Mid-size home · Licensed for 30 · Escondido
Country Club Guest Home
25533 Rua Michelle, Escondido, CA 92026Licensed since 1989
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 30: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 18 residents
- Hospiceup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES THIRTY (30) ELDERLY CLIENTS AGE 60 YEARS AND ABOVE; EIGHTEEN (18) NONAMBULATORY AND TWELVE (12) AMBULATORY. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR ONE (1)
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Diabetes care
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Country Club Guest Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,500a month to start
Likely $3,550–$5,900
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,500likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,550–$5,900
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$6,050
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$9,150
- $7,000
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $8,000
11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$7,900.
- Villa Monticello Assisted LivingEscondido · 0.4 mi · Mid-size home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Elite Manor MelbourneEscondido · 1.1 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Elite Senior LivingEscondido · 1.2 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Silver Tree VillaEscondido · 1.5 mi · Small home$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Diamond Care RCFEEscondido · 1.6 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sapphire SunsetEscondido · 1.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Alta View ManorEscondido · 2.1 mi · Small home$5,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Champine ManorEscondido · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Country Rose Estate Memory CareSan Marcos · 2.5 mi · Mid-size home$3,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Weaver's Twin Oaks VillaSan Marcos · 2.9 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Twin Oaks ManorSan Marcos · 3.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (2)Room types · Common areas
Room typesStudio
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Common areasIndoor Common Areas
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (1)Meals provided
Meals provided
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Religious services off site
Activity types offeredActivities On-site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
25533 Rua Michelle, Escondido, CA 92026Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Palomar Ucsd Medical Center EscondidoHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #372004630 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 9 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 4 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 8/26/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kyle Wellington arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Julita "Julie" Ramirez, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The census at the facility is 25 residents. LPA received a resident and staff roster from Licensee. LPA toured the inside and outside of the facility with Manager, Kevin Ramirez. LPA conducted an observation and record review for the inspection. Facility Overview: Facility is a two story building with 20 resident bedrooms, 13 resident bathrooms, office, kitchen, dining room, laundry room, two (2) commons areas and storage room. There are no pools, bodies of water or firearms at the facility. Facility has a fire clearance for eighteen (18) non-ambulatory elderly adults and twelve (12) ambulatory elderly adults. Hospice waiver was granted to the facility for one (1) resident. Infection Control: LPA observed hand sanitizers and soap dispensers throughout the facility. Cleaning equipment and supplies were kept in the locked laundry room and available for regular facility maintenance. Extra laundry and cleaning supplies were located in the storage room. LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan which met the department’s requirements. Physical Plant: LPA observed the inside and outside of the facility to be clean, safe and well kept. The commons areas and dining room furniture was in good repair. The residents' bedrooms and bathrooms were well maintained. The residents’ bedrooms contained the required bedding, lighting and furniture. Bathrooms had soap, automatic hand dryers, grab bars and non-slip mats in the showers. Extra linen and towels were kept in a closet in the hall. Laundry equipment appeared to be in good working condition. Laundry supplies were kept in the locked laundry room. Fire extinguishers were charged and last inspected on 2/19/26. Facility has smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and a pull system fire alarm. The wrap around deck and backyard area was free of hazards and contained outdoor furniture and shaded area for residents. Kitchen/Food Service: LPA observed the kitchen to be clean, organized, and well maintained. The kitchen had the ability to prepare and store food in a safe and clean environment. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in good working condition. All sharp objects were kept in a locked cabinet under a kitchen sink inaccessible to residents. Cleaning supplies were kept in a locked cabinet under a kitchen sink inaccessible to residents. Facility has over a two day supply of perishable foods and over a seven day supply of non-perishable foods. Care and Supervision: LPA observed four (4) staff and 24 residents at the facility. One (1) resident was away from the facility at the time of the visit. Facility has sufficient staff to supervise the residents. Administration: LPA observed facility sketch, personal rights, emergency disaster plan, emergency phone numbers, complaint procedures, long-term care ombudsman information, and facility license posted in the dining room. Licensee holds a current Administrator Certificate, CPR/First Aid Certificate and a Criminal Record Clearance. Resident & Staff Records: LPA reviewed the records of five (5) resident files and three (3) staff files. Staff present have CPR/First Aid Certificate, criminal record clearance and are associated with the facility. The files contained all the required documentation and paperwork. The staff and resident files were kept in a cabinet in the locked office inaccessible to unauthorized individuals. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: LPA observed clients' medications were centrally stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen inaccessible to residents. First aid kit was kept in a locked cabinet in the kitchen and it contained all the required items. LPA reviewed five (5) residents' medications to the facility’s medication log to make sure all medication was accounted for and dispensed correctly. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan. It is current and up to date. Fire drills are done quarterly and was last completed on 8/4/26. Facility's property and liability insurance is current and expires on 8/17/27. All facility exits had signage and were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with the Licensee, Julita Ramirez, and a copy of this report was given to Licensee, Julita Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2026
Feb 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is being financially abused by licensee.
