Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Supreme Residential Care FacilityLicense #342700381 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareSupreme Residential Care FacilityLicense #342700381 · 8326 Summer Creek Ct, Sacramento, CA · (916) 895-2787Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Sacramento County/Sacramento/Supreme Residential Care Facility
Map · 8326 Summer Creek Ct

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,100/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (916) 895-2787

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

SR

Call Supreme Residential Care Facility

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 895-2787

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Sacramento

Supreme Residential Care Facility

8326 Summer Creek Ct, Sacramento, CA 95828 · Licensed since 2019

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Supreme Residential Care Facility

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,100 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 2 residents

Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS ONLY; HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 2 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Supreme Residential Care Facility: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,100a month to start

Likely $3,350–$5,050

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,100likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
$4,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,500
$6,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes19 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,000 to $6,600

$2,000$6,600

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

19 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,800–$5,000.

  • Siebenthal Care HomeSacramento · 0.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Maria Teresa Home CareSacramento · 0.9 mi · Small home
    $2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gene-Lyn Guest HomeSacramento · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Immaculate Care HomeElk Grove · 2.7 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Utopia Assisted LivingSacramento · 3.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,000Listed on its own website · starting price for housing and basic services · seen October 5, 2026
  • Comforts of Home Laguna ParkElk Grove · 3.9 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on its own website · base rate including all services and board/care · seen October 27, 2026
  • Comforts of Home GavirateElk Grove · 5.0 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Spring View Gardens Care HomeElk Grove · 5.5 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Autumn Grove Senior LivingElk Grove · 5.8 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on its own website · shared room, starting price · seen October 5, 2026
  • Yellow OrchidElk Grove · 6.0 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Love and Serenity IISacramento · 6.8 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Acc Assisted Living at Greenhaven TerraceSacramento · 6.8 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alaturi CareSacramento · 7.3 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Ridge Assisted LivingSacramento · 8.0 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Meadows at Country PlaceSacramento · 8.0 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
  • Silver Springs RCFE 1Sacramento · 8.2 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on its own website · base rate including all services and board/care · seen October 27, 2026
  • Greenhaven Place Independent Lvg and Assisted LvgSacramento · 8.3 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,995Listed on Seniorly · independent living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Courtyard TerraceSacramento · 9.0 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,345Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sunny Beach VillaSacramento · 9.8 mi · Small home
    $3,200Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

8326 Summer Creek Ct, Sacramento, CA 95828Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Methodist Hospital of SacramentoHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.1 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #342700381 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 5 of 11 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 3 documents

Jul 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner.

On 07/06/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shakaricka Hughes arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator Stephanie and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 5. Allegation: Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner It was alleged that facility staff handles a resident in a rough manner. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff and residents in care. On 06/12/2026 LPA Hughes conducted a visit to the facility and spoke with facility staff (S2) who denied ever handling any resident in a rough manner. LPA interviewed one (1) resident, who stated they have never been handled roughly by facility staff and had not observed other residents being handled in a rough manner. LPA also interviewed Resident (R1), who stated they had never been handled roughly by facility staff and reported having no concerns regarding the care provided by facility staff. Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence or information available to corroborate this allegation, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegation are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260603102230
Jul 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained injuries due to staff neglect or physical abuse. Resident was lying on floor for an extended period of time.

