Acc Maple Tree Village is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700683, licensed for 125 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 39 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Acc Maple Tree Village

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 125 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700683, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
18 Kado Ct · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 395-7579
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 125 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 125 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 51 times and filed 39 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 9, 2026
Occupancy at the October 23, 2025 visit
93 of 125 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 22, 2021 to October 23, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 25 of 39 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20267 state visits · 12 documents
Jul 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) Staff did not ensure residents personal items were safely secured 2) Staff damaged residents personal property 3) Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner 4) Staff do not ensure resident receives assistance with dental hygiene

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the ACC Maple Tree Village RCFE on 10/23/25 at 9:20am to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator, Yesenia Jones and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould condeucted interview with R1 who was alert orienatded and able to respond to LPA questions. Per interview R1 denied needing assistance with dental hygiene. Per R1's needs and services plan, R1 did not have full assist with dental hygiene, R1 was listed as needing prompting and setting up toothbrush and toothpaste and R1 was documetned as able to complete this ADL. R1 denied the allegation of being spoken to in an inappropriate manner. R1 only provided positive statemets regarding staff interathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250218132220
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure facility is free from pests

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at ACC Maple Tree Village RCFE on 7/23/25 at 1:30pm to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. During this investigation LPA Gould interviewed S1, S2 and S3 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 7/23/25). Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and documetnation obtained and LPAs own observations, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility and Memory Care area. LPA observed several insect baits and traps to manange pests that may infiltrate the facility. Additionally, LPA observed the facility has routine pest control conducted monthly and documetnation shows facility is addressing pests on an a continual basis with regular inspections and addressing any pests noted during inspections. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250715090728
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) Staff do not ensure kitchen is kept in sanitary conditions. 2) Staff do not ensure expired food is properly discarded 3) Staff do not ensure perishable food is properly stored 4) Staff do not ensure food served to residents is of good quality 5) Staff do not follow food service sanitation practices which protect the food from contamination.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the ACC Maple Tree Village RCFE on 5/20/25 at 12:30pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with administrator, Yesenia Jones and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted two unannounced kitchen inspections and observed no violations of title 22 regulations in terms of food service or storage. LPA conducted interviews with three kitchen staff members, multiple residents eading lunch and the RP. All staff interviewed denied the allegations listed above. Residents informally interviewed during lunch had no objections to the quality of food provided, most informally questioned had positive outlook on the food being provided. Report Continued on LIC 9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250328131444
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations8typical 1
Substantiated complaints18typical 2
Total complaints19typical 7
State visits on file51typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026712020258802024330202344220226712021452
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 395-7579

Is Acc Maple Tree Village licensed?

Yes — Acc Maple Tree Village is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342700683, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 125 residents. State records list 39 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Acc Maple Tree Village care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Acc Maple Tree Village with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 125 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Acc Maple Tree Village cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Acc Maple Tree Village's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Acc Maple Tree Village accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Acc Maple Tree Village is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

93 of 125 beds occupied (74%) when the state visited on October 23, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Acc Maple Tree Village?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 51 state visits and 39 dated documents since 2021 for Acc Maple Tree Village; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 23, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Staff did not ensure residents personal items were safely secured 2) Staff damaged residents personal property 3) Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner 4) Staff do not ensure resident receives assistance with dental hygiene
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the ACC Maple Tree Village RCFE on 10/23/25 at 9:20am to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator, Yesenia Jones and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould condeucted interview with R1 who was alert orienatded and able to respond to LPA questions. Per interview R1 denied needing assistance with dental hygiene. Per R1's needs and services plan, R1 did not have full assist with dental hygiene, R1 was listed as needing prompting and setting up toothbrush and toothpaste and R1 was documetned as able to complete this ADL. R1 denied the allegation of being spoken to in an inappropriate manner. R1 only provided positive statemets regarding staff interaCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250218132220
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure facility is free from pests
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at ACC Maple Tree Village RCFE on 7/23/25 at 1:30pm to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. During this investigation LPA Gould interviewed S1, S2 and S3 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 7/23/25). Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and documetnation obtained and LPAs own observations, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility and Memory Care area. LPA observed several insect baits and traps to manange pests that may infiltrate the facility. Additionally, LPA observed the facility has routine pest control conducted monthly and documetnation shows facility is addressing pests on an a continual basis with regular inspections and addressing any pests noted during inspections. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250715090728
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Staff do not ensure kitchen is kept in sanitary conditions. 2) Staff do not ensure expired food is properly discarded 3) Staff do not ensure perishable food is properly stored 4) Staff do not ensure food served to residents is of good quality 5) Staff do not follow food service sanitation practices which protect the food from contamination.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the ACC Maple Tree Village RCFE on 5/20/25 at 12:30pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with administrator, Yesenia Jones and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted two unannounced kitchen inspections and observed no violations of title 22 regulations in terms of food service or storage. LPA conducted interviews with three kitchen staff members, multiple residents eading lunch and the RP. All staff interviewed denied the allegations listed above. Residents informally interviewed during lunch had no objections to the quality of food provided, most informally questioned had positive outlook on the food being provided. Report Continued on LIC 9099CDSS inspection report, May 20, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250328131444

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is retaliating against resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to conclude the investigation of the above mentioned allegation on 7/31/23 at 8am. LPA met with Yesenia Jones, Administrator and Khownou Sharma Resident Care Coordinator and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews of staff #1 (S1-S5) during this visit. LPA reviewed Incident report (LIC624) dated 5/2/23 indicating resident #1 (R1) was possibly rough handled during transfer on 4/29/23. It is unclear at this time if anyone "rough handled" the resident. Regarding, allegation, "Facility is retaliating against resident", LPA reviewed the facilities Dementia Care Plan of Operation and Facility Program Description. In the Program Description, LPA observed "upon admission, every resident is given a copy of the Personal Rights (LIC613C) form". LPA also observed under the section of Discipline Policies Personal Rights, which indicates residents have the right to relatives and individuals of their choosing visit pCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230505150432
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Untrained staff are administering medications to residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
THIS REPORT AMENDS THE VERBIAGE FOR ALLEGATION #2 WHICH CONTINUES TO REMAIN SUBSTANTIATED AND THE FINDINGS FOR ALLEGATION(S) 7 AND 8 TO BE CHANGED TO UNFOUNDED. ADMINISTRATOR AGREED. Regarding allegation, "Staff are not following physician's instructions when administering medications to residents in care." Licensing Program Analyst observed an incident report submitted to Community Care Licensing that indicated that there was a medication error. Resident 1 had a medication discontinued by the doctor on 7/14/22 but staff continued to administer the medication to the resident for 4 months and 4 days which ended on 10/5/22. There were no adverse effects to resident 1. This allegation continues to be Substantiated which was cited 1/4/2023 and Plan of Correction was cleared. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 27-AS-20221011154411

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents were financially abused while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced on 8/1/22 at 11AM to conclude the investigation. LPA met with Harumi Hurrianko and stated the purpose of the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) received several Incident Reports and SOC 341's from the Administrator beginning 12/29/21 indicating residents were missing money, credit/bank cards or accounts being used. The Administrator conducted meetings, in-services and interviews regarding each occurrence as well as contacting the Licensee, Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) and Law Enforcement. The investigation revealed that Staff #1 (S1) obtained and used financial institution information for approximately 17 residents and/or co-workers and was arrested on 4/29/22. Based on records, interviews, and S1's admission of guilt to Law Enforcement the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Div.6, Ch.CDSS inspection report, August 1, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220614084854

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 51 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
18
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
19
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
51
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 395-7579
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Acc Maple Tree Village? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.