Oakmont Of Folsom is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Folsom, Sacramento County, California — state license #347005427, licensed for 88 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 19, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Oakmont Of Folsom

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 88 residents · Folsom, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #347005427, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1574 Creekside Dr · Folsom, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 817-4500
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 88 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 7 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE EIGHTY-EIGHT (88) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH SEVEN (7) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15) RESIDENTS. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 19, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
February 19, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
68 of 88 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 14, 2022 to February 19, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. -Staff are not providing adequate food services. -Staff do not provide records to resident's responsible party in a timely manner. -Staff do no accord resident privacy.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Executive Director, Anyssa Hill, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, made observations, conducted a medication count, and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Allegation: Staff are mismanaging resident's medications On February 19, 2026, LPA conducted a medication count for residents (R1, R2, and R3), comparing the residents’ medication lists on file with medication centrally stored for the residents. LPA did not observe any medication errors. Interviews with residents (R4, R5, and R6) indicated that they receive all medications as prescribed. Interviews with staff (S1, S2, and S3) indicated that medications are being given as prescribed. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C************************************************** Unsubstanthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260202094237
20255 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility staff did not maintain infection control of scabies.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Executive Director (ED), Anyssa Hill, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Interviews conducted with the ED, Memory Care Director (MCD), and Health Services Director (HSD) indicated that resident (R1) was observed, on November 7, 2025, to have what appeared to be a rash and was seen at urgent care the same day. According to visit summary, dated November 7, 2025, R1 was seen by a physician and was prescribed medication to treat scabies. Interviews with ED, MCD, HSD, and staff (S1 and S2) indicated that R1 was provided the prescription treatment that evening. Interviews indicated that the facility took all environmental precautions ensuring R1's room, clothing, and linens were cleaned. Interviews indicated that staff utilized apprthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251121083547
Dec 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff are not following refund conditions

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home and met with the Executive Director (ED), Anyssa Hill, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ED indicated that the facility was informed of a potential resident (R1) through a placement agency. The facility met with R1 and their responsible party regarding potential move in. According to R1's Admission Agreement, R1's responsible party signed the agreement effective September 2, 2025. On September 6, 2025, R1 refused to move in and following ED offered that the facility could place R1 on the waiting list and refund any monies paid. ED indicated that R1's responsible party declined offer and R1 continued to refuse move in to facility. Interviews with the responsible party and relevant party indicated that they did not provide ***************************the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251021131959
Aug 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff mismanaged client’s medication

Licensed Program Analysts (LPAs) Cassandra Mikkelson and Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Executive Director Michael Clymo to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPAs conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ** Report continued on 9099-C *** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241119170352
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is malodorous Staff are not meeting residents' hygiene needs Facility is unkempt

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigations. LPA met with administrator Michael Clymo during today’s inspection. LPA investigated allegation, “Facility is malodorous”. LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff. LPA toured the facility on 9/11/24 and observed the memory care unit to be clean, sanitary, and free from odor. LPA toured resident rooms, common areas, kitchen area, and dining room and did not smell an odor. LPA interviewed 5 staff members in which they stated housekeeping and other staff keep the memory care clean and free from odor. Staff stated due to resident incontinence care needs, at times their may be a temporary smell but staff take care of the problem in a timely manner. Due to interviews and observation LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Continuation on 9099-C. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240909131359
Aug 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file18typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020255612024550202311020223302021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 817-4500

Is Oakmont Of Folsom licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of Folsom is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Folsom (Sacramento County): California license #347005427, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 88 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 19, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Oakmont Of Folsom care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Folsom with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE EIGHTY-EIGHT (88) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH SEVEN (7) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15) RESIDENTS. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED.

How much does Oakmont Of Folsom cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Folsom's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of Folsom accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of Folsom is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

68 of 88 beds occupied (77%) when the state visited on February 19, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Folsom?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2021 for Oakmont Of Folsom; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 19, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. -Staff are not providing adequate food services. -Staff do not provide records to resident's responsible party in a timely manner. -Staff do no accord resident privacy.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Executive Director, Anyssa Hill, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegations. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, made observations, conducted a medication count, and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Allegation: Staff are mismanaging resident's medications On February 19, 2026, LPA conducted a medication count for residents (R1, R2, and R3), comparing the residents’ medication lists on file with medication centrally stored for the residents. LPA did not observe any medication errors. Interviews with residents (R4, R5, and R6) indicated that they receive all medications as prescribed. Interviews with staff (S1, S2, and S3) indicated that medications are being given as prescribed. ***********************************************Continued on LIC9099-C************************************************** UnsubstanCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260202094237

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff did not maintain infection control of scabies.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Executive Director (ED), Anyssa Hill, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Interviews conducted with the ED, Memory Care Director (MCD), and Health Services Director (HSD) indicated that resident (R1) was observed, on November 7, 2025, to have what appeared to be a rash and was seen at urgent care the same day. According to visit summary, dated November 7, 2025, R1 was seen by a physician and was prescribed medication to treat scabies. Interviews with ED, MCD, HSD, and staff (S1 and S2) indicated that R1 was provided the prescription treatment that evening. Interviews indicated that the facility took all environmental precautions ensuring R1's room, clothing, and linens were cleaned. Interviews indicated that staff utilized apprCDSS inspection report, December 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251121083547
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff are not following refund conditions
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home and met with the Executive Director (ED), Anyssa Hill, to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above stated allegation. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. ED indicated that the facility was informed of a potential resident (R1) through a placement agency. The facility met with R1 and their responsible party regarding potential move in. According to R1's Admission Agreement, R1's responsible party signed the agreement effective September 2, 2025. On September 6, 2025, R1 refused to move in and following ED offered that the facility could place R1 on the waiting list and refund any monies paid. ED indicated that R1's responsible party declined offer and R1 continued to refuse move in to facility. Interviews with the responsible party and relevant party indicated that they did not provide ***************************CDSS inspection report, November 13, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251021131959

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff mismanaged client’s medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensed Program Analysts (LPAs) Cassandra Mikkelson and Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Executive Director Michael Clymo to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPAs conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ** Report continued on 9099-C *** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 18, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241119170352
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is malodorous Staff are not meeting residents' hygiene needs Facility is unkempt
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigations. LPA met with administrator Michael Clymo during today’s inspection. LPA investigated allegation, “Facility is malodorous”. LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff. LPA toured the facility on 9/11/24 and observed the memory care unit to be clean, sanitary, and free from odor. LPA toured resident rooms, common areas, kitchen area, and dining room and did not smell an odor. LPA interviewed 5 staff members in which they stated housekeeping and other staff keep the memory care clean and free from odor. Staff stated due to resident incontinence care needs, at times their may be a temporary smell but staff take care of the problem in a timely manner. Due to interviews and observation LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Continuation on 9099-C. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240909131359

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 817-4500
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of Folsom? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.