On 02/11/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the above allegation. LPA Richard met with the Administrator Julie Ramirez, and the purpose of this visit was explained. LPA toured the facility. The investigation included the following: On 12/14/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kathleen Banrasavong visited the facility to begin the investigation into the allegations listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Julie Ramirez. The LPA also interviewed the caseworker (CW) regarding the Assisted Living Waiver Program. On 02/11/2026, LPA reviewed and requested the following documents: the residents roster and the staff roster. LPA reviewed and requested Residents #1-5, Admissions Agreement, and Physicians' Reports. LPA also requested and obtained the following documents for Resident #1 (R1): Residents' Appraisals, Needs & Services, and copies of 7 Social Security checks, a handwritten note, and the signature of R1. LPA interviewed five residents (R1-R5), four Staff members (S1-S4), and the Administrator (A1). Unsubstantiated Allegation: Resident is being financially abused by the licensee. The complaint alleged that the Administrator brought Social Security checks to the resident at a skilled nursing facility for signature and did not return to deliver the funds to R1. On February 11, 2026, at 11:00 AM, LPA Richard interviewed the administrator (A1), who denied the allegation. A1 stated R1 moved into the facility on 12/08/2022 and that R1's Social Security benefits did not start until 05/1/2023. R1 moved out of the facility on 07/31/2023. R1 still owed the facility back payments for the five months preceding the move-in date. On 12/16/2023, A1 visited R1's residence, had R1 sign the checks for the back rent, and gave R1 the remaining funds after all rent was paid. On February 11, 2026, at 11:55 AM, LPA Richard interviewed four staff members #1-4, (S1-S4). All four denied the allegation, stating they are not involved in managing residents' personal funds and P&I; they only assist residents with shopping, and residents control their own money. Later, at 12:15 PM the same day, LPA interviewed five residents (R2-R6). All five denied any issues with their money. Residents R2, R3, and R4 stated that the payee deposited the funds into their respective bank accounts. On 12/16/2023, LPA interviewed the Case Worker (CW), who denied the allegation and explained that the resident stayed at the facility and was not paying full rent due to SSI being in limbo. CW also stated that R1 owes the facility back pay. CW added that this ALW has ceased because R1 has not been residing at the Country Club Guest Home since June 2023. Report Continued on LIC9099C On February 11, 2026, LPA Richard examined R1’s records, which showed seven copies of Social Security checks and a letter explaining the breakdown of the start of benefits. LPA also reviewed a handwritten note and signature of R1 receiving extra money from A1 for 2022 and 2023. Additionally, copies of the returned checks were sent to the Department of the Treasury because R1 no longer lives at the facility. LPA was unable to interview R1 because R1 moved out of the facility on 07/31/2023. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator, Julie Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026 · control 18-AS-20231208140426
Feb 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is being financially abused by licensee.
