Revere Court is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700005, licensed for 72 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated November 7, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Revere Court

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 72 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700005, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7707 Rush River Drive · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 392-3510
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 72 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 32 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 72 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 32 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 7, 2025.

Most recent state visit
November 7, 2025
Occupancy at the October 29, 2025 visit
63 of 72 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 15, 2021 to October 29, 2025. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) Questionable death. 2) Staff did not ensure resident received adequate nutrition while in care. 3) Staff did not ensure adequate care and supervision was provided to resident.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Revere Court RCFE on 10/29/25 at 1:05pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator Marina Smetyukh and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. The department obtained and reviewed R1's death certificate which did not indicate any cause that was determined to be questionable. LPA Gould conducted interviews with nine (9) staff members. All interviews conducted did not corroborate the allegations listed inthe complaint. Per staff statements, hospice notes reviewed and staff communications and daily notes all indicated that as R1 was declining and on hospice care, as part of R1's decline R1 was reported to have had a decline in appetite and would not consuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250303114503
20246 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner Staff do not ensure residents are handled in an appropriate manner

On 12-31-2024 at 1:50pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced at facility to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Irene Charnell and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with six staff members, three additional witnesses, and reviewed facility file documentation including caregiver schedule, and employee records. Additionally, LPA conducted facility observations on 10/24/2024 and 12/4/2024. Allegation: Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner. LPA conducted interviews and observation as noted above. Based on interviews and observation conducted, it was determined that facility is exclusive to memory care. Interviews did not reveal any corroborated statements of staff speaking inappropriately to residents in care. Observations were conducted by LPA in all four cottages serving memory care residents and consisted of variousthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 31, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241015084008
Dec 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure facility is kept free of pests Licensee does not ensure staff are in good health to perform assigned tasks Licensee does not ensure equipment is maintained and in good repair

On 12-4-24 at 1:35pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced at facility to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Irene Charnell and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with six staff members and reviewed facility file documentation including caregiver schedule, employee records, and pest control agreement. Additionally, LPA conducted facility observations on 10/24/2024 and 12/4/2024. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure facility is kept free of pests. LPA conducted interview and observation as noted above. Observation conducted did not reveal the presence or evidence of pests within the facility. Interviews conducted revealed that although facility has a history of presence of pests, a pest control service is conducted regularly since 4/19/2022 with most recent service conducted 12/4/2024. {Cont. on 9099C} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241015084008
Oct 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) Staff did not prevent resident from pushing another resident in care. 2) Resident in care was locked out of the facility. 3) Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements. 4) Staff did not prevent resident from having an indecent exposure incident at the facility.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Revere Court RCFE on 5/9/24 at 1:30pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator, Irene Charnell and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted interviews with five (5) staff members and three (3) residents in building 1. Per the staff interviews, LPA could not corroborate that an altercation occurred between R2 and R3. Both residents interviewed could not recall or describe the alleged incident. Per R2, she has had only one fall at the facility and it occurred in the bathroom when sick. R2 could not recall if staff were aware of this fall. LPA was unable to corroborate the fall as a result of one resident pushing another. All staff interviewed denied any knowledge of the descthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240402081017
Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024660202311020222202021450
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 392-3510

Is Revere Court licensed?

Yes — Revere Court is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342700005, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 72 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated November 7, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Revere Court care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Revere Court with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 72 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 32 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12 RESIDENTS.

How much does Revere Court cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Revere Court's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Revere Court accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Revere Court is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

63 of 72 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on October 29, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Revere Court?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2021 for Revere Court; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 29, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Questionable death. 2) Staff did not ensure resident received adequate nutrition while in care. 3) Staff did not ensure adequate care and supervision was provided to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Revere Court RCFE on 10/29/25 at 1:05pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator Marina Smetyukh and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. The department obtained and reviewed R1's death certificate which did not indicate any cause that was determined to be questionable. LPA Gould conducted interviews with nine (9) staff members. All interviews conducted did not corroborate the allegations listed inthe complaint. Per staff statements, hospice notes reviewed and staff communications and daily notes all indicated that as R1 was declining and on hospice care, as part of R1's decline R1 was reported to have had a decline in appetite and would not consuCDSS inspection report, October 29, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250303114503

