Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701212, licensed for 99 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 27, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 99 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701212, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1071 Fulton Avenue · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 971-4800
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 99 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR NINETY NINE (99) NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FIFTEEN (15). MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CARLTON SENIOR LIVING, LLC, EFFECTIVE 09/12/2022State service designations983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 27, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
March 27, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
56 of 99 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 23, 2022 to March 27, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner. Staff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are met. Staff do not ensure incontinent needs are met.

On 3/27/26, Licensing Program Analyst, LPA, Cynthia Tamayo arrived to the facility unannounced to complete and deliver complaint investigation findings into the above allegation. Upon arrival, LPA met with Senior Executive Assitant, Christin Pannell(S5), and Resident Liaison, Dionne Hamilton (S6), and Care Manager, Kayla Fermil (S7) explained the purpose of the visit. S5 called Director of resident services, Cal Mendiola (S3) via phone and LPA spoke with them via speaker phone as well. Allegation 1: Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner. It was alleged “Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner”, this investigation focused on Resident 1 (R1). Throughout the process, the LPA conducted facility observationsinterviewed staff and residents, collateral interviews, and reviewed all relevant documents related to R1. S5 stated R1 moved out by their family as of 3/22/26, due to the overall dissatisfaction S2 stated therthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260226143817
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following resident's individual service plans Staff do not ensure that resident needs are met Staff are falsifying resident records

On 9/19/25 at 4am, Licensing Program Analyst,LPA, Noel Wolf Petersen arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with staff Kal Mendiola by phone to explain the purpose of the visit, and then later with Kasie Wimmer by phone. LPA conducted physical inspection of the grounds, interviewed several of the staff, asked to review documents: lic500, lic9020, recent hospitializations, shift logs. LPA observed clients being attended to in a timely fashion, staff responding to calls as needed. No falseificaiton of records were observed. amongst Staff and clients interviewed, there was some conflicting fingerpointing and hearsay regarding the allegations, but nothing resolvable. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, no citations were issued. a copy of the repothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250624133508
Aug 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff required resident's authorized representative to sign admission documents that interfered with resident's personal rights

On 8/22/25 at 8:45am, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Noel Wolf Petersen and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Liza King arrived to conduct a complaint investigation, LPA and LPM met with executive director Kasie Wimmer to explain the purpose of the visit. The above allegation was investigated by Record review. The Admission agreement appendix Ahas a clause number 11 that states in paraphrase, that the arbitration agreement segment is volluntary and not a condition of admission or care to the facility. LPA gave the guidance that the volluntary element should be more promenently displayed, but it is not out of compliance. This agency has investigated the complaint and found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/ or is without a reasonable basis.” An exit interview was conducted, the report was read a copy of the report and appeal rights was given to the Executive Director. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250509144019
Aug 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medications are not being destroyed as required.

On 05/14/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation into the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit and asked to meed with the Designated Facility Administrator. LPA met with Executive Assistant Cal Mendiola and a brief interview followed. LPA conducted an inspection of the Wellness Center and the Medication Manager's office. LPA also conducted interviews of 5 staff members. LPA located medications for 3 current residents in the top drawer of the Medication Manager's desk. There were 4 containers present: 3 contained a single pill and the fourth contained a medication cup with and post it note listing the 7 crushed medications. The crushed medications were for a resident who did not take them because they were out of the facility at the time of administration. LPA also located a large bottle of Tylenol for the Medication Manager's personal use. The Medication Mthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250507202155
Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident medication Staff did not obtain a hospice care plan for resident Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to conclude the investigation of the above mentioned allegations on 1/15/25 at 8:45am. LPA met with Jose Bernales, Maintenance Manager and stated the purpose of the visit. Administrator Kasie Wimmer arrived within 20 minutes to assist with todays visit. Regarding allegation, "Staff mismanaged resident medication" LPA conducted a review of R1's Physician Report (LIC602) dated 12/26/23 which indicates a prescribed medication called DiazePAM (Valium) 5mg oral tab (1 tab by mouth 1 hr before procedure for 1 dose). LPA observed the Suncrest Hospice Comfort Kit Orders dated 7/18/24 which included morphine 20mg/ml solution 0.5ml (10mg) by mouth/sublingual every hour as needed for pain/shortness of breath. There was also Seroquel (Quetiapine) 50mg tabs ordered for 1 tab in AM and 1.5 tab at bedtime and 1 tab every 4hrs as needed (PRN) and 1 tab now per instructed then it was changed to 2 tabs (100mg) 2 times a day on 7/19/24. Uthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20240910153451
20242 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medication: Staff did not properly dispose of used needle.

On 6/12/24 at 9:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium RCFE to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated because LPA Gould interviewed two staff members who confirmed that an LVN staff member administered insulin to a resident and did not remove the needle in accordance with regulations. A PM staff member who attempted to administer medications at a later time was confirmed to be bricked by the exposed needle that was not disposed of according to regulations. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of Medications is substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240610125348
Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261112025451202424120232212022440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 971-4800

Is Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium licensed?

