Cottages At Riverside is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside, Riverside County, California — state license #336425840, licensed for 110 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 42 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2020, the most recent dated July 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Cottages At Riverside

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 110 residents · Riverside, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #336425840, held since 2013 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6280 Clay Street · Riverside, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 360-1616
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 110 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 28 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
110 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 28. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, RIVERSIDE MGR LLC, EFFECTIVE 2/11/2025.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2020, the state has visited this home 47 times and filed 42 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 17, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 17, 2026
Occupancy at the April 29, 2025 visit
78 of 110 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 9, 2020 to April 29, 2025. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (20). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 25 of 42 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202510 state visits · 11 documents
Oct 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow resident's hospice care plan

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto visited the facility to investigate a complaint. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Tawfik and discussed the details of the complaint. Allegation #1 - Interview with Memory Care Director (S1) states that facility medical tech staff were following the care plan for dispensing pain medication to resident #1 (R1). Medication orders were obtained during today's investigation which indicates that R1 is to receive pain medication as needed at the duration of every four (4) hours, as needed. The order reads that the form of dispensing this medication are a crushed pill, in 1 ml of liquid, and dispensed in a syringe for oral dispensing. The facility as a crush order from the hospice agency for dispensing in this manner. S1 states that med tech staff were following procedures by dispensing of pain medication per written order and are not allowed to dispense this medication with a verbal order. S1 states that med tech staff were following protocothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250428092422
Mar 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staffs are not assisting resident with self administered medications. Staffs not reporting incidents to resident representative Medications given to a resident without primary physician authorization.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto visited the facility to investigate a complaint. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Tawfik and discussed the details of the complaint. Allegation #1 LPA Prieto addressed the matter of medications being dispensed to Resident #1 (R1) with the Memory Care Director (S1). S1 confirmed that R1’s medication was dispensed as prescribed. During the investigation, S1 provided LPA Prieto with a copy of R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) log, which showed that medications were given as prescribed. Allegation #2 Interviews with S1 and Executive Director (S2) revealed that communication was conducted with R1's responsible parties. Proof of this communication was obtained during the investigation. Additionally, S1 provided LPA Prieto with resident Narrative Charting regarding R1’s medication, care, and notifications to the responsible parties. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250307103003
Feb 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not administer medication as prescribed. Facility did not prevent resident from becoming malnourished while in care Facility did not meet resident’s hygiene needs. Facility did not prevent resident from developing a pressure injury while in care. Resident's health declined while in the care of the facility

*****This is an amendment ******* On 4/4/2025 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to the Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The allegations indicate: #1 Facility did not administer medication as prescribed. – Based on record review, the electronic medication administration record (EMAR) showed the medication was given as prescribed by the physician. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230607172908
Feb 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to asssist resident with getting out of bed Staff failed to meet resident's nutritional needs Staff failed to meet resident's hygiene needs Staff member made resident feel uncomfortable

***** This is an Amendment***** On 4/4/2025 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to Excutive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The allegations indicate: #1 Staff failed to assist resident with getting out of bed– Based on record review of the facility Daily Assignment record, it was recorded that the resident’s needs and services plan was followed by the facility. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20231031151000
Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow resident's care plan resulting in resident sustaining a pressure injury Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff are not properly mitigating the scabies outbreak at the facility Facility's laundry machine is in disrepair Staff did not inform resident's authorized representative of resident's incident

****This is an amendment **** On 4/2/2025 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to the Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The allegations indicate: #1 Staff did not follow resident's care plan resulting in resident sustaining a pressure injury – Based on staff interview, and record review, LPA is unable to identify resident #8 (R8) as residing at facility prior to or around the time of complaint initiated. As a result, there is no evidence at this time which can corroborate the occurrence of staff neglect of R8. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 56-AS-20221107142123
Jan 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staffs do not seek timely medical care.