On 02/11/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard investigated the above allegation. LPA Richard met with the Administrator Julie Ramirez, and the purpose of this visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: During today’s visits, LPA toured the entire facility. On 02/11/2026, LPA reviewed and requested the following documents: residents roster and staff roster. LPA reviewed five Residents #1-5 (R1-R5) Admissions Agreement, Physicians' Reports, and Medication records. LPA also requested and obtained the following documents for Resident #1 (R1): Residents' Appraisals, Needs & Services, and two checks from DBA Senior Impact. LPA interviewed five residents (R1-R5), four staff members (S1-S4), and the Administrator (A1). Report continued on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Resident is being financially abused by the licensee. The complaint alleged that the residents (R1) had not received a check from the licensee for a couple of years. On February 11, 2026, at 11:00 AM, LPA Richard interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation. A1 stated that DBA Senior Impact sends two $15 checks to the facility address in R1's name. A1 assisted R1 in going to the check-cashing location on Fig Street in Escondido to cash the check. After R1 cashed the check, the facility is not responsible for how R1 uses that money. A1 also mentioned that after the complaint was filed, A1 contacted the payee, who subsequently helped R1 with the supplemental check. On February 11, 2026, at 11:55 AM, LPA Richard interviewed four staff members #1-4 (S1-S4). All four denied the allegation and stated that they are not involved in managing residents' personal funds and P&I; they only assist residents with shopping, and residents control their own money. Later, at 12:15 PM the same day, LPA Richard interviewed five residents (R1-R5). All five denied experiencing any issues with their money. Residents R2, R3, and R4 stated that the payee deposited the money into their bank accounts. R1 also mentioned that their social workers are currently assisting them with cashing their checks. On February 11, 2026, LPA Richard examined R1’s records, which showed two checks from Senior Impact for $15 each, dated February 1, 2022, and August 1, 2023. The facility has stopped receiving the R1 supplement check from Senior Impact. Report Continued on LIC9099C Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator Julie Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026 · control 18-AS-20230710110439
20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 8/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Julita "Julie" Ramirez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The facility has a fire clearance to serve 12 ambulatory and 18 non-ambulatory elderly residents. The facility also has an approved hospice waiver for one (1) and LPA was informed none of the current residents residing in the facility are on hospice. LPA toured the facility with Administrative Assistant (AA), Kevin Ramirez. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. Indoor and outdoor pathways were free of obstruction. The facility had a two-day supply of perishable foods and seven-day supply of non-perishable food items. Medications are secured in locked kitchen cabinets. AA Ramirez tested one (1) of the smoke alarms/carbon monoxide detectors and LPA heard it to be operational. LPA also observed charged fire extinguishers mounted throughout the facility that were last serviced on 2/26/2025. The facility's certificate of liability insurance expires on 8/17/2026. Staff present have a criminal record clearance and are associated with the facility. Resident files reviewed had the required records. LPA reviewed the facility's Fire Drill Log noting their last fire drill was conducted on 6/6/2025. Long Term Care Ombudsman's contact information, residents' personal rights, grievance procedures, facility sketch, and emergency names and phone numbers are visibly posted in the dining room. During today's visit, LPA did not observe any issues or concerns. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Licensee Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff are financially abusing resident
On 12/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to deliver investigative findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Caregiver, Victoria Matthews who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Julie Ramirez was contacted over the phone and also informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Staff 1 (S1) accompanied Resident 1 (R1) to the bank to withdraw $5,000.00 in July 2024 to pay their rent balance and R1 may be getting financially abused by the facility. LPA reviewed R1's Physician Report (LIC602A) dated 8/17/2023, which indicates R1 does not have the capacity to manage their own cash resources. LPA reviewed R1's admission agreement dated 3/1/2015 noting R1 is responsible for themselves, and the facility will maintain and supervise R1's cash resources. Unsubstantiated The admission agreement also notes R1 pays the standard Supplemental Security Income monthly rate for basic services which is currently $1,398.07. S1 was interviewed and reported they safeguard R1’s checkbook in the staff office and R1 writes their own checks. S1 explained R1 pays their monthly rent using paper checks and ran out of checks in May 2024, which resulted in R1 not paying their rent for three (3) months. S1 explained the facility did not realize R1 had not paid their rent until July 2024. S1 reported they informed R1 and R1 requested S1 accompany them to the bank to withdraw money to pay the rent in cash. S1 reported R1 withdrew money and paid the rent balance in cash. R1 was interviewed and corroborated the information provided by S1 and reported they withdrew more than the rent owed, paid the rent balance to the facility in cash, and kept the remaining money on their person, which they recall was approximately $240.00. R1 reported they do not have a reason to suspect S1 or any other facility staff are financially abusing them and did not express any concerns with the care and supervision they currently receive at the facility. LPA reviewed R1’s bank statements noting $4,420.00 was withdrawn on 7/3/2024. LPA conducted a record review and noted the facility documented R1 withdrew cash and paid the rent balance on 7/3/2024. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and this report was reviewed with Licensee Ramirez over the phone and a copy of this report was provided to Caregiver Matthews along wiht a Confidential Names list (LIC 811).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240814162626