Yes — Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701212, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 99 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 27, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR NINETY NINE (99) NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FIFTEEN (15). MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CARLTON SENIOR LIVING, LLC, EFFECTIVE 09/12/2022

How much does Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

56 of 99 beds occupied (57%) when the state visited on March 27, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2022 for Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 27, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner. Staff do not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are met. Staff do not ensure incontinent needs are met.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 3/27/26, Licensing Program Analyst, LPA, Cynthia Tamayo arrived to the facility unannounced to complete and deliver complaint investigation findings into the above allegation. Upon arrival, LPA met with Senior Executive Assitant, Christin Pannell(S5), and Resident Liaison, Dionne Hamilton (S6), and Care Manager, Kayla Fermil (S7) explained the purpose of the visit. S5 called Director of resident services, Cal Mendiola (S3) via phone and LPA spoke with them via speaker phone as well. Allegation 1: Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner. It was alleged “Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner”, this investigation focused on Resident 1 (R1). Throughout the process, the LPA conducted facility observationsinterviewed staff and residents, collateral interviews, and reviewed all relevant documents related to R1. S5 stated R1 moved out by their family as of 3/22/26, due to the overall dissatisfaction S2 stated therCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260226143817

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following resident's individual service plans Staff do not ensure that resident needs are met Staff are falsifying resident records
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/19/25 at 4am, Licensing Program Analyst,LPA, Noel Wolf Petersen arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPA met with staff Kal Mendiola by phone to explain the purpose of the visit, and then later with Kasie Wimmer by phone. LPA conducted physical inspection of the grounds, interviewed several of the staff, asked to review documents: lic500, lic9020, recent hospitializations, shift logs. LPA observed clients being attended to in a timely fashion, staff responding to calls as needed. No falseificaiton of records were observed. amongst Staff and clients interviewed, there was some conflicting fingerpointing and hearsay regarding the allegations, but nothing resolvable. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, no citations were issued. a copy of the repoCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250624133508
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff required resident's authorized representative to sign admission documents that interfered with resident's personal rights
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 8/22/25 at 8:45am, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Noel Wolf Petersen and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Liza King arrived to conduct a complaint investigation, LPA and LPM met with executive director Kasie Wimmer to explain the purpose of the visit. The above allegation was investigated by Record review. The Admission agreement appendix Ahas a clause number 11 that states in paraphrase, that the arbitration agreement segment is volluntary and not a condition of admission or care to the facility. LPA gave the guidance that the volluntary element should be more promenently displayed, but it is not out of compliance. This agency has investigated the complaint and found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/ or is without a reasonable basis.” An exit interview was conducted, the report was read a copy of the report and appeal rights was given to the Executive Director. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250509144019
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedications are not being destroyed as required.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 05/14/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to open an investigation into the above allegations. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit and asked to meed with the Designated Facility Administrator. LPA met with Executive Assistant Cal Mendiola and a brief interview followed. LPA conducted an inspection of the Wellness Center and the Medication Manager's office. LPA also conducted interviews of 5 staff members. LPA located medications for 3 current residents in the top drawer of the Medication Manager's desk. There were 4 containers present: 3 contained a single pill and the fourth contained a medication cup with and post it note listing the 7 crushed medications. The crushed medications were for a resident who did not take them because they were out of the facility at the time of administration. LPA also located a large bottle of Tylenol for the Medication Manager's personal use. The Medication MCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250507202155
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident medication Staff did not obtain a hospice care plan for resident Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to conclude the investigation of the above mentioned allegations on 1/15/25 at 8:45am. LPA met with Jose Bernales, Maintenance Manager and stated the purpose of the visit. Administrator Kasie Wimmer arrived within 20 minutes to assist with todays visit. Regarding allegation, "Staff mismanaged resident medication" LPA conducted a review of R1's Physician Report (LIC602) dated 12/26/23 which indicates a prescribed medication called DiazePAM (Valium) 5mg oral tab (1 tab by mouth 1 hr before procedure for 1 dose). LPA observed the Suncrest Hospice Comfort Kit Orders dated 7/18/24 which included morphine 20mg/ml solution 0.5ml (10mg) by mouth/sublingual every hour as needed for pain/shortness of breath. There was also Seroquel (Quetiapine) 50mg tabs ordered for 1 tab in AM and 1.5 tab at bedtime and 1 tab every 4hrs as needed (PRN) and 1 tab now per instructed then it was changed to 2 tabs (100mg) 2 times a day on 7/19/24. UCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20240910153451

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedication: Staff did not properly dispose of used needle.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6/12/24 at 9:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium RCFE to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated because LPA Gould interviewed two staff members who confirmed that an LVN staff member administered insulin to a resident and did not remove the needle in accordance with regulations. A PM staff member who attempted to administer medications at a later time was confirmed to be bricked by the exposed needle that was not disposed of according to regulations. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of Medications is substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240610125348

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 971-4800
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.