On 07/06/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shakaricka Hughes arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with the Administrator Stephanie and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. The current census is 5. Allegation: Resident sustained injuries due to staff neglect or physical abuse It was alleged that a resident sustained injuries due staff neglect or physical abuse. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, and records review. On 05/12/2026 LPA Hughes conducted a visit to the facility and interviewed one (1) facility staff who stated that they did not observe any bruising, bedsores, or other injuries on Resident (R1). Staff (S2) stated they were instructed by the Emergency Operator not to reposition or change R1 while awaiting transportation. LPA interviewed two (2) residents who did not express any concerns regarding the care provided by facility staff or report witnessing neglect or physical abuse. Continuation 9099-C Unsubstantiated LPA reviewed physician discharge records for resident (R1), which did not indicate that R1 sustained injuries consistent with physical abuse or neglect while residing at the facility. The records did not indicate bruising, pressure injuries to support the allegation that facility staff caused injuries to R1. Based on the information and evidence obtained during this investigation, there is not enough evidence to corroborate this allegation, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Resident was lying on floor for an extended period of time. It was alleged that a resident was lying on the floor for an extended period of time. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, and residents in care. On 05/12/2026 LPA Hughes conducted a visit to the facility and interviewed one (1) facility staff who stated that resident (R1) frequently lies on the floor, and staff must redirect the resident to their bed or alternative areas to sit and rest. Staff (S2) stated that they were instructed not to reposition (R1) so the facility waited for Emergency Services, while the resident was laying on the floor. LPA interviewed one (1) residents who stated that they have not observed any residents in the facility lying on the floor for an extended period. Interview with resident (R3) stated that they have observed resident (R1) laying on the floor in their bedroom, stating that staff usually assist the resident back to their bed. On 05/12/2026, LPA attempted to interview resident (R1) but was unable as the resident declined interview. LPA observed resident (R1) lying on their bed, R1 appeared to be clean and unsoiled. There is not enough information or evidence present to corroborate this allegation, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. LPA also interviewed one (1) resident who requires staff assistance with incontinent care, who stated that staff usually assist them with changing when needed. During a visit on 05/12/2026, LPA directly observed two (2) residents whose incontinent care needs were not being met in a timely manner. LPA further observed a strong odor or urine emanating from one resident whose undergarments had reportedly not been changed since the previous night. These observations were consistent with residents not receiving timely incontinent care. Based on the information and evidence obtained this allegation was observed not in compliance with Title 22 regulation 87625(b)(3) as the facility did not ensure residents incontinent needs were being met in a timely manner. As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with and a copy of the LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D pages and appeal rights were provided to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260518152352

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 10, 2026

87625 Managed Incontinence (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following (3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on facility observations the facility did not ensure incontinent needs were met for two (2) residents in care, as (1) resident had a strong odor of urine, and facility staff stated the residents undergarments had not been changed since the previous night.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2026

Plan of correction: The facility stated the facility has implemented a new schedule of changing residents every 2 hours, and requiring additional staffing during the morning shift, to assist with incontinent care of residents. The facility has requested hospital beds for (3) residents, stating that physician's have approved hospital beds for (3) incontinent residents in care. The facility will send LPA a statement of acknowledgement of the regulation cited, and facility processes to ensure resident incontinent needs are being met by 07/10/2026.

Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 01/14/2026 at 1:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shakaricka Hughes arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA Hughes met with caregiver Chinyere and explained the purpose of the visit. Chinyere called the facility designated administrator Stephanie to inform that CCLD was present in the facility. The current census is 5 with 1 facility staff. This facility is a single story building licensed to serve (6) non-ambulatory residents. LPA inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, laundry room and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished with appropriate bedding and lighting. There are no bodies of water present. LPA toured the kitchen and observed sufficient seven-day non-perishable and two-day perishable food supplies. Hot water temperature was measured at 105.2 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required regulation of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Grab bars and non-slip mat were observed to be stable and in good repair at this time. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are in compliance with fire safety. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen area and was last serviced on 11/19/2025. LPA observed the facility has a public telephone in the common area and the facility has the required posters posted. Facility thermostat was observed at 73 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed toxins and knives located in the garage storage closet kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Continuation 809-C LPA checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA reviewed 3 out of 5 residents medications and the medication administration record (MAR) was complete. The first aid kit was checked and contained the required components. LPA requested resident and staff files for review. LPA reviewed 5 out of 5 resident files and they were complete. LPA reviewed 3 staff files, and it was complete. LPA reviewed staff criminal record clearances, and a review of staff records indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are fingerprint cleared. The following documents will be email to LPA by 01/16/2026 (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) Copy of Administrator Certificate (3) LIC 610 Current Emergency Disaster Plan (4) Proof of Current Liability Insurance (5) LIC 500 Current Personnel Report As a result of this annual visit, the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations, and a copy of these LIC 809 report were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026

