Nick's Maple Home Iii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rialto, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361881035, licensed for 10 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 19 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 18, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 19 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 18, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 22, 2022 to May 18, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
May 18, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow arrived to facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Farlow was greeted and granted entrance into the home by Caregiver, Sharef "Sean" Awad. LPA Farlow asked Caregiver Sean to notify the administrator of my arrival. LPA spoke to Administrator, Ahmad Abdallatef and Yusef Nofal via phone and explained the purpose of the visit and the complaint elements. During the course of the investigation the LPA conducted interviews with resident, staff and relevant parties. LPA reviewed records, obtained copies of documentation from residents. The allegation is the facility conducted an illegal eviction. LPA interviewed staff, resident, and relevant parties. LPA interviews revealed that R1 was not given a 30 day notice advising R1 of the move. R1's Conservator or Social Worker were not aware of the move and was not notified of a need to move. LPA interview with staff revealed that the facility moved the wrong resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 18, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260304150013
Jan 14, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 7, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate food service Staff do not keep kitchen clean and orderly
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow arrived to facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Farlow was greeted and granted entrance into the home by Caregiver, Michelle Mangaong. LPA Farlow asked Caregiver Michelle to notify the administrator of my arrival. LPA met with Administrator, Yousef Nofal and Ahmad Abdallatef explained the elements of the complaint. The allegation is staff are not providing adequate food service. LPA Farlow investigation consist of an tour of the facility, record review, interviews with residents, and staff. LPA interviewed seven (7) residents. Seven (7) out of seven (7) residents stated staff have adequate food service. Residents stated the facility has plenty of food for residents in care. Seven (7) out of seven (7) residents stated staff provide plenty of food and a variety of different meals to eat. LPA interviewed three (3) out of three (3) staff. The results from the interview with the three staff revealedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250801122654
Jul 25, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff coerced resident to enroll in alternative insurance plan.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow arrived to facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Farlow was greeted and granted entrance into the home by Caregiver, Michelle Mangaong. LPA Farlow asked Caregiver Michelle to notify the administrator of my arrival. LPA met with Administrator, Ahmad Abdallatef and explained the elements of the complaint. The allegation is staff coerced resident to enroll in alternative insurance plan. LPA Farlow investigation consist of an tour of the facility, record review, interviews with residents, and staff. LPA interviewed five (5) residents. Four (4) out of five (5) residents stated staff have not forced or coered them to switch insurance plan. Five (5) out of five (5) residents stated staff assist them with medical appointments. LPA reviewed residents file and observed that residents have varies medication insurance programs. LPA interview with R1 revealed that R1 stated the staff coered R1 to change insurthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250723152835
Apr 25, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that residents are administered their medication(s) as prescribed. Staff are not providing medical supervision to resident in care as needed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow arrived to facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Farlow was greeted and granted entrance into the home by Caregiver, Michelle Mangaong. LPA Farlow asked Caregiver Michelle to notify the administrator of my arrival. LPA met with Administrator, Ahmad Abdallatef and explained the elements of the complaint. Allegation 1: Staff are not ensuring that residents are administered their medication(s) as prescribed. Regarding the allegation that Staff are not ensuring that residents are administered their medication(s) as prescribed. LPA interviewed four (4) out of four (4) residents and the interview reveal that staff are assisting residents with medication, however after LPA reviewed and audited the MARS log it was found that 3 out of 3 resdients MARS were missing medications and initial were not completed on the MARS. Also, interview with Reporting party, resident, and facility staff revealed there hasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 25, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250423113821
Apr 21, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Ahmad Abdallatef, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation was conducted by Department staff which consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and document review. Allegation, Facility staff failed to properly supervise resident resulting in resident sustaining burns on chest and hands. Department staff conducted three (3) staff interviews. Three (3) out of the Three (3) staff stated they were aware that Resident one, R1 had a history of burning himself with cigarettes while smoking. R1 would remove filters from the cigarette and hold the lighted cigarette in hand, burning fingertips and lips. Staff revealed that R1 had a prior incident of burning self, using the stove to light a cigarette. ***Continued on LIC9099C*** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240118124025
Jan 21, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 22, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. Resident was left on the ground for a long period of time.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an in-office visit to deliver findings on the mentioned allegation. LPA Allen met with Yusef Nofal-Administrator who was informed of the findings and signed the report. The investigation involved interviews with residents and staff, as well as a review of records. Residents interviewed stated they did not know or remember if Resident 1 (R1) fell and remained on the floor for an extended period. However, interviews with staff members and a review of records indicated that R1 did have a fall and was assisted promptly, receiving medical attention on the same day. LPA was unable to interview R1 as their new location could not be identified. Based on the investigation, the allegation is unsubstantiated. This means that although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prove whether the alleged violations did or did not occur.An exit interview was conducted with Yusef Nofal-Administrator and provithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240508151002
Oct 22, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff is financially abusing resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an in-office visit to deliver findings on the mentioned allegation. LPA Allen met with Yusef Nofal-Administrator who was informed of the findings and signed the report. The investigation involved interviews with residents and staff, as well as a review of records. The interviews with residents and staff indicated that they have not been financially abused by staff members and that ROG services act as their payee. The facility files reviewed, including Resident 1 (R1), confirmed that ROG services are listed as the residents' payee. LPA attempted to interview R1, but they no longer reside at the facility and could not be contacted. Based on interviews and evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is found to be Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Yusef Nofal-Administrator where this report was dithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240404104547
Feb 3, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 5, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Nick's Maple Home Iii licensed?
Yes — Nick's Maple Home Iii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Rialto (San Bernardino County): California license #361881035, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 10 residents. State records list 19 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 18, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.
Can Nick's Maple Home Iii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Nick's Maple Home Iii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 10 OF WHICH 8 ARE AMBULATORY AND 2 NON-AMBULATORY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 2; NON- AMBULATORY RESIDENTS TO RESIDE IN DOWNSTAIRS ROOM.
How much does Nick's Maple Home Iii cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Nick's Maple Home Iii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Nick's Maple Home Iii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Nick's Maple Home Iii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
10 of 10 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on May 18, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Nick's Maple Home Iii?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 19 dated documents since 2022 for Nick's Maple Home Iii; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 18, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Who runs Nick's Maple Home Iii?
From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.
Licensed to Hamed, Najeh, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(786) 219-6008Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Nick's Maple Home Iii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.