Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Royal Palms Care Home
Small home·Licensed for 6·Fair Oaks, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,250 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 6, 2024 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitNovember 24, 2025CDSS inspection record
Royal Palms Care Home is a small care home in Fair Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Royal Palms Care Home
Is Royal Palms Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Royal Palms Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Royal Palms Care Home been cited?
1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.
Is Royal Palms Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Royal Palms Care Home cost?
$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size across Sacramento County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Royal Palms Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Daniela Podar, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 4.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Royal Palms Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Royal Palms Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ROYAL PALMS CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #342700240. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Daniela Podar, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 12 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is November 24, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 1 AMBULATORY AND 5 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 4
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
caring.com · 2026-09-09
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Works with hospice
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Level of medication serviceReminders only
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Nights & staffing
Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,250a month to start
Likely $3,500–$5,250
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,250a month
Likely $3,500–$5,450
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,500–$5,250
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,450
- $4,250
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,600
- $6,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$7,500.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Splendor Oaks Senior Living #3Fair Oaks · 0.9 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- All Seasons HialeahFair Oaks · 1.4 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Crown JewelOrangevale · 1.7 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ettys' CareOrangevale · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 2.3 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 2.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Shearwater ResidenceOrangevale · 2.5 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Magnolia Elderly Care HomeFair Oaks · 2.8 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 8675 Phoenix Ave, Fair Oaks, CA 95628Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2017. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 24, 2025.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 12
- Most recent visit
- November 24, 2025
- Occupied · August 6, 2024 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 4, 2024 to August 6, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations2typical 0
- Substantiated allegations2typical 0
- Total complaints2typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents
Nov 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on November 24, 2025 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and four (4) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 113 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. Emergency exits were unobstructed during visit. Fire extinguishers and first aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA reviewed two (2) residents' medications and observed medication storage to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit was interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 24, 2025
Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Michael Hood and Cassie Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/15/24 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPAs conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and four (4) bathrooms for resident use. LPAs observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 110.8 degrees F. LPAs checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPAs observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPAs observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPAs observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPAs checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPAs reviewed six (6) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPAs requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit was interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2024
Aug 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Untrained staff member is on the premises
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Daniela Podar, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiated LPA reviewed personnel records for staff members S1 and S2. LPA observed that S1 was missing eight (8) hours of dementia care training (with only two [2] hours completed) and four (4) hours of postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care for the year of 2023. LPA observed that S2 had completed only twenty-eight (28) hours of initial training with six (6) hours of dementia care training and four (4) hours of postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care since S2 was hired on 6/28/2024. Based on the information above, it was determined that the facility did not ensure caregivers were provided training in accordance with the Health and Safety code. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per Health and Safety Code §1569.625, deficiencies are being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. LPA interviewed Acting Administrator, Adela Crisan, staff member (S2), and resident (R1). All interviews conducted indicated that Acting Administrator was working on the premises everyday in the mornings and evenings during the absence of the Administrator. LPA observed an updated LIC 500 indicating days worked from Acting Administrator. LPA observed an LIC 308 designating Acting Administrator to fulfill the duties of the Administrator in their absence. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240725155738
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.625(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
§1569.625 Staff training; legislative findings; contents (b) (1) The department shall adopt regulations to require staff members of residential care facilities for the elderly who assist residents with personal activities of daily living to receive appropriate training. This training shall consist of 40 hours of training. A staff member shall complete 20 hours, including six hours specific to dementia care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626 and four hours specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696, before working independently with residents. The remaining 20 hours shall include six hours specific to dementia care and shall be completed within the first four weeks of employment. The training coursework may utilize various methods of instruction, including, but not limited to, lectures, instructional videos, and interactive online courses. The additional 16 hours shall be hands-on training. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed, facility did not ensure that staff were acquiring all required initial trainings per Health and Safety Code, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure that all caregivers receive initial training in accordance with Health and Safety Code. Facility will also complete a statement of understanding regarding Health and Safety Code §1569.625 and submit to LPA by POC due date of 8/21/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.625(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2024
§1569.625 Staff training; legislative findings; contents (b) (2) In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also include an additional 20 hours annually, eight hours of which shall be dementia care training, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626, and four hours of which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696. This training shall be administered on the job, or in a classroom setting, or both, and may include online training. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed, facility did not ensure that staff were acquiring all required annual trainings per Health and Safety Code, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure that all caregivers receive annual training in accordance with Health and Safety Code. Facility will also complete a statement of understanding regarding Health and Safety Code §1569.625 and submit to LPA by POC due date of 8/21/2024.
