1)Transportation costs extra
Transportation costs extra
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
344 E 27th St, National City, CA 91950Address from the public record · October 25, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Paradise Valley HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 25, 2026 · License #374601936 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident care needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to House Manager Milagros Bucatcat. During today's visit, LPA observed residents in care, reviewed and obtained copies of facility records, and interviewed staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff did not meet resident care needs, specific to Resident 1 (R1) not being able to meet their financial needs. Review of R1’s medical assessment dated July 2025 revealed that R1 was diagnosed with a major neurocognitive disorder and was unable to manage their own cash resources but was able to communicate. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiated Interviews with outside sources revealed that there were concerns that R1 did not have a representative to assist R1 with managing R1’s financial and health care needs. Review of R1’s admission agreement dated June 2025 revealed that an individual was listed as R1’s responsible person, however, interviews revealed that the individual had not had contact with R1 for years and had no ability to assist with R1’s financial or health care needs. Interviews with staff and facility management provided conflicting information as they stated that the individual was R1’s responsible party and was responsible for handling R1’s finances. Facility management denied any issues with receiving payment from R1 or any concerns that R1, or any other residents, would be unable to pay for the facility’s basic services rate. Interviews with residents and outside sources did not reveal concerns regarding the care provided at the facility and did not disclose any difficulty with paying for the facility’s services. The Department was unable to interview R1 due to R1’s death in early August 2025. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250716114857
Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced case management visit to cite deficiencies. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to House Manager Milagros Bucatcat. Review of the Department’s Active Administrator List dated 9/16/2025 revealed that Virgil P. Bucatcat, who is the currently listed Administrator for the facility, did not have an active or pending renewal for an Administrator Certificate, and their latest Administrator Certificate expired in 2013. Additionally, Staff 1, [House Manager was provided with an LIC811 Confidential Names List to identify individuals] who was acting as a facility manager did not have active or pending renewal for Administrator Certificate. Review of an Administrator Certificate for Staff 2 revealed that S2 had an active Administrator Certificate for residential care facilities for the elderly, however, interviews confirmed that facility management had not submitted a Change of Administrator request to the Department. Additionally, Staff 1 stated during multiple conversations that only Residents 1 and 2 were receiving hospice services and Residents 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were not receiving hospice services. Staff 1 only provided LPA Borunda with hospice records for R1 and R2. However, interviews with outside sources and review of facility records revealed that Residents 1-7 were under the care of a hospice provider and were receiving hospice services. Residents 1-6 were all admitted to the facility at the same time, which placed the facility over their approved and pending hospice waiver requests. In 2013, the facility was originally approved to admit 2 hospice residents, however in 2022, the facility applied for a hospice waiver increase from 2 to 4 residents. Continued on LIC809-C page... Following a visit from the Department on 7/23/2025, S1 submitted a hospice waiver increase to 6 residents, which is still pending with the Department. Therefore the following deficiencies for lack of active Administrator, false claims, and over capacity for hospice residents are being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC809-D pages. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, the LIC811, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2025
87207 No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that S1 stated that only 2 of 6 residents were receiving hospice services, when it was actually 6 of 6 residents. This poses a potential person rights risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025
Plan of correction: House Manager will submit a written letter to the Department stating that S1 will be truthful when interacting with representatives from the Department and the LIC9098 Self Certification of Deficiencies Cleared to the Department by POC due date of 9/25/2025. LPA provided House Manager with LIC9098 Self Certification of Deficiencies Cleared.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87407(k)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2025
87407 (k) Whenever a certified administrator assumes… responsibility for administering a residential care facility for the elderly, he or she shall provide written notice, within thirty (30) days, to: (1) The local licensing office… This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that a written notice of S2 acting at the facility’s administrator was not submitted to the Department. This poses a potential safety risk to 5 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025
Plan of correction: House Manager will submit the LIC308, copy of S2's Administrator Certificate, and a written request to change the Administrator to S2 to the Department by POC due date of 9/25/2025. LPA provided House Manager with LIC308 and Change of Administrator Checklist.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87632(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 18, 2025
87632 (a) In order accept or retain terminally ill residents… the licensee shall have obtained a facility hospice care waiver from the Department… This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility was caring for 6 hospice residents without requesting an hospice waiver for 6 residents. This posed a potential health risk to 6 of 6 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025
Plan of correction: House Manager submitted a hospice waiver request for 6 residents after 7/23/2025, which the Department has received and is currently reviewing. DEFICIENCY CLEARED
