Skypark Manor is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701097, licensed for 144 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 31 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Skypark Manor

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 144 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701097, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5510 Sky Parkway · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 422-5650
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 144 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 144 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 34 times and filed 31 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 30, 2026
Occupancy at the November 26, 2025 visit
74 of 144 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 23, 2023 to November 26, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 21 of 31 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's medication was provided.

On 11/26/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo arrived unannounced to conduct a follow-up investigation into an allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator (S2) and stated the purpose of this visit. Administrator, Sherry Richardson (S1) arrived later on during this visit. LPA requested the following records for review: • LIC 500 • LIC 9020 And the following records for R1-R4: • LIC 602 • Appraisal • Medication list • November SIRs and discharge documents •MARs Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251123203239
Nov 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not provide transportation for resident to their medical appointments. Facility staff do not provide meal to meet residents' dietery needs. Facility staff do not ensure that the facility is free of pests. Facility staff do not respond to resident calls in a timely manner. Illegal eviction.

On 2/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegations noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator (AAd) and stated the purpose of this visit. Throughout this investigation, this LPA conducted interviews of relevant persons, record reviews of relevant documents and facility observation. Allegation: facility staff do not provide transportation for resident to their medical appointments. The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. The Resident Van Appointments log, covering the period from 12/12/2024, to 12/31/2024, indicates that transportation is offered to residents Monday through Friday. However, there are several limitations to this service, such as the restriction that no appointments are scheduled after 2:00 PM, and that only four appointments per day are available. Additionally, lab appointments can only be schedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241223152310
Feb 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff made sexual advances to resident in care.

On 2/27/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced to conduct a follow-up investigation into an allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator (AAd) and stated the purpose of this visit. The investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. Through interview with Resident_1 (R1), who reported incidents occurring on the weekend of January 26-28, 2025. The complaint indicated that sexual advances took place on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, though during subsequent interviews, it was clarified that only Saturday and Sunday were mentioned in the initial email from R1. {1 of 2} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250127144608
Feb 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not preventing resident from harassing other residents in care.

On 2/6/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator, and stated the purpose of this visit. The investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. A review of Resident1’s (R1) documents indicated several instances of agitation and confusion, consistent with their diagnosis (D1) dementia and Alzheimer’s. These behaviors included occasional aggressive actions, such as trying to hit other residents, shouting, and entering other residents' rooms mistakenly. However, there was no consistent evidence that R1 intentionally harassed other residents or that the staff failed to intervene appropriately. {1 of 2} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241017115504
20246 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility installed a surveillance device in a resident's room without consent.

On 12/31/2024, at 2pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived at this facility to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure and stated the purpose of this visit. The investigation included interviews with relevant parties, observation of the facility, including resident rooms and common areas, and a review of pertinent records, such as resident admission agreement and care notes. Interview with an outside agency reported inspecting R1’s room and found no evidence of surveillance devices. Interview with facility staff revelaed that surveillance cameras were installed only in common areas for monitoring purposes and that no cameras were placed in resident rooms. From the interviews with residents, one resident suspected that the smoke detector in their room contain a hidden camera. R1 informed LPA that they were becoming suspicious after returning from a trip and pointed to the device installed at the ceiling, wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 31, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241209094904
Dec 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has an infestation of rodents Facility is unclean

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced complaint visit on 1/4/2024 at 1:00 pm to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Susan McClure and explained the purpose of today's visit. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and conducted interviews. Based on observations, interviews, and records review, it was determined that the facility has an infestation of rodents. LPA observed there were rat feces in rooms #136, 145 and 146. In addition, LPA observed the carpet is dirty and there were debris and rat feces on the floor in multiple rooms. As a result of the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standards has been met, therefore, the above allegation(s) is/are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099-D during this visit. Exit interview held, Appeal Rights discussed, copy of report given. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231228130547
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect

On 09/01/2023 at 10:55 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Rabindar Signhand and Dietary Director/Assistant Administrator, Susan Mclure and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Throughout the course of this investigation, the Department conducted interviews, reviewed facility files, and reviewed medical documents. Allegation: Staff failed to treat residents with dignity and respect It was alleged that the facility staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents. It was learned that 6 out of 10 residents had concerns regarding facility staff not treating residents with dignity and respect. 6 out of 10 resident stated that facility staff walks into resident's room without knocking and turns on the light and never turn off the light and shutthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230802083802
Aug 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglected resident while in care Staff failed to meet resident's needs

On 08/18/2023 at 2:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Rabindar Signhand explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Throughout the course of this investigation, the Department conducted interviews, reviewed facility files, and reviewed medical documents. Allegation: Staff neglected resident while in care It was alleged that the facility neglected resident in care. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents. It was learned that 8 out of 10 residents had no concerns regarding facility staff neglecting residents while in care. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 staff and 10 out of 10 facility staff denies that residents are neglected while in care. Continued LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230802083802
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints7typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file34typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020257912024661202344220225602021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 422-5650

Is Skypark Manor licensed?

Yes — Skypark Manor is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701097, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 144 residents. State records list 31 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Skypark Manor care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Skypark Manor with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 144 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.

