Angies Care Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fair Oaks, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700554, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, agency initiated in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 15, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Angies Care Home

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Agency Initiated”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

The state also licenses a home at this address today: Rashas Senior Living · licence #345920365 →

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Fair Oaks, CA · Sacramento County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #342700554, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8558 Sheraton Dr · Fair Oaks, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 962-2460
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 5 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 3 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 5 NON-AMBULATORY & 1 AMBULATORY. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR BEDROOM #1 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 15, 2025.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2025
Occupancy at the November 3, 2024 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2021 to November 3, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20256 state visits · 6 documents
Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff financially abused resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Licensee, Angelina Crudo, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Staff financially abused resident ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240328141731
Nov 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20237 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of resident's hospitalization in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Angelina Crudo, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of resident's hospitalization in a timely manner ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023 · control 59-AS-20231204141005
Dec 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 25, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file22typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20256602024341202377120223302021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $4,000–$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 962-2460

Is Angies Care Home licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Angies Care Home in Fair Oaks (Sacramento County), California license #342700554, as “Closed, Agency Initiated”, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 15, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Angies Care Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Angies Care Home with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 5 NON-AMBULATORY & 1 AMBULATORY. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR BEDROOM #1 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

How much does Angies Care Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Angies Care Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Angies Care Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Angies Care Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on November 3, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Angies Care Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Angies Care Home; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 3, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff financially abused resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Licensee, Angelina Crudo, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Staff financially abused resident ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, November 3, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240328141731

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify resident's authorized representative of resident's hospitalization in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Angelina Crudo, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of resident's hospitalization in a timely manner ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, December 13, 2023 · control 59-AS-20231204141005

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Resident is not allowed to move out of facility.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Administrator, Angie Crudo, to deliver findings into the allegation that resident is not allowed to move out of facility. LPA wore an N95 mask and was screened upon entry in the care home. All staff wore masks in the care home. There are no COVID positive cases at the facility. According to interview with Administrator, resident (R1) had expressed interest in moving out of the care home and Administrator offered to assist in finding placement to another assisted living facility. Administrator stated that R1 wanted to move to an independent living facility as opposed to an assisted living facility. Administrator provided LPA with copy of a handwritten notice dated 7/7/21, which was provided to the Administrator by R1, indicating R1 would be moving out of the facility by 8/7/21. R1 did not move out of the facility by 8/7/21 and, ************************************************Continued on LIC9099-— CDSS inspection report, September 16, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210810131036
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Resident's room has insects -Resident's room is a fire hazard -Resident's room is not kept clean
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Hood arrived at the care home today and met with the Administrator, Angie Crudo, to open a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. Facility currently does not have any COVID-19 positive cases. LPA wore N95 mask and was screened by facility upon entry. Facility staff wore masks in the care home. During today’s visit, LPA conducted a tour of the facility. LPA observed that residents’ (R1 and R2’s) shared bedroom did not have insects, was not a fire hazard, and was clean during the time of the visit. Based on observation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, July 7, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210628125157

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 962-2460
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Angies Care Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.