Jul 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted a plan of correction (POC) visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit to House Manager Milagros Bucatcat. On 6/17/2025, the licensee was issued three deficiencies. Deficiency 87355(e)(2) had a POC due date of 6/18/2025 and deficiencies 87465(h)(2) and 87458(a) had POC due dates of 7/17/2025. On 6/18/2025, House Manager provided LPA with proof of correction for deficiency 87355(e). As of today’s date, 7/23/2025, the licensee has not submitted POC to the Department for deficiencies 87465(h)(2) and 87458(a). During today’s visit, LPA Borunda toured the facility, reviewed resident paperwork and staff training documents, and spoke with staff. House Manager stated that a new tenant was renting a room upstairs and provided LPA with background clearance and association paperwork, which LPA was able to confirm with the facility's Guardian Roster. Review of resident records revealed that each resident had a complete and signed medical assessment. House Manager stated staff will receive medication training on 7/25/2025 and provided LPA with training flyer. LPA observed a locked medication box in the refrigerator and observed that the medication cabinet was still unlocked. House Manager stated that they had already purchased the locks, which LPA verified, and their repair person was installing them tonight. LPA granted a POC extension for deficiency 87465(h)(2) until 7/28/2025 and informed House Manager to provide LPA with proof of lock installation and medication training as soon as completed. Therefore, the deficiencies 87355(e)(2) and 87458(a) are corrected. LPA provided House Manager with letters of Deficiency Cleared. LPA also provided LIC178 for POC extension. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, Letters of Deficiency Cleared, LIC178, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Ben Rosario. Manager Milagros Bucatcat arrived during the visit. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, reviewed facility records, observed residents in care, and spoke with staff. Review of resident records revealed that one resident did not have an initial medical assessment and multiple residents had medical assessments which were incomplete. During the tour of the facility, LPA observed multiple medications stored in the unsecured refrigerator in the kitchen as well as all resident medications stored in an unlocked cabinet in the facility kitchen. LPA spoke with Caregiver Rosario and Manager Bucatcat who stated that the kitchen is normally locked, however, LPA observed the facility kitchen door to remain open and unlocked for a majority of the visit. During the tour of the facility, LPA observed two individuals who Manager Bucatcat stated were not residents or staff. Manager Bucatcat stated that Tenant 1 (T1) was renting a room and Tenant 2 (T2) was their partner. LPA spoke with T1 and learned that T1 has been renting a room for 4.5 years and T2 has been at the facility approximately once a week for 4 months. LPA verified on Guardian that neither individual had active fingerprint clearance or association to the facility. [Manager was provided with an LIC811 Confidential Names List to identify residents, T1, and T2]. Continued on LIC809-C page... Due to time constraints, the annual inspection could not be completed and a return visit on a subsequent day is needed. LPA provided Manager Bucatcat with a copy of the facility's current Guardian roster, and written documentation regarding the facility's annual licensing fee balance and Administrator Certificate status of Licensee Virgil Bucacat. The following deficiencies were cited for incomplete medical assessments, unsecured medications, and non-cleared individuals and noted on the attached LIC809-D pages. Additionally, a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 was assessed for T1 and T2 not being finger print cleared and noted on the attached LIC421BG form. An exit interview was conducted with Manager Milagros Bucatcat, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, the LIC811, the LIC421BG, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alyssa Ramirez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Manage Milagros Bucacat. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, of which all may be non-ambulatory. There was a total of four (4) client in care. LPA, accompanied by staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. Hot water temperature was in compliance. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were present. Per staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher and first aid kit present. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff/clients and reviewed multiple staff/client files. The files which LPA reviewed contained all required documents. No deficiencies were cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Manager to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 3 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jan 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident eloped from facility resulting in serious injury Facility did not follow reporting requirements
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was met by House Manager, Milagros Bucatcat and was granted entry into the facility. Administrator, Virgil Bubcat joined the meeting via telephone as well as Acting Administrator, Martcela Marcelo and LPA shared the investigative findings. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, including medical and outside source records and interviews with staff and outside sources. On 07/23/21, it was alleged that a resident eloped from the facility which resulted in serious bodily injuries that required hospitalization. It was also alleged the elopement incident was not reported by the licensee to the Department as required. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on May 15, 2019. R1 had a primary diagnosis of a Major Neurocognitive Disorder (severe dementia) with agitation and mood swings. R1 also was diagnosed with and under treatment for hypertension and type-2 diabetes. A physician’s report dated 4/29/21 stated R1 was often confused and disoriented and medically evaluated as unable to leave the facility unassisted. Review of the resident’s pre-appraisal form dated 4/29/21 stated R1 was ambulatory but had an unsteady gait and could not stand for long without assistance. R1 had a known history of wandering behaviors and required close staff supervision and monitoring. (Continue at LIC9099C) Substantiated (Continue from LIC9099) Interviews and facility records revealed that on the afternoon of 07/23/21 R1 and a direct caregiver Staff #1 (S1) were outside smoking cigarettes on the facility front porch. S1 acknowledged during interview statements that they had been advised of R1’s prior elopements and knew R1 was not be left unsupervised. S1 admitted they left the resident alone for 10-15 minutes and went inside to use the bathroom. R1 was alone in an unsecured area of the facility that led directly out to the street. When S1 returned to the porch fifteen minutes later, at approximately 1:00 pm, R1 had left the facility unattended and was not in sight. S1 stated they advised the licensee, Staff #2 (S2) who was present at the facility and searched the immediate vicinity on foot but could not find the resident. When S1’s care shift ended at 6:00 pm in the evening, R1 had still not returned. After the elopement occurred, S2 drove around local streets looking for R1 but acknowledged that they did not call 911 to report the elderly resident as missing. During interview statements, S2 claimed that they attempted to call a non-emergency police number and later went to the local police station that evening but the station was closed. S2 did not leave a voice message or other form of communication to advise law enforcement of the elopement. The next day, 7/24/21, at approximately 8:00 am, the licensee