City Creek Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700835, licensed for 121 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 69 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

City Creek Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 121 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700835, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6254 66th Avenue · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 393-2324
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 121 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 121 NON-AMBULATORY. HOPSICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 85 times and filed 69 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 8, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 8, 2026
Occupancy at the January 20, 2022 visit
101 of 121 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 27, 2021 to January 20, 2022. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 40 of 69 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 12 documents
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202412 state visits · 15 documents
Sep 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20236 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 25, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 25, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations19typical 1
Type B citations14typical 1
Substantiated complaints35typical 2
Total complaints38typical 7
State visits on file85typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644020257120202412150202391502022111502021783
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 393-2324

Is City Creek Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — City Creek Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342700835, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 121 residents. State records list 69 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can City Creek Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists City Creek Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 121 NON-AMBULATORY. HOPSICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 RESIDENTS.

How much does City Creek Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include City Creek Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does City Creek Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at City Creek Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sacramento County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

101 of 121 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on January 20, 2022. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for City Creek Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 85 state visits and 69 dated documents since 2021 for City Creek Assisted Living; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 20, 2022, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNight supervision staff was not available to assist in caring for a resident during an emergency Staff do not assist resident(s) with medications as needed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived at the facility unannouced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio was screened for COVID-19 symptoms with temperature taken prior to being allowed entry into the facility. The facility currently has active cases of COVID positive residents and staff. Complaint investigation consisted of file review of two residents (R1 - R2), file review of facility documentation, interviews with staff, and interviews with residents The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegation: Night supervision staff was not available to assist in caring for a resident during an emergency and Staff do not assist resident(s) with medications as needed On 12/11/2021 at 7:45 PM, LPA Valerio arrived at the facility unannounced. LPA Valerio observed four medication technicians on shift, five residential aids, and two kitchen staff on shift. Continues on LIC 9099 C... Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, January 20, 2022 · control 27-AS-20211109130810
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio was screened for COVID-19 symptoms with temperature taken prior to being allowed entry. The facility has confirmed cases of COVID-19 among residents and staff. Complaint investigation consisted of file review of four residents (R1 - R4), interviews with staff, and interviews with an outside agency. The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegation: Personal Rights LPA Valerio reviewed four resident files (R1 - R4). The files reviewed were of residents who were temporarily out of the facility due to medical reasons. LPA did not observe any personal rights being violated for R1, R2, or R4. R1 was being transferred to another facility due to needing a higher level of care. R2 and R4 are being temporarily treated at higher level of care and will be welcome back once treatment is complete. R3 was transferred to another facil— CDSS inspection report, January 18, 2022 · control 27-AS-20211021170202

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following the resident's care plan Facility is understaffed Facility is not screening visitors
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio was screened for COVID-19 symptoms prior to being allowed entry into the facility. Facility staff confirmed zero residents and zero staff have displayed any signs or symptoms of COVID-19 in the last 10 days. The investigation was conducted by LPA Valerio. The investigation consisted of interviews with residents, interviews with staff, review of resident files, review of medical records, and observation of the facility. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Staff are not following the resident's care plan, facility is understaffed, and facility is not screening visitors Continues on LIC 9099-C... Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, December 13, 2021 · control 27-AS-20211011125942
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not getting their medications as ordered by physician.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA Valerio was screened for COVID-19 symptoms prior to being allowed entry into the facility. Staff confirmed residents and staff have not displayed any signs or symptoms of COVID-19 in the last 10 days. LPA Valerio explained the purpose of the visit and was met by Caleb Summerhays. The investigation was conducted by LPA Valerio. The investigation consisted of interviews with residents, interviews with staff, and review of resident files. The Department has determined the following as it relates to the allegations: Residents are not getting their medication as ordered by physician. Continued on LIC 9099 - C... Page 1 of 2 Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, November 15, 2021 · control 27-AS-20210927154924
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal Eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to conduct a 10-Day Complaint Investigation Visit. LPA Valerio was screened for COVID-19 symptoms prior to being allowed entry. LPA Valerio explained the purpose of the visit and was met by Administrator Kevin Litterer. LPA Valerio requested facility documentation for any residents that may relate to the allegation above. Administrator named Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2). R1 and R2's LIC 602 and Admission Agreement was provided and reviewed. The facility's Admission Agreement references Conditions for Evictions that correlate with Title 22 regulations and H&S code 1569.682. The admission agreements were signed by both residents and facility representative. LPA Valerio interviewed the Reporting Party (RP), Mid-Town Oaks Discharge Planner, Kaiser South Sacramento Doctor, and Administrator Kevin L. at the time of the visit. Continued on LIC 9099-C... Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 27, 2021 · control 27-AS-20210923103802

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 85 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
19
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
14
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
35
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
38
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
85
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 393-2324
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run City Creek Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.