How much does Skypark Manor cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Skypark Manor's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Skypark Manor accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Skypark Manor through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sacramento County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

74 of 144 beds occupied (51%) when the state visited on November 26, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Skypark Manor?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 34 state visits and 31 dated documents since 2021 for Skypark Manor; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 26, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident's medication was provided.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 11/26/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo arrived unannounced to conduct a follow-up investigation into an allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator (S2) and stated the purpose of this visit. Administrator, Sherry Richardson (S1) arrived later on during this visit. LPA requested the following records for review: • LIC 500 • LIC 9020 And the following records for R1-R4: • LIC 602 • Appraisal • Medication list • November SIRs and discharge documents •MARs SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 26, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251123203239
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not provide transportation for resident to their medical appointments. Facility staff do not provide meal to meet residents' dietery needs. Facility staff do not ensure that the facility is free of pests. Facility staff do not respond to resident calls in a timely manner. Illegal eviction.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegations noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator (AAd) and stated the purpose of this visit. Throughout this investigation, this LPA conducted interviews of relevant persons, record reviews of relevant documents and facility observation. Allegation: facility staff do not provide transportation for resident to their medical appointments. The investigation into this allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. The Resident Van Appointments log, covering the period from 12/12/2024, to 12/31/2024, indicates that transportation is offered to residents Monday through Friday. However, there are several limitations to this service, such as the restriction that no appointments are scheduled after 2:00 PM, and that only four appointments per day are available. Additionally, lab appointments can only be schedCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241223152310
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff made sexual advances to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/27/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced to conduct a follow-up investigation into an allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator (AAd) and stated the purpose of this visit. The investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. Through interview with Resident_1 (R1), who reported incidents occurring on the weekend of January 26-28, 2025. The complaint indicated that sexual advances took place on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, though during subsequent interviews, it was clarified that only Saturday and Sunday were mentioned in the initial email from R1. {1 of 2} UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250127144608
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not preventing resident from harassing other residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/6/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure, Assistant Administrator, and stated the purpose of this visit. The investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. A review of Resident1’s (R1) documents indicated several instances of agitation and confusion, consistent with their diagnosis (D1) dementia and Alzheimer’s. These behaviors included occasional aggressive actions, such as trying to hit other residents, shouting, and entering other residents' rooms mistakenly. However, there was no consistent evidence that R1 intentionally harassed other residents or that the staff failed to intervene appropriately. {1 of 2} UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 6, 2025 · control 27-AS-20241017115504

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility installed a surveillance device in a resident's room without consent.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 12/31/2024, at 2pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arvin Villanueva arrived at this facility to conduct a follow up complaint visit regarding the allegation noted above. LPA met with Susan McClure and stated the purpose of this visit. The investigation included interviews with relevant parties, observation of the facility, including resident rooms and common areas, and a review of pertinent records, such as resident admission agreement and care notes. Interview with an outside agency reported inspecting R1’s room and found no evidence of surveillance devices. Interview with facility staff revelaed that surveillance cameras were installed only in common areas for monitoring purposes and that no cameras were placed in resident rooms. From the interviews with residents, one resident suspected that the smoke detector in their room contain a hidden camera. R1 informed LPA that they were becoming suspicious after returning from a trip and pointed to the device installed at the ceiling, wCDSS inspection report, December 31, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241209094904
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has an infestation of rodents Facility is unclean
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tung Truong conducted an unannounced complaint visit on 1/4/2024 at 1:00 pm to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Susan McClure and explained the purpose of today's visit. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and conducted interviews. Based on observations, interviews, and records review, it was determined that the facility has an infestation of rodents. LPA observed there were rat feces in rooms #136, 145 and 146. In addition, LPA observed the carpet is dirty and there were debris and rat feces on the floor in multiple rooms. As a result of the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standards has been met, therefore, the above allegation(s) is/are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099-D during this visit. Exit interview held, Appeal Rights discussed, copy of report given. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 4, 2024 · control 27-AS-20231228130547

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 09/01/2023 at 10:55 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Rabindar Signhand and Dietary Director/Assistant Administrator, Susan Mclure and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Throughout the course of this investigation, the Department conducted interviews, reviewed facility files, and reviewed medical documents. Allegation: Staff failed to treat residents with dignity and respect It was alleged that the facility staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents. It was learned that 6 out of 10 residents had concerns regarding facility staff not treating residents with dignity and respect. 6 out of 10 resident stated that facility staff walks into resident's room without knocking and turns on the light and never turn off the light and shutCDSS inspection report, September 1, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230802083802
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglected resident while in care Staff failed to meet resident's needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/18/2023 at 2:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Business Office Manager, Rabindar Signhand explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Throughout the course of this investigation, the Department conducted interviews, reviewed facility files, and reviewed medical documents. Allegation: Staff neglected resident while in care It was alleged that the facility neglected resident in care. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents. It was learned that 8 out of 10 residents had no concerns regarding facility staff neglecting residents while in care. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 staff and 10 out of 10 facility staff denies that residents are neglected while in care. Continued LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 18, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230802083802
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was assaulted by another resident while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)s Jamie Ivey Canady arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Ivey Canady explained the purpose of the visit and was met by Sherry Richardson. The investigation was conducted by the Department. The investigation consisted of resident medical and file review, in addition to facility incident reports and file review. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Resident was assaulted by another resident while in care. Continued on LIC 9099 - C... Page 1 of 2 SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2023 · control 27-AS-20221118090329

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 34 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
34
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 422-5650
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Skypark Manor? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.