Carlton Senior Living Sacramento is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701213, licensed for 185 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated July 1, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 185 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701213, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1075 Fulton Avenue · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 971-4800
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY (120) NON-AMBULATORY AND SIXTY FIVE (65) AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWENTY. MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CARLTON SENIOR LIVING, LLC: EFFECTIVE 09/12/2022.State service designations983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated July 1, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 7, 2026
Occupancy at the April 28, 2026 visit
53 of 185 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 20, 2024 to April 28, 2026. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 18 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Uncleared individuals are providing care and supervision.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced on April 28, 2026, at 7:00 AM to open and deliver complaint findings, LPA Martinez met with Christin Pannell and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and reviewed facility files. It was learned that staff 1 (S1) was allowed to work at this facility prior to obtaining criminal record clearance documentation and approval from Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD). S1 worked at this facility from December 12, 2025 to April 17, 2026. Violation of Section 87355(e) shall result in an immediate assessment of civil penalties. A civil penalty in the amount $500.00 shall be assessed on April 28, 2026. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this 9099 report, 9099-D Page, LIC421BG, and appeals rights documentation was provided to Christin Pannell. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260422152033
Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not treat resident with dignity and respect

On 3/4/26 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo arrived unannounced to complete and close the investigation into an allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator, Kasie Wimmer(S1) and Director of Memory Care Rose De La Garza (S2), LPA stated the purpose of this visit. Allegation: Staff does not treat resident with dignity and respect It was alleged “staff yelled at resident”, this investigation focused on Resident 1 (R1). Throughout the process, the LPA conducted interviewed staff, collateral interviews, and reviewed all relevant documents related to R1. On 2/3/26, the facility received a report from a witness stating that Resident 1 (R1) was not treated with respect by staff 3 (S3). On 2/10/26, the facility self reported to the Regional Office via an incident report and SOC 341 that on 2/3/26, R1 wondered into another resident’s’ room in which a witnessed reported that they overheard S3 calling R1 “stupid” in a “frustrated” tone. It observed through video footage to assithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260205131706
Jan 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that placemats used for meal services are kept in a sanitary condition.

Licensing Program Analyst, LPA, Noel Wolf Petersen arrived unannounced to the facility, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Cal Mendiola to explain the purpose of the visit. LPA arrived during a dinner service and did observe a condition of general cleanliness with regards to the floors, cultery, plates, tables, and placemats. LPA also observed a roach trap in the kitchen managers office. LPA interviewed 5 clients, none reported a recent history of uncleanliness with regards to the kitchen, the dining area, or the staff. All found the staff to be responsive to sudden messes, and attentive to thier needs. LPA interviewed 4 staff, kitchen staff have a mix of statements regarding improvements in cleanliness, one in support of a potential risk to the development of bacterial colonies if the placemats are not allowed to air dry properly. Kitchen manager provided a statement that the placemats are chemically treated to prevent development of colonies and the rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20250930151234
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure facility was adequately treated for pests Staff did not ensure resident was provided with bathing services Staff did not ensure residents room was kept in clean sanitary conditions

On 07/07/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Arielle Pascua and Triel Lindstrom arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with FDR Rose Dela Garza and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 131. A brief interview with FDR was conducted. Allegation: Licensee did not ensure facility was adequately treated for pests. It was alleged that the licensee failed to ensure the facility was adequately treated for pests. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, made observations, and reviewed facility records. On March 27, 2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Viarella and Sommer Hayes conducted observations in three adjacent bedrooms. No evidence of pests was found in one of the rooms; however, further inspection of the remaining two bedrooms revealed several small, flat, black bugs along the baseboards and behindthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250324141824
May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident's care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility on 05/22/25 to continue this investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED). LPA met with Cal Mendiola and a brief interview followed. Based on a review of records combined with information gathered from interviews, R1 was not receiving their necessary incontinent care. An entry made on 08/18/24 stated that R1 was not changed prior to the PM shift coming on duty and R1 and their bed “was soaking wet.” On 8/28/24, it was also noted that R1 had a large bowel movement and that R1 was not changed prior to the PM shift coming on duty. Additional care notes entered in the ALIS computer system, also described the following on 08/11/24 by 3 care partners. At 6:02, S3 wrote, “Care partners were not able to do last rounds because resident was unable to standthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241015143137
May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights

On 1/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver the findings of this complaint investigation. The LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator. LPA met with Kasie Wimmer and a brief interview followed. A resident (R1) sustained a fall on 5/28/24 in the common area of the facility while trying to transfer independently from a chair into their wheelchair. R1 was taken to Kaiser Permanente. R1 had a CT scan which showed no acute hemorrhage or calvarial fracture and no mass effect of herniation. Tylenol was given for pain. Discharge paperwork listed to monitor R1 and if symptoms got worse, to bring R1 back to the hospital. R1 returned to the facility. On 5/29/24, R1 entered a different resident's room and sustained a fall at approximately 1303 hours. R1 remained on the floor in a pool of blood until facility staff entered the room at apprthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2025 · control 27-AS-20240624162127
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident medication Staff did not obtain a hospice care plan for resident Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to open the initial investigation of the above mentioned allegations on 9/10/24 at 3:15p. LPA met with Kasie Wimmer and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA obtained information that the resident does not reside at this facility. Based on interview with Exective Director/Administrator Kasie Wimmer the allegation(s) are deemed Unfounded."The allegation is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This Department has therefore dismissed the complaint." Per California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies were observed or cited. Exit interview held, and a copy provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240905163918
Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff sexually abused resident in care

On 6-20-24 at 2:50pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the complaint allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Kasie Wimmer and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, the Department conducted interviews with resident1 (R1) and additional witness. The department also reviewed facility file documentation including SOC 341 abuse report, resident and services agreement, physician's report for R1, Activities of Daily LIving (ADL) questionnaire for physician review, resident health identification information, key lock audits, observation notes dated 4-2-2024 to 5-6-2024, resident roster, staffing roster, staff schedules for April 2024 to May 2024, and assisted living/memory care staff contact information. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that R1 was unable to identify a suspect male or female. Interviews conducted further revealed facility staff performed duties tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240506161153
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations7typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints10typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file21typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264522025453202434020232202022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 971-4800

Is Carlton Senior Living Sacramento licensed?

Yes — Carlton Senior Living Sacramento is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701213, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 185 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated July 1, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Carlton Senior Living Sacramento care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Carlton Senior Living Sacramento with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY (120) NON-AMBULATORY AND SIXTY FIVE (65) AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWENTY. MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CARLTON SENIOR LIVING, LLC: EFFECTIVE 09/12/2022.

How much does Carlton Senior Living Sacramento cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Carlton Senior Living Sacramento's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Carlton Senior Living Sacramento accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

53 of 185 beds occupied (29%) when the state visited on April 28, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Carlton Senior Living Sacramento?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2022 for Carlton Senior Living Sacramento; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 28, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUncleared individuals are providing care and supervision.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced on April 28, 2026, at 7:00 AM to open and deliver complaint findings, LPA Martinez met with Christin Pannell and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and reviewed facility files. It was learned that staff 1 (S1) was allowed to work at this facility prior to obtaining criminal record clearance documentation and approval from Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD). S1 worked at this facility from December 12, 2025 to April 17, 2026. Violation of Section 87355(e) shall result in an immediate assessment of civil penalties. A civil penalty in the amount $500.00 shall be assessed on April 28, 2026. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this 9099 report, 9099-D Page, LIC421BG, and appeals rights documentation was provided to Christin Pannell. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260422152033
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not treat resident with dignity and respect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 3/4/26 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo arrived unannounced to complete and close the investigation into an allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator, Kasie Wimmer(S1) and Director of Memory Care Rose De La Garza (S2), LPA stated the purpose of this visit. Allegation: Staff does not treat resident with dignity and respect It was alleged “staff yelled at resident”, this investigation focused on Resident 1 (R1). Throughout the process, the LPA conducted interviewed staff, collateral interviews, and reviewed all relevant documents related to R1. On 2/3/26, the facility received a report from a witness stating that Resident 1 (R1) was not treated with respect by staff 3 (S3). On 2/10/26, the facility self reported to the Regional Office via an incident report and SOC 341 that on 2/3/26, R1 wondered into another resident’s’ room in which a witnessed reported that they overheard S3 calling R1 “stupid” in a “frustrated” tone. It observed through video footage to assiCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260205131706
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that placemats used for meal services are kept in a sanitary condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, LPA, Noel Wolf Petersen arrived unannounced to the facility, to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with Cal Mendiola to explain the purpose of the visit. LPA arrived during a dinner service and did observe a condition of general cleanliness with regards to the floors, cultery, plates, tables, and placemats. LPA also observed a roach trap in the kitchen managers office. LPA interviewed 5 clients, none reported a recent history of uncleanliness with regards to the kitchen, the dining area, or the staff. All found the staff to be responsive to sudden messes, and attentive to thier needs. LPA interviewed 4 staff, kitchen staff have a mix of statements regarding improvements in cleanliness, one in support of a potential risk to the development of bacterial colonies if the placemats are not allowed to air dry properly. Kitchen manager provided a statement that the placemats are chemically treated to prevent development of colonies and the rCDSS inspection report, January 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20250930151234