Nov 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff physically and emotionally abused resident
On 12/16/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to deliver amended investigative findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Caregiver, Victoria Matthews who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Licensee, Julie Ramirez was contacted over the phone and also informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) was being physically and emotionally abused by Staff 1 (S1) and R1 sustained multiple bruises on their forearm and back of leg. It was not described how R1 is allegedly emotionally abused. LPA toured the facility, made a collateral visit, conducted resident, staff, and witness interviews and obtained copies of pertinent documentation. LPA made a collateral visit to R1's day program and observed R1 with multiple bruises on their forearms and back of leg. A witness interview conducted revealed R1 has been observed at day program with bruises on their forearms since 2023 but the day program did not suspect abuse from facility staff. Information gathered during an interview with R1 did not refute nor corroborate the allegation. LPA attempted to conduct an interview with R1's roommate, however they refused to be interviewed. *This is an amended version of the original report. Unsubstantiated Two (2) facility staff were interviewed and reported they have never observed S1 abuse R1 or any other resident. S1 was interviewed and reported they have never hit or abused R1. Licensee Ramirez was interviewed and reported R1 receives home health services at the facility twice per week. LPA contacted the home health agency who reported due to R1's diagnosis, R1 sustains substantial bruises with minor contact, including when receiving transfer assistance. The home health agency added they do not suspect R1 is being abused by facility staff and there are no concerns with the type of care and supervision R1 is receiving at the facility. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Staff physically and emotionally abused resident". Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and this report was reviewed with Licensee Ramirez over the phone and a copy of this report was provided to Caregiver Matthews along with a Confidential Names list (LIC 811). *This is an amended version of the original report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241113162414
Nov 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 11/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to address a deficiency discovered during investigation of complaint control number 18-AS-20241113162414. LPA met with Licensee, Julie Ramirez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, Staff 1 (S1) was interviewed and reported on several occasions, they have physically showered Resident 1 (R1) after R1 verbalized their refusal to shower. S1 reported R1 attends day program and they believed R1 was required to shower on their scheduled shower days. Licensee Ramirez reported the facility does not currently document resident shower refusals. S1 also reported they gave R1 the option to shower or stay home from day program. The facility will be cited. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Licensee Ramirez along with Confidential Names list (LIC 811) and Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 22, 2024
(3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. Based on interviews conducted, S1 showered R1 on several ocassions despite R1 verbalizing their refusal to shower. This poses a potential personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee reported they will conduct an in-service staff training regarding residents' personal rights and develop a log to document residents' shower refusals. Proof of correction to be submitted to LPA by POC due date.
Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident a statement of fees or payments
On 12/27/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver amended findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Caregiver, Claras Aguas who was informed of the of the purpose of the visit. LPA communicated with Licensee, Julie Ramirez over the phone who was also informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged the facility is managing Resident 1's (R1's) finances and did not provide them with receipts or statements of fees. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews and obtained copies of pertinent records. LPA reviewed R1's Physician's Report (LIC602A) dated 8/17/2023, which indicates R1 does not have the capacity to manage their own cash resources. LPA also reviewed two (2) Resident Appraisals (LIC603s) for R1 dated 3/1/2015 and 6/14/2019, which list assistance with managing cash resources as a service needed. LPA reviewed R1's admission agreement dated 3/1/2015, which also indicates the facility will maintain and supervise R1's cash resources. R1's checkbook is safeguarded by Administrator, Kevin Ramirez in the staff office. Administrator, Melanie Cuaresma corroborated this information. *This is an amended version of the original report Substantiated Administrator Cuaresma was interviewed and reported the facility manages R1's finances and has never provided R1 with receipts for cash resources or monthly rent paid to the facility. Administrator Cuaresma reported the facility keeps a record of R1's safeguarded cash resources and was unaware they had to provide R1 with receipts. R1 was interviewed and reported their finances are managed by the facility and they have not received receipts for rent paid or statements of fees. Based on LPA’s interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Cuaresma along with a Confidential Names List (LIC811) and Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240814162626
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(b) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
87217(b) The licensee shall give the residents receipts for all such articles or cash resources. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: A complaint investigation revealed the facility was managing R1's finances and providing them with receipts for monthly rent or cash resources. This poses a potential health/safety/personal rights to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024
Plan of correction: During LPA's visit, Administrator Cuaresma had a physical receipt book, featuring a white originals and canary duplicates, delivered to the facility. Administrator stated the facility will provide R1 with the original white receipt and keep the canary duplicate for their records. Administrator also stated the facility will use the Department's LIC405 form in place of their log. POC met.
