Ivy Park At Laguna Creek is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove, Sacramento County, California — state license #347005512, licensed for 108 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 39 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 1, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Ivy Park At Laguna Creek

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 108 residents · Elk Grove, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #347005512, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6727 Laguna Park Dr · Elk Grove, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 683-1881
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 88 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE 108 RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE OF WHICH 88 MAY BE NONAMBULATORY AND 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS. FIRE CLEARED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. NEW MGMT. CO., OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC. EFFECTIVE 2-1-24.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 45 times and filed 39 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 1, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 1, 2026
Occupancy at the May 30, 2024 visit
55 of 108 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 21, 2021 to May 30, 2024. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 39 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 8 documents
Oct 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide sufficient notice of rate increase

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Michelle Swearingen and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed a former resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). R1’s RP said that they had not received any sort of written notification after a reassessment for R1 raised R1’s care costs. R1’s RP said they were only made aware of the increase in costs by looking through their bank statements. LPA Moleski reviewed a reassessment for R1 dated 12/11/23. The assessment was unsigned by either facility representatives or by R1’s RP. LPA Moleski asked Swearingen for any written notifications sent to R1’s RP regarding increased costs due to an increased level of care. Swearingen was unable to produce any such notifications. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240227090631
May 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify resident's responsible party of incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this allegation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Michelle Swearingen and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski opened a complaint investigation at this facility on 4/11/24. During the complaint investigation, it was revealed that a resident (R1) suffered a suspected unwitnessed fall on the morning of 3/30/24, and was sent to the hospital with an injury. During interviews, two staff members (S1-S2) said that R1's responsible party (RP) was notified by phone shortly after R1's injury was discovered. During an interview, R1's RP said they had been contacted by phone on the morning the injuries were discovered. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240404121416
Apr 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet residents' needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Michelle Swearingen and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Swearingen, 17 staff members (S1-15, S17-S18), nine residents (R2-R10), and a former resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s medical records, medication prescriptions, and three months’ worth of medication administration records (MARs). LPA Moleski did not observe any indication of medication mismanagement in these records. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240208123439
20234 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide resident medication as needed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)s Jamie Ivey Canady arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Ivey Canady explained the purpose of the visit and was met by Executive Director Morgan Greenwood. The investigation was conducted by LPA Ivey Canady. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, reporting party, review of resident files, facility medical files, facility chart notes and caregiver daily notes. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Staff do not provide resident medication as needed. Continued on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023 · control 27-AS-20221227132746
Oct 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints10typical 2
Total complaints17typical 7
State visits on file45typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025680202466120231214220225522021551
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 683-1881

Is Ivy Park At Laguna Creek licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park At Laguna Creek is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove (Sacramento County): California license #347005512, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 108 residents. State records list 39 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 1, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ivy Park At Laguna Creek care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Laguna Creek with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE 108 RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE OF WHICH 88 MAY BE NONAMBULATORY AND 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS. FIRE CLEARED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. NEW MGMT. CO., OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC. EFFECTIVE 2-1-24.

How much does Ivy Park At Laguna Creek cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Laguna Creek's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Laguna Creek accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Laguna Creek is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

55 of 108 beds occupied (51%) when the state visited on May 30, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Laguna Creek?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 45 state visits and 39 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Laguna Creek; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 30, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide sufficient notice of rate increase
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Michelle Swearingen and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed a former resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). R1’s RP said that they had not received any sort of written notification after a reassessment for R1 raised R1’s care costs. R1’s RP said they were only made aware of the increase in costs by looking through their bank statements. LPA Moleski reviewed a reassessment for R1 dated 12/11/23. The assessment was unsigned by either facility representatives or by R1’s RP. LPA Moleski asked Swearingen for any written notifications sent to R1’s RP regarding increased costs due to an increased level of care. Swearingen was unable to produce any such notifications. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, May 30, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240227090631
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify resident's responsible party of incident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this allegation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Michelle Swearingen and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski opened a complaint investigation at this facility on 4/11/24. During the complaint investigation, it was revealed that a resident (R1) suffered a suspected unwitnessed fall on the morning of 3/30/24, and was sent to the hospital with an injury. During interviews, two staff members (S1-S2) said that R1's responsible party (RP) was notified by phone shortly after R1's injury was discovered. During an interview, R1's RP said they had been contacted by phone on the morning the injuries were discovered. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, May 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240404121416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet residents' needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Michelle Swearingen and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Swearingen, 17 staff members (S1-15, S17-S18), nine residents (R2-R10), and a former resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s medical records, medication prescriptions, and three months’ worth of medication administration records (MARs). LPA Moleski did not observe any indication of medication mismanagement in these records. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, April 15, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240208123439