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure facility was adequately treated for pests Staff did not ensure resident was provided with bathing services Staff did not ensure residents room was kept in clean sanitary conditions
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 07/07/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Arielle Pascua and Triel Lindstrom arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with FDR Rose Dela Garza and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 131. A brief interview with FDR was conducted. Allegation: Licensee did not ensure facility was adequately treated for pests. It was alleged that the licensee failed to ensure the facility was adequately treated for pests. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, made observations, and reviewed facility records. On March 27, 2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Viarella and Sommer Hayes conducted observations in three adjacent bedrooms. No evidence of pests was found in one of the rooms; however, further inspection of the remaining two bedrooms revealed several small, flat, black bugs along the baseboards and behindCDSS inspection report, July 7, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250324141824
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not meeting resident's care needs
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility on 05/22/25 to continue this investigation into the above allegation. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator/Executive Director (ED). LPA met with Cal Mendiola and a brief interview followed. Based on a review of records combined with information gathered from interviews, R1 was not receiving their necessary incontinent care. An entry made on 08/18/24 stated that R1 was not changed prior to the PM shift coming on duty and R1 and their bed “was soaking wet.” On 8/28/24, it was also noted that R1 had a large bowel movement and that R1 was not changed prior to the PM shift coming on duty. Additional care notes entered in the ALIS computer system, also described the following on 08/11/24 by 3 care partners. At 6:02, S3 wrote, “Care partners were not able to do last rounds because resident was unable to standCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241015143137
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 1/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to deliver the findings of this complaint investigation. The LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator. LPA met with Kasie Wimmer and a brief interview followed. A resident (R1) sustained a fall on 5/28/24 in the common area of the facility while trying to transfer independently from a chair into their wheelchair. R1 was taken to Kaiser Permanente. R1 had a CT scan which showed no acute hemorrhage or calvarial fracture and no mass effect of herniation. Tylenol was given for pain. Discharge paperwork listed to monitor R1 and if symptoms got worse, to bring R1 back to the hospital. R1 returned to the facility. On 5/29/24, R1 entered a different resident's room and sustained a fall at approximately 1303 hours. R1 remained on the floor in a pool of blood until facility staff entered the room at apprCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2025 · control 27-AS-20240624162127

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident medication Staff did not obtain a hospice care plan for resident Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to open the initial investigation of the above mentioned allegations on 9/10/24 at 3:15p. LPA met with Kasie Wimmer and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA obtained information that the resident does not reside at this facility. Based on interview with Exective Director/Administrator Kasie Wimmer the allegation(s) are deemed Unfounded."The allegation is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or was without a reasonable basis. This Department has therefore dismissed the complaint." Per California Code of Regulations, no deficiencies were observed or cited. Exit interview held, and a copy provided. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240905163918
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff sexually abused resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6-20-24 at 2:50pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver and discuss findings for the complaint allegation noted above. LPA met with Administrator Kasie Wimmer and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, the Department conducted interviews with resident1 (R1) and additional witness. The department also reviewed facility file documentation including SOC 341 abuse report, resident and services agreement, physician's report for R1, Activities of Daily LIving (ADL) questionnaire for physician review, resident health identification information, key lock audits, observation notes dated 4-2-2024 to 5-6-2024, resident roster, staffing roster, staff schedules for April 2024 to May 2024, and assisted living/memory care staff contact information. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that R1 was unable to identify a suspect male or female. Interviews conducted further revealed facility staff performed duties toCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240506161153

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
10
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 971-4800
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Carlton Senior Living Sacramento? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.