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 08/08/24 at 8:45am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a 1 year required visit/annual inspection. LPA George met with Licensee/Administrator Julie Razmirez and informed her of the purpose of today's visit. The facility is licensed to serve (30) Elderly clients age 60 years and above (18) non ambulatory and (12) ambulatory. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for (1), with (0) resident's receiving hospice services. Below is a summary of what was observed during today’s inspection: Infection Control: LPA George observed that the facility has an updated Infection Control Plan on file and is demonstrating best practices in the facility to maintain a healthy environment for staff and residents. The facility was observed to have an adequate supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies. Physical Plant: LPA toured the interior and exterior of the facility and observed that there a sufficient bedrooms (24) and bathrooms (12) for client use. The facility was observed to have the required furniture and linen to be present and in good condition in resident bedrooms. The exits are not obstructed and that there is plenty of space for activities. There is an activities calendar posted on the white board. There are no pools or bodies of water on the premises. Staff Records: LPA observed that there are sufficient staff present to meet the needs of clients. LPA George additionally confirmed that there is an Administrator present with a valid certificate that expires April 2025. LPA observed for staff present to have criminal record clearance and were associated to the facility and have training to perform their required duties. Staff present at have current CPR/First Aid Certification. In addition LPA verified facility contact information was up to date. Resident Records: A review of (3) client files including Physician's Report, Admissions Agreement, and current Needs & Services Plan. The client's are assisted with cashing their checks, and are responsible for there money thereafter therefore no Personal and Incidental funds were reviewed during today's inspection. Food Services: The kitchen and dining area to be maintained in a clean and healthful manner. The facility was observed to have sufficient dishware and silverware were present for resident’s use. There were graham crackers, cereal, fruit cups and 2 bottles of salad dressing, that were observed to have expired. The items were discarded at the time of LPAs visit, therefore no citations were issued. LPA observed the facility to have the required amount of 7 day supply non-perishable and a two supply perishable food items. Medication: Resident medication was observed to be locked in the medication storage and inaccessible to residents. A review of medication revealed that the medication is being given as prescribed as evidenced by the Medication Authorization Record (MAR) and medication (bubble packs). Emergency Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan on file and conducts regular disaster drills on a quarterly basis. The last drill was conducted on 06/12/24, the next drill is due this month. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and were found to be operable. The facility has (4) fully charged fire extinguishers. There are no known guns or ammunition on the premises. The hot water was tested and was found to be within regulatory limit measuring at 108-111 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility has emergency food and water supply. The sharps and hazardous chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to clients in care. Based on today's inspection no deficiencies/citations were issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, were provided to Licensee/Administrator Julie Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 7 documents
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yell at residents Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Co-Administrator Kevin Ramirez and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Staff yell at residents", it was alleged that Staff #1(S1) yells at the residents. Five (5) of nine (9) residents interviewed reported either having been yelled at by S1 or observing S1 yelling at a resident. Five (5) staff of five (5) staff interviewed denied ever yelling at a resident, observing a staff yell at a resident, or hearing of a staff yelling at a resident. Regarding the allegation "Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents", it was alleged that foods are served cold when they should be hot. Five (5) of nine (9) residents interviewed reported foods such as burritos, pizza, oatmeal, pasta, sausages, quesadillas, soup, grilled cheese sandwiches, and chili are often served cold. Five (5) of five (5) staff interviewed denied food is served cold or every hearing of complaints about food being served cold. Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. (CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C) Substantiated (CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099) California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names list and Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230215123217
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 14, 2023
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities- (a)Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requiremet was not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not ensure residents' dignity was maintained. Based on interviews conducted, 5 of 9 residents reported S1 yells at residents. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will retrain all staff on the importance of maintaining the personal rights of all residents. Proof of training to be submitted to CCL by 5 PM 9/14/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(9) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 22, 2023
General Food Service Requirements-(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (9)Procedures which protect the safety, acceptability...of food shall be observed in food...service. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not ensure food service requirements were met. Based on interviews conducted, 5 of 9 residents reported food is often served cold. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will retrain food prep staff to ensure food is served at apporopriate temperatures. Proof of training to be submitted to CCL by 5PM 9/22/2023