On 01/30/2025 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melody Brown, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegation. LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director (ED) Eva Tawfik. The investigation of the allegation was conducted by Department staff. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates staff do not seek timely medical care. During the Department staff investigation, it was indicated that Resident #1 (R1) had a witnessed fall on 05/07/2021 at approximately 09:00 PM and it was reported that R1 used R1's right hand for balance and R1 complained of hand and wrist pain. In addition, Department staff investigation revealed that the facility contacted R1's Healthcare provider the same day. Moreover, records review indicated that R1's Healthcare provider completed a visit at the facility with R1 on 05/11/2021 and the results were receivedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210524094053
Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident died due to staff neglect. Resident developed multiple pressure injuries due to neglect. Facility failed to seek timely medical care for resident. Facility did not meet resident's needs. Facility staff did not follow sanitary precautions during care of resident.

On 01/29/2025 at 01:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melody Brown, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegations. LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director (ED) Eva Tawfik. The investigation of the first allegation was conducted by Department staff. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates resident died due to staff neglect. The Department staff interviewed six (6) of six (6) staffs and six (6) of six (6) staffs indicated that when Resident #1 (R1) was placed in Pacifica Senior Living of Riverside on 05/21/2021, R1 had a documented multiple health diseases and non-ambulatory. Interviews with six (6) of six (6) staffs revealed that R1 was receiving home health with nurse visits three (3) times per week. Staff #3 (S3) and Staff #5 (S5) reported to Department staff that Staff #6 (S6) contacted home health on 07/08/2021 as R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210803122229
Jan 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries in care Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner Facility spoke inappropriately to resident Facility staff did not follow hospice care plan

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Tawfik and explained the elements if the complaint. Allegation #1, LPA interviews with staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 that reveals resident #1 (R1) sustained an injury due a fall. The fall was documented and R1's responsible party was notified as well as R1's Hospice representative. LPA interviewed R1, who stated that the injury was caused by herself when R1 attempted to stand from a seated position. R1 indicated what the injuries were and that the injuries were treated. The fall was witness by resident #2 (R2), who concurred R1's description of the fall. Allegation #2, the allegation of "facility staff handled resident in a rough manner", stems from the transfer of R1 from her wheelchair to the bed by staff. LPA interviewed S1 who indicated R1 was tranferred properly to the bed. Confirmation of the proper transfethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250117145104
Jan 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care. Resident sustained multiple falls due to lack of care or supervision from staff.

**This is an amended copy. Original 9099 signed and dated on 12/13/2024** On 12/13/2024 at 1:25 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to a staff. Staff informed the Executive Director (ED) Eva Tawfik of the visit. ED met with LPA Serrano and LPA explained the purpose of the visit to ED Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with relevant parties. The allegations indicate: #1 Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care – Based on residents and staff interview, 6 out of 6 residents and 5 out of 6 staff stated that they did not witness or observe any resident that sustained unexplained injuries while in care at the facility. *** Continuation in LIC9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241119202411
Nov 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's dental needs are met. Staff do not ensure that resident is administered their medications as prescribed. Staff do not ensure that the facility is clean.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Sales Director Julie Schevette and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. For the allegation, Staff do not ensure that resident's dental needs are met. LPA conducted 7 staff interviews. 7 out of the 7 staff stated dental services are being provided to their residents. 5 out of the 7 staff informed LPA that occasionally residents will refuse to brush their teeth due to behaviors. During the residents’ interviews, LPA Rico did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240126151948
Jun 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents' toothbrushes are stored in a sanitary manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Sales Director Julie Schevette and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. For the allegation, Staff do not ensure that residents' toothbrushes are stored in a sanitary manner. LPA Rico conducted 7 staff interviews. 7 out of the 7 staff informed LPA that residents toothbrushes were not stored in a sanitary manner. 7 out of the 7 staff indictaed all resident’s toothbrushes were stored in a mix bin without a lid and had no name label.1 out of 7 staff stated they indeed provided R1 with a toothbrush that was not stored in sanitary manner to their appointment on 1/24/2024. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240126151948
May 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from harming another resident in care Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care resulting in a fall