20251 state visit · 1 document

Jan 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Moleski met with licensee Justice Ehimamiegho and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed four resident files (R1-R4) and three staff files (S1-S3). LPA Moleski observed in R3's file three incident reports dating between 6/27/24 and 8/28/24 describing elopements by R3 wherein he was unsupervised in the community. An incident report dated 6/27/24 indicated that R3 was walking around in the backyard around 8 a.m., but when staff checked on him he had evidently left the property through a rear gate. Staff tried to find R3, but could not, so they called 911, according to the incident report. R3 was later found around 8:36 a.m. A second incident report dated 7/01/24 indicated that R3 left the facility through the front door around 9 a.m. and could not be redirected. Staff notified the licensee, who looked through the neighborhood, but could not find R3, according to the incident report. 911 was called, but at the time the incident report was written, R3 had not been found. LPA Moleski reviewed ongoing progress notes for R3 and observed a note dated 7/2/24 that indicated R3 was brought back to the facility by police on 7/2/24 around 7 a.m. LPA Moleski reviewed an after-visit summary from a hospital visit on 8/27/24, which showed R3 was diagnosed with acute psychosis. A third incident report dated 8/28/24 indicated that R3 became irritable and broke the facility television without apparent cause. Later in the day, around 4 p.m., R3 broke a bathroom window and left the facility through the window, according to the incident report. Staff called 911, but a neighbor notified staff that R3 was found in their backyard. R3 is diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment, and is non-ambulatory, according to R3's LIC 602, dated 11/15/23. R3 suffers from confusion and disorientation, and is not able to independently transfer, according to the LIC 602. R3 also has a history of seizures. LPA Moleski asked Ehimamiegho if he felt it is safe for R3 to be in the community independently. Ehimamiegho said that R3 would not be entirely safe, as R3 does require care, and R3 may also be unable to remember how to return to the facility if gone for too long. [continued on 809-C] Upon arrival, LPA Moleski observed a noticeable odor of urine in the facility. While reviewing facility records, LPA Moleski observed staff cleaning bedding and removing diapers from resident rooms. While touring this facility, LPA Moleski observed a noticeable odor of urine remaining in R1 and R4's shared room. LPA Moleski toured the facility with Ehimamiegho and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 73 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The facility's water temperature measured 105 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked cabinet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. LPA Moleski interviewed one staff member (S1) and one resident (R2). This facility is hereby cited per HSC Section 1569.312(d) and 22 CCR Section 87625(b)(3). An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with Ehimamiegho.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025