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Illegal Eviction
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced at the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Co-Administrator (Co-AD) Kevin Ramirez and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Illegal eviction", it was alleged that due to nonpayment of rent, Resident #1(R1) was given a handwritten notice of eviction without 30 days’ notice. Interview with Licensee Julie Ramirez revealed R1 was provided a written 30-day notice to evict on 4/20/2023 for nonpayment of rent in its entirety for the months November 2022, January 2023, February 2023, March 2023, and April 2023 which was in violation of the terms of the admission agreement. Review of R1's admission agreement revealed R1 agreed to the terms of the admission agreement as evidenced by thier signature. Records reviewed also indicated a copy of R1's 30-day eviction notice was also emailed to R1's care coordinator on 4/20/2023. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Illegal eviction". We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names list. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230525141314
Aug 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 08/29/23 at 2:30 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheryl Goodrich arrived to conduct an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with Caregiver Clara Aguas at the front door and was granted entry. The Administrator, Julita Ramirez arrived at 3:06 p.m. The purpose of today’s visit is to inspect the facility to ensure that the facility is following California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6. Facility is approved for thirty (30) ambulatory residents, having 23 residents in care. Infection Control: The facility has an approved infection control plan and a surplus of supplies for infection control including but not limited to mask, gloves, gowns, first aid kit, and cleaning supplies. Physical Plant and Environmental Safety: There are a total of 24 resident bedrooms, and 10 bathrooms, a kitchen, living room, office area, backyard area with furniture for residents and staff. All rooms, living room, office area, kitchen and dinning room are all clean and clear of obstruction. The resident bedrooms were clean and clear from obstruction. The resident’s rooms were complete with and clean linens and bedding, dresser, and closet space. The bathroom water temperature read at 108.2 degree. Operational Requirements: The facility was staffed with 3 caregivers. The facility meets the operational requirements for an RCE and has a current fire clearance for the facility, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and fire extinguisher. (Continued on LIC809-C) (Continued from LIC809) Personnel Records-Training: All staff have fingerprint clearances, current CPR/First Aid certification, Health screen and TB test completed. All staff complete monthly in-service training and fire-drills and disaster training. Client Records-Incident Reports: The resident records are complete with pre-assessments, admissions agreement, physician reports, identification and emergency information, , house rules, medication log, daily logs of the resident’s health condition, and additional medical assessments. Client Rights-Information: The resident’s right documentation is present. The resident records also contain needs assessment information for each resident. Food Service: 7-day non-perishable and 2 day of perishable food supply was observed, and all food was properly stored and available to residents. Health- Related Services: The caregivers at the facility are dispensing medications within the guidelines of the physician’s order and the regulations. The facility is documenting the date and time of the dispensing of medication for each resident. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has a disaster plan and has posted the evacuation plan, visible for staff and residents in care. The last fire drill was completed 08/02/23. The facility has emergency supply of food and water. Summary: Based on today's visit, no deficiencies were observed at this time. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Julita Ramirez and a copy of this report was printed Signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2023
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 1, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Violation of Personal Rights
Licesning Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to initate an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Caregiver Juanario Payumo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with Licensee/Administrator Julie Ramirez via telephone regarding Resident #1(R1). Ramirez reported R1 no longer resides at the facility. Ramirez reported R1 moved out of the facility in October 2022 and believed R1 now resides at a facility located in Lemon Grove. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Violation of Personal Rights". We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names List. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2022 · control 18-AS-20221122132324
Oct 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportCollateralReport on file
Type of visit: Collateral
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Ramon Serrano, conducted an unannounced collateral visit as a follow-up for an unrelated complaint investigation for another facility. LPA was allowed entry by Clara Aguas and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Julita Ramirez. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews with staff members. An exit interview was conducted with Julita Ramirez and copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9098, 01/16) was provided to Julita Ramirez whose signature below verifies receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2022