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the mentioned allegations. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik to discuss the complaint elements. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, observations, and a review of relevant documents.Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent a resident from harming another resident in care, LPA Prieto interviewed residents R1 and R2, who were involved in the incident. Both residents stated that they do not recall any incident or altercation occurring and did not express any concerns about a lack of staff or care.LPA Prieto also interviewed staff member S1, who was present during the altercation. S1 observed the incident but was unable to prevent it as it occurred quickly. S1 took the appropriate steps by calling other staff members and ensuring that R1 received medical attention by sending them to a medical facility. ***continued on LIthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240430155237
20235 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to provide resident food. Resident suffered from dehydration while in care. Facility failed to observe resident's change in condition. Staff failed to meet the resident's needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Staff failed to provide resident food: Interviews with residents and the staff revealed that the residents are provided with food. The staff denied not providing the residents food. The residents stated that they are provided food throughout the day. The residents are provided three (3) full meals a day and three (3) snacks throughout the day. If a resident is still hungry after their meals and snacks, the residents can request additional food at any point during the day or night. A document review of the facilities menu revealed that the residents are served three (3) meals a day that includes protein, vegetables, fruit, and carbohydrates, as well as snacksthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200813151731
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to staff negligence, resident has an unexplained bruise Staff is not allowing resident to have visitors

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of a facility tour, resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Due to staff negligence, resident has an unexplained bruise : Interviews with staff and documentation revealed that resident #1 (R1) did have a fall and was witnessed by staff. The fall was documented and the responsible party notified. R1 did sustained a bruise, which is explained in detail in the incident report obtained during today's investigation. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231024105428
Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints26typical 7
State visits on file47typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2013.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264402025101102024451202310100202245020215712020110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 360-1616

Is Cottages At Riverside licensed?

Yes — Cottages At Riverside is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside (Riverside County): California license #336425840, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 110 residents. State records list 42 inspection and complaint documents since 2020; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 17, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cottages At Riverside care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cottages At Riverside with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record110 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 28. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, RIVERSIDE MGR LLC, EFFECTIVE 2/11/2025.

How much does Cottages At Riverside cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cottages At Riverside's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cottages At Riverside accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cottages At Riverside is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

78 of 110 beds occupied (71%) when the state visited on April 29, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cottages At Riverside?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 47 state visits and 42 dated documents since 2020 for Cottages At Riverside; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 29, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow resident's hospice care plan
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto visited the facility to investigate a complaint. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Tawfik and discussed the details of the complaint. Allegation #1 - Interview with Memory Care Director (S1) states that facility medical tech staff were following the care plan for dispensing pain medication to resident #1 (R1). Medication orders were obtained during today's investigation which indicates that R1 is to receive pain medication as needed at the duration of every four (4) hours, as needed. The order reads that the form of dispensing this medication are a crushed pill, in 1 ml of liquid, and dispensed in a syringe for oral dispensing. The facility as a crush order from the hospice agency for dispensing in this manner. S1 states that med tech staff were following procedures by dispensing of pain medication per written order and are not allowed to dispense this medication with a verbal order. S1 states that med tech staff were following protocoCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250428092422
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaffs are not assisting resident with self administered medications. Staffs not reporting incidents to resident representative Medications given to a resident without primary physician authorization.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto visited the facility to investigate a complaint. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Tawfik and discussed the details of the complaint. Allegation #1 LPA Prieto addressed the matter of medications being dispensed to Resident #1 (R1) with the Memory Care Director (S1). S1 confirmed that R1’s medication was dispensed as prescribed. During the investigation, S1 provided LPA Prieto with a copy of R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) log, which showed that medications were given as prescribed. Allegation #2 Interviews with S1 and Executive Director (S2) revealed that communication was conducted with R1's responsible parties. Proof of this communication was obtained during the investigation. Additionally, S1 provided LPA Prieto with resident Narrative Charting regarding R1’s medication, care, and notifications to the responsible parties. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 13, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250307103003
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not administer medication as prescribed. Facility did not prevent resident from becoming malnourished while in care Facility did not meet resident’s hygiene needs. Facility did not prevent resident from developing a pressure injury while in care. Resident's health declined while in the care of the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
*****This is an amendment ******* On 4/4/2025 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to the Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The allegations indicate: #1 Facility did not administer medication as prescribed. – Based on record review, the electronic medication administration record (EMAR) showed the medication was given as prescribed by the physician. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230607172908
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to asssist resident with getting out of bed Staff failed to meet resident's nutritional needs Staff failed to meet resident's hygiene needs Staff member made resident feel uncomfortable
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
***** This is an Amendment***** On 4/4/2025 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to Excutive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The allegations indicate: #1 Staff failed to assist resident with getting out of bed– Based on record review of the facility Daily Assignment record, it was recorded that the resident’s needs and services plan was followed by the facility. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20231031151000
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow resident's care plan resulting in resident sustaining a pressure injury Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff are not properly mitigating the scabies outbreak at the facility Facility's laundry machine is in disrepair Staff did not inform resident's authorized representative of resident's incident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
****This is an amendment **** On 4/2/2025 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to the Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The allegations indicate: #1 Staff did not follow resident's care plan resulting in resident sustaining a pressure injury – Based on staff interview, and record review, LPA is unable to identify resident #8 (R8) as residing at facility prior to or around the time of complaint initiated. As a result, there is no evidence at this time which can corroborate the occurrence of staff neglect of R8. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2025 · control 56-AS-20221107142123
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaffs do not seek timely medical care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 01/30/2025 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melody Brown, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegation. LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director (ED) Eva Tawfik. The investigation of the allegation was conducted by Department staff. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates staff do not seek timely medical care. During the Department staff investigation, it was indicated that Resident #1 (R1) had a witnessed fall on 05/07/2021 at approximately 09:00 PM and it was reported that R1 used R1's right hand for balance and R1 complained of hand and wrist pain. In addition, Department staff investigation revealed that the facility contacted R1's Healthcare provider the same day. Moreover, records review indicated that R1's Healthcare provider completed a visit at the facility with R1 on 05/11/2021 and the results were receivedCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210524094053
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident died due to staff neglect. Resident developed multiple pressure injuries due to neglect. Facility failed to seek timely medical care for resident. Facility did not meet resident's needs. Facility staff did not follow sanitary precautions during care of resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 01/29/2025 at 01:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melody Brown, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegations. LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director (ED) Eva Tawfik. The investigation of the first allegation was conducted by Department staff. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The first allegation indicates resident died due to staff neglect. The Department staff interviewed six (6) of six (6) staffs and six (6) of six (6) staffs indicated that when Resident #1 (R1) was placed in Pacifica Senior Living of Riverside on 05/21/2021, R1 had a documented multiple health diseases and non-ambulatory. Interviews with six (6) of six (6) staffs revealed that R1 was receiving home health with nurse visits three (3) times per week. Staff #3 (S3) and Staff #5 (S5) reported to Department staff that Staff #6 (S6) contacted home health on 07/08/2021 as R1CDSS inspection report, January 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20210803122229
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained injuries in care Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner Facility spoke inappropriately to resident Facility staff did not follow hospice care plan
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Tawfik and explained the elements if the complaint. Allegation #1, LPA interviews with staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 that reveals resident #1 (R1) sustained an injury due a fall. The fall was documented and R1's responsible party was notified as well as R1's Hospice representative. LPA interviewed R1, who stated that the injury was caused by herself when R1 attempted to stand from a seated position. R1 indicated what the injuries were and that the injuries were treated. The fall was witness by resident #2 (R2), who concurred R1's description of the fall. Allegation #2, the allegation of "facility staff handled resident in a rough manner", stems from the transfer of R1 from her wheelchair to the bed by staff. LPA interviewed S1 who indicated R1 was tranferred properly to the bed. Confirmation of the proper transfeCDSS inspection report, January 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250117145104