20241 state visit · 1 document

Jan 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted an unannounced required 1 year annual inspection visit. LPA met with administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator assisted LPA for inspection visit on today's date. LPA inspected the physical plant including, but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, client bedrooms, client bathrooms, laundry room and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. This facility is a single story building licensed to serve four (6) non-ambulatory residents and (2) hospice waiver. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor and clean. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished with appropriate bedding and lighting. There are no bodies of water present. The furniture is spaced six feet apart, and the facility does daily cleaning. LPA observed an insufficient supply of food in the two day perishables; missing vegetables, dairy products, bread, and fruit. The hot water temperature was measured at 110.7*F in kitchen sink and is within the required range of 105-120*F. The temperature inside the facility measured at 75*F which was within the required range of 68-85*F. The facility smoke and carbon detectors are in good repair. Fire extinguishers last inspected on 2/2/2023. The facility has a first aid kit, and the medications are stored in a locked cabinet. LPA toured the exterior of the facility. LPA reviewed four resident files and four staff files, including criminal record clearances. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are Fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA verified staff training for staff file reviews. The following documents shall be submitted to LPA Wallace by 01/17/2024: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility, LIC 500 Personnel Report, Copy of Administrator Certificate, and Proof of Current Liability Insurance. ruth.wallace@dss.ca.gov Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, see violation cited during this visit. Exit interview held with administrator. A copy of LIC 809, LIC 809-D, LIC 811 (Confidential Names), and Appeal Rights left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Feb 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Pang Lee and Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility on 02/02/2023 at 1:15 PM to conduct an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit. LPAs met with Sylvia Osei and explained the purpose of the visit. Sylvia stated that she doesn’t work at the facility. LPA Lee asked to speak to the administrator or licensee. Sylvia stated that she will call Stephanie. LPA Lee asked if Justice was in the facility and Sylvia stated, “he’s coming”. After 45 minutes, care staff Stephanie Siewe arrived at the facility. LPA Lee informed Stephanie the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was a Proof of correction (POC) visit to determine if the citation issued on 01/30/23 have been corrected Based upon this inspection, the LPAs observed the following: I. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87555(b)(26) has been cleared. Licensee complied with the terms of the POC by POC due date. A POC letter was generated and provided to the licensee. II. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 1569.269(5) has been cleared. Licensee complied with the terms of the POC by POC due date. A POC letter was generated and provided to the licensee. III. Deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(e)(2) has been cleared. Licensee complied with the terms of the POC by POC due date. A POC letter was generated and provided to the licensee. During the visit the licensee requested a call with LPM to discuss his concerns. LPM got on the call and heard the licensee and LPAs concerns. The licensee requested for a separate meeting with LPM. During this time, LPM requested LPAs to leave the facility. The LPM advised the licensee that the report will be email to him. Due to the abrupt end of the visit the LPAs was not able to verify the rest of the corrections. An exit interview was held, and a copy of this report, 809 was given to the facility at the end of the visit. Facility was provided POC cleared letter.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2023
Jan 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Pang Lee and Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection on 1/30/2023. LPAs met with Justice Ehimamiegho and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Justice Ehimamiegho assisted with today’s visit. LPAs inspected the physical plant including, but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, client bedrooms, client bathrooms, laundry room and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. This facility is a single story building licensed to serve four (6) non-ambulatory residents and (2) hospice waiver. LPAs observed the facility to be free of odor and clean. LPAs observed bedrooms to be properly furnished with appropriate bedding and lighting. There are no bodies of water present. The facility has one main Covid-19 screening entry point. The facility has Covid-19 posting throughout the facility. The furniture is spaced six feet apart, and the facility does daily cleaning. The facility has a 30-day supply of PPE. LPAs observed an insufficient supply of food in the facility. The facility has three refrigerators designated for resident food use. One refrigerator was locked, which had very little food and a knife and insulin medication was kept in that fridge. The second resident refrigerator was empty, and the third refrigerator only had two gallons of milk. In addition, the facility water temperature measured at 95 degrees. Moreover, hallway light fixture was not in good repair and is missing a light bulb. Bedroom two and four were missing electric plate covers. The facility smoke and carbon detectors are in good repair, and the fire extinguishers are in good repair. The facility has a first aid kit, and the medications are stored in a locked cabinet. LPAs toured the exterior of the facility. The facility’s exterior fence is not in good repair. The patio canopy is not in good repair, and there are cigarette butts on the grass area. LPAs reviewed two resident files and three staff files. The resident files were up to date, and Staff 1 (S1) does not have a staff file. Continued... The following documents shall be submitted to LPA Lee by 02/10/2023 by close of business 5:00 PM. (1) LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) LIC500 Personnel Report (3) Copy of Administrator Certificate (4) LIC610 Emergency Disaster Plan (5) Proof of Current Liability Insurance As a result of this annual visit, the facility is not in compliance with Title 22 Regulation, and the deficiencies can be found on the 809 D page. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of these 809 reports, 809 D Page, and Appeals rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Plan of correction due date: Jan 31, 2023

87555(b)(26) General Food Service Requirements: The following food service requirements shall apply... Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation: The Licensee did not ensure the facility had a 7 and 2 days supplies of non-perishable and perishable food. One of the designated resident refrigerator was empty. The other refrigerator was lock. This pose an immediate health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Plan of correction due date: Jan 31, 2023

87555(b)(24)General Food Service Requirements: The following food service requirements shall apply...Pesticides and other toxic substances shall not be stored in food storerooms, kitchen areas, or where kitchen equipment or utensils are stored. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and interview Licensee did not ensure insulin medication was stored separately from resident food.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Plan of correction due date: Jan 31, 2023

1569.269(5) Enumerated rights; severability Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: To be accorded safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment. This requirement was not met evidence by... Based on obervation one of the resident designated food refreigarotor was lock and made inaccessiable to resident in care. This pose an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Jan 31, 2023

