Lotus Villa And Memory Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fontana, San Bernardino County, California — state license #365530102, licensed for 99 residents, listed as licensed/pending increase in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 12, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Lotus Villa And Memory Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 99 residents · Fontana, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #365530102, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9448 Citrus Avenue · Fontana, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 355-6887
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 99 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR NINETY-NINE (99) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH SIX (6) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN THE ROOMS LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR WITH SLIDING DOORS. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR TWENTY-FIVE (25).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 26 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 12, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
July 7, 2026
Occupancy at the June 12, 2026 visit
94 of 99 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 19, 2024 to June 12, 2026. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident being hospitalized. Facility staff did not meet the residents’ care needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Mayra Alfaro and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff neglect resulted in R1 being hospitalized. Investigation was conducted by department staff which included review of records and witness interviews. Based on the investigation, it was discovered that facility staff observed a significant decline in Resident #1 (R1)’s condition but staff continued to let critical time pass while R1’s condition continued to decline throughout August 2025. An appraisal dated March 28, 2024, and a preplacement appraisal dated April 15, 2024, show R1’s overall health as being good. In addition, a physician’s report dated May 2, 2025 indicated R1’s health as fair. In addition, a Needs and Service plan dated August 6, 2025, indicates that R1 was able to make their needs known and needing assistance with Actthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250911105509
May 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff provide medical care to residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Mayra Alfaro and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Unqualified staff provide medical care to residents. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPAs conducted interviews with Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, pertaining to the alleged allegation and three out of the four residents informed LPAs that they independently administer their own insulin as well as checking their own blood sugar. During further interview Resident #4 informed LPA that facility staff assists with the administration of insulin. Resident #4 further explained that the assistance is not hand over hand assistance but full injectable administration of insulin. Resident #4 also stated that the last administration done by staff was about a week ago. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigatithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260304110227
202511 state visits · 12 documents
Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Melisa Sevilla and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, review of records, and observations. First allegation: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3, LPA went over the allegation with staff and S#1-3 informed LPA that the facility has not evicted or refuse to accept any resident back the facility. Based on records LPA observed that no name of the victim was listed or provided for the unlawful eviction. Staff #3 informed LPA that one resident, Resident #1 was transported to a local hospital on 10/22/2023 and discharged on 10/23/2025 Staff #3 informed LPA that facility was having arrangement issues pertaining to R#1 however, Staff #3 informed LPA that R#1 was later transported to back the facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251023100251
Oct 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not properly addressing bed bugs in the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Melisa Sevilla and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, review of records, and observations. First allegation: Facility staff are not properly addressing bed bugs in the facility. Regarding the allegation, LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3, who informed LPA that the facility received a report from a resident on 10/7/2025 regarding bedbugs. Based on treatment contract LPA observed that a two-day treatment was completed on 10/13 and on 10/24/2025, staff informed LPA that treatment has been completed, and the indication of bedbugs was no longer present. In addition, Staff informed LPA that a total of four (4) residents will be moving back into their rooms in the next couple of days. LPA conducted interviews with R#2, R#3, and R#4, who informed LPA that ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251020101251
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate supervision to the residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, and review of records. First allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision to the residents in care. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with staff #1 and staff #2 who informed LPA that on 9/19/2025, it was reported by staff that R#1 had not been seen and was possibly missing. S#1 and S#2 informed LPA that family and local police department were notified of the incident pertaining to R#1. S#1 informed LPA that R#1 was found three in a half hours later (3.5 hrs.) and was found to be inside a storage room located on the second-floor same floor where R#1 room is located. S#1 informed LPA that storage room was accidently left opened which R#1 gained access and was locked in the storage room for 3.5the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250915144012
Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow up on resident's change of condition Staff left resident in filthy clothes Staff did not ensure resident in care was hydrated Staff did not ensure resident in care was properly fed Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and review of records. First allegation: Staff did not follow up on resident's change of condition. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interviews with S#1, S#2, and S#3, who informed LPA that on 11/19/2023, facility informed InnoVage clinic that Resident #1 was being transported to local hospital because R#1 was weak and was not eating. LPA collected documentation pertaining to R#1 and LPA discovered that on 11/19/2023, R#1 was seen at a local hospital and diagnosed with UTI R#1, was discharged on the same day. LPA observed that medication was set to be delivered to the facility per InnoVage orders. LPA observed that R#1 completed antibiotics as indicated in addition, based on R#1 follow-up inforthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2025 · control 56-AS-20231215091035