Apr 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Acting Administrator, Denisa Crisan, to obtain a signature relative to amending a report for an inspection conducted on 4/04/2024. LPA spoke with Licensee, Daniela Podar, via telephone, who gave permission to have Acting Administrator sign report. Signature was obtained for amended document during visit. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2024
Apr 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident was hospitalized due to staff neglect
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Daniela Podar, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiated Per R1's records, R1 was admitted to the hospital on 8/28/2023 with a chief complaint of generalized weakness and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Records state that R1 reported to have abdominal pain and poor oral intake for the past three days prior to admission. On 9/3/2023, R1 was discharged from the hospital with a UTI and generalized weakness. Interview with R1's responsible party (RP) indicated that R1 moved to the facility on 7/8/2023 and was able to use their walker, go to the bathroom, and communicate with others in the home. RP stated that they noticed R1 getting weaker and having a harder time communicating. Interview with staff (S1) indicated that they noticed R1 getting weaker while working with R1. S1 stated that they did not notice any signs of a UTI regarding R1, but stated that they were not educated on the signs to look for related to a UTI. Administrator stated that R1 was showing signs of a UTI five days prior to being sent to the hospital on 8/28/2023. Follow-up interview with Administrator indicated that they noticed a change in condition with R1 five days prior to them being sent to the hospital on 8/28/2023, but did not suspect R1 having a UTI until three days prior to R1 being sent to the hospital on 8/28/2023. Administrator stated that the signs were not severe or urgent. RP and Administrator attempted to get a hold of R1's doctor to obtain an order for a urine sample. Administrator stated that R1 was showing signs of weakness and confusion, and R1's urine had an odor. It was not until 8/28/2023 that R1 was declining to eat meals. Administrator stated that once R1 stopped eating and missed two meals, Administrator called 911 and sent R1 to the hospital. Administrator indicated that R1 had prostate cancer and, therefore, had frequent UTIs. Administrator stated that R1 did not sustain a UTI due to anything done by the facility. Per R1’s Physician’s Report dated 7/6/2023, R1 was diagnosed with Dementia. R1’s records also indicated that R1 had prostate cancer and bowel and bladder impairment, requiring assistance with toileting. R1's records indicated that they were able to communicate their needs and ambulate with their walker. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Administrator's signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. A review of resident (R1's) Admission Agreement indicates the following regarding activities: "We shall offer an individualized program of recreational activities based on cooperative planning by the facility, family, caregivers, physician, and rapport and communication with the resident, and responsive, creative, and fluid planning of recreational activities. Residents and families are interviewed to gather information on their personal beliefs, culture, values, attention span and life experiences to determine activities that residents will enjoy and benefit from. The Administrator shall arrange for utilization of community recourses and promote resident participation in community-centered activities." During multiple visits conducted by LPA, LPA observed a sufficient amount of resources for activities for the residents and observed residents participating in activities at the facility. Interviews conducted with residents R2, R3, R4, and R5 indicated that the residents have plenty of activities to participate in at the facility and they have no concerns regarding activities at the facility. Interview with Administrator indicated that they gave a copy of R1's Admission Agreement to R1's responsible party (RP) a few days after the agreement was signed. Administrator stated that they gave R1's RP another copy of the agreement when R1 moved out of the facility. Administrator stated that R1's RP never requested another copy of R1's Admission Agreement during the time that R1 resided at the facility. LPA observed R1's Admission Agreement signed by R1's RP and dated for 7/8/2023. Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Licensee gave permission to have Acting Administrator, Denisa Crisan, sign report. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. On 9/1/2023, the Department received a phone call from R1's responsible party (RP) indicating that R1's personal property had yet to be removed from the facility as of 9/1/2023. During visit conducted on 3/13/2024, LPA obtained documentation from Administrator showing proof of refund to R1's RP in relation to the date in which R1's personal property was removed from the facility. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2024 · control 59-AS-20230905121646
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 5, 2024
87466 Observation of Resident - The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical (...) functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. (...) This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility did not ensure resident R1 received timely medical attention after observation of unmet needs, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87466. Facility will submit statement to LPA by POC due date of 4/5/24.
Apr 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Daniela Podar, to conduct a case management visit. During a separate investigation conducted by the Department, it was discovered multiple incidents occurred at the facility that were not reported to the Department. During records reviewed, it was discovered that resident (R1) was sent to the hospital on 7/18/2023 and 8/28/2023. It was also discovered that resident (R2) was sent to the hospital on 10/16/2023. During visit conducted on 4/4/2024, LPA requested copies of incident reports (SIRs) regarding the hospital visits for R1 and R2. Administrator could not produce requested documents during visit. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 809-D page regarding reporting requirements. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. The ED’s signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 19, 2024
87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. (...) This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility did not ensure to report multiple incidents to the licensing agency, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87211. Facility will submit statement to LPA by POC due date of 4/19/24.
Oct 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/17/23 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six bedrooms and four bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 108 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed three (3) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. LPA also requested a copy of an active Administrator certificate, staff roster, and updated emergency disaster plan. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit was interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Room typesAll Private Rooms
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a petReported no
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Phoenix Manor
Fair Oaks · Small home · 0.0 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Legaci Senior Care
Fair Oaks · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$5,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Fair Oaks Villa
Fair Oaks · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Saint Thomas Care Home
Fair Oaks · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Jerida Lane Residential Care
Fair Oaks · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$3,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Elderly Inn IV
Fair Oaks · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate