Hazel Home For Seniors is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fair Oaks, Sacramento County, California — state license #345002868, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 19 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

12 homes in view

Hazel Home For Seniors

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Fair Oaks, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedMemory careHospiceWheelchair not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #345002868, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4919 Hazel Avenue · Fair Oaks, Sacramento County
Phone
(831) 334-1223
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR TWO (2) AMBULATORY AND FOUR (4) NON-AMBULATORIES IN ROOM #1, 3, 4, OR 5. LICENSED IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 19 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 24, 2026
Occupancy at the December 12, 2022 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 2, 2022 to December 12, 2022. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 5 of 19 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Mar 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file22typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202522020241102023110202212143
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $4,000–$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (831) 334-1223

Is Hazel Home For Seniors licensed?

Yes — Hazel Home For Seniors is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fair Oaks (Sacramento County): California license #345002868, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 19 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Hazel Home For Seniors care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Hazel Home For Seniors with clearances for dementia / memory care and hospice care; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR TWO (2) AMBULATORY AND FOUR (4) NON-AMBULATORIES IN ROOM #1, 3, 4, OR 5. LICENSED IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO (2) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

How much does Hazel Home For Seniors cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Hazel Home For Seniors's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Hazel Home For Seniors accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Hazel Home For Seniors is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on December 12, 2022. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Hazel Home For Seniors?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 19 dated documents since 2022 for Hazel Home For Seniors; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 12, 2022, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Rent Increase Facility did not provide Invoice as stated on Admission Agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Licensee, Cleopatra Grant, to open a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. Licensee gave permission to have caregiver, Dian Evering, sign report. LPA wore a surgical mask. Facility staff wore masks while on the premises. During today’s visit, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Unlawful Rent Increase ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, December 12, 2022 · control 25-AS-20221207155201
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNot enough staff to supervise residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to deliver findings to a complaint received by the department on 4/12/2022. LPA met with Diane Evering, caregiver LPA spoke to Administrator, Cleo Grant, andf Licensee, Farah Chaudhary, by phone. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask. LPA observed resident (R5) return from the hospital after being sent out earlier today for a fall. LIC624 to be submitted. During the investigation, LPA interviewed Licensee, the Administrator, the Ombudsman, resident (R1), resident (R1)'s representative (POA) and another resident.— CDSS inspection report, July 21, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220412134911
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPOA not notified of incidents involving resident behavior
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Allegation is resident’s representative was never notified of resident’s behaviors which were the basis of the eviction notice being issued. This allegation was inadvertently not listed on the other report page so is being listed separately. Licensee stated to LPA on 4/14/22 that resident’s POA was upset that she was not reached out to regarding resident behaviors that were not safe. Eviction letter to resident’s representative states that facility staff have only communicated with resident R1 “on multiple occasions” about her behavior from Feb-April. Documentation provided by POA notes that on 3/28/22 (5:01 pm) R1 texted her POA that she was reprimanded by staff (S2) for rubbing Mary’s back and that Licensee would send POA a picture of R1 combing R2's hair. POA stated that she never received an emailed picture of R1 combing R2’s hair. Administrator stated she discussed R1's behavior with the POA "very often" since she visited regularly. Licensee stated she also discussed by phone the— CDSS inspection report, July 21, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220412134911
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff unlawfully evicted a resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
**This report is being amended only to change findings from "Unsubstantiated" to "Unfounded". There are no other changes being made to the report. ** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to deliver findings to a complaint received by the department on 4/11/2022. LPA met with Diane Evering, caregiver LPA spoke to Administrator and Licensee by phone. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask. During the investigation, LPA interviewed Licensee, the Ombudsman, resident (R1), resident (R1)'s family member. LPA reviewed documentation pertaining to resident (— CDSS inspection report, July 21, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220411160405
Facility Evaluation ReportAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedto be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following— CDSS inspection report, May 2, 2022

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(831) 334-1223
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Hazel Home For Seniors? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.