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained unexplained injuries while in care. Resident sustained multiple falls due to lack of care or supervision from staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
**This is an amended copy. Original 9099 signed and dated on 12/13/2024** On 12/13/2024 at 1:25 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA Serrano explained the purpose of the visit to a staff. Staff informed the Executive Director (ED) Eva Tawfik of the visit. ED met with LPA Serrano and LPA explained the purpose of the visit to ED Tawfik. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Serrano. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with relevant parties. The allegations indicate: #1 Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care – Based on residents and staff interview, 6 out of 6 residents and 5 out of 6 staff stated that they did not witness or observe any resident that sustained unexplained injuries while in care at the facility. *** Continuation in LIC9099CDSS inspection report, December 13, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241119202411
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that resident's dental needs are met. Staff do not ensure that resident is administered their medications as prescribed. Staff do not ensure that the facility is clean.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Sales Director Julie Schevette and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. For the allegation, Staff do not ensure that resident's dental needs are met. LPA conducted 7 staff interviews. 7 out of the 7 staff stated dental services are being provided to their residents. 5 out of the 7 staff informed LPA that occasionally residents will refuse to brush their teeth due to behaviors. During the residents’ interviews, LPA Rico did not find evidence to corroborate the allegation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240126151948
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that residents' toothbrushes are stored in a sanitary manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Sales Director Julie Schevette and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews, document reviews, and facility tour. For the allegation, Staff do not ensure that residents' toothbrushes are stored in a sanitary manner. LPA Rico conducted 7 staff interviews. 7 out of the 7 staff informed LPA that residents toothbrushes were not stored in a sanitary manner. 7 out of the 7 staff indictaed all resident’s toothbrushes were stored in a mix bin without a lid and had no name label.1 out of 7 staff stated they indeed provided R1 with a toothbrush that was not stored in sanitary manner to their appointment on 1/24/2024. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240126151948
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from harming another resident in care Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care resulting in a fall
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the mentioned allegations. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik to discuss the complaint elements. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, observations, and a review of relevant documents.Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent a resident from harming another resident in care, LPA Prieto interviewed residents R1 and R2, who were involved in the incident. Both residents stated that they do not recall any incident or altercation occurring and did not express any concerns about a lack of staff or care.LPA Prieto also interviewed staff member S1, who was present during the altercation. S1 observed the incident but was unable to prevent it as it occurred quickly. S1 took the appropriate steps by calling other staff members and ensuring that R1 received medical attention by sending them to a medical facility. ***continued on LICDSS inspection report, May 1, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240430155237

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide resident food. Resident suffered from dehydration while in care. Facility failed to observe resident's change in condition. Staff failed to meet the resident's needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Staff failed to provide resident food: Interviews with residents and the staff revealed that the residents are provided with food. The staff denied not providing the residents food. The residents stated that they are provided food throughout the day. The residents are provided three (3) full meals a day and three (3) snacks throughout the day. If a resident is still hungry after their meals and snacks, the residents can request additional food at any point during the day or night. A document review of the facilities menu revealed that the residents are served three (3) meals a day that includes protein, vegetables, fruit, and carbohydrates, as well as snacksCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200813151731
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to staff negligence, resident has an unexplained bruise Staff is not allowing resident to have visitors
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik. The investigation consisted of a facility tour, resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Due to staff negligence, resident has an unexplained bruise : Interviews with staff and documentation revealed that resident #1 (R1) did have a fall and was witnessed by staff. The fall was documented and the responsible party notified. R1 did sustained a bruise, which is explained in detail in the incident report obtained during today's investigation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 26, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231024105428
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not inform authorized representative(s) about residents change of medical condition. Facility staff not meeting resident’s needs. Staff did not safeguard client's personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Javier met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of direct observations and interviews with staff and witnesses. Regarding the allegation that facility did not inform authorized representative(s) about residents change of medical condition, no documentation was found to shown that there was an change of condition for former resident #1 (R1) in care. R1 was medically evaluated with no note of a change of condition that would constitute notifying responsible party of a change of condition. Witness #1 (W1) visiting R1 did not observe change of condition while R1 was residing at the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230602093630
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from becoming infected with scabies.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrive to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation regarding an allegation that staff did not prevent resident from becoming infected with scabies. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik. Documentation was obtained from residents #1 (R1), (R2), (R3), (R4) and (R5) for possible diagnosis of scabies. No such diagnosis was discovered from the periods of January 2020 to September 2020. The allegation states that the facility did not prevent resident from becoming infected with scabies, but a facility cannot prevent resident from becoming infected with scabies, but must assure that those resident who were infected with scabies are addressed as soon as possible and treated. It was so documented that residents were medically assessed and treated and contained to prevent the spread of scabies. Staff are trained in the dispensing of the medications and cleaning and proper hygiene matters were in place. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200929162618
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff do not allow resident to leave the facility Facility staff threatened resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Javier met with Executive Director Eva Tawfik and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of direct observations and interviews with residents and staff. Regarding allegation that facility staff do not allow resident to leave the facility, interview with Executive Director state that the facility is a Memory Care facility. Resident's who reside in the cottage are allowed to roam the gated area freely and any outings outside the facility must be supervised. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230405084549

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 47 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
26
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
47
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 360-1616
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cottages At Riverside? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.