notified R1’s responsible party and other family members of the elopement. A family member then immediately reported R1 as at-risk missing person to local police and advised them R1 had been missing for nearly 24 hours. At approximately 5:45 pm on the evening of 7/24/21, community members found R1 lying injured in a drainage ditch. The open ditch was located down a 20-foot sloped embankment in an empty construction lot several blocks away from the facility. A review of medical and outside source records confirmed that R1 was assessed with serious injuries including a badly fractured ankle, severe dehydration, and a black eye. R1 also had multiple bruises, abrasions and skin tears on their upper and lower extremities from falling into the ditch and a stage 2 pressure injury on their hip. The acute pressure injury was diagnosed as caused by R1 lying immobile for a prolonged period in one position. Medical records noted the resident was “covered in ants and dried feces” and was observed as confused, disoriented and expressing acute pain due to their injuries. R1 required immediate surgery for the ankle fracture and was hospitalized for five days, then discharged to a post-acute care skilled nursing facility. (continue at LIC9099C) (Continue from LIC9099) During investigative interview statements, both S1 and S2 admitted that they knew this resident had a history of previous elopements: R1 had previously gone missing twice from their facility, most recently on 9/7/20 and was brought back by police each time, after neighbors observed the resident wandering away and called local law enforcement. Outside source records revealed that during a subsequent interview, the licensee stated they “did not think it was necessary to call 911” and decided to “wait and see” if the resident would return on their own. Licensee and staff statements also confirmed that they knew the resident had a medical diagnosis of severe cognitive impairment and required close supervision to prevent elopement risk. Based on multiple staff and outside source interviews and review of documentation including medical records, the allegations are substantiated. This Department has investigated the allegations noted above. The Department has found that based upon records review and interviews gathered during the investigation, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Therefore, these allegations are deemed substantiated. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 is being assessed today and per Health and Safety Code Section 1569.49, an additional civil penalty assessment is under review by the Program Administrator of the Community Care Licensing Division.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210804110059
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 21, 2023
87464(f)(1) - Elopement resulting in serious bodily injury. Basic Sercices shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). "Care and supervision" means the facility assumes responsibility for, or provides ...., ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Interviews and record reviews showing staff left R1 unassisted on 7/23/21, resulting in elopement with serious bodily injury and hospitalization. This posed an immediate safety risk to one of six residents in care. Immediate CP of $500 assessed todaythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to conduct training by an outside source on elopements/absent without leave (AWOL), supervision for residents in care. This training will be scheduled by 2/3/2023 and trainings will be completed by POC date of 2/21/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 21, 2023
87211(a)(D) Reporting Requirements - Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Interviews and records review showing licensee did not report the elopement of R1 to local licensing as required. This posed an potential safety risk to one of six residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to conduct training by an outside source on reporting requirements. This training will be scheduled by 2/3/2023 and trainings will be completed by POC date of 2/21/2023.
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - COVID-19Report on file
Type of visit: Case Management - COVID-19
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an announced Case Management visit, accompanied by nurse contractor Elizar Perez from the Healthcare Associated Infection (HAI) team of San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency. LPA and HAI nurse were welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with administrator-on-duty Milagros Bucatcat. The Department conducted the on-site visit to provide technical assistance and to evaluate the facility's COVID-19 screening, testing, and disinfection processes and the staff’s use of personal protective equipment. During the visit, LPA and HAI nurse briefly toured the facility, interacted with staff, and interviewed Bucatcat. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Bucacat, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2022
Jun 2, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with caregiver Daisy Arcal. LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility and observed the staff and residents in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control program, LPA provided technical assistance and observed and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan, to include disinfection, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Arcal. A copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided to Arcal and the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2022
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the September 18, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Bucatcat, Virgil P., licensed since 2004.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2004, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2004, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about VMB Ultimate Care
Is VMB Ultimate Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
How many residents is VMB Ultimate Care licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Has VMB Ultimate Care been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is VMB Ultimate Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does VMB Ultimate Care cost?
$3,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 197 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,125 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 197 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does VMB Ultimate Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Bucatcat, Virgil P., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Paradise Valley Hospital is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can VMB Ultimate Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
VMB Ultimate Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VMB ULTIMATE CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374601936. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- Licensed to Bucatcat, Virgil P., per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 6, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 25, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,910 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County