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner Staff do not ensure residents are handled in an appropriate manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12-31-2024 at 1:50pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced at facility to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Irene Charnell and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with six staff members, three additional witnesses, and reviewed facility file documentation including caregiver schedule, and employee records. Additionally, LPA conducted facility observations on 10/24/2024 and 12/4/2024. Allegation: Staff do not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner. LPA conducted interviews and observation as noted above. Based on interviews and observation conducted, it was determined that facility is exclusive to memory care. Interviews did not reveal any corroborated statements of staff speaking inappropriately to residents in care. Observations were conducted by LPA in all four cottages serving memory care residents and consisted of variousCDSS inspection report, December 31, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241015084008
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure facility is kept free of pests Licensee does not ensure staff are in good health to perform assigned tasks Licensee does not ensure equipment is maintained and in good repair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12-4-24 at 1:35pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced at facility to deliver and discuss findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Irene Charnell and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with six staff members and reviewed facility file documentation including caregiver schedule, employee records, and pest control agreement. Additionally, LPA conducted facility observations on 10/24/2024 and 12/4/2024. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure facility is kept free of pests. LPA conducted interview and observation as noted above. Observation conducted did not reveal the presence or evidence of pests within the facility. Interviews conducted revealed that although facility has a history of presence of pests, a pest control service is conducted regularly since 4/19/2022 with most recent service conducted 12/4/2024. {Cont. on 9099C} UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2024 · control 27-AS-20241015084008
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed) Staff did not prevent resident from pushing another resident in care. 2) Resident in care was locked out of the facility. 3) Staff did not follow proper reporting requirements. 4) Staff did not prevent resident from having an indecent exposure incident at the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Revere Court RCFE on 5/9/24 at 1:30pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with Administrator, Irene Charnell and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted interviews with five (5) staff members and three (3) residents in building 1. Per the staff interviews, LPA could not corroborate that an altercation occurred between R2 and R3. Both residents interviewed could not recall or describe the alleged incident. Per R2, she has had only one fall at the facility and it occurred in the bathroom when sick. R2 could not recall if staff were aware of this fall. LPA was unable to corroborate the fall as a result of one resident pushing another. All staff interviewed denied any knowledge of the descCDSS inspection report, May 9, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240402081017

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained major injury while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced on 10/27/21 at 11:47am to conclude the investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Brenda Chappell and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA requested a copy of the Admission agreement including the Respite agreement for resident #1 (R1), contact phone numbers of staff, and Admission Record (Face Sheet). Regarding allegation, “Resident sustained major injury while in care”, LPA reviewed facility documents and medical records and conducted interviews. LPA observed a Special Incident Report (LIC624(SIR)) dated 7/9/21 that indicates resident #1 (R1) fell and was sent to the emergency room for a cheek laceration. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2021 · control 27-AS-20210712163451
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not allowing resident to leave the facility
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced on 10/20/21 at 1:20pm to conclude the complaint investigation of the above-mentioned allegation. LPA was met by Brenda Chappell and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding, allegation, “Facility is not allowing resident to leave the facility”, LPA observed that on 5/3/21, Sacramento City Police Department (SPD) was involved when there was an attempt to remove Resident #1 (R1) from the facility without the knowledge of the Responsible Party (RP), at which time it was deemed there was not a court order to remove R1 from the facility. The Physician Report (LIC602) dated 4/1/21 indicates R1 was diagnosed with vascular dementia. LPA also observed the Advance Health Care Directive dated 12/3/15 which appoints an agent to make healthcare decisions for R1. LPA observed there are several documents such as petitions for hearings, letters from attorneys, conservatorship requests, narrative charting regarding calls that R1 receiCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2021 · control 27-AS-20210519092416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident not allowed to have visitors Resident not allowed to have contact with people via phone.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced to conclude the investigation of the above mentioned allegations on 10/15/21 at 2:00pm. LPA met with Brenda Chappell and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation, "Resident not allowed to have visitors" LPA received the visitation protocol which indicates an update in accordance with the new guidelines from CDSS. During interviews with staff, LPA obtained information that visitation protocols were given to the responsible parties (RP) and any others requested by the (RP) via email. In addition, copies were readily available to visitors upon entry to the facility as stated in the Provider Information Notices (PIN)s. In this case, the protocols were handed to the family. Upon arrival during the visits, the family would not wear masks properly which puts the community residents at risk. Family was reminded of the proper way to wear the masks during the visits. LPA reviewed the Resident Off Campus Register andCDSS inspection report, October 15, 2021 · control 27-AS-20210511112140

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 392-3510
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Revere Court? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.