Aug 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not administering residents’ insulin as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Facility staff are not administering residents’ insulin as prescribed. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1 and Staff #2, provided LPA with a verbal admission, that R#1 did not receive insulin medication because R#1 insulin could not be located. S#1 and S#2 informed LPA that R#1 insulin medication was later located and found to be inside Med-room refrigerator. Because R#1 insulin was not located and found several days later R#1 was not able to receive their medication as prescribed. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240416172928
Aug 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff allowed resident to become dehydrated while in care. Staff did not prevent outbreak of covid. Staff did not report a change in resident's condition to resident's responsible party. Staff did not provide adequate care to resident while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff allowed resident to become dehydrated while in care. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Resident #2-5 regarding the allegation listed above all residents informed LPA that facility has water available to all residents. In addition, resident #2-5, informed LPA that facility has water dispensers available throughout the facility, and that water is also provided upon residents’ request. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1-5, regarding the allegation stated above, and staff #1-5 informed LPA that there is a total of three (3), water stations available to residents and that water is also available upon residents’ request. Furthermore, staff #1-5 althe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240830134517
Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal item. Staff did not prevent a resident from sustaining falls while in care. Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in an altercation. Staff did not respond to resident's call light.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal item. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted an interview with Resident#1 pertaining to the allegation R#1 informed LPA that resident does not know if resident’s cellphone was misplaced, lost, or stolen. Resident #1 informed LPA that resident shares a room, however, resident#1 does not know if roommate or staff might have taken R#1 cellphone as R#1 has not witnessed any theft. Resident #1 informed LPA that resident has a designated area where resident stores their personal items. LPA conducted a review of R#1 records during the review of records LPA observed an inventory sheet that lists all valuable items pertaining tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250418130652
Jul 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident falling. Staff did not ensure resident’s room was adequately cleaned. Staff did not ensure resident’s room was free from odors. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff did not assist resident with personal hygiene care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff neglect resulted in resident falling. Regarding the allegation listed above LPA conducted a review of records pertaining to Resident #1 during the review of records LPA discovered that R#1 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 9/25/2024, based on report R#1 was later transported to local hospital for treatment. During further investigation LPA observed that R#1 has not sustained no falls since initial fall that occurred on 9/24/2024. LPA conducted an interview with Resident#1 pertaining the allegation stated above R#1 informed LPA that during the fall resident was attempting to lean to the side and went a little to far and that is when resident sustained the fathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250210141739
Jun 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is financially abusing resident(s) in care. Staff do not respond to residents' requests for assistance as necessary. Staff do not accord dignity to resident(s) in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Licensee is financially abusing resident(s) in care. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted an interview with Business Office Manager who informed LPA all rent payments are received and processed by facility Business Office Manager (BOM). Business Office Manager informed LPA that all residents receive a proof of payment and upon request. In addition, BOM explained to LPA that all residents receiving SSI at the end of the year receive a 2.5-percent cost of living increase deemed by social security. BOM further explained that due to the cost-of-living increase residents rents get impacted (increased). LPA conducted interviews with four residents and four out othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250213100958
Feb 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple falls due to lack of supervision.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Resident sustained multiple falls due to lack of supervision. Regarding the allegation listed above LPA collected documentation pertaining to R#1. During the review or R#1 documentation LPA discovered that R#1 was able to ambulate via walker, and facility caregivers will assist as needed. On 7/12/2024, and 7/13/2024, R#1 sustained two unwitnessed falls in which paramedics were notified and transferred R#1 to be treated. Based on R#1 needs, and service plan R#1 was receiving escorting as needed as well as observation checks every two hours. LPA conducted interview with R#2 who denied pushing R#1 or being aggressive towards any other residents. R#2 reported not witnessing Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240716144230
Jan 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not meeting resident care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Facility is not meeting resident care needs. Regarding the allegation “Facility is not meeting resident care needs” LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 Responsible Party who informed LPA that R#1 had developed a bad diaper rash on 9/14/2024. Resident #1 Responsible Party stated to LPA that R#1 had developed a diaper rash because R#1 was left on a soiled diaper for a long period of time. LPA received photograph pictures of R#1 during review of photos LPA observed that R#1 appeared to have a rash and redness around R#1 groin area. Based on the interviews and evidence gathered the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240916135423
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident records are properly maintained. Facility does not ensure staff follow infection control requirements. Staff do not ensure residents medications are properly stored and secured .