Aug 11, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conduct an annual inspection with emphasis on infection control. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Kevin Ramirez and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility has submitted an Infection Control Plan as required. During the inspection, LPA interviewed Ramirez regarding the facility's infection control measures and inspected the facility for regulatory compliance. LPA observed appropriate postings at the facility front entrance, including COVID-19 symptoms postings, which were in accordance with the Department's guidelines. LPA observed that the facility was also equipped with sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning/disinfecting provisions, and a supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). LPA observed facility staff wearing appropriate face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead person/infection preventionist who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring staff are trained in the facility's infection control procedures, and ensuring infection control measures are implemented. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolation, and properly caring for residents and staff with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident's physician, emergency personnel, and responsible party in the event the resident presents with any COVID-19 symptoms. No deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Jun 29, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Adam Hamer conducted an unannounced annual required licensing inspection at the facility on today's date. LPA was greeted at the front door by Caregiver Juanario Yambao Payumo and was granted entry after identifying himself and disclosing the purpose of the visit. Administrator Julie Ramirez later arrived and met with LPA. An overall tour of the facility was conducted inside and out. The inspection included, but was not limited to, verifying compliance with statutes, regulations and other written requirements that are most relevant to protecting the health of residents in care and staff, including in the area of infection control practices. LPA reviewed the facility’s Plan for Epidemic Outbreak Specific to COVID-19 Mitigation Plan Report (LIC 808) with Ms. Ramirez including the following sections: Person in Care, Staff, Visitors, Facilities without COVID-19, Residents, Facility has Plans for Infection Control, and Physical Distancing. LPA assessed the strategies that the facility is employing for the prevention, containment and mitigation of COVID-19, implementation of infection control guidance, staff retention and essential health and safety. LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; routine symptom screening initiated at entry for staff, residents and visitors; a sign-in policy enacted for all visitors; signs posted at facility entrance with the facility’s visitor policy and signs throughout the facility to promote hand hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette and physical distancing; face coverings worn by staff and residents as much as possible; hand sanitizer/hand washing stations readily available; a designated visitation area; emergency agencies’ contact information posted in a location visible to staff and residents; and an adequate supply of PPE. The facility is in compliance with and has implemented infection control practices as outlined in its LIC 808. No deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Ms. Ramirez and a copy of this report along with the Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 FAS 01/16) was emailed to her via the email address she provided to LPA; she expressed that she would send a confirmation to LPA upon receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2021
27 of 30 beds were occupied at the February 11, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Ramirez, Julita E. and Randy M., licensed since 1989.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1989, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 16
- Total complaints
- 7
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1989, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 7 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Country Club Guest Home
Is Country Club Guest Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Country Club Guest Home licensed for?
30 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Country Club Guest Home been cited?
1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 1989, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.
Is Country Club Guest Home still open?
The state does not list this license as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
What does Country Club Guest Home cost?
$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 32 other homes of a similar licensed size in Escondido that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 32 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Country Club Guest Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Ramirez, Julita E. and Randy M., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Palomar Ucsd Medical Center Escondido is 3.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Country Club Guest Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Country Club Guest Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “COUNTRY CLUB GUEST HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #372004630. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 30 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Ramirez, Julita E. and Randy M., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 1989, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 16 state inspection visits since 1989, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 1989, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
- 7 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 1989, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 26, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$8,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$7,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Escondido · 1.4 mi
Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community
Large community · licensed for 200
Estimated starting rate
$4,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County