87303(e)(2)Maintenance and Operation Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows...Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water... This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and inspection the licensee did not ensure water temperature did not measure to the require temperature of 105-120. Resident bathroom sink water temperature measured at 95 degrees. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2023

87303(a)Maintenance and Operation. The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times...This requirement was not met evidence by...Based on observation and inspection the licensee did not ensure building and grounds were in good repairs. Broken exterior fence, broken canopy blocking the emergency gate, electric plate plugs are missing in room 2 and 4, light bulb is missing in hall way light fixture. This pose a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Feb 23, 2023

87412(a) Personnel Records: The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and file review, the Licensee did not ensure all staff files were completed. The facility did not have a staff file for Staff 1. This posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20221 state visit · 2 documents

Jan 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Food services are inadequate. Facility is not properly maintained. Facility is unsanitary.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anthony Tuck arrived at the facility unannounced and was met by Staff Prince Ehimaniegho on 01/03/2021. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit to conclude the complaint investigation and review findings for the allegation listed above. LPA conducted interviews with R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6 and S1 on 12/10/2021 at the facility during the initial investigation. LPA learned that 4 out of 6 residents were unhappy with the quality of certain meals being served at the facility. LPA observed R6 during an interview to have trouble remembering what meals he had. LPA attempted to interview R5. R5 stated that she did not want to be interviewed and had no complaints. LPA observed several light fixtures either missing bulbs or had bulbs that were burnt out during the investigation. LPA observed the shower in the master bedroom that is shared by R3 and R2. LPA discovered lime and calcium build up on the shower floor. LPA obtained photographs of discovered lighting issues and unsanitary shower floor. LPA observed and obtained photographs of food kept in refrigerator, freezer and pantry, LPA obtained copy of weekly menu. LPA discovered that the facility has several packs of frozen hot-dogs in the freezer and fridge after learning that hot-dogs are not on the weekly food menu. Continued on LIC 9099C... Substantiated Based upon observation of food kept in the facility and interviews with 4 out of 6 residents, the facility is not following the weekly menu. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. The following deficiency was observed (see LIC 9099-D) and cited from the California Code of regulations Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview was conducted with Justice Ehimaniegho . LPA generated the report for the staff to sign. A copy of the report LIC 9099, LIC 9099C, LIC 9099-D, and appeal rights were provided upon exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2022 · control 27-AS-20211206143822

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 10, 2022

87555(a) General Food Service Requirements (a)The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents and shall meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council… This was not met as evidenced by: Based upon interviews with residents, staff, documents, and observation, the licensee did not ensure that the weekly food menu was being followed by staff food items that were not on the weekly menu were found in the fridge and freezer and being served to residents. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to remove all food items that are not part of the weekly menu and update the weekly food menu to include new meal selections to be served weekly and special meals to be served on occasion. Licensee will send a copy of updated weekly food menu to CCLD by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(d) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 10, 2022

(d)There shall be lamps or light appropriate for the use of each room and sufficient to ensure the comfort and safety of all persons in the facility. This was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews with residents and observations, the Licensee failed to ensure that the facility had sufficient lamps or lighting in each room. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee has already replaced or repaired all light fixtures in the facility. Licensee agrees to create a schedule for maintenance repairs to be checked at the facility on a weekly basis. Licensee will send a copy of the maintenance schedule to CCLD by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 10, 2022

87303(a)(1) Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times… (1) Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition. This was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews with residents and observations, the Licensee failed to ensure that floor surfaces in bathrooms were maintained to be kept clean and safe and sanitary. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to ensure that staff are maintaining a clean, safe and sanitary facility and ensure that resident bathroom floors and surface's are kept clean and free from calcium and lime build up. Licensee will create an additional duty list for staff to complete while conducting daily activities at the facility. Licensee will submit a copy of the new staff daily activity schedule to CCLD by POC due date.