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Paola Guerrero and Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Administrative Assistant Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff do not ensure resident records are properly maintained. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure residents records are properly maintained” LPA Guerrero conducted a record inspection in facilities Med-room LPA observed med-room to be locked. Med-room was opened by Staff #1. LPA observed that all Residents records were filed in a secured and designated area. LPA inspected MAR record along with residents’ medication card and observed medication to be dispensed and recorded properly by staff. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240610140357
Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with respect. Staff slapped resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Rebecca Parra and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not treat resident with respect. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a review of resident (R1) records was completed and copy of pertinent documents were obtained. Regarding the alleged allegation, staff did not treat resident with respect. interviews with staff were conducted and all staff denied mistreating resident[s] or violating resident[s] rights in addition, staff also denied witnessing staff mistreat or violate resident[s] rights. Interviews with residents were conducted where 4 out five residents denied being mistreated or their personal rights to be violated by staff. In addition, four residents denied witnessing staff mistreating or viothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240416115905
Apr 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls resulting in injuries.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Rebecca Parra and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls resulting in injuries. During facility record review LPA found that Resident #1 sustained two falls on 1/16/2024 and on 4/1/2024. Both falls in which Resident #1 received medical treatment. Records also revealed that after Resident #1 last fall the facility updated Resident #1 Needs and Service along with resident’s care plan that addressed the preventative measures that the facility has in place for Resident #1 to prevent continuation of falls. LPA obtained a copy of the facilities current roster and observed that facility has sufficient staffing support to meet resident’s needs. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240405124933
Apr 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff serve food that is of poor quality.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Rebecca Parra and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff serve food that is of poor quality. LPA observed and inspected the quantity and quality of food on (2) separate facility visits. LPA conducted interviews with kitchen staff. LPA conducted a review of food service of meals served. LPA collected a copy of the current menu, along with the alternative menu. LPA collected a copy of the internal food temperature logs and food handlers training certificates. LPA toured the facility and observed the meals that are being served reflected on what was on the menu for the week. LPA observed food to be of adequate quality. Meals appeared to be fresh and balanced. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240325145341
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints18typical 7
State visits on file26typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633220251112320244502023330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 355-6887

Is Lotus Villa And Memory Care licensed?

Yes — Lotus Villa And Memory Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fontana (San Bernardino County): California license #365530102, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 99 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 12, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Lotus Villa And Memory Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Lotus Villa And Memory Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR NINETY-NINE (99) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH SIX (6) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN THE ROOMS LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR WITH SLIDING DOORS. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR TWENTY-FIVE (25).

How much does Lotus Villa And Memory Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Lotus Villa And Memory Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Lotus Villa And Memory Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Lotus Villa And Memory Care through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Bernardino County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

94 of 99 beds occupied (95%) when the state visited on June 12, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Lotus Villa And Memory Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 26 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2023 for Lotus Villa And Memory Care; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 12, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in resident being hospitalized. Facility staff did not meet the residents’ care needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Mayra Alfaro and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff neglect resulted in R1 being hospitalized. Investigation was conducted by department staff which included review of records and witness interviews. Based on the investigation, it was discovered that facility staff observed a significant decline in Resident #1 (R1)’s condition but staff continued to let critical time pass while R1’s condition continued to decline throughout August 2025. An appraisal dated March 28, 2024, and a preplacement appraisal dated April 15, 2024, show R1’s overall health as being good. In addition, a physician’s report dated May 2, 2025 indicated R1’s health as fair. In addition, a Needs and Service plan dated August 6, 2025, indicates that R1 was able to make their needs known and needing assistance with ActCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250911105509
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnqualified staff provide medical care to residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Mayra Alfaro and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Unqualified staff provide medical care to residents. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPAs conducted interviews with Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, pertaining to the alleged allegation and three out of the four residents informed LPAs that they independently administer their own insulin as well as checking their own blood sugar. During further interview Resident #4 informed LPA that facility staff assists with the administration of insulin. Resident #4 further explained that the assistance is not hand over hand assistance but full injectable administration of insulin. Resident #4 also stated that the last administration done by staff was about a week ago. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigatiCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260304110227

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff unlawfully evicted a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Melisa Sevilla and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, review of records, and observations. First allegation: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3, LPA went over the allegation with staff and S#1-3 informed LPA that the facility has not evicted or refuse to accept any resident back the facility. Based on records LPA observed that no name of the victim was listed or provided for the unlawful eviction. Staff #3 informed LPA that one resident, Resident #1 was transported to a local hospital on 10/22/2023 and discharged on 10/23/2025 Staff #3 informed LPA that facility was having arrangement issues pertaining to R#1 however, Staff #3 informed LPA that R#1 was later transported to back the facilityCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251023100251
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not properly addressing bed bugs in the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Melisa Sevilla and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, review of records, and observations. First allegation: Facility staff are not properly addressing bed bugs in the facility. Regarding the allegation, LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3, who informed LPA that the facility received a report from a resident on 10/7/2025 regarding bedbugs. Based on treatment contract LPA observed that a two-day treatment was completed on 10/13 and on 10/24/2025, staff informed LPA that treatment has been completed, and the indication of bedbugs was no longer present. In addition, Staff informed LPA that a total of four (4) residents will be moving back into their rooms in the next couple of days. LPA conducted interviews with R#2, R#3, and R#4, who informed LPA that thCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251020101251
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate supervision to the residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, and review of records. First allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision to the residents in care. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with staff #1 and staff #2 who informed LPA that on 9/19/2025, it was reported by staff that R#1 had not been seen and was possibly missing. S#1 and S#2 informed LPA that family and local police department were notified of the incident pertaining to R#1. S#1 informed LPA that R#1 was found three in a half hours later (3.5 hrs.) and was found to be inside a storage room located on the second-floor same floor where R#1 room is located. S#1 informed LPA that storage room was accidently left opened which R#1 gained access and was locked in the storage room for 3.5CDSS inspection report, September 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250915144012
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow up on resident's change of condition Staff left resident in filthy clothes Staff did not ensure resident in care was hydrated Staff did not ensure resident in care was properly fed Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and review of records. First allegation: Staff did not follow up on resident's change of condition. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interviews with S#1, S#2, and S#3, who informed LPA that on 11/19/2023, facility informed InnoVage clinic that Resident #1 was being transported to local hospital because R#1 was weak and was not eating. LPA collected documentation pertaining to R#1 and LPA discovered that on 11/19/2023, R#1 was seen at a local hospital and diagnosed with UTI R#1, was discharged on the same day. LPA observed that medication was set to be delivered to the facility per InnoVage orders. LPA observed that R#1 completed antibiotics as indicated in addition, based on R#1 follow-up inforCDSS inspection report, August 26, 2025 · control 56-AS-20231215091035
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not administering residents’ insulin as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Facility staff are not administering residents’ insulin as prescribed. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1 and Staff #2, provided LPA with a verbal admission, that R#1 did not receive insulin medication because R#1 insulin could not be located. S#1 and S#2 informed LPA that R#1 insulin medication was later located and found to be inside Med-room refrigerator. Because R#1 insulin was not located and found several days later R#1 was not able to receive their medication as prescribed. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 20, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240416172928
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff allowed resident to become dehydrated while in care. Staff did not prevent outbreak of covid. Staff did not report a change in resident's condition to resident's responsible party. Staff did not provide adequate care to resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff allowed resident to become dehydrated while in care. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Resident #2-5 regarding the allegation listed above all residents informed LPA that facility has water available to all residents. In addition, resident #2-5, informed LPA that facility has water dispensers available throughout the facility, and that water is also provided upon residents’ request. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1-5, regarding the allegation stated above, and staff #1-5 informed LPA that there is a total of three (3), water stations available to residents and that water is also available upon residents’ request. Furthermore, staff #1-5 alCDSS inspection report, August 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240830134517
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's personal item. Staff did not prevent a resident from sustaining falls while in care. Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in an altercation. Staff did not respond to resident's call light.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal item. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted an interview with Resident#1 pertaining to the allegation R#1 informed LPA that resident does not know if resident’s cellphone was misplaced, lost, or stolen. Resident #1 informed LPA that resident shares a room, however, resident#1 does not know if roommate or staff might have taken R#1 cellphone as R#1 has not witnessed any theft. Resident #1 informed LPA that resident has a designated area where resident stores their personal items. LPA conducted a review of R#1 records during the review of records LPA observed an inventory sheet that lists all valuable items pertaining tCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250418130652
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in resident falling. Staff did not ensure resident’s room was adequately cleaned. Staff did not ensure resident’s room was free from odors. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff did not assist resident with personal hygiene care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff neglect resulted in resident falling. Regarding the allegation listed above LPA conducted a review of records pertaining to Resident #1 during the review of records LPA discovered that R#1 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 9/25/2024, based on report R#1 was later transported to local hospital for treatment. During further investigation LPA observed that R#1 has not sustained no falls since initial fall that occurred on 9/24/2024. LPA conducted an interview with Resident#1 pertaining the allegation stated above R#1 informed LPA that during the fall resident was attempting to lean to the side and went a little to far and that is when resident sustained the faCDSS inspection report, July 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250210141739
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is financially abusing resident(s) in care. Staff do not respond to residents' requests for assistance as necessary. Staff do not accord dignity to resident(s) in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Business Office Manager Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Licensee is financially abusing resident(s) in care. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted an interview with Business Office Manager who informed LPA all rent payments are received and processed by facility Business Office Manager (BOM). Business Office Manager informed LPA that all residents receive a proof of payment and upon request. In addition, BOM explained to LPA that all residents receiving SSI at the end of the year receive a 2.5-percent cost of living increase deemed by social security. BOM further explained that due to the cost-of-living increase residents rents get impacted (increased). LPA conducted interviews with four residents and four out oCDSS inspection report, June 6, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250213100958
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple falls due to lack of supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Resident sustained multiple falls due to lack of supervision. Regarding the allegation listed above LPA collected documentation pertaining to R#1. During the review or R#1 documentation LPA discovered that R#1 was able to ambulate via walker, and facility caregivers will assist as needed. On 7/12/2024, and 7/13/2024, R#1 sustained two unwitnessed falls in which paramedics were notified and transferred R#1 to be treated. Based on R#1 needs, and service plan R#1 was receiving escorting as needed as well as observation checks every two hours. LPA conducted interview with R#2 who denied pushing R#1 or being aggressive towards any other residents. R#2 reported not witnessing RCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240716144230
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not meeting resident care needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Heather O’Neel and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Facility is not meeting resident care needs. Regarding the allegation “Facility is not meeting resident care needs” LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 Responsible Party who informed LPA that R#1 had developed a bad diaper rash on 9/14/2024. Resident #1 Responsible Party stated to LPA that R#1 had developed a diaper rash because R#1 was left on a soiled diaper for a long period of time. LPA received photograph pictures of R#1 during review of photos LPA observed that R#1 appeared to have a rash and redness around R#1 groin area. Based on the interviews and evidence gathered the above allegation is Substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240916135423

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident records are properly maintained. Facility does not ensure staff follow infection control requirements. Staff do not ensure residents medications are properly stored and secured .
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Paola Guerrero and Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Administrative Assistant Reyna Figueroa and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff do not ensure resident records are properly maintained. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure residents records are properly maintained” LPA Guerrero conducted a record inspection in facilities Med-room LPA observed med-room to be locked. Med-room was opened by Staff #1. LPA observed that all Residents records were filed in a secured and designated area. LPA inspected MAR record along with residents’ medication card and observed medication to be dispensed and recorded properly by staff. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 20, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240610140357
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with respect. Staff slapped resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Rebecca Parra and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not treat resident with respect. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a review of resident (R1) records was completed and copy of pertinent documents were obtained. Regarding the alleged allegation, staff did not treat resident with respect. interviews with staff were conducted and all staff denied mistreating resident[s] or violating resident[s] rights in addition, staff also denied witnessing staff mistreat or violate resident[s] rights. Interviews with residents were conducted where 4 out five residents denied being mistreated or their personal rights to be violated by staff. In addition, four residents denied witnessing staff mistreating or vioCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240416115905
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly address resident's multiple falls resulting in injuries.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Rebecca Parra and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls resulting in injuries. During facility record review LPA found that Resident #1 sustained two falls on 1/16/2024 and on 4/1/2024. Both falls in which Resident #1 received medical treatment. Records also revealed that after Resident #1 last fall the facility updated Resident #1 Needs and Service along with resident’s care plan that addressed the preventative measures that the facility has in place for Resident #1 to prevent continuation of falls. LPA obtained a copy of the facilities current roster and observed that facility has sufficient staffing support to meet resident’s needs. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240405124933
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff serve food that is of poor quality.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Rebecca Parra and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff serve food that is of poor quality. LPA observed and inspected the quantity and quality of food on (2) separate facility visits. LPA conducted interviews with kitchen staff. LPA conducted a review of food service of meals served. LPA collected a copy of the current menu, along with the alternative menu. LPA collected a copy of the internal food temperature logs and food handlers training certificates. LPA toured the facility and observed the meals that are being served reflected on what was on the menu for the week. LPA observed food to be of adequate quality. Meals appeared to be fresh and balanced. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240325145341

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 26 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
18
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
26
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 355-6887
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Lotus Villa And Memory Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.