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide resident medication as needed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)s Jamie Ivey Canady arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Ivey Canady explained the purpose of the visit and was met by Executive Director Morgan Greenwood. The investigation was conducted by LPA Ivey Canady. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, reporting party, review of resident files, facility medical files, facility chart notes and caregiver daily notes. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Staff do not provide resident medication as needed. Continued on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 10, 2023 · control 27-AS-20221227132746
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff speak inappropriately in the presence of residents Facility staff did not respond to residents call in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Morgan Whinery and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews with Whinery, staff members (S1-S7), interviews with residents (R1-R5), and review of resident records. During interviews, S1 described an incident where a staff member utilized a curse word while speaking with a resident. During interviews, Whinery and S2-S7 did not express concerns regarding inappropriate staff speech. During an interview, R1 was unable to provide details regarding inappropriate staff speech. During interviews, R2-R5 did not express concerns regarding inappropriate staff speech. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, August 1, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230523170557
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents responsible parties are informed of epidemic outbreaks. Staff do not ensure resident records are maintained. Staff do not ensure soiled gloves are properly discarded after use.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Morgan Whinery and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of review of facility records, review of resident records, and interviews with Whinery, eight staff members (S1-S8) and five residents (R2-R6). LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s LIC 602, R1's medication administration records (MARs) for the months of January, February, and March of 2023, two incident reports involving R1, and daily notes for R1. LPA Moleski also reviewed widespread illness trackers showing which residents and staff experienced symptoms of and/or tested positive for Noro Virus during an outbreak, and a letter that was posted in the facility and sent out to families during the outbreak of Noro Virus, according to S1. LPA Moleski reviewed a photograph of this letter posted on official letterhead. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, July 13, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230310112136
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff mishandling resident’s medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with administrator Morgan Whinery and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews with three staff members, (S1-S3), interviews with administrator Whinery, and review of resident records for R1. LPA Moleski reviewed three signed doctor’s orders regarding a prescribed medication for R1. LPA Moleski observed signed doctor’s orders for R1 dated September 2, 2022, ordering R1 to take one half tablet of this medication daily. LPA Moleski observed signed doctor’s orders dated October 4, 2022, ordering R1’s dosage of medication be reduced to one half tablet taken every other day. [Continued on 9099-C] Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, May 25, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230222131123

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not dispensing medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jamie Ivey Canady arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Ivey Canady explained the purpose of the visit and was met by James Hall. The investigation was conducted by LPA Ivey Canady. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, reporting party, other witnesses, review of resident files and caregiver daily notes. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed. Continued on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 11, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220609110321
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not answering residents call buttons timely
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio explained the purpose of the visit and was met by Administrator James Hall. The investigation was conducted by LPA Ivey Canady. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, reporting party, other witnesses, review of resident files and caregiver daily notes. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Staff are not answering residents call buttons timely. Continued on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 13, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220330095947
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following COVID protocols.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to conduct an investigation of the allegation mentioned above on 7/13/2022 at 2pm. LPA met with Susie Sarria, Business Office Manager and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the physical plant which included all four cottages and Community Center. LPA observed that the covid related cases have all cleared except 1 resident. In addition, there is 3 staff that is still not present in the facility. LPA observed there is a sufficienat amount of PPEs during this visit. LPA observed all staff and visitors utilizing masks during this visit and there is signage posted upon entry of every building. Based on interviews, observation and lack of evidence the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the— CDSS inspection report, July 13, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220711163102

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 45 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
10
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
17
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
45
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 683-1881
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Laguna Creek? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.