Jan 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportAnnual/RandomReport on file

Type of visit: Annual/Random

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anthony Tuck Island arrived to conduct an unannounced annual/random inspection on 01/03/2022. LPA met with Justice Ehimamiegho and explained the purpose of the visit. Justice Ehimamiegho is the Administrator and holds certificate #6038919740 that expires on 06/11/2022 This facility is a single story building licensed to serve six (6) non-ambulatory residents and a waiver to service 2 hospice residents. LPA toured the physical plant including but not limited to two resident bedrooms, two resident bathrooms, garage and backyard area. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. There are no bodies of water present. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Hot water temperature was measured at (106) degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required regulation of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire extinguishers and smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are in compliance with fire safety. Fire extinguisher last serviced 01/03/2022. Thermostat observed at (72) degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed centrally stored medications, toxins and sharp knives kept locked and inaccessible to clients. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA reviewed staff associations to the facility. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA received an updated copy of the certificate of liability insurance during visit. All other documents are current and updated on file. No Deficiencies were found during today's inspection. Exit interview held with Justice Ehimamiegho and a copy of report given at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2022

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 29, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide resident with a comfortable mattress

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anthony Tuck arrived at the facility unannounced and was met by Staff Stephanie Siewe on 12/29/2022. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit to conclude the complaint investigation and review findings for the allegation listed above. Staff contacted Licensee Justice Ehimaniegho via telephone to be present during visit. Licensee arrived shortly after called and met with LPA. LPA conducted interviews with R4 and R2 and S1 on 12/10/2021 during the initial investigation. LPA learned that the facility replaced the bed mattress for both R2 and R4 with spare mattresses that were never used. LPA inspected the condition of the bed mattress for R2 and R4. LPA did not find any issues with the condition of either mattress. LPA observed both mattresses to be basic standard mattresses in new condition. This agency has investigated the allegation listed above. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview was conducted with Justice Ehimaniegho, a copy of the report was left with the facility upon exit. No deficiencies were cited during this investigation. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2021 · control 27-AS-20211206153726

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jul 20, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anthony Tuck Island arrived to conduct an unannounced annual/random inspection on 07/20/2021. LPA met with staff Prince Ehimamiegho and explained the purpose of the visit. Justice Ehimamiegho is the Administrator and holds certificate #6038919740 that expires on 06/11/2022 This facility is a single story building licensed to serve six (6) non-ambulatory residents and a waiver to service 2 hospice residents. LPA toured the physical plant including but not limited to two resident bedrooms, two resident bathrooms, garage and backyard area. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. There are no bodies of water present. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Hot water temperature was measured at 106 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required regulation of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire extinguishers and smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are in compliance with fire safety. Fire extinguisher last serviced 11/30/2020. Thermostat observed at 79 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed centrally stored medications, toxins and sharp knives kept locked and inaccessible to clients. LPA reviewed and compared resident medication vs. resident medication logs. LPA reviewed staff associations to the facility. First aid kit was checked and is complete. The following forms need updating and were collected during visit on 07/20/2021: LIC 308, LIC 500, LIC 610, copy of Administrator Certificate, copy of liability Insurance. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6, Chapter 8, Exit interview held with Prince Ehimamiegho and a copy of report given at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 20, 2021

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 6, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Johnson, Princess Amas; Ehimamiegho, Justice, licensed since 2019.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
11
Total complaints
4
Substantiated allegations
4
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
4

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations40
Substantiated allegations40
Total complaints40

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Supreme Residential Care Facility

Is Supreme Residential Care Facility licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Supreme Residential Care Facility licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Supreme Residential Care Facility been cited?

0 Type A and 4 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Supreme Residential Care Facility still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Supreme Residential Care Facility cost?

$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,149 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Supreme Residential Care Facility take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Johnson, Princess Amas; Ehimamiegho, Justice, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Methodist Hospital of Sacramento is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Supreme Residential Care Facility keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Supreme Residential Care Facility license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SUPREME RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342700381. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Johnson, Princess Amas; Ehimamiegho, Justice, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 4 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 6, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.5 mi

    Siebenthal Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $3,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.5 mi

    Vible Comfort Homes

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.6 mi

    Indocare House 1

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,000–$4,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.6 mi

    Camelot Care Bucks Harbor

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.7 mi

    Carlito's Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.7 mi

    Rosemary's Willow Grove Home

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$4,750

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Sacramento County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
SR

Call Supreme Residential Care Facility

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 895-2787

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Supreme Residential Care Facility

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages